Optimisation.CirclePacking:place from circle-packing-0.1.0.4, G

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 5.1s

Alternatives: 9

Speedup: 1.0×

• 20.8% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (+ x y) (+ z 1.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (z + 1.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) * (z + 1.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (z + 1.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) * (z + 1.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) * Float64(z + 1.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) * (z + 1.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (+ x y) (+ z 1.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (z + 1.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) * (z + 1.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (z + 1.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) * (z + 1.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) * Float64(z + 1.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) * (z + 1.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) + z \cdot \left(x + y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ x y) (* z (+ x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) + (z * (x + y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) + (z * (x + y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) + (z * (x + y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) + (z * (x + y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) + Float64(z * Float64(x + y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) + (z * (x + y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + z\right)} \]

   2. distribute-lft-in 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) \cdot 1 + \left(x + y\right) \cdot z} \]

   3. *-rgt-identity 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(x + y\right) \cdot z \]

4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(x + y\right) \cdot z} \]

5. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) + z \cdot \left(x + y\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 51.3% accurate, 0.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -7.2 \cdot 10^{-181}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{-278}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.26 \cdot 10^{-79}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1.0)
   (* x z)
   (if (<= z -7.2e-181)
     y
     (if (<= z 4.8e-278) x (if (<= z 1.26e-79) y (if (<= z 1.0) x (* x z)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.0) {
		tmp = x * z;
	} else if (z <= -7.2e-181) {
		tmp = y;
	} else if (z <= 4.8e-278) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (z <= 1.26e-79) {
		tmp = y;
	} else if (z <= 1.0) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-1.0d0)) then
        tmp = x * z
    else if (z <= (-7.2d-181)) then
        tmp = y
    else if (z <= 4.8d-278) then
        tmp = x
    else if (z <= 1.26d-79) then
        tmp = y
    else if (z <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x * z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.0) {
		tmp = x * z;
	} else if (z <= -7.2e-181) {
		tmp = y;
	} else if (z <= 4.8e-278) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (z <= 1.26e-79) {
		tmp = y;
	} else if (z <= 1.0) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1.0:
		tmp = x * z
	elif z <= -7.2e-181:
		tmp = y
	elif z <= 4.8e-278:
		tmp = x
	elif z <= 1.26e-79:
		tmp = y
	elif z <= 1.0:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x * z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.0)
		tmp = Float64(x * z);
	elseif (z <= -7.2e-181)
		tmp = y;
	elseif (z <= 4.8e-278)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (z <= 1.26e-79)
		tmp = y;
	elseif (z <= 1.0)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1.0)
		tmp = x * z;
	elseif (z <= -7.2e-181)
		tmp = y;
	elseif (z <= 4.8e-278)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (z <= 1.26e-79)
		tmp = y;
	elseif (z <= 1.0)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x * z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1.0], N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, -7.2e-181], y, If[LessEqual[z, 4.8e-278], x, If[LessEqual[z, 1.26e-79], y, If[LessEqual[z, 1.0], x, N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -1 or 1 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + 1\right) \cdot \left(x + y\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(z + 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} \]

      3. distribute-lft-in 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + 1\right) \cdot y + \left(z + 1\right) \cdot x} \]

      4. fma-def 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 1, y, \left(z + 1\right) \cdot x\right)} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 1, y, \left(z + 1\right) \cdot x\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + 1, y, \color{blue}{x \cdot z}\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 57.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 57.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot x} \]

   8. Simplified 57.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot x} \]

   if -1 < z < -7.1999999999999998e-181 or 4.8e-278 < z < 1.25999999999999993e-79

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 49.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 48.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]

   if -7.1999999999999998e-181 < z < 4.8e-278 or 1.25999999999999993e-79 < z < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 51.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 49.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 53.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -7.2 \cdot 10^{-181}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{-278}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.26 \cdot 10^{-79}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 76.2% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7.5 \cdot 10^{-6} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{-6}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + 1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -7.5e-6) (not (<= z 2.3e-6))) (* x (+ z 1.0)) (+ x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -7.5e-6) || !(z <= 2.3e-6)) {
		tmp = x * (z + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-7.5d-6)) .or. (.not. (z <= 2.3d-6))) then
        tmp = x * (z + 1.0d0)
    else
        tmp = x + y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -7.5e-6) || !(z <= 2.3e-6)) {
		tmp = x * (z + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -7.5e-6) or not (z <= 2.3e-6):
		tmp = x * (z + 1.0)
	else:
		tmp = x + y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -7.5e-6) || !(z <= 2.3e-6))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(z + 1.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -7.5e-6) || ~((z <= 2.3e-6)))
		tmp = x * (z + 1.0);
	else
		tmp = x + y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -7.5e-6], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 2.3e-6]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(z + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -7.50000000000000019e-6 or 2.3e-6 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 58.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + z\right)} \]

   if -7.50000000000000019e-6 < z < 2.3e-6

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   5. Simplified 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 77.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7.5 \cdot 10^{-6} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{-6}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + 1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 97.6% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.0) (not (<= z 1.0))) (* z (+ x y)) (+ x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.0) || !(z <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = z * (x + y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.0d0))) then
        tmp = z * (x + y)
    else
        tmp = x + y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.0) || !(z <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = z * (x + y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.0) or not (z <= 1.0):
		tmp = z * (x + y)
	else:
		tmp = x + y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.0) || !(z <= 1.0))
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(x + y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.0) || ~((z <= 1.0)))
		tmp = z * (x + y);
	else
		tmp = x + y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1 or 1 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.0%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)} \]

   if -1 < z < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 97.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   5. Simplified 97.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 75.3% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 24.5\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.0) (not (<= z 24.5))) (* x z) (+ x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.0) || !(z <= 24.5)) {
		tmp = x * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 24.5d0))) then
        tmp = x * z
    else
        tmp = x + y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.0) || !(z <= 24.5)) {
		tmp = x * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.0) or not (z <= 24.5):
		tmp = x * z
	else:
		tmp = x + y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.0) || !(z <= 24.5))
		tmp = Float64(x * z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.0) || ~((z <= 24.5)))
		tmp = x * z;
	else
		tmp = x + y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 24.5]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1 or 24.5 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + 1\right) \cdot \left(x + y\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(z + 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} \]

      3. distribute-lft-in 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + 1\right) \cdot y + \left(z + 1\right) \cdot x} \]

      4. fma-def 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 1, y, \left(z + 1\right) \cdot x\right)} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 1, y, \left(z + 1\right) \cdot x\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + 1, y, \color{blue}{x \cdot z}\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 57.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 57.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot x} \]

   8. Simplified 57.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot x} \]

   if -1 < z < 24.5

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 97.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   5. Simplified 97.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 76.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 24.5\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 63.0% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{-101}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + 1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z + 1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 1.4e-101) (* x (+ z 1.0)) (* y (+ z 1.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.4e-101) {
		tmp = x * (z + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = y * (z + 1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 1.4d-101) then
        tmp = x * (z + 1.0d0)
    else
        tmp = y * (z + 1.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.4e-101) {
		tmp = x * (z + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = y * (z + 1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1.4e-101:
		tmp = x * (z + 1.0)
	else:
		tmp = y * (z + 1.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.4e-101)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(z + 1.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(z + 1.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1.4e-101)
		tmp = x * (z + 1.0);
	else
		tmp = y * (z + 1.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1.4e-101], N[(x * N[(z + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * N[(z + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.39999999999999995e-101

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 62.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + z\right)} \]

   if 1.39999999999999995e-101 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 66.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 + z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 64.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{-101}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + 1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z + 1\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (+ x y) (+ z 1.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (z + 1.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) * (z + 1.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (z + 1.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) * (z + 1.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) * Float64(z + 1.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) * (z + 1.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 31.6% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{-92}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (if (<= y 1.4e-92) x y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.4e-92) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 1.4d-92) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.4e-92) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1.4e-92:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.4e-92)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1.4e-92)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1.4e-92], x, y]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.4e-92

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 62.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 29.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 1.4e-92 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 66.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 35.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 31.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{-92}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 26.4% accurate, 7.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(z + 1\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 54.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + z\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 25.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

5. Final simplification 25.3%

   \[\leadsto x \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024027 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Optimisation.CirclePacking:place from circle-packing-0.1.0.4, G"
  :precision binary64
  (* (+ x y) (+ z 1.0)))