Optimisation.CirclePacking:place from circle-packing-0.1.0.4, D

Percentage Accurate: 92.7% → 97.8%

Time: 7.0s

Alternatives: 4

Speedup: 1.0×

• 25.2% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ x (/ (* y (- z x)) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * (z - x)) / t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * (z - x)) / t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * (z - x)) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * (z - x)) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(z - x)) / t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * (z - x)) / t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 92.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ x (/ (* y (- z x)) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * (z - x)) / t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * (z - x)) / t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * (z - x)) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * (z - x)) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(z - x)) / t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * (z - x)) / t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 97.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y}{t} \cdot \left(z - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ x (* (/ y t) (- z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y / t) * (z - x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y / t) * (z - x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y / t) * (z - x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y / t) * (z - x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y / t) * Float64(z - x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y / t) * (z - x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 90.5%

   \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l/ 98.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]

3. Simplified 98.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{t} \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 98.0%

   \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{t} \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 85.2% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.22 \cdot 10^{+32} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 9 \cdot 10^{-84}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{t} \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.22e+32) (not (<= z 9e-84)))
   (+ x (* (/ y t) z))
   (* x (- 1.0 (/ y t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.22e+32) || !(z <= 9e-84)) {
		tmp = x + ((y / t) * z);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.22d+32)) .or. (.not. (z <= 9d-84))) then
        tmp = x + ((y / t) * z)
    else
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - (y / t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.22e+32) || !(z <= 9e-84)) {
		tmp = x + ((y / t) * z);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.22e+32) or not (z <= 9e-84):
		tmp = x + ((y / t) * z)
	else:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.22e+32) || !(z <= 9e-84))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y / t) * z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - Float64(y / t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.22e+32) || ~((z <= 9e-84)))
		tmp = x + ((y / t) * z);
	else
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.22e+32], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 9e-84]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(1.0 - N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.22000000000000002e32 or 9.00000000000000031e-84 < z

   1. Initial program 87.9%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{t} \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 81.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 91.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot z} \]

      2. *-commutative 91.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{y}{t}} \]

   7. Simplified 91.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{y}{t}} \]

   if -1.22000000000000002e32 < z < 9.00000000000000031e-84

   1. Initial program 93.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 95.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 95.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{t} \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 86.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 86.4%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{t}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 86.4%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 86.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.22 \cdot 10^{+32} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 9 \cdot 10^{-84}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{t} \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 65.7% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (* x (- 1.0 (/ y t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x * (1.0 - (y / t));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x * (1.0d0 - (y / t))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x * (1.0 - (y / t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x * (1.0 - (y / t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - Float64(y / t)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x * (1.0 - (y / t));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x * N[(1.0 - N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 90.5%

   \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l/ 98.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]

3. Simplified 98.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{t} \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 64.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 64.2%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{t}\right)}\right) \]

   2. unsub-neg 64.2%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]

7. Simplified 64.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right)} \]

8. Final simplification 64.2%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{y}{t}\right) \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 37.9% accurate, 9.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 90.5%

   \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l/ 98.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]

3. Simplified 98.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{t} \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 35.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

6. Final simplification 35.8%

   \[\leadsto x \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 90.8% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \left(x \cdot \frac{y}{t} + \left(-z\right) \cdot \frac{y}{t}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (+ (* x (/ y t)) (* (- z) (/ y t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - ((x * (y / t)) + (-z * (y / t)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - ((x * (y / t)) + (-z * (y / t)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - ((x * (y / t)) + (-z * (y / t)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - ((x * (y / t)) + (-z * (y / t)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(Float64(x * Float64(y / t)) + Float64(Float64(-z) * Float64(y / t))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - ((x * (y / t)) + (-z * (y / t)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[(x * N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[((-z) * N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024027 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Optimisation.CirclePacking:place from circle-packing-0.1.0.4, D"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (- x (+ (* x (/ y t)) (* (- z) (/ y t))))

  (+ x (/ (* y (- z x)) t)))