Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]

Percentage Accurate: 98.9% → 98.9%
Time: 23.3s
Alternatives: 8
Speedup: N/A×

Specification

?
\[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary32 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 8 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 98.9% accurate, 1.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (log
    (+
     (/
      1.0
      (+
       (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI (- s)))))
       (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
     -1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf(((1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / -s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)))))) + -1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / Float32(-s))))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))))) + Float32(-1.0)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log(((single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / -s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)))))) + single(-1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Final simplification99.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 25.0% accurate, 2.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{\pi}{s} \cdot -0.25, 1\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* s (- (log (fma -4.0 (* (/ PI s) -0.25) 1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf(fmaf(-4.0f, ((((float) M_PI) / s) * -0.25f), 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(fma(Float32(-4.0), Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) / s) * Float32(-0.25)), Float32(1.0)))))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{\pi}{s} \cdot -0.25, 1\right)\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 24.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + -4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s}\right)}\right) \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative24.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s} + 1\right)}\right) \]
    2. fma-def24.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  6. Simplified24.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25}{s}, 1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  7. Taylor expanded in u around 0 25.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \color{blue}{-0.25 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}, 1\right)\right)\right) \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative25.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{s} \cdot -0.25}, 1\right)\right)\right) \]
  9. Simplified25.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{s} \cdot -0.25}, 1\right)\right)\right) \]
  10. Final simplification25.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{\pi}{s} \cdot -0.25, 1\right)\right)\right) \]
  11. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 24.8% accurate, 3.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.25 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right)}{s}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (log
    (+
     1.0
     (*
      4.0
      (/ (- (* -0.25 (* u PI)) (+ (* (* u PI) 0.25) (* PI -0.25))) s)))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf((1.0f + (4.0f * (((-0.25f * (u * ((float) M_PI))) - (((u * ((float) M_PI)) * 0.25f) + (((float) M_PI) * -0.25f))) / s))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(Float32(4.0) * Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(-0.25) * Float32(u * Float32(pi))) - Float32(Float32(Float32(u * Float32(pi)) * Float32(0.25)) + Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(-0.25)))) / s))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log((single(1.0) + (single(4.0) * (((single(-0.25) * (u * single(pi))) - (((u * single(pi)) * single(0.25)) + (single(pi) * single(-0.25)))) / s))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.25 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right)}{s}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 24.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right)}\right) \]
  5. Final simplification24.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.25 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right)}{s}\right)\right) \]
  6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 11.6% accurate, 3.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 - \mathsf{fma}\left(u, 0.25, -0.25\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* -4.0 (* PI (- (* u -0.25) (fma u 0.25 -0.25)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -4.0f * (((float) M_PI) * ((u * -0.25f) - fmaf(u, 0.25f, -0.25f)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-4.0) * Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(u * Float32(-0.25)) - fma(u, Float32(0.25), Float32(-0.25)))))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 - \mathsf{fma}\left(u, 0.25, -0.25\right)\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 11.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25} - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right) \]
    2. associate-*l*11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)} - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right) \]
    3. +-commutative11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right) - \color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}\right) \]
    4. associate-*r*11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right) - \left(\color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} + -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    5. distribute-rgt-out11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right) - \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot u + -0.25\right)}\right) \]
    6. *-commutative11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right) - \pi \cdot \left(\color{blue}{u \cdot 0.25} + -0.25\right)\right) \]
  6. Simplified11.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right) - \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.25 + -0.25\right)\right)} \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. sub-neg11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right) + \left(-\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.25 + -0.25\right)\right)\right)} \]
    2. fma-def11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right) + \left(-\pi \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(u, 0.25, -0.25\right)}\right)\right) \]
  8. Applied egg-rr11.3%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right) + \left(-\pi \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(u, 0.25, -0.25\right)\right)\right)} \]
  9. Step-by-step derivation
    1. sub-neg11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right) - \pi \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(u, 0.25, -0.25\right)\right)} \]
    2. *-commutative11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right) - \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(u, 0.25, -0.25\right) \cdot \pi}\right) \]
    3. associate-*r*11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25} - \mathsf{fma}\left(u, 0.25, -0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    4. *-commutative11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)} - \mathsf{fma}\left(u, 0.25, -0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    5. associate-*r*11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} - \mathsf{fma}\left(u, 0.25, -0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    6. distribute-rgt-out--11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u - \mathsf{fma}\left(u, 0.25, -0.25\right)\right)\right)} \]
    7. *-commutative11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(\color{blue}{u \cdot -0.25} - \mathsf{fma}\left(u, 0.25, -0.25\right)\right)\right) \]
  10. Simplified11.3%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 - \mathsf{fma}\left(u, 0.25, -0.25\right)\right)\right)} \]
  11. Final simplification11.3%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 - \mathsf{fma}\left(u, 0.25, -0.25\right)\right)\right) \]
  12. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 11.6% accurate, 28.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right) - \pi \cdot \left(-0.25 + u \cdot 0.25\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* -4.0 (- (* u (* PI -0.25)) (* PI (+ -0.25 (* u 0.25))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -4.0f * ((u * (((float) M_PI) * -0.25f)) - (((float) M_PI) * (-0.25f + (u * 0.25f))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-4.0) * Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(-0.25))) - Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(-0.25) + Float32(u * Float32(0.25))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(-4.0) * ((u * (single(pi) * single(-0.25))) - (single(pi) * (single(-0.25) + (u * single(0.25)))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right) - \pi \cdot \left(-0.25 + u \cdot 0.25\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 11.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25} - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right) \]
    2. associate-*l*11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)} - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right) \]
    3. +-commutative11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right) - \color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}\right) \]
    4. associate-*r*11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right) - \left(\color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} + -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    5. distribute-rgt-out11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right) - \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot u + -0.25\right)}\right) \]
    6. *-commutative11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right) - \pi \cdot \left(\color{blue}{u \cdot 0.25} + -0.25\right)\right) \]
  6. Simplified11.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right) - \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.25 + -0.25\right)\right)} \]
  7. Final simplification11.3%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right) - \pi \cdot \left(-0.25 + u \cdot 0.25\right)\right) \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 11.6% accurate, 39.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25 + \left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.5\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* 4.0 (+ (* PI -0.25) (* (* u PI) 0.5))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return 4.0f * ((((float) M_PI) * -0.25f) + ((u * ((float) M_PI)) * 0.5f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(4.0) * Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(-0.25)) + Float32(Float32(u * Float32(pi)) * Float32(0.5))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(4.0) * ((single(pi) * single(-0.25)) + ((u * single(pi)) * single(0.5)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25 + \left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.5\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 11.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+11.3%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) - 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv11.3%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    3. distribute-rgt-out--11.3%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    4. *-commutative11.3%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    5. metadata-eval11.3%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    6. metadata-eval11.3%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \pi\right) \]
    7. *-commutative11.3%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot -0.25}\right) \]
  6. Simplified11.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right)} \]
  7. Final simplification11.3%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25 + \left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.5\right) \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 11.6% accurate, 48.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.5\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* -4.0 (* PI (+ 0.25 (* u -0.5)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -4.0f * (((float) M_PI) * (0.25f + (u * -0.5f)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-4.0) * Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(0.25) + Float32(u * Float32(-0.5)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(-4.0) * (single(pi) * (single(0.25) + (u * single(-0.5))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.5\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 11.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25} - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right) \]
    2. associate-*l*11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)} - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right) \]
    3. +-commutative11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right) - \color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}\right) \]
    4. associate-*r*11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right) - \left(\color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} + -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    5. distribute-rgt-out11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right) - \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot u + -0.25\right)}\right) \]
    6. *-commutative11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right) - \pi \cdot \left(\color{blue}{u \cdot 0.25} + -0.25\right)\right) \]
  6. Simplified11.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right) - \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.25 + -0.25\right)\right)} \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. sub-neg11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right) + \left(-\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.25 + -0.25\right)\right)\right)} \]
    2. fma-def11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right) + \left(-\pi \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(u, 0.25, -0.25\right)}\right)\right) \]
  8. Applied egg-rr11.3%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right) + \left(-\pi \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(u, 0.25, -0.25\right)\right)\right)} \]
  9. Step-by-step derivation
    1. sub-neg11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right) - \pi \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(u, 0.25, -0.25\right)\right)} \]
    2. *-commutative11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right) - \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(u, 0.25, -0.25\right) \cdot \pi}\right) \]
    3. associate-*r*11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25} - \mathsf{fma}\left(u, 0.25, -0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    4. *-commutative11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)} - \mathsf{fma}\left(u, 0.25, -0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    5. associate-*r*11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} - \mathsf{fma}\left(u, 0.25, -0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    6. distribute-rgt-out--11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u - \mathsf{fma}\left(u, 0.25, -0.25\right)\right)\right)} \]
    7. *-commutative11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(\color{blue}{u \cdot -0.25} - \mathsf{fma}\left(u, 0.25, -0.25\right)\right)\right) \]
  10. Simplified11.3%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 - \mathsf{fma}\left(u, 0.25, -0.25\right)\right)\right)} \]
  11. Taylor expanded in u around 0 11.3%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)} \]
  12. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot \pi + -0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    2. associate-*r*11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \pi + \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi}\right) \]
    3. distribute-rgt-out11.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + -0.5 \cdot u\right)\right)} \]
  13. Simplified11.3%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + -0.5 \cdot u\right)\right)} \]
  14. Final simplification11.3%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.5\right)\right) \]
  15. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 11.4% accurate, 216.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -\pi \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (- PI))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -((float) M_PI);
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(-Float32(pi))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -single(pi);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-\pi
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in u around 0 11.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \pi} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-mul-111.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  6. Simplified11.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  7. Final simplification11.0%

    \[\leadsto -\pi \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2024027 
(FPCore (u s)
  :name "Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]"
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0)) (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
  (* (- s) (log (- (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) 1.0))))