Linear.V3:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, B

Percentage Accurate: 97.7% → 98.9%

Time: 7.5s

Alternatives: 11

Speedup: 0.4×

• 33.7% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 97.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.9% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, z \cdot t\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (fma x y (fma a b (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return fma(x, y, fma(a, b, (z * t)));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return fma(x, y, fma(a, b, Float64(z * t)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(x * y + N[(a * b + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 96.8%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 96.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   2. fma-def 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. +-commutative 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + z \cdot t}\right) \]

   4. fma-def 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

3. Simplified 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, z \cdot t\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, z \cdot t\right)\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.9% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (+ (* a b) (+ (* x y) (* z t))) INFINITY)
   (+ (* a b) (fma x y (* z t)))
   (fma a b (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))) <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = (a * b) + fma(x, y, (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(a, b, (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))) <= Inf)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + fma(x, y, Float64(z * t)));
	else
		tmp = fma(a, b, Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], Infinity], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * b + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + a \cdot b \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 25.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-def 62.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 62.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.9% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* a b) (+ (* x y) (* z t)))))
   (if (<= t_1 INFINITY) t_1 (fma a b (* z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(a, b, (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = fma(a, b, Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, Infinity], t$95$1, N[(a * b + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 25.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-def 62.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 62.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 98.5% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, a \cdot b + z \cdot t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (fma x y (+ (* a b) (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return fma(x, y, ((a * b) + (z * t)));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return fma(x, y, Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(x * y + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 96.8%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 96.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   2. fma-def 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. +-commutative 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + z \cdot t}\right) \]

   4. fma-def 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

3. Simplified 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, z \cdot t\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-udef 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + z \cdot t}\right) \]

   2. +-commutative 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{z \cdot t + a \cdot b}\right) \]

6. Applied egg-rr 97.6%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{z \cdot t + a \cdot b}\right) \]

7. Final simplification 97.6%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, a \cdot b + z \cdot t\right) \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 53.9% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{+58}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq -7.2 \cdot 10^{-53}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq -1.25 \cdot 10^{-268}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 0.0037:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* a b) -1.9e+58)
   (* a b)
   (if (<= (* a b) -7.2e-53)
     (* x y)
     (if (<= (* a b) -1.25e-268)
       (* z t)
       (if (<= (* a b) 0.0037) (* x y) (* a b))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -1.9e+58) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((a * b) <= -7.2e-53) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((a * b) <= -1.25e-268) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 0.0037) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a * b) <= (-1.9d+58)) then
        tmp = a * b
    else if ((a * b) <= (-7.2d-53)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if ((a * b) <= (-1.25d-268)) then
        tmp = z * t
    else if ((a * b) <= 0.0037d0) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = a * b
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -1.9e+58) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((a * b) <= -7.2e-53) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((a * b) <= -1.25e-268) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 0.0037) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (a * b) <= -1.9e+58:
		tmp = a * b
	elif (a * b) <= -7.2e-53:
		tmp = x * y
	elif (a * b) <= -1.25e-268:
		tmp = z * t
	elif (a * b) <= 0.0037:
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = a * b
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(a * b) <= -1.9e+58)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= -7.2e-53)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= -1.25e-268)
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 0.0037)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a * b) <= -1.9e+58)
		tmp = a * b;
	elseif ((a * b) <= -7.2e-53)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif ((a * b) <= -1.25e-268)
		tmp = z * t;
	elseif ((a * b) <= 0.0037)
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = a * b;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -1.9e+58], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -7.2e-53], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -1.25e-268], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 0.0037], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -1.8999999999999999e58 or 0.0037000000000000002 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 95.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 66.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]

   if -1.8999999999999999e58 < (*.f64 a b) < -7.1999999999999998e-53 or -1.25e-268 < (*.f64 a b) < 0.0037000000000000002

   1. Initial program 98.2%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 56.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -7.1999999999999998e-53 < (*.f64 a b) < -1.25e-268

   1. Initial program 96.6%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 52.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 60.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{+58}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq -7.2 \cdot 10^{-53}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq -1.25 \cdot 10^{-268}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 0.0037:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 98.6% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* a b) (+ (* x y) (* z t)))))
   (if (<= t_1 INFINITY) t_1 (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = z * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = z * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= math.inf:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = z * t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = z * t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, Infinity], t$95$1, N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 50.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 80.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.95 \cdot 10^{+145} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{+66}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -1.95e+145) (not (<= (* x y) 1.35e+66)))
   (* x y)
   (+ (* a b) (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -1.95e+145) || !((x * y) <= 1.35e+66)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * y) <= (-1.95d+145)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= 1.35d+66))) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -1.95e+145) || !((x * y) <= 1.35e+66)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -1.95e+145) or not ((x * y) <= 1.35e+66):
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -1.95e+145) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 1.35e+66))
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -1.95e+145) || ~(((x * y) <= 1.35e+66)))
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1.95e+145], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1.35e+66]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.9499999999999999e145 or 1.35e66 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 93.3%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 77.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -1.9499999999999999e145 < (*.f64 x y) < 1.35e66

   1. Initial program 98.3%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 83.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 81.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.95 \cdot 10^{+145} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{+66}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 85.2% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+63} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 10^{+52}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -1e+63) (not (<= (* x y) 1e+52)))
   (+ (* a b) (* x y))
   (+ (* a b) (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -1e+63) || !((x * y) <= 1e+52)) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * y) <= (-1d+63)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= 1d+52))) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (x * y)
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -1e+63) || !((x * y) <= 1e+52)) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -1e+63) or not ((x * y) <= 1e+52):
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y)
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -1e+63) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 1e+52))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(x * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -1e+63) || ~(((x * y) <= 1e+52)))
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y);
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1e+63], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1e+52]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.00000000000000006e63 or 9.9999999999999999e51 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 94.6%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 81.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]

   if -1.00000000000000006e63 < (*.f64 x y) < 9.9999999999999999e51

   1. Initial program 98.1%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 86.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+63} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 10^{+52}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 84.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-20}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{-18}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* a b) -5e-20)
   (+ (* a b) (* x y))
   (if (<= (* a b) 9.5e-18) (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (+ (* a b) (* z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -5e-20) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y);
	} else if ((a * b) <= 9.5e-18) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a * b) <= (-5d-20)) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (x * y)
    else if ((a * b) <= 9.5d-18) then
        tmp = (x * y) + (z * t)
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -5e-20) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y);
	} else if ((a * b) <= 9.5e-18) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (a * b) <= -5e-20:
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y)
	elif (a * b) <= 9.5e-18:
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * t)
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(a * b) <= -5e-20)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(x * y));
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 9.5e-18)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a * b) <= -5e-20)
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y);
	elseif ((a * b) <= 9.5e-18)
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * t);
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -5e-20], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 9.5e-18], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -4.9999999999999999e-20

   1. Initial program 93.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 79.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]

   if -4.9999999999999999e-20 < (*.f64 a b) < 9.5000000000000003e-18

   1. Initial program 97.5%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 93.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]

   if 9.5000000000000003e-18 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 87.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-20}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{-18}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 54.0% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -3.6 \cdot 10^{-19} \lor \neg \left(a \cdot b \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{+50}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* a b) -3.6e-19) (not (<= (* a b) 1.3e+50))) (* a b) (* z t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (((a * b) <= -3.6e-19) || !((a * b) <= 1.3e+50)) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else {
		tmp = z * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((a * b) <= (-3.6d-19)) .or. (.not. ((a * b) <= 1.3d+50))) then
        tmp = a * b
    else
        tmp = z * t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (((a * b) <= -3.6e-19) || !((a * b) <= 1.3e+50)) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else {
		tmp = z * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if ((a * b) <= -3.6e-19) or not ((a * b) <= 1.3e+50):
		tmp = a * b
	else:
		tmp = z * t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(a * b) <= -3.6e-19) || !(Float64(a * b) <= 1.3e+50))
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((a * b) <= -3.6e-19) || ~(((a * b) <= 1.3e+50)))
		tmp = a * b;
	else
		tmp = z * t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -3.6e-19], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 1.3e+50]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -3.6000000000000001e-19 or 1.3000000000000001e50 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 62.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]

   if -3.6000000000000001e-19 < (*.f64 a b) < 1.3000000000000001e50

   1. Initial program 97.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 47.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 54.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -3.6 \cdot 10^{-19} \lor \neg \left(a \cdot b \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{+50}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 36.2% accurate, 3.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (* a b))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return a * b;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = a * b
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return a * b;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return a * b

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(a * b)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = a * b;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 96.8%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 35.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]

4. Final simplification 35.4%

   \[\leadsto a \cdot b \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024026 
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
  :name "Linear.V3:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, B"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)))