Diagrams.TwoD.Apollonian:descartes from diagrams-contrib-1.3.0.5

Percentage Accurate: 70.0% → 95.2%

Time: 15.2s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (+ (* x y) (* x z)) (* y z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(x * z)) + Float64(y * z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 70.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (+ (* x y) (* x z)) (* y z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(x * z)) + Float64(y * z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 95.2% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -6.4 \cdot 10^{+38}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(-y\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}\right)}^{2}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.45 \cdot 10^{-253}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(y + x\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -6.4e+38)
   (* 2.0 (pow (exp (* 0.25 (- (log (- y)) (log (/ -1.0 x))))) 2.0))
   (if (<= y 2.45e-253)
     (* 2.0 (sqrt (fma x y (* z (+ y x)))))
     (* 2.0 (* (sqrt (+ y x)) (sqrt z))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -6.4e+38) {
		tmp = 2.0 * pow(exp((0.25 * (log(-y) - log((-1.0 / x))))), 2.0);
	} else if (y <= 2.45e-253) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(fma(x, y, (z * (y + x))));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt((y + x)) * sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -6.4e+38)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * (exp(Float64(0.25 * Float64(log(Float64(-y)) - log(Float64(-1.0 / x))))) ^ 2.0));
	elseif (y <= 2.45e-253)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(fma(x, y, Float64(z * Float64(y + x)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(y + x)) * sqrt(z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -6.4e+38], N[(2.0 * N[Power[N[Exp[N[(0.25 * N[(N[Log[(-y)], $MachinePrecision] - N[Log[N[(-1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 2.45e-253], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * y + N[(z * N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -6.3999999999999997e38

   1. Initial program 52.8%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 52.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 52.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 52.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 52.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 24.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot y}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 24.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x}} \]

   7. Simplified 24.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot x}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sqrt-prod 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y} \cdot \sqrt{x}\right)} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 0.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y} \cdot \sqrt{x}\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative 0.0%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{x} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \]

       2. sqrt-prod 24.6%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot y}} \]

       3. add-sqr-sqrt 24.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{\sqrt{x \cdot y}} \cdot \sqrt{\sqrt{x \cdot y}}\right)} \]

       4. pow2 24.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{\sqrt{x \cdot y}}\right)}^{2}} \]

       5. pow1/2 24.8%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{{\left(x \cdot y\right)}^{0.5}}}\right)}^{2} \]

       6. sqrt-pow1 24.9%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left({\left(x \cdot y\right)}^{\left(\frac{0.5}{2}\right)}\right)}}^{2} \]

       7. metadata-eval 24.9%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(x \cdot y\right)}^{\color{blue}{0.25}}\right)}^{2} \]

   11. Applied egg-rr 24.9%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left({\left(x \cdot y\right)}^{0.25}\right)}^{2}} \]

   12. Taylor expanded in x around -inf 41.6%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(-1 \cdot y\right) + -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}\right)}}^{2} \]

   if -6.3999999999999997e38 < y < 2.45e-253

   1. Initial program 83.5%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 83.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. *-commutative 83.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 83.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 83.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 83.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

      6. +-commutative 83.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 83.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 83.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      9. *-commutative 83.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      10. +-commutative 83.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]

      11. +-commutative 83.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)}} \]

      12. *-commutative 83.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot z} + \left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      13. associate-+r+ 83.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y}} \]

      14. *-commutative 83.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot y} + x \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y} \]

      15. *-commutative 83.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(z \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot x}\right) + x \cdot y} \]

      16. +-commutative 83.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

      17. fma-def 83.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 83.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 2.45e-253 < y

   1. Initial program 61.5%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 61.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 61.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 34.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 34.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)}} \]

   7. Simplified 34.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. pow1/2 34.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(z \cdot \left(y + x\right)\right)}^{0.5}} \]

      2. +-commutative 34.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right)}^{0.5} \]

      3. *-commutative 34.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) \cdot z\right)}}^{0.5} \]

      4. unpow-prod-down 48.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left({\left(x + y\right)}^{0.5} \cdot {z}^{0.5}\right)} \]

      5. pow1/2 48.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\sqrt{x + y}} \cdot {z}^{0.5}\right) \]

      6. pow1/2 48.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{x + y} \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{z}}\right) \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 48.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{x + y} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 58.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -6.4 \cdot 10^{+38}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(-y\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}\right)}^{2}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.45 \cdot 10^{-253}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(y + x\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 84.3% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{-272}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 5.2e-272)
   (* 2.0 (sqrt (* x (+ y z))))
   (* 2.0 (* (sqrt (+ y x)) (sqrt z)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 5.2e-272) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt((y + x)) * sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 5.2d-272) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (sqrt((y + x)) * sqrt(z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 5.2e-272) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (Math.sqrt((y + x)) * Math.sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 5.2e-272:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((x * (y + z)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * (math.sqrt((y + x)) * math.sqrt(z))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 5.2e-272)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(x * Float64(y + z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(y + x)) * sqrt(z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 5.2e-272)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt((y + x)) * sqrt(z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 5.2e-272], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 5.19999999999999983e-272

   1. Initial program 71.6%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 71.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 71.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 71.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 71.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 47.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}} \]

   if 5.19999999999999983e-272 < y

   1. Initial program 62.3%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 62.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 62.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 62.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 62.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 36.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 36.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)}} \]

   7. Simplified 36.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. pow1/2 36.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(z \cdot \left(y + x\right)\right)}^{0.5}} \]

      2. +-commutative 36.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right)}^{0.5} \]

      3. *-commutative 36.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) \cdot z\right)}}^{0.5} \]

      4. unpow-prod-down 48.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left({\left(x + y\right)}^{0.5} \cdot {z}^{0.5}\right)} \]

      5. pow1/2 48.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\sqrt{x + y}} \cdot {z}^{0.5}\right) \]

      6. pow1/2 48.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{x + y} \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{z}}\right) \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 48.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{x + y} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 47.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{-272}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 83.0% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.45 \cdot 10^{-253}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 2.45e-253)
   (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* y x) (* z (+ y x)))))
   (* 2.0 (* (sqrt z) (sqrt y)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.45e-253) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt(z) * sqrt(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 2.45d-253) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (sqrt(z) * sqrt(y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.45e-253) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (Math.sqrt(z) * Math.sqrt(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 2.45e-253:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * (math.sqrt(z) * math.sqrt(y))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 2.45e-253)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(y * x) + Float64(z * Float64(y + x)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(z) * sqrt(y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 2.45e-253)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt(z) * sqrt(y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 2.45e-253], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 2.45e-253

   1. Initial program 71.9%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 71.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 71.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 72.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 72.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 2.45e-253 < y

   1. Initial program 61.5%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 61.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 61.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 61.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 18.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot z}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 18.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y}} \]

      2. sqrt-prod 31.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 31.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 53.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.45 \cdot 10^{-253}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 69.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 7.8 \cdot 10^{-272}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 7.8e-272) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* x (+ y z)))) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y z)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 7.8e-272) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 7.8d-272) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 7.8e-272) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 7.8e-272:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((x * (y + z)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * z))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 7.8e-272)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(x * Float64(y + z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 7.8e-272)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 7.8e-272], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 7.7999999999999994e-272

   1. Initial program 71.6%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 71.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 71.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 71.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 71.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 47.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}} \]

   if 7.7999999999999994e-272 < y

   1. Initial program 62.3%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 62.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 62.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 62.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 62.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 18.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot z}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 33.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 7.8 \cdot 10^{-272}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 70.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-300}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -5e-300) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* x (+ y z)))) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* z (+ y x))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -5e-300) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((z * (y + x)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-5d-300)) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((z * (y + x)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -5e-300) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((z * (y + x)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -5e-300:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((x * (y + z)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((z * (y + x)))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -5e-300)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(x * Float64(y + z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(z * Float64(y + x))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -5e-300)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((z * (y + x)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -5e-300], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(z * N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -4.99999999999999996e-300

   1. Initial program 70.6%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 70.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 70.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 70.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 70.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 43.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}} \]

   if -4.99999999999999996e-300 < y

   1. Initial program 64.0%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 64.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 64.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 64.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 64.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 40.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 40.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)}} \]

   7. Simplified 40.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 42.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-300}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 70.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* y x) (* z (+ y x))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))));
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))))
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))));
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))))

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(y * x) + Float64(z * Float64(y + x)))))
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))));
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 67.2%

   \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 67.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

   2. +-commutative 67.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

   3. distribute-rgt-in 67.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

3. Simplified 67.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 67.3%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 68.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{-310}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -2e-310) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y x))) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y z)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -2e-310) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-2d-310)) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * x))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -2e-310) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * x));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -2e-310:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * x))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * z))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -2e-310)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * x)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -2e-310)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -2e-310], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.999999999999994e-310

   1. Initial program 71.0%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 71.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 71.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 71.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 71.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 23.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot y}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 23.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x}} \]

   7. Simplified 23.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot x}} \]

   if -1.999999999999994e-310 < y

   1. Initial program 63.4%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 63.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 63.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 63.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 63.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 17.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot z}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 20.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{-310}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 35.2% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y x))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * x))
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * x));
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * x))

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * x)))
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 67.2%

   \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 67.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

   2. +-commutative 67.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

   3. distribute-rgt-in 67.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

3. Simplified 67.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 25.4%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot y}} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 25.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x}} \]

7. Simplified 25.4%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot x}} \]

8. Final simplification 25.4%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x} \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 82.5% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := 0.25 \cdot \left(\left({y}^{-0.75} \cdot \left({z}^{-0.75} \cdot x\right)\right) \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) + {z}^{0.25} \cdot {y}^{0.25}\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < 7.636950090573675 \cdot 10^{+176}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x + y\right) \cdot z + x \cdot y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(t\_0 \cdot t\_0\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0
         (+
          (* 0.25 (* (* (pow y -0.75) (* (pow z -0.75) x)) (+ y z)))
          (* (pow z 0.25) (pow y 0.25)))))
   (if (< z 7.636950090573675e+176)
     (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* (+ x y) z) (* x y))))
     (* (* t_0 t_0) 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (0.25 * ((pow(y, -0.75) * (pow(z, -0.75) * x)) * (y + z))) + (pow(z, 0.25) * pow(y, 0.25));
	double tmp;
	if (z < 7.636950090573675e+176) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)));
	} else {
		tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (0.25d0 * (((y ** (-0.75d0)) * ((z ** (-0.75d0)) * x)) * (y + z))) + ((z ** 0.25d0) * (y ** 0.25d0))
    if (z < 7.636950090573675d+176) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)))
    else
        tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (0.25 * ((Math.pow(y, -0.75) * (Math.pow(z, -0.75) * x)) * (y + z))) + (Math.pow(z, 0.25) * Math.pow(y, 0.25));
	double tmp;
	if (z < 7.636950090573675e+176) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)));
	} else {
		tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = (0.25 * ((math.pow(y, -0.75) * (math.pow(z, -0.75) * x)) * (y + z))) + (math.pow(z, 0.25) * math.pow(y, 0.25))
	tmp = 0
	if z < 7.636950090573675e+176:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)))
	else:
		tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(0.25 * Float64(Float64((y ^ -0.75) * Float64((z ^ -0.75) * x)) * Float64(y + z))) + Float64((z ^ 0.25) * (y ^ 0.25)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < 7.636950090573675e+176)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) * z) + Float64(x * y))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(t_0 * t_0) * 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = (0.25 * (((y ^ -0.75) * ((z ^ -0.75) * x)) * (y + z))) + ((z ^ 0.25) * (y ^ 0.25));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < 7.636950090573675e+176)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)));
	else
		tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(0.25 * N[(N[(N[Power[y, -0.75], $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Power[z, -0.75], $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Power[z, 0.25], $MachinePrecision] * N[Power[y, 0.25], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, 7.636950090573675e+176], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024026 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.TwoD.Apollonian:descartes from diagrams-contrib-1.3.0.5"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (if (< z 7.636950090573675e+176) (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* (+ x y) z) (* x y)))) (* (* (+ (* 0.25 (* (* (pow y -0.75) (* (pow z -0.75) x)) (+ y z))) (* (pow z 0.25) (pow y 0.25))) (+ (* 0.25 (* (* (pow y -0.75) (* (pow z -0.75) x)) (+ y z))) (* (pow z 0.25) (pow y 0.25)))) 2.0))

  (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (+ (* x y) (* x z)) (* y z)))))