Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendInside from plot-0.2.3.4

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 5.9s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.2×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ x y) y) x) z) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ x y) y) x) z) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z - \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -3, y \cdot -2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- z (fma x -3.0 (* y -2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z - fma(x, -3.0, (y * -2.0));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(z - fma(x, -3.0, Float64(y * -2.0)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z - N[(x * -3.0 + N[(y * -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]

   3. remove-double-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. unsub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \left(-\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)\right)} \]

   5. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z - \left(-\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)}\right) \]

   6. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z - \left(-\left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

   7. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z - \left(-\left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right)\right) \]

   8. associate-+r+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z - \left(-\left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

   9. associate-+r+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z - \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]

   10. distribute-neg-in 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right)\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right)} \]

   11. distribute-neg-out 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + \left(-\left(x + x\right)\right)\right)} + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

   12. distribute-neg-out 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(\left(-x\right) + \left(-\left(x + x\right)\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)}\right) \]

   13. neg-mul-1 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot x} + \left(-\left(x + x\right)\right)\right) + \left(\left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)\right) \]

   14. count-2 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \left(-\color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right)\right) + \left(\left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)\right) \]

   15. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(-2\right) \cdot x}\right) + \left(\left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)\right) \]

   16. metadata-eval 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{-2} \cdot x\right) + \left(\left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)\right) \]

   17. metadata-eval 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 + -1\right)} \cdot x\right) + \left(\left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)\right) \]

   18. distribute-rgt-out 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-1 + \left(-1 + -1\right)\right)} + \left(\left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)\right) \]

   19. fma-def 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -1 + \left(-1 + -1\right), \left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)} \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -3, y \cdot -2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto z - \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -3, y \cdot -2\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 51.9% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -9 \cdot 10^{+149}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -6.2 \cdot 10^{+47}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{-79}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.04 \cdot 10^{-243}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{-183}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{+87}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -9e+149)
   (* y 2.0)
   (if (<= y -6.2e+47)
     (* x 3.0)
     (if (<= y -1.3e-79)
       z
       (if (<= y 1.04e-243)
         (* x 3.0)
         (if (<= y 2.8e-183) z (if (<= y 1.2e+87) (* x 3.0) (* y 2.0))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -9e+149) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (y <= -6.2e+47) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else if (y <= -1.3e-79) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (y <= 1.04e-243) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else if (y <= 2.8e-183) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (y <= 1.2e+87) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-9d+149)) then
        tmp = y * 2.0d0
    else if (y <= (-6.2d+47)) then
        tmp = x * 3.0d0
    else if (y <= (-1.3d-79)) then
        tmp = z
    else if (y <= 1.04d-243) then
        tmp = x * 3.0d0
    else if (y <= 2.8d-183) then
        tmp = z
    else if (y <= 1.2d+87) then
        tmp = x * 3.0d0
    else
        tmp = y * 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -9e+149) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (y <= -6.2e+47) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else if (y <= -1.3e-79) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (y <= 1.04e-243) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else if (y <= 2.8e-183) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (y <= 1.2e+87) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -9e+149:
		tmp = y * 2.0
	elif y <= -6.2e+47:
		tmp = x * 3.0
	elif y <= -1.3e-79:
		tmp = z
	elif y <= 1.04e-243:
		tmp = x * 3.0
	elif y <= 2.8e-183:
		tmp = z
	elif y <= 1.2e+87:
		tmp = x * 3.0
	else:
		tmp = y * 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -9e+149)
		tmp = Float64(y * 2.0);
	elseif (y <= -6.2e+47)
		tmp = Float64(x * 3.0);
	elseif (y <= -1.3e-79)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (y <= 1.04e-243)
		tmp = Float64(x * 3.0);
	elseif (y <= 2.8e-183)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (y <= 1.2e+87)
		tmp = Float64(x * 3.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -9e+149)
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	elseif (y <= -6.2e+47)
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	elseif (y <= -1.3e-79)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (y <= 1.04e-243)
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	elseif (y <= 2.8e-183)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (y <= 1.2e+87)
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	else
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -9e+149], N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, -6.2e+47], N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, -1.3e-79], z, If[LessEqual[y, 1.04e-243], N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 2.8e-183], z, If[LessEqual[y, 1.2e+87], N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -8.99999999999999965e149 or 1.19999999999999991e87 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 79.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y} \]

   if -8.99999999999999965e149 < y < -6.2000000000000001e47 or -1.29999999999999997e-79 < y < 1.0400000000000001e-243 or 2.79999999999999985e-183 < y < 1.19999999999999991e87

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 54.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot x} \]

   if -6.2000000000000001e47 < y < -1.29999999999999997e-79 or 1.0400000000000001e-243 < y < 2.79999999999999985e-183

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 66.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 64.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -9 \cdot 10^{+149}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -6.2 \cdot 10^{+47}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{-79}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.04 \cdot 10^{-243}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{-183}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{+87}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 80.1% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{+150} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{+87}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z - x \cdot -3\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -1.15e+150) (not (<= y 1.8e+87))) (* y 2.0) (- z (* x -3.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.15e+150) || !(y <= 1.8e+87)) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = z - (x * -3.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-1.15d+150)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.8d+87))) then
        tmp = y * 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = z - (x * (-3.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.15e+150) || !(y <= 1.8e+87)) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = z - (x * -3.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -1.15e+150) or not (y <= 1.8e+87):
		tmp = y * 2.0
	else:
		tmp = z - (x * -3.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -1.15e+150) || !(y <= 1.8e+87))
		tmp = Float64(y * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z - Float64(x * -3.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -1.15e+150) || ~((y <= 1.8e+87)))
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	else
		tmp = z - (x * -3.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -1.15e+150], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.8e+87]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(z - N[(x * -3.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.15000000000000001e150 or 1.79999999999999997e87 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 79.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y} \]

   if -1.15000000000000001e150 < y < 1.79999999999999997e87

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]

      3. remove-double-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)\right)\right)} \]

      4. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \left(-\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(-\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)}\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(-\left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

      7. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(-\left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right)\right) \]

      8. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(-\left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

      9. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]

      10. distribute-neg-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right)\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right)} \]

      11. distribute-neg-out 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + \left(-\left(x + x\right)\right)\right)} + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

      12. distribute-neg-out 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(\left(-x\right) + \left(-\left(x + x\right)\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)}\right) \]

      13. neg-mul-1 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot x} + \left(-\left(x + x\right)\right)\right) + \left(\left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)\right) \]

      14. count-2 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \left(-\color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right)\right) + \left(\left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)\right) \]

      15. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(-2\right) \cdot x}\right) + \left(\left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)\right) \]

      16. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{-2} \cdot x\right) + \left(\left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 + -1\right)} \cdot x\right) + \left(\left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)\right) \]

      18. distribute-rgt-out 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-1 + \left(-1 + -1\right)\right)} + \left(\left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)\right) \]

      19. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -1 + \left(-1 + -1\right), \left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -3, y \cdot -2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - -3 \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{+150} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{+87}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z - x \cdot -3\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 84.5% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -9 \cdot 10^{+149} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{+68}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z - y \cdot -2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z - x \cdot -3\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -9e+149) (not (<= y 4.5e+68)))
   (- z (* y -2.0))
   (- z (* x -3.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -9e+149) || !(y <= 4.5e+68)) {
		tmp = z - (y * -2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = z - (x * -3.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-9d+149)) .or. (.not. (y <= 4.5d+68))) then
        tmp = z - (y * (-2.0d0))
    else
        tmp = z - (x * (-3.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -9e+149) || !(y <= 4.5e+68)) {
		tmp = z - (y * -2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = z - (x * -3.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -9e+149) or not (y <= 4.5e+68):
		tmp = z - (y * -2.0)
	else:
		tmp = z - (x * -3.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -9e+149) || !(y <= 4.5e+68))
		tmp = Float64(z - Float64(y * -2.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z - Float64(x * -3.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -9e+149) || ~((y <= 4.5e+68)))
		tmp = z - (y * -2.0);
	else
		tmp = z - (x * -3.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -9e+149], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 4.5e+68]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z - N[(y * -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z - N[(x * -3.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -8.99999999999999965e149 or 4.5000000000000003e68 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]

      3. remove-double-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)\right)\right)} \]

      4. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \left(-\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(-\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)}\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(-\left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

      7. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(-\left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right)\right) \]

      8. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(-\left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

      9. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]

      10. distribute-neg-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right)\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right)} \]

      11. distribute-neg-out 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + \left(-\left(x + x\right)\right)\right)} + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

      12. distribute-neg-out 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(\left(-x\right) + \left(-\left(x + x\right)\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)}\right) \]

      13. neg-mul-1 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot x} + \left(-\left(x + x\right)\right)\right) + \left(\left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)\right) \]

      14. count-2 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \left(-\color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right)\right) + \left(\left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)\right) \]

      15. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(-2\right) \cdot x}\right) + \left(\left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)\right) \]

      16. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{-2} \cdot x\right) + \left(\left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 + -1\right)} \cdot x\right) + \left(\left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)\right) \]

      18. distribute-rgt-out 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-1 + \left(-1 + -1\right)\right)} + \left(\left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)\right) \]

      19. fma-def 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -1 + \left(-1 + -1\right), \left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -3, y \cdot -2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 94.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - -2 \cdot y} \]

   if -8.99999999999999965e149 < y < 4.5000000000000003e68

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]

      3. remove-double-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)\right)\right)} \]

      4. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \left(-\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(-\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)}\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(-\left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

      7. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(-\left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right)\right) \]

      8. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(-\left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

      9. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]

      10. distribute-neg-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right)\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right)} \]

      11. distribute-neg-out 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + \left(-\left(x + x\right)\right)\right)} + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

      12. distribute-neg-out 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(\left(-x\right) + \left(-\left(x + x\right)\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)}\right) \]

      13. neg-mul-1 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot x} + \left(-\left(x + x\right)\right)\right) + \left(\left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)\right) \]

      14. count-2 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \left(-\color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right)\right) + \left(\left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)\right) \]

      15. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(-2\right) \cdot x}\right) + \left(\left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)\right) \]

      16. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{-2} \cdot x\right) + \left(\left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)\right) \]

      17. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 + -1\right)} \cdot x\right) + \left(\left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)\right) \]

      18. distribute-rgt-out 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-1 + \left(-1 + -1\right)\right)} + \left(\left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)\right) \]

      19. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -1 + \left(-1 + -1\right), \left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -3, y \cdot -2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 88.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - -3 \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -9 \cdot 10^{+149} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{+68}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z - y \cdot -2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z - x \cdot -3\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 52.8% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -9.6 \cdot 10^{+42} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 8.6 \cdot 10^{+86}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -9.6e+42) (not (<= y 8.6e+86))) (* y 2.0) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -9.6e+42) || !(y <= 8.6e+86)) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-9.6d+42)) .or. (.not. (y <= 8.6d+86))) then
        tmp = y * 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -9.6e+42) || !(y <= 8.6e+86)) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -9.6e+42) or not (y <= 8.6e+86):
		tmp = y * 2.0
	else:
		tmp = z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -9.6e+42) || !(y <= 8.6e+86))
		tmp = Float64(y * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -9.6e+42) || ~((y <= 8.6e+86)))
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -9.6e+42], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 8.6e+86]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], z]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -9.5999999999999994e42 or 8.6000000000000004e86 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 71.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y} \]

   if -9.5999999999999994e42 < y < 8.6000000000000004e86

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 46.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 55.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -9.6 \cdot 10^{+42} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 8.6 \cdot 10^{+86}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 99.9% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(z + x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* 2.0 (+ x y)) (+ z x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (2.0 * (x + y)) + (z + x);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (2.0d0 * (x + y)) + (z + x)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (2.0 * (x + y)) + (z + x);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (2.0 * (x + y)) + (z + x)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(2.0 * Float64(x + y)) + Float64(z + x))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (2.0 * (x + y)) + (z + x);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(2.0 * N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

   3. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

   4. count-2 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

   5. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

   6. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 33.7% accurate, 11.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 z)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return z
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := z

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

   3. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

   4. count-2 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

   5. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

   6. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 35.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

6. Final simplification 35.1%

   \[\leadsto z \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024024 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendInside from plot-0.2.3.4"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ x y) y) x) z) x))