Diagrams.ThreeD.Transform:aboutY from diagrams-lib-1.3.0.3

Percentage Accurate: 99.8% → 99.8%

Time: 7.7s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (cos y)) (* z (sin y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * cos(y)) + (z * sin(y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * cos(y)) + (z * sin(y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * Math.cos(y)) + (z * Math.sin(y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * math.cos(y)) + (z * math.sin(y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * cos(y)) + Float64(z * sin(y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * cos(y)) + (z * sin(y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (cos y)) (* z (sin y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * cos(y)) + (z * sin(y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * cos(y)) + (z * sin(y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * Math.cos(y)) + (z * Math.sin(y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * math.cos(y)) + (z * math.sin(y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * cos(y)) + Float64(z * sin(y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * cos(y)) + (z * sin(y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\sin y, z, x \cdot \cos y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma (sin y) z (* x (cos y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(sin(y), z, (x * cos(y)));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(sin(y), z, Float64(x * cos(y)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision] * z + N[(x * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \sin y + x \cdot \cos y} \]

   2. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sin y \cdot z} + x \cdot \cos y \]

   3. fma-def 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\sin y, z, x \cdot \cos y\right)} \]

4. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\sin y, z, x \cdot \cos y\right)} \]

5. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\sin y, z, x \cdot \cos y\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \cos y + \sin y \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (cos y)) (* (sin y) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * cos(y)) + (sin(y) * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * cos(y)) + (sin(y) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * Math.cos(y)) + (Math.sin(y) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * math.cos(y)) + (math.sin(y) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * cos(y)) + Float64(sin(y) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * cos(y)) + (sin(y) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \cos y + \sin y \cdot z \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 86.1% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.9 \cdot 10^{+51} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{+147}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \cos y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \sin y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -5.9e+51) (not (<= x 9.5e+147)))
   (* x (cos y))
   (+ x (* (sin y) z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -5.9e+51) || !(x <= 9.5e+147)) {
		tmp = x * cos(y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (sin(y) * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-5.9d+51)) .or. (.not. (x <= 9.5d+147))) then
        tmp = x * cos(y)
    else
        tmp = x + (sin(y) * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -5.9e+51) || !(x <= 9.5e+147)) {
		tmp = x * Math.cos(y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (Math.sin(y) * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -5.9e+51) or not (x <= 9.5e+147):
		tmp = x * math.cos(y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (math.sin(y) * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -5.9e+51) || !(x <= 9.5e+147))
		tmp = Float64(x * cos(y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(sin(y) * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -5.9e+51) || ~((x <= 9.5e+147)))
		tmp = x * cos(y);
	else
		tmp = x + (sin(y) * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -5.9e+51], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 9.5e+147]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -5.89999999999999983e51 or 9.4999999999999996e147 < x

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 94.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \cos y} \]

   if -5.89999999999999983e51 < x < 9.4999999999999996e147

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 89.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} + z \cdot \sin y \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.9 \cdot 10^{+51} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{+147}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \cos y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \sin y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 74.4% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -0.0009 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{-7}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \cos y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -0.0009) (not (<= y 7.5e-7))) (* x (cos y)) (+ x (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -0.0009) || !(y <= 7.5e-7)) {
		tmp = x * cos(y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-0.0009d0)) .or. (.not. (y <= 7.5d-7))) then
        tmp = x * cos(y)
    else
        tmp = x + (y * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -0.0009) || !(y <= 7.5e-7)) {
		tmp = x * Math.cos(y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -0.0009) or not (y <= 7.5e-7):
		tmp = x * math.cos(y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -0.0009) || !(y <= 7.5e-7))
		tmp = Float64(x * cos(y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -0.0009) || ~((y <= 7.5e-7)))
		tmp = x * cos(y);
	else
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -0.0009], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 7.5e-7]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -8.9999999999999998e-4 or 7.5000000000000002e-7 < y

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 51.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \cos y} \]

   if -8.9999999999999998e-4 < y < 7.5000000000000002e-7

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

   5. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 75.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -0.0009 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{-7}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \cos y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 73.5% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+16} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{-130}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \cos y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sin y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -2e+16) (not (<= x 1.3e-130))) (* x (cos y)) (* (sin y) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2e+16) || !(x <= 1.3e-130)) {
		tmp = x * cos(y);
	} else {
		tmp = sin(y) * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-2d+16)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.3d-130))) then
        tmp = x * cos(y)
    else
        tmp = sin(y) * z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2e+16) || !(x <= 1.3e-130)) {
		tmp = x * Math.cos(y);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.sin(y) * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -2e+16) or not (x <= 1.3e-130):
		tmp = x * math.cos(y)
	else:
		tmp = math.sin(y) * z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -2e+16) || !(x <= 1.3e-130))
		tmp = Float64(x * cos(y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(sin(y) * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -2e+16) || ~((x <= 1.3e-130)))
		tmp = x * cos(y);
	else
		tmp = sin(y) * z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -2e+16], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.3e-130]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -2e16 or 1.3e-130 < x

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 83.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \cos y} \]

   if -2e16 < x < 1.3e-130

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 74.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \sin y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 80.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+16} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{-130}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \cos y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sin y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 39.6% accurate, 15.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{+16}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.28 \cdot 10^{-166}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -1.8e+16) x (if (<= x 1.28e-166) (* y z) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.8e+16) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 1.28e-166) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.8d+16)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (x <= 1.28d-166) then
        tmp = y * z
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.8e+16) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 1.28e-166) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.8e+16:
		tmp = x
	elif x <= 1.28e-166:
		tmp = y * z
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.8e+16)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 1.28e-166)
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.8e+16)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 1.28e-166)
		tmp = y * z;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.8e+16], x, If[LessEqual[x, 1.28e-166], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.8e16 or 1.2800000000000001e-166 < x

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \sin y + x \cdot \cos y} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sin y \cdot z} + x \cdot \cos y \]

      3. fma-def 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\sin y, z, x \cdot \cos y\right)} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\sin y, z, x \cdot \cos y\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 53.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -1.8e16 < x < 1.2800000000000001e-166

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 49.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 49.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

   5. Simplified 49.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 33.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 46.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{+16}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.28 \cdot 10^{-166}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 52.2% accurate, 41.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 53.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 53.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

5. Simplified 53.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

6. Final simplification 53.9%

   \[\leadsto x + y \cdot z \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 38.2% accurate, 207.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \sin y + x \cdot \cos y} \]

   2. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sin y \cdot z} + x \cdot \cos y \]

   3. fma-def 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\sin y, z, x \cdot \cos y\right)} \]

4. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\sin y, z, x \cdot \cos y\right)} \]

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 42.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

6. Final simplification 42.9%

   \[\leadsto x \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024021 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.ThreeD.Transform:aboutY from diagrams-lib-1.3.0.3"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (* x (cos y)) (* z (sin y))))