Linear.V4:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, C

Percentage Accurate: 95.9% → 98.3%

Time: 12.4s

Alternatives: 16

Speedup: 0.4×

• 41.2% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b)) + Float64(c * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 95.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b)) + Float64(c * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.3% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right) + c \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, z \cdot t + \left(a \cdot b + x \cdot y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (+ (+ (* a b) (+ (* x y) (* z t))) (* c i)) INFINITY)
   (fma c i (+ (* z t) (+ (* a b) (* x y))))
   (fma z t (fma a b (* c i)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))) + (c * i)) <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = fma(c, i, ((z * t) + ((a * b) + (x * y))));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(z, t, fma(a, b, (c * i)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))) + Float64(c * i)) <= Inf)
		tmp = fma(c, i, Float64(Float64(z * t) + Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(x * y))));
	else
		tmp = fma(z, t, fma(a, b, Float64(c * i)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], Infinity], N[(c * i + N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * t + N[(a * b + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-udef 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      2. fma-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, a \cdot b + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      3. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot t}\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot t}\right) \]

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 45.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ 45.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) + t \cdot z} \]

      2. fma-udef 63.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right)} + t \cdot z \]

      3. *-commutative 63.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right) + \color{blue}{z \cdot t} \]

      4. +-commutative 63.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t + \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right)} \]

      5. fma-def 72.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 72.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right) + c \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, z \cdot t + \left(a \cdot b + x \cdot y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.0% accurate, 0.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (fma c i (fma x y (fma z t (* a b)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return fma(c, i, fma(x, y, fma(z, t, (a * b))));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return fma(c, i, fma(x, y, fma(z, t, Float64(a * b))))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(c * i + N[(x * y + N[(z * t + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.7%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   2. fma-def 96.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. associate-+l+ 96.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   4. fma-def 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   5. fma-def 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)\right)\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 97.8% accurate, 0.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (fma c i (fma a b (fma x y (* z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return fma(c, i, fma(a, b, fma(x, y, (z * t))));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return fma(c, i, fma(a, b, fma(x, y, Float64(z * t))))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(c * i + N[(a * b + N[(x * y + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.7%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   2. fma-def 96.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. +-commutative 96.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   4. fma-def 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   5. fma-def 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 97.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 97.6%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 97.8% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right) + c \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, z \cdot t + \left(a \cdot b + x \cdot y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (+ (+ (* a b) (+ (* x y) (* z t))) (* c i)) INFINITY)
   (fma c i (+ (* z t) (+ (* a b) (* x y))))
   (fma c i (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))) + (c * i)) <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = fma(c, i, ((z * t) + ((a * b) + (x * y))));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(c, i, (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))) + Float64(c * i)) <= Inf)
		tmp = fma(c, i, Float64(Float64(z * t) + Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(x * y))));
	else
		tmp = fma(c, i, Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], Infinity], N[(c * i + N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(c * i + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-udef 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      2. fma-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, a \cdot b + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      3. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot t}\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot t}\right) \]

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-def 9.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 9.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-def 18.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-def 45.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 45.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-udef 36.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      2. fma-def 9.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, a \cdot b + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      3. associate-+r+ 9.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot t}\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 9.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot t}\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around inf 64.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right) + c \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, z \cdot t + \left(a \cdot b + x \cdot y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 97.8% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right) + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_1 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (+ (* a b) (+ (* x y) (* z t))) (* c i))))
   (if (<= t_1 INFINITY) t_1 (fma c i (* z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))) + (c * i);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(c, i, (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))) + Float64(c * i))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = fma(c, i, Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, Infinity], t$95$1, N[(c * i + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-def 9.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 9.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-def 18.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-def 45.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 45.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-udef 36.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      2. fma-def 9.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, a \cdot b + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      3. associate-+r+ 9.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot t}\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 9.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot t}\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around inf 64.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right) + c \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right) + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 97.5% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right) + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_1 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (+ (* a b) (+ (* x y) (* z t))) (* c i))))
   (if (<= t_1 INFINITY) t_1 (+ (* c i) (* z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))) + (c * i);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))) + (c * i);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))) + (c * i)
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= math.inf:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))) + Float64(c * i))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))) + (c * i);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, Infinity], t$95$1, N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 27.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 55.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right) + c \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right) + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 42.3% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -3 \cdot 10^{-18}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 10^{-174}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 4.1 \cdot 10^{+181}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* c i) -3e-18)
   (* c i)
   (if (<= (* c i) 0.0)
     (* z t)
     (if (<= (* c i) 1e-174)
       (* a b)
       (if (<= (* c i) 4.1e+181) (* z t) (* c i))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -3e-18) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else if ((c * i) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else if ((c * i) <= 1e-174) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((c * i) <= 4.1e+181) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = c * i;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((c * i) <= (-3d-18)) then
        tmp = c * i
    else if ((c * i) <= 0.0d0) then
        tmp = z * t
    else if ((c * i) <= 1d-174) then
        tmp = a * b
    else if ((c * i) <= 4.1d+181) then
        tmp = z * t
    else
        tmp = c * i
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -3e-18) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else if ((c * i) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else if ((c * i) <= 1e-174) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((c * i) <= 4.1e+181) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = c * i;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (c * i) <= -3e-18:
		tmp = c * i
	elif (c * i) <= 0.0:
		tmp = z * t
	elif (c * i) <= 1e-174:
		tmp = a * b
	elif (c * i) <= 4.1e+181:
		tmp = z * t
	else:
		tmp = c * i
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(c * i) <= -3e-18)
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= 0.0)
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= 1e-174)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= 4.1e+181)
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c * i) <= -3e-18)
		tmp = c * i;
	elseif ((c * i) <= 0.0)
		tmp = z * t;
	elseif ((c * i) <= 1e-174)
		tmp = a * b;
	elseif ((c * i) <= 4.1e+181)
		tmp = z * t;
	else
		tmp = c * i;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -3e-18], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 0.0], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 1e-174], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 4.1e+181], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -2.99999999999999983e-18 or 4.10000000000000018e181 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 95.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around inf 64.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]

   if -2.99999999999999983e-18 < (*.f64 c i) < 0.0 or 1e-174 < (*.f64 c i) < 4.10000000000000018e181

   1. Initial program 95.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 71.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + t \cdot z\right)} + c \cdot i \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 71.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + a \cdot b\right)} + c \cdot i \]

      2. *-commutative 71.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot t} + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

      3. fma-def 72.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)} + c \cdot i \]

   5. Simplified 72.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)} + c \cdot i \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 43.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if 0.0 < (*.f64 c i) < 1e-174

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 73.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + t \cdot z\right)} + c \cdot i \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 73.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + a \cdot b\right)} + c \cdot i \]

      2. *-commutative 73.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot t} + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

      3. fma-def 73.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)} + c \cdot i \]

   5. Simplified 73.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)} + c \cdot i \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around inf 73.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 52.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -3 \cdot 10^{-18}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 10^{-174}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 4.1 \cdot 10^{+181}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 84.9% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -3.7 \cdot 10^{+93} \lor \neg \left(a \cdot b \leq 1.08 \cdot 10^{+175}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* a b) -3.7e+93) (not (<= (* a b) 1.08e+175)))
   (+ (* a b) (* z t))
   (+ (* c i) (+ (* x y) (* z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((a * b) <= -3.7e+93) || !((a * b) <= 1.08e+175)) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((a * b) <= (-3.7d+93)) .or. (.not. ((a * b) <= 1.08d+175))) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    else
        tmp = (c * i) + ((x * y) + (z * t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((a * b) <= -3.7e+93) || !((a * b) <= 1.08e+175)) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((a * b) <= -3.7e+93) or not ((a * b) <= 1.08e+175):
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	else:
		tmp = (c * i) + ((x * y) + (z * t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(a * b) <= -3.7e+93) || !(Float64(a * b) <= 1.08e+175))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((a * b) <= -3.7e+93) || ~(((a * b) <= 1.08e+175)))
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	else
		tmp = (c * i) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -3.7e+93], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 1.08e+175]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -3.69999999999999987e93 or 1.08e175 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 86.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 86.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + t \cdot z\right)} + c \cdot i \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 86.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + a \cdot b\right)} + c \cdot i \]

      2. *-commutative 86.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot t} + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

      3. fma-def 88.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)} + c \cdot i \]

   5. Simplified 88.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)} + c \cdot i \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 86.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]

   if -3.69999999999999987e93 < (*.f64 a b) < 1.08e175

   1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 90.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -3.7 \cdot 10^{+93} \lor \neg \left(a \cdot b \leq 1.08 \cdot 10^{+175}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 88.3% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -2.5 \cdot 10^{-7} \lor \neg \left(a \cdot b \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{+38}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* a b) -2.5e-7) (not (<= (* a b) 2.5e+38)))
   (+ (* c i) (+ (* a b) (* z t)))
   (+ (* c i) (+ (* x y) (* z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((a * b) <= -2.5e-7) || !((a * b) <= 2.5e+38)) {
		tmp = (c * i) + ((a * b) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((a * b) <= (-2.5d-7)) .or. (.not. ((a * b) <= 2.5d+38))) then
        tmp = (c * i) + ((a * b) + (z * t))
    else
        tmp = (c * i) + ((x * y) + (z * t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((a * b) <= -2.5e-7) || !((a * b) <= 2.5e+38)) {
		tmp = (c * i) + ((a * b) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((a * b) <= -2.5e-7) or not ((a * b) <= 2.5e+38):
		tmp = (c * i) + ((a * b) + (z * t))
	else:
		tmp = (c * i) + ((x * y) + (z * t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(a * b) <= -2.5e-7) || !(Float64(a * b) <= 2.5e+38))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((a * b) <= -2.5e-7) || ~(((a * b) <= 2.5e+38)))
		tmp = (c * i) + ((a * b) + (z * t));
	else
		tmp = (c * i) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -2.5e-7], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 2.5e+38]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -2.49999999999999989e-7 or 2.49999999999999985e38 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 92.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 85.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z} + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   if -2.49999999999999989e-7 < (*.f64 a b) < 2.49999999999999985e38

   1. Initial program 98.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 95.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -2.5 \cdot 10^{-7} \lor \neg \left(a \cdot b \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{+38}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 88.7% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot t \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+50} \lor \neg \left(z \cdot t \leq 10^{+71}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + x \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* z t) -2e+50) (not (<= (* z t) 1e+71)))
   (+ (* c i) (+ (* a b) (* z t)))
   (+ (* c i) (+ (* a b) (* x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((z * t) <= -2e+50) || !((z * t) <= 1e+71)) {
		tmp = (c * i) + ((a * b) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + ((a * b) + (x * y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((z * t) <= (-2d+50)) .or. (.not. ((z * t) <= 1d+71))) then
        tmp = (c * i) + ((a * b) + (z * t))
    else
        tmp = (c * i) + ((a * b) + (x * y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((z * t) <= -2e+50) || !((z * t) <= 1e+71)) {
		tmp = (c * i) + ((a * b) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + ((a * b) + (x * y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((z * t) <= -2e+50) or not ((z * t) <= 1e+71):
		tmp = (c * i) + ((a * b) + (z * t))
	else:
		tmp = (c * i) + ((a * b) + (x * y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(z * t) <= -2e+50) || !(Float64(z * t) <= 1e+71))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(x * y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((z * t) <= -2e+50) || ~(((z * t) <= 1e+71)))
		tmp = (c * i) + ((a * b) + (z * t));
	else
		tmp = (c * i) + ((a * b) + (x * y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], -2e+50], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], 1e+71]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z t) < -2.0000000000000002e50 or 1e71 < (*.f64 z t)

   1. Initial program 91.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z} + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   if -2.0000000000000002e50 < (*.f64 z t) < 1e71

   1. Initial program 98.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 96.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot t \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+50} \lor \neg \left(z \cdot t \leq 10^{+71}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + x \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 63.1% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2.05 \cdot 10^{+148} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{+140}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -2.05e+148) (not (<= (* x y) 3.2e+140)))
   (* x y)
   (+ (* a b) (* c i))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -2.05e+148) || !((x * y) <= 3.2e+140)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * y) <= (-2.05d+148)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= 3.2d+140))) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -2.05e+148) || !((x * y) <= 3.2e+140)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -2.05e+148) or not ((x * y) <= 3.2e+140):
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -2.05e+148) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 3.2e+140))
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -2.05e+148) || ~(((x * y) <= 3.2e+140)))
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -2.05e+148], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 3.2e+140]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -2.0499999999999999e148 or 3.20000000000000011e140 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 91.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 87.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in t around 0 75.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + x \cdot y} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 69.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -2.0499999999999999e148 < (*.f64 x y) < 3.20000000000000011e140

   1. Initial program 97.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 59.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} + c \cdot i \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 62.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2.05 \cdot 10^{+148} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{+140}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 64.7% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -8.6 \cdot 10^{-19} \lor \neg \left(c \cdot i \leq 5.9 \cdot 10^{+181}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* c i) -8.6e-19) (not (<= (* c i) 5.9e+181)))
   (+ (* a b) (* c i))
   (+ (* a b) (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((c * i) <= -8.6e-19) || !((c * i) <= 5.9e+181)) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((c * i) <= (-8.6d-19)) .or. (.not. ((c * i) <= 5.9d+181))) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((c * i) <= -8.6e-19) || !((c * i) <= 5.9e+181)) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((c * i) <= -8.6e-19) or not ((c * i) <= 5.9e+181):
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(c * i) <= -8.6e-19) || !(Float64(c * i) <= 5.9e+181))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((c * i) <= -8.6e-19) || ~(((c * i) <= 5.9e+181)))
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -8.6e-19], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 5.9e+181]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -8.6e-19 or 5.8999999999999997e181 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 95.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 70.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} + c \cdot i \]

   if -8.6e-19 < (*.f64 c i) < 5.8999999999999997e181

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 71.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + t \cdot z\right)} + c \cdot i \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 71.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + a \cdot b\right)} + c \cdot i \]

      2. *-commutative 71.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot t} + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

      3. fma-def 72.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)} + c \cdot i \]

   5. Simplified 72.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)} + c \cdot i \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 66.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 67.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -8.6 \cdot 10^{-19} \lor \neg \left(c \cdot i \leq 5.9 \cdot 10^{+181}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 64.9% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{-18}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 4.1 \cdot 10^{+181}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* c i) -2.6e-18)
   (+ (* c i) (* z t))
   (if (<= (* c i) 4.1e+181) (+ (* a b) (* z t)) (+ (* a b) (* c i)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -2.6e-18) {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	} else if ((c * i) <= 4.1e+181) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((c * i) <= (-2.6d-18)) then
        tmp = (c * i) + (z * t)
    else if ((c * i) <= 4.1d+181) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -2.6e-18) {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	} else if ((c * i) <= 4.1e+181) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (c * i) <= -2.6e-18:
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t)
	elif (c * i) <= 4.1e+181:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(c * i) <= -2.6e-18)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * t));
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= 4.1e+181)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c * i) <= -2.6e-18)
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	elseif ((c * i) <= 4.1e+181)
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -2.6e-18], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 4.1e+181], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -2.6e-18

   1. Initial program 94.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 91.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 73.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + t \cdot z} \]

   if -2.6e-18 < (*.f64 c i) < 4.10000000000000018e181

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 71.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + t \cdot z\right)} + c \cdot i \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 71.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + a \cdot b\right)} + c \cdot i \]

      2. *-commutative 71.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot t} + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

      3. fma-def 72.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)} + c \cdot i \]

   5. Simplified 72.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)} + c \cdot i \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 66.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]

   if 4.10000000000000018e181 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 96.2%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 88.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} + c \cdot i \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 70.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{-18}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 4.1 \cdot 10^{+181}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 65.4% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -3 \cdot 10^{-18}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 3.9 \cdot 10^{+181}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* c i) -3e-18)
   (+ (* x y) (* c i))
   (if (<= (* c i) 3.9e+181) (+ (* a b) (* z t)) (+ (* a b) (* c i)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -3e-18) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	} else if ((c * i) <= 3.9e+181) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((c * i) <= (-3d-18)) then
        tmp = (x * y) + (c * i)
    else if ((c * i) <= 3.9d+181) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -3e-18) {
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	} else if ((c * i) <= 3.9e+181) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (c * i) <= -3e-18:
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i)
	elif (c * i) <= 3.9e+181:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(c * i) <= -3e-18)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(c * i));
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= 3.9e+181)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c * i) <= -3e-18)
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	elseif ((c * i) <= 3.9e+181)
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -3e-18], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 3.9e+181], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -2.99999999999999983e-18

   1. Initial program 94.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 91.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in t around 0 78.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + x \cdot y} \]

   if -2.99999999999999983e-18 < (*.f64 c i) < 3.9e181

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 71.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + t \cdot z\right)} + c \cdot i \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 71.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + a \cdot b\right)} + c \cdot i \]

      2. *-commutative 71.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot t} + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

      3. fma-def 72.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)} + c \cdot i \]

   5. Simplified 72.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)} + c \cdot i \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 66.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]

   if 3.9e181 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 96.2%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 88.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} + c \cdot i \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 71.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -3 \cdot 10^{-18}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 3.9 \cdot 10^{+181}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 15: 42.8% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -2.8 \cdot 10^{-18} \lor \neg \left(c \cdot i \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{+125}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* c i) -2.8e-18) (not (<= (* c i) 1.2e+125))) (* c i) (* a b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((c * i) <= -2.8e-18) || !((c * i) <= 1.2e+125)) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((c * i) <= (-2.8d-18)) .or. (.not. ((c * i) <= 1.2d+125))) then
        tmp = c * i
    else
        tmp = a * b
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((c * i) <= -2.8e-18) || !((c * i) <= 1.2e+125)) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((c * i) <= -2.8e-18) or not ((c * i) <= 1.2e+125):
		tmp = c * i
	else:
		tmp = a * b
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(c * i) <= -2.8e-18) || !(Float64(c * i) <= 1.2e+125))
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((c * i) <= -2.8e-18) || ~(((c * i) <= 1.2e+125)))
		tmp = c * i;
	else
		tmp = a * b;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -2.8e-18], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 1.2e+125]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -2.80000000000000012e-18 or 1.2e125 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 94.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around inf 60.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]

   if -2.80000000000000012e-18 < (*.f64 c i) < 1.2e125

   1. Initial program 96.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 71.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + t \cdot z\right)} + c \cdot i \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 71.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + a \cdot b\right)} + c \cdot i \]

      2. *-commutative 71.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot t} + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

      3. fma-def 71.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)} + c \cdot i \]

   5. Simplified 71.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)} + c \cdot i \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around inf 31.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 42.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -2.8 \cdot 10^{-18} \lor \neg \left(c \cdot i \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{+125}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 16: 27.1% accurate, 5.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i) :precision binary64 (* a b))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return a * b;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = a * b
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return a * b;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return a * b

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(a * b)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = a * b;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.7%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 75.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + t \cdot z\right)} + c \cdot i \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 75.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + a \cdot b\right)} + c \cdot i \]

   2. *-commutative 75.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot t} + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   3. fma-def 75.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)} + c \cdot i \]

5. Simplified 75.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)} + c \cdot i \]

6. Taylor expanded in a around inf 25.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]

7. Final simplification 25.0%

   \[\leadsto a \cdot b \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024021 
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
  :name "Linear.V4:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, C"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))