Diagrams.TwoD.Apollonian:descartes from diagrams-contrib-1.3.0.5

Percentage Accurate: 70.4% → 98.1%

Time: 15.6s

Alternatives: 11

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (+ (* x y) (* x z)) (* y z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(x * z)) + Float64(y * z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 70.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (+ (* x y) (* x z)) (* y z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(x * z)) + Float64(y * z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.1% accurate, 0.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{+210}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(-x\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{y}\right)\right)}\right)}^{2}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{-282}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot {\left({\left({\left(\sqrt[3]{x}\right)}^{2}\right)}^{0.25} \cdot {\left(\sqrt[3]{x} \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)}^{0.25}\right)}^{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -6.5e+210)
   (* 2.0 (pow (exp (* 0.25 (- (log (- x)) (log (/ -1.0 y))))) 2.0))
   (if (<= y 4.4e-282)
     (*
      2.0
      (pow
       (* (pow (pow (cbrt x) 2.0) 0.25) (pow (* (cbrt x) (+ y z)) 0.25))
       2.0))
     (* 2.0 (* (sqrt (+ y x)) (sqrt z))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -6.5e+210) {
		tmp = 2.0 * pow(exp((0.25 * (log(-x) - log((-1.0 / y))))), 2.0);
	} else if (y <= 4.4e-282) {
		tmp = 2.0 * pow((pow(pow(cbrt(x), 2.0), 0.25) * pow((cbrt(x) * (y + z)), 0.25)), 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt((y + x)) * sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -6.5e+210) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.pow(Math.exp((0.25 * (Math.log(-x) - Math.log((-1.0 / y))))), 2.0);
	} else if (y <= 4.4e-282) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.pow((Math.pow(Math.pow(Math.cbrt(x), 2.0), 0.25) * Math.pow((Math.cbrt(x) * (y + z)), 0.25)), 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (Math.sqrt((y + x)) * Math.sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -6.5e+210)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * (exp(Float64(0.25 * Float64(log(Float64(-x)) - log(Float64(-1.0 / y))))) ^ 2.0));
	elseif (y <= 4.4e-282)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * (Float64(((cbrt(x) ^ 2.0) ^ 0.25) * (Float64(cbrt(x) * Float64(y + z)) ^ 0.25)) ^ 2.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(y + x)) * sqrt(z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -6.5e+210], N[(2.0 * N[Power[N[Exp[N[(0.25 * N[(N[Log[(-x)], $MachinePrecision] - N[Log[N[(-1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 4.4e-282], N[(2.0 * N[Power[N[(N[Power[N[Power[N[Power[x, 1/3], $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision], 0.25], $MachinePrecision] * N[Power[N[(N[Power[x, 1/3], $MachinePrecision] * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 0.25], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -6.4999999999999996e210

   1. Initial program 36.5%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 36.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 36.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 36.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 36.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 36.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 36.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 36.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z}} \]

      4. +-commutative 36.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + y \cdot z} \]

      5. associate-+r+ 36.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      6. *-commutative 36.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      7. distribute-lft-in 36.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)}} \]

      8. fma-udef 37.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}} \]

      9. add-sqr-sqrt 37.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}} \cdot \sqrt{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}}\right)} \]

      10. pow2 37.4%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}}\right)}^{2}} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 37.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)\right)}^{0.25}\right)}^{2}} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in x around inf 0.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(y + z\right) + -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{x}\right)\right)}\right)}}^{2} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(e^{\color{blue}{\left(\log \left(y + z\right) + -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{x}\right)\right) \cdot 0.25}}\right)}^{2} \]

      2. exp-prod 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left({\left(e^{\log \left(y + z\right) + -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{x}\right)}\right)}^{0.25}\right)}}^{2} \]

      3. mul-1-neg 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(e^{\log \left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{x}\right)\right)}}\right)}^{0.25}\right)}^{2} \]

      4. log-rec 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(e^{\log \left(y + z\right) + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-\log x\right)}\right)}\right)}^{0.25}\right)}^{2} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(e^{\log \left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\log x}}\right)}^{0.25}\right)}^{2} \]

      6. log-prod 14.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(\left(y + z\right) \cdot x\right)}}\right)}^{0.25}\right)}^{2} \]

      7. rem-exp-log 16.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) \cdot x\right)}}^{0.25}\right)}^{2} \]

      8. *-commutative 16.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)}}^{0.25}\right)}^{2} \]

      9. +-commutative 16.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + y\right)}\right)}^{0.25}\right)}^{2} \]

   9. Simplified 16.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left({\left(x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\right)}^{0.25}\right)}}^{2} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in y around -inf 35.4%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(-1 \cdot x\right) + -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1}{y}\right)\right)}\right)}}^{2} \]

   if -6.4999999999999996e210 < y < 4.39999999999999962e-282

   1. Initial program 81.3%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 81.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 81.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 81.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 81.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 81.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 81.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 81.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z}} \]

      4. +-commutative 81.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + y \cdot z} \]

      5. associate-+r+ 81.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      6. *-commutative 81.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      7. distribute-lft-in 81.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)}} \]

      8. fma-udef 81.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}} \]

      9. add-sqr-sqrt 80.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}} \cdot \sqrt{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}}\right)} \]

      10. pow2 80.8%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}}\right)}^{2}} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 80.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)\right)}^{0.25}\right)}^{2}} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in x around inf 22.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(y + z\right) + -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{x}\right)\right)}\right)}}^{2} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 22.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(e^{\color{blue}{\left(\log \left(y + z\right) + -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{x}\right)\right) \cdot 0.25}}\right)}^{2} \]

      2. exp-prod 18.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left({\left(e^{\log \left(y + z\right) + -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{x}\right)}\right)}^{0.25}\right)}}^{2} \]

      3. mul-1-neg 18.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(e^{\log \left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{x}\right)\right)}}\right)}^{0.25}\right)}^{2} \]

      4. log-rec 18.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(e^{\log \left(y + z\right) + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-\log x\right)}\right)}\right)}^{0.25}\right)}^{2} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 18.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(e^{\log \left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\log x}}\right)}^{0.25}\right)}^{2} \]

      6. log-prod 55.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(\left(y + z\right) \cdot x\right)}}\right)}^{0.25}\right)}^{2} \]

      7. rem-exp-log 59.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) \cdot x\right)}}^{0.25}\right)}^{2} \]

      8. *-commutative 59.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)}}^{0.25}\right)}^{2} \]

      9. +-commutative 59.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + y\right)}\right)}^{0.25}\right)}^{2} \]

   9. Simplified 59.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left({\left(x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\right)}^{0.25}\right)}}^{2} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. add-cube-cbrt 58.8%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(\sqrt[3]{x} \cdot \sqrt[3]{x}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{x}\right)} \cdot \left(z + y\right)\right)}^{0.25}\right)}^{2} \]

       2. unpow2 58.8%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(\left(\color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{x}\right)}^{2}} \cdot \sqrt[3]{x}\right) \cdot \left(z + y\right)\right)}^{0.25}\right)}^{2} \]

       3. +-commutative 58.8%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(\left({\left(\sqrt[3]{x}\right)}^{2} \cdot \sqrt[3]{x}\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right)}^{0.25}\right)}^{2} \]

       4. associate-*r* 58.9%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\color{blue}{\left({\left(\sqrt[3]{x}\right)}^{2} \cdot \left(\sqrt[3]{x} \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)\right)}}^{0.25}\right)}^{2} \]

       5. unpow-prod-down 69.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left({\left({\left(\sqrt[3]{x}\right)}^{2}\right)}^{0.25} \cdot {\left(\sqrt[3]{x} \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)}^{0.25}\right)}}^{2} \]

   11. Applied egg-rr 69.3%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left({\left({\left(\sqrt[3]{x}\right)}^{2}\right)}^{0.25} \cdot {\left(\sqrt[3]{x} \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)}^{0.25}\right)}}^{2} \]
   12. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative 69.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left({\left(\sqrt[3]{x}\right)}^{2}\right)}^{0.25} \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{x}\right)}}^{0.25}\right)}^{2} \]

   13. Simplified 69.3%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left({\left({\left(\sqrt[3]{x}\right)}^{2}\right)}^{0.25} \cdot {\left(\left(y + z\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{x}\right)}^{0.25}\right)}}^{2} \]

   if 4.39999999999999962e-282 < y

   1. Initial program 70.2%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 70.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 70.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 70.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 70.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 52.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 52.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)}} \]

   7. Simplified 52.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sqrt-prod 55.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y + x}\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 55.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 55.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 59.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{+210}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(-x\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{y}\right)\right)}\right)}^{2}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{-282}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot {\left({\left({\left(\sqrt[3]{x}\right)}^{2}\right)}^{0.25} \cdot {\left(\sqrt[3]{x} \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)}^{0.25}\right)}^{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 94.3% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.7 \cdot 10^{+49}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25}\right)}^{\left(2 \cdot \left(\log \left(\left(-z\right) - y\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-243}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(y + x\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -1.7e+49)
   (* 2.0 (pow (exp 0.25) (* 2.0 (- (log (- (- z) y)) (log (/ -1.0 x))))))
   (if (<= y 4.2e-243)
     (* 2.0 (sqrt (fma x y (* z (+ y x)))))
     (* 2.0 (* (sqrt (+ y x)) (sqrt z))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.7e+49) {
		tmp = 2.0 * pow(exp(0.25), (2.0 * (log((-z - y)) - log((-1.0 / x)))));
	} else if (y <= 4.2e-243) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(fma(x, y, (z * (y + x))));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt((y + x)) * sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.7e+49)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * (exp(0.25) ^ Float64(2.0 * Float64(log(Float64(Float64(-z) - y)) - log(Float64(-1.0 / x))))));
	elseif (y <= 4.2e-243)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(fma(x, y, Float64(z * Float64(y + x)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(y + x)) * sqrt(z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -1.7e+49], N[(2.0 * N[Power[N[Exp[0.25], $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Log[N[((-z) - y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Log[N[(-1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 4.2e-243], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * y + N[(z * N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -1.7e49

   1. Initial program 55.1%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 55.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 55.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 55.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 55.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 55.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 55.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 55.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z}} \]

      4. +-commutative 55.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + y \cdot z} \]

      5. associate-+r+ 55.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      6. *-commutative 55.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      7. distribute-lft-in 55.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)}} \]

      8. fma-udef 55.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}} \]

      9. add-sqr-sqrt 55.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}} \cdot \sqrt{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}}\right)} \]

      10. pow2 55.2%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}}\right)}^{2}} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 55.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)\right)}^{0.25}\right)}^{2}} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in x around -inf 39.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(-1 \cdot y + -1 \cdot z\right) + -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}\right)}^{2}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 39.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(-1 \cdot y + -1 \cdot z\right) + -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)} \cdot e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(-1 \cdot y + -1 \cdot z\right) + -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}\right)} \]

      2. exp-prod 38.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{{\left(e^{0.25}\right)}^{\left(\log \left(-1 \cdot y + -1 \cdot z\right) + -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}} \cdot e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(-1 \cdot y + -1 \cdot z\right) + -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}\right) \]

      3. exp-prod 37.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left({\left(e^{0.25}\right)}^{\left(\log \left(-1 \cdot y + -1 \cdot z\right) + -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)} \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(e^{0.25}\right)}^{\left(\log \left(-1 \cdot y + -1 \cdot z\right) + -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}}\right) \]

      4. pow-sqr 37.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(e^{0.25}\right)}^{\left(2 \cdot \left(\log \left(-1 \cdot y + -1 \cdot z\right) + -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)\right)}} \]

      5. mul-1-neg 37.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25}\right)}^{\left(2 \cdot \left(\log \left(-1 \cdot y + -1 \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}\right)\right)} \]

      6. unsub-neg 37.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25}\right)}^{\left(2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(-1 \cdot y + -1 \cdot z\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}\right)} \]

      7. mul-1-neg 37.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25}\right)}^{\left(2 \cdot \left(\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + -1 \cdot z\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)\right)} \]

      8. +-commutative 37.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25}\right)}^{\left(2 \cdot \left(\log \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z + \left(-y\right)\right)} - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)\right)} \]

      9. unsub-neg 37.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25}\right)}^{\left(2 \cdot \left(\log \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z - y\right)} - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)\right)} \]

      10. mul-1-neg 37.7%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25}\right)}^{\left(2 \cdot \left(\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} - y\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   9. Simplified 37.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(e^{0.25}\right)}^{\left(2 \cdot \left(\log \left(\left(-z\right) - y\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)\right)}} \]

   if -1.7e49 < y < 4.2000000000000002e-243

   1. Initial program 85.3%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 85.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. *-commutative 85.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 85.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 85.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 85.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

      6. +-commutative 85.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 85.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 85.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      9. *-commutative 85.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      10. +-commutative 85.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]

      11. +-commutative 85.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)}} \]

      12. *-commutative 85.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot z} + \left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      13. associate-+r+ 85.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y}} \]

      14. *-commutative 85.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot y} + x \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y} \]

      15. *-commutative 85.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(z \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot x}\right) + x \cdot y} \]

      16. +-commutative 85.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

      17. fma-def 85.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 85.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 4.2000000000000002e-243 < y

   1. Initial program 69.4%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 69.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 69.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 69.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 69.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 50.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 50.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)}} \]

   7. Simplified 50.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sqrt-prod 56.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y + x}\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 56.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 56.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 61.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.7 \cdot 10^{+49}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25}\right)}^{\left(2 \cdot \left(\log \left(\left(-z\right) - y\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-243}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(y + x\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 95.0% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4.6 \cdot 10^{+50}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(-x\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{y}\right)\right)}\right)}^{2}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-243}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(y + x\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -4.6e+50)
   (* 2.0 (pow (exp (* 0.25 (- (log (- x)) (log (/ -1.0 y))))) 2.0))
   (if (<= y 4.2e-243)
     (* 2.0 (sqrt (fma x y (* z (+ y x)))))
     (* 2.0 (* (sqrt (+ y x)) (sqrt z))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -4.6e+50) {
		tmp = 2.0 * pow(exp((0.25 * (log(-x) - log((-1.0 / y))))), 2.0);
	} else if (y <= 4.2e-243) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(fma(x, y, (z * (y + x))));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt((y + x)) * sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -4.6e+50)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * (exp(Float64(0.25 * Float64(log(Float64(-x)) - log(Float64(-1.0 / y))))) ^ 2.0));
	elseif (y <= 4.2e-243)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(fma(x, y, Float64(z * Float64(y + x)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(y + x)) * sqrt(z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -4.6e+50], N[(2.0 * N[Power[N[Exp[N[(0.25 * N[(N[Log[(-x)], $MachinePrecision] - N[Log[N[(-1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 4.2e-243], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * y + N[(z * N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -4.59999999999999994e50

   1. Initial program 55.1%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 55.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 55.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 55.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 55.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 55.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 55.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 55.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z}} \]

      4. +-commutative 55.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + y \cdot z} \]

      5. associate-+r+ 55.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      6. *-commutative 55.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      7. distribute-lft-in 55.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)}} \]

      8. fma-udef 55.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}} \]

      9. add-sqr-sqrt 55.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}} \cdot \sqrt{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}}\right)} \]

      10. pow2 55.2%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}}\right)}^{2}} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 55.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)\right)}^{0.25}\right)}^{2}} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in x around inf 0.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(y + z\right) + -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{x}\right)\right)}\right)}}^{2} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(e^{\color{blue}{\left(\log \left(y + z\right) + -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{x}\right)\right) \cdot 0.25}}\right)}^{2} \]

      2. exp-prod 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left({\left(e^{\log \left(y + z\right) + -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{x}\right)}\right)}^{0.25}\right)}}^{2} \]

      3. mul-1-neg 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(e^{\log \left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{x}\right)\right)}}\right)}^{0.25}\right)}^{2} \]

      4. log-rec 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(e^{\log \left(y + z\right) + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-\log x\right)}\right)}\right)}^{0.25}\right)}^{2} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(e^{\log \left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\log x}}\right)}^{0.25}\right)}^{2} \]

      6. log-prod 23.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(\left(y + z\right) \cdot x\right)}}\right)}^{0.25}\right)}^{2} \]

      7. rem-exp-log 26.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) \cdot x\right)}}^{0.25}\right)}^{2} \]

      8. *-commutative 26.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)}}^{0.25}\right)}^{2} \]

      9. +-commutative 26.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\left(x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + y\right)}\right)}^{0.25}\right)}^{2} \]

   9. Simplified 26.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left({\left(x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\right)}^{0.25}\right)}}^{2} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in y around -inf 34.9%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(-1 \cdot x\right) + -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1}{y}\right)\right)}\right)}}^{2} \]

   if -4.59999999999999994e50 < y < 4.2000000000000002e-243

   1. Initial program 85.3%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 85.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. *-commutative 85.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 85.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 85.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 85.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

      6. +-commutative 85.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 85.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 85.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      9. *-commutative 85.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      10. +-commutative 85.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]

      11. +-commutative 85.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)}} \]

      12. *-commutative 85.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot z} + \left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      13. associate-+r+ 85.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y}} \]

      14. *-commutative 85.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot y} + x \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y} \]

      15. *-commutative 85.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(z \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot x}\right) + x \cdot y} \]

      16. +-commutative 85.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

      17. fma-def 85.3%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 85.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 4.2000000000000002e-243 < y

   1. Initial program 69.4%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 69.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 69.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 69.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 69.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 50.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 50.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)}} \]

   7. Simplified 50.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sqrt-prod 56.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y + x}\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 56.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 56.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 61.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4.6 \cdot 10^{+50}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(-x\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{y}\right)\right)}\right)}^{2}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-243}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(y + x\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 84.5% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-243}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 4.2e-243)
   (* 2.0 (sqrt (fma x z (* y (+ x z)))))
   (* 2.0 (* (sqrt (+ y x)) (sqrt z)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 4.2e-243) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(fma(x, z, (y * (x + z))));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt((y + x)) * sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 4.2e-243)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(fma(x, z, Float64(y * Float64(x + z)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(y + x)) * sqrt(z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 4.2e-243], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * z + N[(y * N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 4.2000000000000002e-243

   1. Initial program 73.5%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 73.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. *-commutative 73.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 73.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 73.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 73.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

      6. +-commutative 73.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]

      7. +-commutative 73.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 73.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot z} + z \cdot x\right)} \]

      9. *-commutative 73.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot z}\right)} \]

      10. associate-+l+ 73.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot z}} \]

      11. +-commutative 73.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      12. fma-def 73.5%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      13. distribute-lft-out 73.7%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 73.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 4.2000000000000002e-243 < y

   1. Initial program 69.4%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 69.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 69.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 69.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 69.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 50.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 50.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)}} \]

   7. Simplified 50.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sqrt-prod 56.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y + x}\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 56.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 56.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 65.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-243}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 84.8% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.02 \cdot 10^{-282}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 1.02e-282)
   (* 2.0 (sqrt (* x (+ y z))))
   (* 2.0 (* (sqrt (+ y x)) (sqrt z)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.02e-282) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt((y + x)) * sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 1.02d-282) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (sqrt((y + x)) * sqrt(z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.02e-282) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (Math.sqrt((y + x)) * Math.sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1.02e-282:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((x * (y + z)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * (math.sqrt((y + x)) * math.sqrt(z))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.02e-282)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(x * Float64(y + z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(y + x)) * sqrt(z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1.02e-282)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt((y + x)) * sqrt(z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1.02e-282], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.02e-282

   1. Initial program 73.0%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 73.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 73.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 73.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 73.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 51.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}} \]

   if 1.02e-282 < y

   1. Initial program 70.2%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 70.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 70.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 70.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 70.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 52.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 52.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)}} \]

   7. Simplified 52.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sqrt-prod 55.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y + x}\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 55.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 55.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 53.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.02 \cdot 10^{-282}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 83.3% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-243}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + y \cdot z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 4.2e-243)
   (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* x (+ y z)) (* y z))))
   (* 2.0 (* (sqrt z) (sqrt y)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 4.2e-243) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(((x * (y + z)) + (y * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt(z) * sqrt(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 4.2d-243) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt(((x * (y + z)) + (y * z)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (sqrt(z) * sqrt(y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 4.2e-243) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt(((x * (y + z)) + (y * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (Math.sqrt(z) * Math.sqrt(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 4.2e-243:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt(((x * (y + z)) + (y * z)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * (math.sqrt(z) * math.sqrt(y))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 4.2e-243)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(x * Float64(y + z)) + Float64(y * z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(z) * sqrt(y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 4.2e-243)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(((x * (y + z)) + (y * z)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt(z) * sqrt(y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 4.2e-243], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 4.2000000000000002e-243

   1. Initial program 73.5%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 73.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + y \cdot z} \]

      2. *-commutative 73.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) \cdot x} + y \cdot z} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 73.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) \cdot x} + y \cdot z} \]

   if 4.2000000000000002e-243 < y

   1. Initial program 69.4%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 69.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + y \cdot z} \]

      2. *-commutative 69.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) \cdot x} + y \cdot z} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 69.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) \cdot x} + y \cdot z} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 29.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot z}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 29.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y}} \]

   7. Simplified 29.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{z \cdot y}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sqrt-prod 44.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 44.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 59.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-243}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + y \cdot z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 69.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{-282}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 4.4e-282) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* x (+ y z)))) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y z)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 4.4e-282) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 4.4d-282) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 4.4e-282) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 4.4e-282:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((x * (y + z)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * z))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 4.4e-282)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(x * Float64(y + z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 4.4e-282)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 4.4e-282], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 4.39999999999999962e-282

   1. Initial program 73.0%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 73.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 73.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 73.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 73.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 51.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}} \]

   if 4.39999999999999962e-282 < y

   1. Initial program 70.2%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 70.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 70.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 70.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 70.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 28.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot z}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 39.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{-282}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 70.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4 \cdot 10^{-275}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -4e-275) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* x (+ y z)))) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* z (+ y x))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -4e-275) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((z * (y + x)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-4d-275)) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((z * (y + x)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -4e-275) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((z * (y + x)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -4e-275:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((x * (y + z)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((z * (y + x)))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -4e-275)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(x * Float64(y + z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(z * Float64(y + x))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -4e-275)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((z * (y + x)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -4e-275], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(z * N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -3.99999999999999974e-275

   1. Initial program 72.9%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 72.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 72.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 72.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 72.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 49.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}} \]

   if -3.99999999999999974e-275 < y

   1. Initial program 70.4%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 70.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 70.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 70.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 70.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 53.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 53.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)}} \]

   7. Simplified 53.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 51.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4 \cdot 10^{-275}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 70.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* y x) (* z (+ y x))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))));
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))))
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))));
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))))

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(y * x) + Float64(z * Float64(y + x)))))
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))));
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 71.6%

   \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 71.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

   2. +-commutative 71.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

   3. distribute-rgt-in 71.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

3. Simplified 71.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 71.6%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 68.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-310}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -5e-310) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y x))) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y z)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -5e-310) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-5d-310)) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * x))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -5e-310) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * x));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -5e-310:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * x))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * z))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -5e-310)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * x)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -5e-310)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -5e-310], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -4.999999999999985e-310

   1. Initial program 72.9%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 72.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 72.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 72.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 72.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 20.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot y}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 20.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x}} \]

   7. Simplified 20.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot x}} \]

   if -4.999999999999985e-310 < y

   1. Initial program 70.3%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 70.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 70.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 70.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 70.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 27.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot z}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 24.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-310}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 36.2% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y x))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * x))
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * x));
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * x))

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * x)))
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 71.6%

   \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 71.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

   2. +-commutative 71.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

   3. distribute-rgt-in 71.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

3. Simplified 71.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 20.3%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot y}} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 20.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x}} \]

7. Simplified 20.3%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot x}} \]

8. Final simplification 20.3%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x} \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 82.9% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := 0.25 \cdot \left(\left({y}^{-0.75} \cdot \left({z}^{-0.75} \cdot x\right)\right) \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) + {z}^{0.25} \cdot {y}^{0.25}\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < 7.636950090573675 \cdot 10^{+176}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x + y\right) \cdot z + x \cdot y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(t_0 \cdot t_0\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0
         (+
          (* 0.25 (* (* (pow y -0.75) (* (pow z -0.75) x)) (+ y z)))
          (* (pow z 0.25) (pow y 0.25)))))
   (if (< z 7.636950090573675e+176)
     (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* (+ x y) z) (* x y))))
     (* (* t_0 t_0) 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (0.25 * ((pow(y, -0.75) * (pow(z, -0.75) * x)) * (y + z))) + (pow(z, 0.25) * pow(y, 0.25));
	double tmp;
	if (z < 7.636950090573675e+176) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)));
	} else {
		tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (0.25d0 * (((y ** (-0.75d0)) * ((z ** (-0.75d0)) * x)) * (y + z))) + ((z ** 0.25d0) * (y ** 0.25d0))
    if (z < 7.636950090573675d+176) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)))
    else
        tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (0.25 * ((Math.pow(y, -0.75) * (Math.pow(z, -0.75) * x)) * (y + z))) + (Math.pow(z, 0.25) * Math.pow(y, 0.25));
	double tmp;
	if (z < 7.636950090573675e+176) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)));
	} else {
		tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = (0.25 * ((math.pow(y, -0.75) * (math.pow(z, -0.75) * x)) * (y + z))) + (math.pow(z, 0.25) * math.pow(y, 0.25))
	tmp = 0
	if z < 7.636950090573675e+176:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)))
	else:
		tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(0.25 * Float64(Float64((y ^ -0.75) * Float64((z ^ -0.75) * x)) * Float64(y + z))) + Float64((z ^ 0.25) * (y ^ 0.25)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < 7.636950090573675e+176)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) * z) + Float64(x * y))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(t_0 * t_0) * 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = (0.25 * (((y ^ -0.75) * ((z ^ -0.75) * x)) * (y + z))) + ((z ^ 0.25) * (y ^ 0.25));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < 7.636950090573675e+176)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)));
	else
		tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(0.25 * N[(N[(N[Power[y, -0.75], $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Power[z, -0.75], $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Power[z, 0.25], $MachinePrecision] * N[Power[y, 0.25], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, 7.636950090573675e+176], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024021 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.TwoD.Apollonian:descartes from diagrams-contrib-1.3.0.5"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (if (< z 7.636950090573675e+176) (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* (+ x y) z) (* x y)))) (* (* (+ (* 0.25 (* (* (pow y -0.75) (* (pow z -0.75) x)) (+ y z))) (* (pow z 0.25) (pow y 0.25))) (+ (* 0.25 (* (* (pow y -0.75) (* (pow z -0.75) x)) (+ y z))) (* (pow z 0.25) (pow y 0.25)))) 2.0))

  (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (+ (* x y) (* x z)) (* y z)))))