Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:quartForm from diagrams-solve-0.1, B

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%
Time: 7.4s
Alternatives: 9
Speedup: 0.1×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (* (/ 1.0 8.0) x) (/ (* y z) 2.0)) t))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((1.0d0 / 8.0d0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0d0)) + t
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t
function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 / 8.0) * x) - Float64(Float64(y * z) / 2.0)) + t)
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(1.0 / 8.0), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 9 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (* (/ 1.0 8.0) x) (/ (* y z) 2.0)) t))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((1.0d0 / 8.0d0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0d0)) + t
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t
function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 / 8.0) * x) - Float64(Float64(y * z) / 2.0)) + t)
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(1.0 / 8.0), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot -0.5, \mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, t\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (fma z (* y -0.5) (fma 0.125 x t)))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(z, (y * -0.5), fma(0.125, x, t));
}
function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(z, Float64(y * -0.5), fma(0.125, x, t))
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(z * N[(y * -0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(0.125 * x + t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot -0.5, \mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, t\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.7%

    \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. sub-neg99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x + \left(-\frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right)\right)} + t \]
    2. +-commutative99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + \frac{1}{8} \cdot x\right)} + t \]
    3. associate-+l+99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + \left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x + t\right)} \]
    4. associate-/l*99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}}\right) + \left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x + t\right) \]
    5. distribute-frac-neg99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-y}{\frac{2}{z}}} + \left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x + t\right) \]
    6. associate-/r/100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-y}{2} \cdot z} + \left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x + t\right) \]
    7. *-commutative100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{-y}{2}} + \left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x + t\right) \]
    8. +-commutative100.0%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \frac{-y}{2} + \color{blue}{\left(t + \frac{1}{8} \cdot x\right)} \]
    9. fma-def100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{-y}{2}, t + \frac{1}{8} \cdot x\right)} \]
    10. neg-mul-1100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot y}}{2}, t + \frac{1}{8} \cdot x\right) \]
    11. associate-/l*100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{\frac{2}{y}}}, t + \frac{1}{8} \cdot x\right) \]
    12. associate-/r/100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{2} \cdot y}, t + \frac{1}{8} \cdot x\right) \]
    13. *-commutative100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{-1}{2}}, t + \frac{1}{8} \cdot x\right) \]
    14. metadata-eval100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \color{blue}{-0.5}, t + \frac{1}{8} \cdot x\right) \]
    15. +-commutative100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot -0.5, \color{blue}{\frac{1}{8} \cdot x + t}\right) \]
    16. fma-def100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot -0.5, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{8}, x, t\right)}\right) \]
    17. metadata-eval100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot -0.5, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{0.125}, x, t\right)\right) \]
  3. Simplified100.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot -0.5, \mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, t\right)\right)} \]
  4. Add Preprocessing
  5. Final simplification100.0%

    \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot -0.5, \mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, t\right)\right) \]
  6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ t + \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot -0.5, 0.125 \cdot x\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ t (fma y (* z -0.5) (* 0.125 x))))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t + fma(y, (z * -0.5), (0.125 * x));
}
function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(t + fma(y, Float64(z * -0.5), Float64(0.125 * x)))
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(t + N[(y * N[(z * -0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(0.125 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
t + \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot -0.5, 0.125 \cdot x\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.7%

    \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. metadata-eval99.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{0.125} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
    2. associate-/l*99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.125 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}}\right) + t \]
  3. Simplified99.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) + t} \]
  4. Add Preprocessing
  5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + 0.125 \cdot x\right) - 0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--l+99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t + \left(0.125 \cdot x - 0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv99.7%

      \[\leadsto t + \color{blue}{\left(0.125 \cdot x + \left(-0.5\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
    3. metadata-eval99.7%

      \[\leadsto t + \left(0.125 \cdot x + \color{blue}{-0.5} \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) \]
    4. +-commutative99.7%

      \[\leadsto t + \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + 0.125 \cdot x\right)} \]
    5. *-commutative99.7%

      \[\leadsto t + \left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -0.5} + 0.125 \cdot x\right) \]
    6. associate-*l*100.0%

      \[\leadsto t + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.5\right)} + 0.125 \cdot x\right) \]
    7. metadata-eval100.0%

      \[\leadsto t + \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.5\right)}\right) + 0.125 \cdot x\right) \]
    8. distribute-rgt-neg-in100.0%

      \[\leadsto t + \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-z \cdot 0.5\right)} + 0.125 \cdot x\right) \]
    9. fma-udef100.0%

      \[\leadsto t + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, -z \cdot 0.5, 0.125 \cdot x\right)} \]
    10. distribute-rgt-neg-in100.0%

      \[\leadsto t + \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-0.5\right)}, 0.125 \cdot x\right) \]
    11. metadata-eval100.0%

      \[\leadsto t + \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \color{blue}{-0.5}, 0.125 \cdot x\right) \]
  7. Simplified100.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t + \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot -0.5, 0.125 \cdot x\right)} \]
  8. Final simplification100.0%

    \[\leadsto t + \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot -0.5, 0.125 \cdot x\right) \]
  9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 48.9% accurate, 0.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := z \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{+67}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{-248}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{-217}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.125 \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 9 \cdot 10^{-89}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{+43}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.125 \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{+113}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* z (* y -0.5))))
   (if (<= z -3.8e+67)
     t_1
     (if (<= z 3.3e-248)
       t
       (if (<= z 1.15e-217)
         (* 0.125 x)
         (if (<= z 9e-89)
           t
           (if (<= z 1.8e+43) (* 0.125 x) (if (<= z 3.6e+113) t t_1))))))))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = z * (y * -0.5);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.8e+67) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= 3.3e-248) {
		tmp = t;
	} else if (z <= 1.15e-217) {
		tmp = 0.125 * x;
	} else if (z <= 9e-89) {
		tmp = t;
	} else if (z <= 1.8e+43) {
		tmp = 0.125 * x;
	} else if (z <= 3.6e+113) {
		tmp = t;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = z * (y * (-0.5d0))
    if (z <= (-3.8d+67)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (z <= 3.3d-248) then
        tmp = t
    else if (z <= 1.15d-217) then
        tmp = 0.125d0 * x
    else if (z <= 9d-89) then
        tmp = t
    else if (z <= 1.8d+43) then
        tmp = 0.125d0 * x
    else if (z <= 3.6d+113) then
        tmp = t
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = z * (y * -0.5);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.8e+67) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= 3.3e-248) {
		tmp = t;
	} else if (z <= 1.15e-217) {
		tmp = 0.125 * x;
	} else if (z <= 9e-89) {
		tmp = t;
	} else if (z <= 1.8e+43) {
		tmp = 0.125 * x;
	} else if (z <= 3.6e+113) {
		tmp = t;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = z * (y * -0.5)
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -3.8e+67:
		tmp = t_1
	elif z <= 3.3e-248:
		tmp = t
	elif z <= 1.15e-217:
		tmp = 0.125 * x
	elif z <= 9e-89:
		tmp = t
	elif z <= 1.8e+43:
		tmp = 0.125 * x
	elif z <= 3.6e+113:
		tmp = t
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(z * Float64(y * -0.5))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -3.8e+67)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= 3.3e-248)
		tmp = t;
	elseif (z <= 1.15e-217)
		tmp = Float64(0.125 * x);
	elseif (z <= 9e-89)
		tmp = t;
	elseif (z <= 1.8e+43)
		tmp = Float64(0.125 * x);
	elseif (z <= 3.6e+113)
		tmp = t;
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = z * (y * -0.5);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -3.8e+67)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= 3.3e-248)
		tmp = t;
	elseif (z <= 1.15e-217)
		tmp = 0.125 * x;
	elseif (z <= 9e-89)
		tmp = t;
	elseif (z <= 1.8e+43)
		tmp = 0.125 * x;
	elseif (z <= 3.6e+113)
		tmp = t;
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(z * N[(y * -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -3.8e+67], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[z, 3.3e-248], t, If[LessEqual[z, 1.15e-217], N[(0.125 * x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 9e-89], t, If[LessEqual[z, 1.8e+43], N[(0.125 * x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 3.6e+113], t, t$95$1]]]]]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := z \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.5\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{+67}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\

\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{-248}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\\

\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{-217}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.125 \cdot x\\

\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 9 \cdot 10^{-89}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\\

\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{+43}:\\
\;\;\;\;0.125 \cdot x\\

\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{+113}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_1\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if z < -3.8000000000000002e67 or 3.59999999999999992e113 < z

    1. Initial program 99.3%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. metadata-eval99.3%

        \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{0.125} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
      2. associate-/l*99.9%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.125 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}}\right) + t \]
    3. Simplified99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) + t} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 60.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r*61.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]
    7. Simplified61.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]

    if -3.8000000000000002e67 < z < 3.3000000000000002e-248 or 1.15000000000000002e-217 < z < 8.9999999999999998e-89 or 1.80000000000000005e43 < z < 3.59999999999999992e113

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. metadata-eval100.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{0.125} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
      2. associate-/l*100.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.125 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}}\right) + t \]
    3. Simplified100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) + t} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 48.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t} \]

    if 3.3000000000000002e-248 < z < 1.15000000000000002e-217 or 8.9999999999999998e-89 < z < 1.80000000000000005e43

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. metadata-eval99.9%

        \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{0.125} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
      2. associate-/l*99.9%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.125 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}}\right) + t \]
    3. Simplified99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) + t} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 37.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.125 \cdot x} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification53.3%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{+67}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{-248}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{-217}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.125 \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 9 \cdot 10^{-89}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{+43}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.125 \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{+113}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 88.3% accurate, 0.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(z \cdot y\right) \cdot 0.5\\ t_2 := t - t_1\\ t_3 := 0.125 \cdot x - t_1\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+128}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+46}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \cdot y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+38}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \cdot y \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+31}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + 0.125 \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (* z y) 0.5)) (t_2 (- t t_1)) (t_3 (- (* 0.125 x) t_1)))
   (if (<= (* z y) -2e+128)
     t_3
     (if (<= (* z y) -1e+46)
       t_2
       (if (<= (* z y) -5e+38)
         t_3
         (if (<= (* z y) 5e+31) (+ t (* 0.125 x)) t_2))))))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (z * y) * 0.5;
	double t_2 = t - t_1;
	double t_3 = (0.125 * x) - t_1;
	double tmp;
	if ((z * y) <= -2e+128) {
		tmp = t_3;
	} else if ((z * y) <= -1e+46) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if ((z * y) <= -5e+38) {
		tmp = t_3;
	} else if ((z * y) <= 5e+31) {
		tmp = t + (0.125 * x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    real(8) :: t_3
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (z * y) * 0.5d0
    t_2 = t - t_1
    t_3 = (0.125d0 * x) - t_1
    if ((z * y) <= (-2d+128)) then
        tmp = t_3
    else if ((z * y) <= (-1d+46)) then
        tmp = t_2
    else if ((z * y) <= (-5d+38)) then
        tmp = t_3
    else if ((z * y) <= 5d+31) then
        tmp = t + (0.125d0 * x)
    else
        tmp = t_2
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (z * y) * 0.5;
	double t_2 = t - t_1;
	double t_3 = (0.125 * x) - t_1;
	double tmp;
	if ((z * y) <= -2e+128) {
		tmp = t_3;
	} else if ((z * y) <= -1e+46) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if ((z * y) <= -5e+38) {
		tmp = t_3;
	} else if ((z * y) <= 5e+31) {
		tmp = t + (0.125 * x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = (z * y) * 0.5
	t_2 = t - t_1
	t_3 = (0.125 * x) - t_1
	tmp = 0
	if (z * y) <= -2e+128:
		tmp = t_3
	elif (z * y) <= -1e+46:
		tmp = t_2
	elif (z * y) <= -5e+38:
		tmp = t_3
	elif (z * y) <= 5e+31:
		tmp = t + (0.125 * x)
	else:
		tmp = t_2
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(z * y) * 0.5)
	t_2 = Float64(t - t_1)
	t_3 = Float64(Float64(0.125 * x) - t_1)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(z * y) <= -2e+128)
		tmp = t_3;
	elseif (Float64(z * y) <= -1e+46)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (Float64(z * y) <= -5e+38)
		tmp = t_3;
	elseif (Float64(z * y) <= 5e+31)
		tmp = Float64(t + Float64(0.125 * x));
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = (z * y) * 0.5;
	t_2 = t - t_1;
	t_3 = (0.125 * x) - t_1;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z * y) <= -2e+128)
		tmp = t_3;
	elseif ((z * y) <= -1e+46)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif ((z * y) <= -5e+38)
		tmp = t_3;
	elseif ((z * y) <= 5e+31)
		tmp = t + (0.125 * x);
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision] * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(t - t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$3 = N[(N[(0.125 * x), $MachinePrecision] - t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision], -2e+128], t$95$3, If[LessEqual[N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision], -1e+46], t$95$2, If[LessEqual[N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision], -5e+38], t$95$3, If[LessEqual[N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision], 5e+31], N[(t + N[(0.125 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$2]]]]]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := \left(z \cdot y\right) \cdot 0.5\\
t_2 := t - t_1\\
t_3 := 0.125 \cdot x - t_1\\
\mathbf{if}\;z \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+128}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_3\\

\mathbf{elif}\;z \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+46}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_2\\

\mathbf{elif}\;z \cdot y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+38}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_3\\

\mathbf{elif}\;z \cdot y \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+31}:\\
\;\;\;\;t + 0.125 \cdot x\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_2\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if (*.f64 y z) < -2.0000000000000002e128 or -9.9999999999999999e45 < (*.f64 y z) < -4.9999999999999997e38

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. metadata-eval99.9%

        \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{0.125} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
      2. associate-/l*99.9%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.125 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}}\right) + t \]
    3. Simplified99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) + t} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in t around 0 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.125 \cdot x - 0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]

    if -2.0000000000000002e128 < (*.f64 y z) < -9.9999999999999999e45 or 5.00000000000000027e31 < (*.f64 y z)

    1. Initial program 98.9%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. metadata-eval98.9%

        \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{0.125} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
      2. associate-/l*99.8%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.125 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}}\right) + t \]
    3. Simplified99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) + t} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 92.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t - 0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]

    if -4.9999999999999997e38 < (*.f64 y z) < 5.00000000000000027e31

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. metadata-eval100.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{0.125} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
      2. associate-/l*100.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.125 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}}\right) + t \]
    3. Simplified100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) + t} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 95.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t + 0.125 \cdot x} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification94.8%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+128}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.125 \cdot x - \left(z \cdot y\right) \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+46}:\\ \;\;\;\;t - \left(z \cdot y\right) \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \cdot y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+38}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.125 \cdot x - \left(z \cdot y\right) \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \cdot y \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+31}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + 0.125 \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t - \left(z \cdot y\right) \cdot 0.5\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 88.2% accurate, 0.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+43} \lor \neg \left(z \cdot y \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+31}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t - \left(z \cdot y\right) \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + 0.125 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* z y) -2e+43) (not (<= (* z y) 5e+31)))
   (- t (* (* z y) 0.5))
   (+ t (* 0.125 x))))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((z * y) <= -2e+43) || !((z * y) <= 5e+31)) {
		tmp = t - ((z * y) * 0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = t + (0.125 * x);
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((z * y) <= (-2d+43)) .or. (.not. ((z * y) <= 5d+31))) then
        tmp = t - ((z * y) * 0.5d0)
    else
        tmp = t + (0.125d0 * x)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((z * y) <= -2e+43) || !((z * y) <= 5e+31)) {
		tmp = t - ((z * y) * 0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = t + (0.125 * x);
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if ((z * y) <= -2e+43) or not ((z * y) <= 5e+31):
		tmp = t - ((z * y) * 0.5)
	else:
		tmp = t + (0.125 * x)
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(z * y) <= -2e+43) || !(Float64(z * y) <= 5e+31))
		tmp = Float64(t - Float64(Float64(z * y) * 0.5));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t + Float64(0.125 * x));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((z * y) <= -2e+43) || ~(((z * y) <= 5e+31)))
		tmp = t - ((z * y) * 0.5);
	else
		tmp = t + (0.125 * x);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision], -2e+43], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision], 5e+31]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(t - N[(N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision] * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(t + N[(0.125 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+43} \lor \neg \left(z \cdot y \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+31}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;t - \left(z \cdot y\right) \cdot 0.5\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t + 0.125 \cdot x\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (*.f64 y z) < -2.00000000000000003e43 or 5.00000000000000027e31 < (*.f64 y z)

    1. Initial program 99.3%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. metadata-eval99.3%

        \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{0.125} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
      2. associate-/l*99.9%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.125 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}}\right) + t \]
    3. Simplified99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) + t} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 90.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t - 0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]

    if -2.00000000000000003e43 < (*.f64 y z) < 5.00000000000000027e31

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. metadata-eval100.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{0.125} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
      2. associate-/l*100.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.125 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}}\right) + t \]
    3. Simplified100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) + t} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 94.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t + 0.125 \cdot x} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification92.8%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+43} \lor \neg \left(z \cdot y \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+31}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t - \left(z \cdot y\right) \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + 0.125 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 72.6% accurate, 0.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.22 \cdot 10^{+69} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{+183}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + 0.125 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.22e+69) (not (<= z 2.4e+183)))
   (* z (* y -0.5))
   (+ t (* 0.125 x))))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.22e+69) || !(z <= 2.4e+183)) {
		tmp = z * (y * -0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = t + (0.125 * x);
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.22d+69)) .or. (.not. (z <= 2.4d+183))) then
        tmp = z * (y * (-0.5d0))
    else
        tmp = t + (0.125d0 * x)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.22e+69) || !(z <= 2.4e+183)) {
		tmp = z * (y * -0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = t + (0.125 * x);
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.22e+69) or not (z <= 2.4e+183):
		tmp = z * (y * -0.5)
	else:
		tmp = t + (0.125 * x)
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.22e+69) || !(z <= 2.4e+183))
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(y * -0.5));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t + Float64(0.125 * x));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.22e+69) || ~((z <= 2.4e+183)))
		tmp = z * (y * -0.5);
	else
		tmp = t + (0.125 * x);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.22e+69], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 2.4e+183]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[(y * -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(t + N[(0.125 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.22 \cdot 10^{+69} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{+183}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.5\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t + 0.125 \cdot x\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if z < -1.22e69 or 2.4000000000000002e183 < z

    1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. metadata-eval99.2%

        \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{0.125} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
      2. associate-/l*99.9%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.125 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}}\right) + t \]
    3. Simplified99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) + t} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 64.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r*64.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]
    7. Simplified64.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]

    if -1.22e69 < z < 2.4000000000000002e183

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. metadata-eval100.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{0.125} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
      2. associate-/l*99.9%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.125 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}}\right) + t \]
    3. Simplified99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) + t} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 80.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t + 0.125 \cdot x} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification74.2%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.22 \cdot 10^{+69} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{+183}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + 0.125 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 50.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -8.5 \cdot 10^{+32} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3.7 \cdot 10^{+121}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;0.125 \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -8.5e+32) (not (<= x 3.7e+121))) (* 0.125 x) t))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -8.5e+32) || !(x <= 3.7e+121)) {
		tmp = 0.125 * x;
	} else {
		tmp = t;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-8.5d+32)) .or. (.not. (x <= 3.7d+121))) then
        tmp = 0.125d0 * x
    else
        tmp = t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -8.5e+32) || !(x <= 3.7e+121)) {
		tmp = 0.125 * x;
	} else {
		tmp = t;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -8.5e+32) or not (x <= 3.7e+121):
		tmp = 0.125 * x
	else:
		tmp = t
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -8.5e+32) || !(x <= 3.7e+121))
		tmp = Float64(0.125 * x);
	else
		tmp = t;
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -8.5e+32) || ~((x <= 3.7e+121)))
		tmp = 0.125 * x;
	else
		tmp = t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -8.5e+32], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 3.7e+121]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(0.125 * x), $MachinePrecision], t]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;x \leq -8.5 \cdot 10^{+32} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3.7 \cdot 10^{+121}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;0.125 \cdot x\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if x < -8.4999999999999998e32 or 3.70000000000000013e121 < x

    1. Initial program 99.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. metadata-eval99.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{0.125} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
      2. associate-/l*99.9%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.125 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}}\right) + t \]
    3. Simplified99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) + t} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 60.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.125 \cdot x} \]

    if -8.4999999999999998e32 < x < 3.70000000000000013e121

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. metadata-eval100.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{0.125} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
      2. associate-/l*99.9%

        \[\leadsto \left(0.125 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}}\right) + t \]
    3. Simplified99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) + t} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 48.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification52.1%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -8.5 \cdot 10^{+32} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3.7 \cdot 10^{+121}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;0.125 \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 99.9% accurate, 1.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ t + \left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ t (- (* 0.125 x) (/ y (/ 2.0 z)))))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t + ((0.125 * x) - (y / (2.0 / z)));
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = t + ((0.125d0 * x) - (y / (2.0d0 / z)))
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t + ((0.125 * x) - (y / (2.0 / z)));
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	return t + ((0.125 * x) - (y / (2.0 / z)))
function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(t + Float64(Float64(0.125 * x) - Float64(y / Float64(2.0 / z))))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = t + ((0.125 * x) - (y / (2.0 / z)));
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(t + N[(N[(0.125 * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y / N[(2.0 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
t + \left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.7%

    \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. metadata-eval99.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{0.125} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
    2. associate-/l*99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.125 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}}\right) + t \]
  3. Simplified99.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) + t} \]
  4. Add Preprocessing
  5. Final simplification99.9%

    \[\leadsto t + \left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) \]
  6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 33.3% accurate, 13.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ t \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 t)
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = t
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t;
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	return t
function code(x, y, z, t)
	return t
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = t;
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := t
\begin{array}{l}

\\
t
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.7%

    \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. metadata-eval99.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{0.125} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
    2. associate-/l*99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.125 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}}\right) + t \]
  3. Simplified99.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) + t} \]
  4. Add Preprocessing
  5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 35.5%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t} \]
  6. Final simplification35.5%

    \[\leadsto t \]
  7. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 100.0% accurate, 1.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{x}{8} + t\right) - \frac{z}{2} \cdot y \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (+ (/ x 8.0) t) (* (/ z 2.0) y)))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x / 8.0) + t) - ((z / 2.0) * y);
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((x / 8.0d0) + t) - ((z / 2.0d0) * y)
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x / 8.0) + t) - ((z / 2.0) * y);
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	return ((x / 8.0) + t) - ((z / 2.0) * y)
function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x / 8.0) + t) - Float64(Float64(z / 2.0) * y))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = ((x / 8.0) + t) - ((z / 2.0) * y);
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(x / 8.0), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(z / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(\frac{x}{8} + t\right) - \frac{z}{2} \cdot y
\end{array}

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2024020 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:quartForm  from diagrams-solve-0.1, B"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (- (+ (/ x 8.0) t) (* (/ z 2.0) y))

  (+ (- (* (/ 1.0 8.0) x) (/ (* y z) 2.0)) t))