exp neg sub

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 3.2s

Alternatives: 2

Speedup: 1.0×

• 50.4% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{-\left(1 - x \cdot x\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (exp (- (- 1.0 (* x x)))))

C

double code(double x) {
	return exp(-(1.0 - (x * x)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = exp(-(1.0d0 - (x * x)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return Math.exp(-(1.0 - (x * x)));
}

Python

def code(x):
	return math.exp(-(1.0 - (x * x)))

Julia

function code(x)
	return exp(Float64(-Float64(1.0 - Float64(x * x))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = exp(-(1.0 - (x * x)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := N[Exp[(-N[(1.0 - N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision])], $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{-\left(1 - x \cdot x\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (exp (- (- 1.0 (* x x)))))

C

double code(double x) {
	return exp(-(1.0 - (x * x)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = exp(-(1.0d0 - (x * x)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return Math.exp(-(1.0 - (x * x)));
}

Python

def code(x):
	return math.exp(-(1.0 - (x * x)))

Julia

function code(x)
	return exp(Float64(-Float64(1.0 - Float64(x * x))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = exp(-(1.0 - (x * x)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := N[Exp[(-N[(1.0 - N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision])], $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{x \cdot x + -1} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (exp (+ (* x x) -1.0)))

C

double code(double x) {
	return exp(((x * x) + -1.0));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = exp(((x * x) + (-1.0d0)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return Math.exp(((x * x) + -1.0));
}

Python

def code(x):
	return math.exp(((x * x) + -1.0))

Julia

function code(x)
	return exp(Float64(Float64(x * x) + -1.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = exp(((x * x) + -1.0));
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := N[Exp[N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{-\left(1 - x \cdot x\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sqr-neg 100.0%

      \[\leadsto e^{-\left(1 - \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)}\right)} \]

   2. neg-sub0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{0 - \left(1 - \left(-x\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)\right)}} \]

   3. associate--r- 100.0%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{\left(0 - 1\right) + \left(-x\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)}} \]

   4. metadata-eval 100.0%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-1} + \left(-x\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   5. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot \left(-x\right) + -1}} \]

   6. sqr-neg 100.0%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{x \cdot x} + -1} \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{x \cdot x + -1}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto e^{x \cdot x + -1} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 50.5% accurate, 35.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{e} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (/ 1.0 E))

C

double code(double x) {
	return 1.0 / ((double) M_E);
}

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return 1.0 / Math.E;
}

Python

def code(x):
	return 1.0 / math.e

Julia

function code(x)
	return Float64(1.0 / exp(1))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 1.0 / 2.71828182845904523536;
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := N[(1.0 / E), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{-\left(1 - x \cdot x\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sqr-neg 100.0%

      \[\leadsto e^{-\left(1 - \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)}\right)} \]

   2. neg-sub0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{0 - \left(1 - \left(-x\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)\right)}} \]

   3. associate--r- 100.0%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{\left(0 - 1\right) + \left(-x\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)}} \]

   4. metadata-eval 100.0%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-1} + \left(-x\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   5. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot \left(-x\right) + -1}} \]

   6. sqr-neg 100.0%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{x \cdot x} + -1} \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{x \cdot x + -1}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-un-lft-identity 100.0%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{1 \cdot \left(x \cdot x + -1\right)}} \]

   2. exp-prod 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(e^{1}\right)}^{\left(x \cdot x + -1\right)}} \]

   3. exp-1-e 100.0%

      \[\leadsto {\color{blue}{e}}^{\left(x \cdot x + -1\right)} \]

   4. fma-def 100.0%

      \[\leadsto {e}^{\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -1\right)\right)}} \]

6. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{e}^{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -1\right)\right)}} \]

7. Taylor expanded in x around 0 52.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e}} \]

8. Final simplification 52.2%

   \[\leadsto \frac{1}{e} \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024020 
(FPCore (x)
  :name "exp neg sub"
  :precision binary64
  (exp (- (- 1.0 (* x x)))))