Maksimov and Kolovsky, Equation (4)

Percentage Accurate: 86.6% → 99.9%
Time: 12.1s
Alternatives: 12
Speedup: 1.4×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(J \cdot \left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right)\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) + U \end{array} \]
(FPCore (J l K U)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (* (* J (- (exp l) (exp (- l)))) (cos (/ K 2.0))) U))
double code(double J, double l, double K, double U) {
	return ((J * (exp(l) - exp(-l))) * cos((K / 2.0))) + U;
}
real(8) function code(j, l, k, u)
    real(8), intent (in) :: j
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: u
    code = ((j * (exp(l) - exp(-l))) * cos((k / 2.0d0))) + u
end function
public static double code(double J, double l, double K, double U) {
	return ((J * (Math.exp(l) - Math.exp(-l))) * Math.cos((K / 2.0))) + U;
}
def code(J, l, K, U):
	return ((J * (math.exp(l) - math.exp(-l))) * math.cos((K / 2.0))) + U
function code(J, l, K, U)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(J * Float64(exp(l) - exp(Float64(-l)))) * cos(Float64(K / 2.0))) + U)
end
function tmp = code(J, l, K, U)
	tmp = ((J * (exp(l) - exp(-l))) * cos((K / 2.0))) + U;
end
code[J_, l_, K_, U_] := N[(N[(N[(J * N[(N[Exp[l], $MachinePrecision] - N[Exp[(-l)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(K / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + U), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(J \cdot \left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right)\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) + U
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 12 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 86.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(J \cdot \left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right)\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) + U \end{array} \]
(FPCore (J l K U)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (* (* J (- (exp l) (exp (- l)))) (cos (/ K 2.0))) U))
double code(double J, double l, double K, double U) {
	return ((J * (exp(l) - exp(-l))) * cos((K / 2.0))) + U;
}
real(8) function code(j, l, k, u)
    real(8), intent (in) :: j
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: u
    code = ((j * (exp(l) - exp(-l))) * cos((k / 2.0d0))) + u
end function
public static double code(double J, double l, double K, double U) {
	return ((J * (Math.exp(l) - Math.exp(-l))) * Math.cos((K / 2.0))) + U;
}
def code(J, l, K, U):
	return ((J * (math.exp(l) - math.exp(-l))) * math.cos((K / 2.0))) + U
function code(J, l, K, U)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(J * Float64(exp(l) - exp(Float64(-l)))) * cos(Float64(K / 2.0))) + U)
end
function tmp = code(J, l, K, U)
	tmp = ((J * (exp(l) - exp(-l))) * cos((K / 2.0))) + U;
end
code[J_, l_, K_, U_] := N[(N[(N[(J * N[(N[Exp[l], $MachinePrecision] - N[Exp[(-l)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(K / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + U), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(J \cdot \left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right)\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) + U
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right)\\ t_1 := e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_1 \leq -0.2 \lor \neg \left(t_1 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-7}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(t_1 \cdot J\right) \cdot t_0 + U\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;U + t_0 \cdot \left(J \cdot \left(0.3333333333333333 \cdot {\ell}^{3} + \ell \cdot 2\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (J l K U)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (cos (/ K 2.0))) (t_1 (- (exp l) (exp (- l)))))
   (if (or (<= t_1 -0.2) (not (<= t_1 5e-7)))
     (+ (* (* t_1 J) t_0) U)
     (+ U (* t_0 (* J (+ (* 0.3333333333333333 (pow l 3.0)) (* l 2.0))))))))
double code(double J, double l, double K, double U) {
	double t_0 = cos((K / 2.0));
	double t_1 = exp(l) - exp(-l);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_1 <= -0.2) || !(t_1 <= 5e-7)) {
		tmp = ((t_1 * J) * t_0) + U;
	} else {
		tmp = U + (t_0 * (J * ((0.3333333333333333 * pow(l, 3.0)) + (l * 2.0))));
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(j, l, k, u)
    real(8), intent (in) :: j
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: u
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = cos((k / 2.0d0))
    t_1 = exp(l) - exp(-l)
    if ((t_1 <= (-0.2d0)) .or. (.not. (t_1 <= 5d-7))) then
        tmp = ((t_1 * j) * t_0) + u
    else
        tmp = u + (t_0 * (j * ((0.3333333333333333d0 * (l ** 3.0d0)) + (l * 2.0d0))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double J, double l, double K, double U) {
	double t_0 = Math.cos((K / 2.0));
	double t_1 = Math.exp(l) - Math.exp(-l);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_1 <= -0.2) || !(t_1 <= 5e-7)) {
		tmp = ((t_1 * J) * t_0) + U;
	} else {
		tmp = U + (t_0 * (J * ((0.3333333333333333 * Math.pow(l, 3.0)) + (l * 2.0))));
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(J, l, K, U):
	t_0 = math.cos((K / 2.0))
	t_1 = math.exp(l) - math.exp(-l)
	tmp = 0
	if (t_1 <= -0.2) or not (t_1 <= 5e-7):
		tmp = ((t_1 * J) * t_0) + U
	else:
		tmp = U + (t_0 * (J * ((0.3333333333333333 * math.pow(l, 3.0)) + (l * 2.0))))
	return tmp
function code(J, l, K, U)
	t_0 = cos(Float64(K / 2.0))
	t_1 = Float64(exp(l) - exp(Float64(-l)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t_1 <= -0.2) || !(t_1 <= 5e-7))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(t_1 * J) * t_0) + U);
	else
		tmp = Float64(U + Float64(t_0 * Float64(J * Float64(Float64(0.3333333333333333 * (l ^ 3.0)) + Float64(l * 2.0)))));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(J, l, K, U)
	t_0 = cos((K / 2.0));
	t_1 = exp(l) - exp(-l);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_1 <= -0.2) || ~((t_1 <= 5e-7)))
		tmp = ((t_1 * J) * t_0) + U;
	else
		tmp = U + (t_0 * (J * ((0.3333333333333333 * (l ^ 3.0)) + (l * 2.0))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[J_, l_, K_, U_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[Cos[N[(K / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[Exp[l], $MachinePrecision] - N[Exp[(-l)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t$95$1, -0.2], N[Not[LessEqual[t$95$1, 5e-7]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(N[(t$95$1 * J), $MachinePrecision] * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] + U), $MachinePrecision], N[(U + N[(t$95$0 * N[(J * N[(N[(0.3333333333333333 * N[Power[l, 3.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(l * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right)\\
t_1 := e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\\
\mathbf{if}\;t_1 \leq -0.2 \lor \neg \left(t_1 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-7}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;\left(t_1 \cdot J\right) \cdot t_0 + U\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;U + t_0 \cdot \left(J \cdot \left(0.3333333333333333 \cdot {\ell}^{3} + \ell \cdot 2\right)\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (-.f64 (exp.f64 l) (exp.f64 (neg.f64 l))) < -0.20000000000000001 or 4.99999999999999977e-7 < (-.f64 (exp.f64 l) (exp.f64 (neg.f64 l)))

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(J \cdot \left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right)\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) + U \]
    2. Add Preprocessing

    if -0.20000000000000001 < (-.f64 (exp.f64 l) (exp.f64 (neg.f64 l))) < 4.99999999999999977e-7

    1. Initial program 71.4%

      \[\left(J \cdot \left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right)\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) + U \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in l around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(J \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.3333333333333333 \cdot {\ell}^{3} + 2 \cdot \ell\right)}\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) + U \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification99.9%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell} \leq -0.2 \lor \neg \left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell} \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-7}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right) \cdot J\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) + U\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;U + \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) \cdot \left(J \cdot \left(0.3333333333333333 \cdot {\ell}^{3} + \ell \cdot 2\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 95.5% accurate, 1.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\ell \leq -9 \cdot 10^{+84} \lor \neg \left(\ell \leq -0.33\right) \land \left(\ell \leq 0.027 \lor \neg \left(\ell \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+100}\right)\right):\\ \;\;\;\;U + \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) \cdot \left(J \cdot \left(0.3333333333333333 \cdot {\ell}^{3} + \ell \cdot 2\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right) \cdot J + U\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (J l K U)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= l -9e+84)
         (and (not (<= l -0.33)) (or (<= l 0.027) (not (<= l 1.25e+100)))))
   (+
    U
    (* (cos (/ K 2.0)) (* J (+ (* 0.3333333333333333 (pow l 3.0)) (* l 2.0)))))
   (+ (* (- (exp l) (exp (- l))) J) U)))
double code(double J, double l, double K, double U) {
	double tmp;
	if ((l <= -9e+84) || (!(l <= -0.33) && ((l <= 0.027) || !(l <= 1.25e+100)))) {
		tmp = U + (cos((K / 2.0)) * (J * ((0.3333333333333333 * pow(l, 3.0)) + (l * 2.0))));
	} else {
		tmp = ((exp(l) - exp(-l)) * J) + U;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(j, l, k, u)
    real(8), intent (in) :: j
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: u
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((l <= (-9d+84)) .or. (.not. (l <= (-0.33d0))) .and. (l <= 0.027d0) .or. (.not. (l <= 1.25d+100))) then
        tmp = u + (cos((k / 2.0d0)) * (j * ((0.3333333333333333d0 * (l ** 3.0d0)) + (l * 2.0d0))))
    else
        tmp = ((exp(l) - exp(-l)) * j) + u
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double J, double l, double K, double U) {
	double tmp;
	if ((l <= -9e+84) || (!(l <= -0.33) && ((l <= 0.027) || !(l <= 1.25e+100)))) {
		tmp = U + (Math.cos((K / 2.0)) * (J * ((0.3333333333333333 * Math.pow(l, 3.0)) + (l * 2.0))));
	} else {
		tmp = ((Math.exp(l) - Math.exp(-l)) * J) + U;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(J, l, K, U):
	tmp = 0
	if (l <= -9e+84) or (not (l <= -0.33) and ((l <= 0.027) or not (l <= 1.25e+100))):
		tmp = U + (math.cos((K / 2.0)) * (J * ((0.3333333333333333 * math.pow(l, 3.0)) + (l * 2.0))))
	else:
		tmp = ((math.exp(l) - math.exp(-l)) * J) + U
	return tmp
function code(J, l, K, U)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((l <= -9e+84) || (!(l <= -0.33) && ((l <= 0.027) || !(l <= 1.25e+100))))
		tmp = Float64(U + Float64(cos(Float64(K / 2.0)) * Float64(J * Float64(Float64(0.3333333333333333 * (l ^ 3.0)) + Float64(l * 2.0)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(exp(l) - exp(Float64(-l))) * J) + U);
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(J, l, K, U)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((l <= -9e+84) || (~((l <= -0.33)) && ((l <= 0.027) || ~((l <= 1.25e+100)))))
		tmp = U + (cos((K / 2.0)) * (J * ((0.3333333333333333 * (l ^ 3.0)) + (l * 2.0))));
	else
		tmp = ((exp(l) - exp(-l)) * J) + U;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[J_, l_, K_, U_] := If[Or[LessEqual[l, -9e+84], And[N[Not[LessEqual[l, -0.33]], $MachinePrecision], Or[LessEqual[l, 0.027], N[Not[LessEqual[l, 1.25e+100]], $MachinePrecision]]]], N[(U + N[(N[Cos[N[(K / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[(J * N[(N[(0.3333333333333333 * N[Power[l, 3.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(l * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(N[Exp[l], $MachinePrecision] - N[Exp[(-l)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * J), $MachinePrecision] + U), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;\ell \leq -9 \cdot 10^{+84} \lor \neg \left(\ell \leq -0.33\right) \land \left(\ell \leq 0.027 \lor \neg \left(\ell \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+100}\right)\right):\\
\;\;\;\;U + \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) \cdot \left(J \cdot \left(0.3333333333333333 \cdot {\ell}^{3} + \ell \cdot 2\right)\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right) \cdot J + U\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if l < -8.9999999999999994e84 or -0.330000000000000016 < l < 0.0269999999999999997 or 1.25e100 < l

    1. Initial program 83.5%

      \[\left(J \cdot \left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right)\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) + U \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in l around 0 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(J \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.3333333333333333 \cdot {\ell}^{3} + 2 \cdot \ell\right)}\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) + U \]

    if -8.9999999999999994e84 < l < -0.330000000000000016 or 0.0269999999999999997 < l < 1.25e100

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(J \cdot \left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right)\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) + U \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in K around 0 85.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{J \cdot \left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right)} + U \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification97.0%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\ell \leq -9 \cdot 10^{+84} \lor \neg \left(\ell \leq -0.33\right) \land \left(\ell \leq 0.027 \lor \neg \left(\ell \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+100}\right)\right):\\ \;\;\;\;U + \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) \cdot \left(J \cdot \left(0.3333333333333333 \cdot {\ell}^{3} + \ell \cdot 2\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right) \cdot J + U\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 76.7% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) \leq 0.84:\\ \;\;\;\;U + \ell \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(J \cdot \cos \left(K \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;U + J \cdot \left(0.3333333333333333 \cdot {\ell}^{3} + \ell \cdot 2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (J l K U)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (cos (/ K 2.0)) 0.84)
   (+ U (* l (* 2.0 (* J (cos (* K 0.5))))))
   (+ U (* J (+ (* 0.3333333333333333 (pow l 3.0)) (* l 2.0))))))
double code(double J, double l, double K, double U) {
	double tmp;
	if (cos((K / 2.0)) <= 0.84) {
		tmp = U + (l * (2.0 * (J * cos((K * 0.5)))));
	} else {
		tmp = U + (J * ((0.3333333333333333 * pow(l, 3.0)) + (l * 2.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(j, l, k, u)
    real(8), intent (in) :: j
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: u
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (cos((k / 2.0d0)) <= 0.84d0) then
        tmp = u + (l * (2.0d0 * (j * cos((k * 0.5d0)))))
    else
        tmp = u + (j * ((0.3333333333333333d0 * (l ** 3.0d0)) + (l * 2.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double J, double l, double K, double U) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.cos((K / 2.0)) <= 0.84) {
		tmp = U + (l * (2.0 * (J * Math.cos((K * 0.5)))));
	} else {
		tmp = U + (J * ((0.3333333333333333 * Math.pow(l, 3.0)) + (l * 2.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(J, l, K, U):
	tmp = 0
	if math.cos((K / 2.0)) <= 0.84:
		tmp = U + (l * (2.0 * (J * math.cos((K * 0.5)))))
	else:
		tmp = U + (J * ((0.3333333333333333 * math.pow(l, 3.0)) + (l * 2.0)))
	return tmp
function code(J, l, K, U)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (cos(Float64(K / 2.0)) <= 0.84)
		tmp = Float64(U + Float64(l * Float64(2.0 * Float64(J * cos(Float64(K * 0.5))))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(U + Float64(J * Float64(Float64(0.3333333333333333 * (l ^ 3.0)) + Float64(l * 2.0))));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(J, l, K, U)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (cos((K / 2.0)) <= 0.84)
		tmp = U + (l * (2.0 * (J * cos((K * 0.5)))));
	else
		tmp = U + (J * ((0.3333333333333333 * (l ^ 3.0)) + (l * 2.0)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[J_, l_, K_, U_] := If[LessEqual[N[Cos[N[(K / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision], 0.84], N[(U + N[(l * N[(2.0 * N[(J * N[Cos[N[(K * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(U + N[(J * N[(N[(0.3333333333333333 * N[Power[l, 3.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(l * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;\cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) \leq 0.84:\\
\;\;\;\;U + \ell \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(J \cdot \cos \left(K \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;U + J \cdot \left(0.3333333333333333 \cdot {\ell}^{3} + \ell \cdot 2\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (cos.f64 (/.f64 K 2)) < 0.839999999999999969

    1. Initial program 83.8%

      \[\left(J \cdot \left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right)\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) + U \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in l around 0 71.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(J \cdot \left(\ell \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot K\right)\right)\right)} + U \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r*71.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot J\right) \cdot \left(\ell \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot K\right)\right)} + U \]
      2. *-commutative71.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\ell \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot K\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot J\right)} + U \]
      3. associate-*l*71.5%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot K\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot J\right)\right)} + U \]
      4. *-commutative71.5%

        \[\leadsto \ell \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(2 \cdot J\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot K\right)\right)} + U \]
      5. associate-*l*71.5%

        \[\leadsto \ell \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \left(J \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot K\right)\right)\right)} + U \]
    5. Simplified71.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(J \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot K\right)\right)\right)} + U \]

    if 0.839999999999999969 < (cos.f64 (/.f64 K 2))

    1. Initial program 87.0%

      \[\left(J \cdot \left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right)\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) + U \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in l around 0 88.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(J \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.3333333333333333 \cdot {\ell}^{3} + 2 \cdot \ell\right)}\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) + U \]
    4. Taylor expanded in K around 0 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{J \cdot \left(0.3333333333333333 \cdot {\ell}^{3} + 2 \cdot \ell\right)} + U \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification80.7%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) \leq 0.84:\\ \;\;\;\;U + \ell \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(J \cdot \cos \left(K \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;U + J \cdot \left(0.3333333333333333 \cdot {\ell}^{3} + \ell \cdot 2\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 87.3% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\ell \leq -0.135 \lor \neg \left(\ell \leq 0.009\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right) \cdot J + U\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;U + \ell \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(J \cdot \cos \left(K \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (J l K U)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= l -0.135) (not (<= l 0.009)))
   (+ (* (- (exp l) (exp (- l))) J) U)
   (+ U (* l (* 2.0 (* J (cos (* K 0.5))))))))
double code(double J, double l, double K, double U) {
	double tmp;
	if ((l <= -0.135) || !(l <= 0.009)) {
		tmp = ((exp(l) - exp(-l)) * J) + U;
	} else {
		tmp = U + (l * (2.0 * (J * cos((K * 0.5)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(j, l, k, u)
    real(8), intent (in) :: j
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: u
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((l <= (-0.135d0)) .or. (.not. (l <= 0.009d0))) then
        tmp = ((exp(l) - exp(-l)) * j) + u
    else
        tmp = u + (l * (2.0d0 * (j * cos((k * 0.5d0)))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double J, double l, double K, double U) {
	double tmp;
	if ((l <= -0.135) || !(l <= 0.009)) {
		tmp = ((Math.exp(l) - Math.exp(-l)) * J) + U;
	} else {
		tmp = U + (l * (2.0 * (J * Math.cos((K * 0.5)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(J, l, K, U):
	tmp = 0
	if (l <= -0.135) or not (l <= 0.009):
		tmp = ((math.exp(l) - math.exp(-l)) * J) + U
	else:
		tmp = U + (l * (2.0 * (J * math.cos((K * 0.5)))))
	return tmp
function code(J, l, K, U)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((l <= -0.135) || !(l <= 0.009))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(exp(l) - exp(Float64(-l))) * J) + U);
	else
		tmp = Float64(U + Float64(l * Float64(2.0 * Float64(J * cos(Float64(K * 0.5))))));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(J, l, K, U)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((l <= -0.135) || ~((l <= 0.009)))
		tmp = ((exp(l) - exp(-l)) * J) + U;
	else
		tmp = U + (l * (2.0 * (J * cos((K * 0.5)))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[J_, l_, K_, U_] := If[Or[LessEqual[l, -0.135], N[Not[LessEqual[l, 0.009]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(N[(N[Exp[l], $MachinePrecision] - N[Exp[(-l)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * J), $MachinePrecision] + U), $MachinePrecision], N[(U + N[(l * N[(2.0 * N[(J * N[Cos[N[(K * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;\ell \leq -0.135 \lor \neg \left(\ell \leq 0.009\right):\\
\;\;\;\;\left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right) \cdot J + U\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;U + \ell \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(J \cdot \cos \left(K \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if l < -0.13500000000000001 or 0.00899999999999999932 < l

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(J \cdot \left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right)\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) + U \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in K around 0 76.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{J \cdot \left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right)} + U \]

    if -0.13500000000000001 < l < 0.00899999999999999932

    1. Initial program 71.6%

      \[\left(J \cdot \left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right)\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) + U \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in l around 0 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(J \cdot \left(\ell \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot K\right)\right)\right)} + U \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r*99.2%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot J\right) \cdot \left(\ell \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot K\right)\right)} + U \]
      2. *-commutative99.2%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\ell \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot K\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot J\right)} + U \]
      3. associate-*l*99.3%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot K\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot J\right)\right)} + U \]
      4. *-commutative99.3%

        \[\leadsto \ell \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(2 \cdot J\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot K\right)\right)} + U \]
      5. associate-*l*99.3%

        \[\leadsto \ell \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \left(J \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot K\right)\right)\right)} + U \]
    5. Simplified99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(J \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot K\right)\right)\right)} + U \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification87.9%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\ell \leq -0.135 \lor \neg \left(\ell \leq 0.009\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right) \cdot J + U\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;U + \ell \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(J \cdot \cos \left(K \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 78.0% accurate, 2.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\ell \leq -300000 \lor \neg \left(\ell \leq 80000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;{\ell}^{3} \cdot \left(J \cdot 0.3333333333333333\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;U + 2 \cdot \left(J \cdot \left(\ell \cdot \cos \left(K \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (J l K U)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= l -300000.0) (not (<= l 80000.0)))
   (* (pow l 3.0) (* J 0.3333333333333333))
   (+ U (* 2.0 (* J (* l (cos (* K 0.5))))))))
double code(double J, double l, double K, double U) {
	double tmp;
	if ((l <= -300000.0) || !(l <= 80000.0)) {
		tmp = pow(l, 3.0) * (J * 0.3333333333333333);
	} else {
		tmp = U + (2.0 * (J * (l * cos((K * 0.5)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(j, l, k, u)
    real(8), intent (in) :: j
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: u
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((l <= (-300000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (l <= 80000.0d0))) then
        tmp = (l ** 3.0d0) * (j * 0.3333333333333333d0)
    else
        tmp = u + (2.0d0 * (j * (l * cos((k * 0.5d0)))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double J, double l, double K, double U) {
	double tmp;
	if ((l <= -300000.0) || !(l <= 80000.0)) {
		tmp = Math.pow(l, 3.0) * (J * 0.3333333333333333);
	} else {
		tmp = U + (2.0 * (J * (l * Math.cos((K * 0.5)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(J, l, K, U):
	tmp = 0
	if (l <= -300000.0) or not (l <= 80000.0):
		tmp = math.pow(l, 3.0) * (J * 0.3333333333333333)
	else:
		tmp = U + (2.0 * (J * (l * math.cos((K * 0.5)))))
	return tmp
function code(J, l, K, U)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((l <= -300000.0) || !(l <= 80000.0))
		tmp = Float64((l ^ 3.0) * Float64(J * 0.3333333333333333));
	else
		tmp = Float64(U + Float64(2.0 * Float64(J * Float64(l * cos(Float64(K * 0.5))))));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(J, l, K, U)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((l <= -300000.0) || ~((l <= 80000.0)))
		tmp = (l ^ 3.0) * (J * 0.3333333333333333);
	else
		tmp = U + (2.0 * (J * (l * cos((K * 0.5)))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[J_, l_, K_, U_] := If[Or[LessEqual[l, -300000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[l, 80000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[Power[l, 3.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[(J * 0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(U + N[(2.0 * N[(J * N[(l * N[Cos[N[(K * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;\ell \leq -300000 \lor \neg \left(\ell \leq 80000\right):\\
\;\;\;\;{\ell}^{3} \cdot \left(J \cdot 0.3333333333333333\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;U + 2 \cdot \left(J \cdot \left(\ell \cdot \cos \left(K \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if l < -3e5 or 8e4 < l

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(J \cdot \left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right)\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) + U \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in l around 0 78.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(J \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.3333333333333333 \cdot {\ell}^{3} + 2 \cdot \ell\right)}\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) + U \]
    4. Taylor expanded in K around 0 59.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{J \cdot \left(0.3333333333333333 \cdot {\ell}^{3} + 2 \cdot \ell\right)} + U \]
    5. Taylor expanded in l around inf 59.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.3333333333333333 \cdot \left(J \cdot {\ell}^{3}\right)} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r*59.2%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.3333333333333333 \cdot J\right) \cdot {\ell}^{3}} \]
    7. Simplified59.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.3333333333333333 \cdot J\right) \cdot {\ell}^{3}} \]

    if -3e5 < l < 8e4

    1. Initial program 72.1%

      \[\left(J \cdot \left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right)\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) + U \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in l around 0 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(J \cdot \left(\ell \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot K\right)\right)\right)} + U \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification79.0%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\ell \leq -300000 \lor \neg \left(\ell \leq 80000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;{\ell}^{3} \cdot \left(J \cdot 0.3333333333333333\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;U + 2 \cdot \left(J \cdot \left(\ell \cdot \cos \left(K \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 78.0% accurate, 2.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\ell \leq -1250 \lor \neg \left(\ell \leq 4600000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;{\ell}^{3} \cdot \left(J \cdot 0.3333333333333333\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;U + \ell \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(J \cdot \cos \left(K \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (J l K U)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= l -1250.0) (not (<= l 4600000.0)))
   (* (pow l 3.0) (* J 0.3333333333333333))
   (+ U (* l (* 2.0 (* J (cos (* K 0.5))))))))
double code(double J, double l, double K, double U) {
	double tmp;
	if ((l <= -1250.0) || !(l <= 4600000.0)) {
		tmp = pow(l, 3.0) * (J * 0.3333333333333333);
	} else {
		tmp = U + (l * (2.0 * (J * cos((K * 0.5)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(j, l, k, u)
    real(8), intent (in) :: j
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: u
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((l <= (-1250.0d0)) .or. (.not. (l <= 4600000.0d0))) then
        tmp = (l ** 3.0d0) * (j * 0.3333333333333333d0)
    else
        tmp = u + (l * (2.0d0 * (j * cos((k * 0.5d0)))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double J, double l, double K, double U) {
	double tmp;
	if ((l <= -1250.0) || !(l <= 4600000.0)) {
		tmp = Math.pow(l, 3.0) * (J * 0.3333333333333333);
	} else {
		tmp = U + (l * (2.0 * (J * Math.cos((K * 0.5)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(J, l, K, U):
	tmp = 0
	if (l <= -1250.0) or not (l <= 4600000.0):
		tmp = math.pow(l, 3.0) * (J * 0.3333333333333333)
	else:
		tmp = U + (l * (2.0 * (J * math.cos((K * 0.5)))))
	return tmp
function code(J, l, K, U)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((l <= -1250.0) || !(l <= 4600000.0))
		tmp = Float64((l ^ 3.0) * Float64(J * 0.3333333333333333));
	else
		tmp = Float64(U + Float64(l * Float64(2.0 * Float64(J * cos(Float64(K * 0.5))))));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(J, l, K, U)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((l <= -1250.0) || ~((l <= 4600000.0)))
		tmp = (l ^ 3.0) * (J * 0.3333333333333333);
	else
		tmp = U + (l * (2.0 * (J * cos((K * 0.5)))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[J_, l_, K_, U_] := If[Or[LessEqual[l, -1250.0], N[Not[LessEqual[l, 4600000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[Power[l, 3.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[(J * 0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(U + N[(l * N[(2.0 * N[(J * N[Cos[N[(K * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;\ell \leq -1250 \lor \neg \left(\ell \leq 4600000\right):\\
\;\;\;\;{\ell}^{3} \cdot \left(J \cdot 0.3333333333333333\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;U + \ell \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(J \cdot \cos \left(K \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if l < -1250 or 4.6e6 < l

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(J \cdot \left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right)\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) + U \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in l around 0 78.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(J \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.3333333333333333 \cdot {\ell}^{3} + 2 \cdot \ell\right)}\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) + U \]
    4. Taylor expanded in K around 0 59.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{J \cdot \left(0.3333333333333333 \cdot {\ell}^{3} + 2 \cdot \ell\right)} + U \]
    5. Taylor expanded in l around inf 59.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.3333333333333333 \cdot \left(J \cdot {\ell}^{3}\right)} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r*59.2%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.3333333333333333 \cdot J\right) \cdot {\ell}^{3}} \]
    7. Simplified59.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.3333333333333333 \cdot J\right) \cdot {\ell}^{3}} \]

    if -1250 < l < 4.6e6

    1. Initial program 72.1%

      \[\left(J \cdot \left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right)\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) + U \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in l around 0 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(J \cdot \left(\ell \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot K\right)\right)\right)} + U \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r*97.8%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot J\right) \cdot \left(\ell \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot K\right)\right)} + U \]
      2. *-commutative97.8%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\ell \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot K\right)\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot J\right)} + U \]
      3. associate-*l*97.8%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot K\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot J\right)\right)} + U \]
      4. *-commutative97.8%

        \[\leadsto \ell \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(2 \cdot J\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot K\right)\right)} + U \]
      5. associate-*l*97.8%

        \[\leadsto \ell \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \left(J \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot K\right)\right)\right)} + U \]
    5. Simplified97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(J \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot K\right)\right)\right)} + U \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification79.0%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\ell \leq -1250 \lor \neg \left(\ell \leq 4600000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;{\ell}^{3} \cdot \left(J \cdot 0.3333333333333333\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;U + \ell \cdot \left(2 \cdot \left(J \cdot \cos \left(K \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 71.6% accurate, 2.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\ell \leq -6 \cdot 10^{-7} \lor \neg \left(\ell \leq 700000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;{\ell}^{3} \cdot \left(J \cdot 0.3333333333333333\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;U + 2 \cdot \left(\ell \cdot J\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (J l K U)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= l -6e-7) (not (<= l 700000.0)))
   (* (pow l 3.0) (* J 0.3333333333333333))
   (+ U (* 2.0 (* l J)))))
double code(double J, double l, double K, double U) {
	double tmp;
	if ((l <= -6e-7) || !(l <= 700000.0)) {
		tmp = pow(l, 3.0) * (J * 0.3333333333333333);
	} else {
		tmp = U + (2.0 * (l * J));
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(j, l, k, u)
    real(8), intent (in) :: j
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: u
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((l <= (-6d-7)) .or. (.not. (l <= 700000.0d0))) then
        tmp = (l ** 3.0d0) * (j * 0.3333333333333333d0)
    else
        tmp = u + (2.0d0 * (l * j))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double J, double l, double K, double U) {
	double tmp;
	if ((l <= -6e-7) || !(l <= 700000.0)) {
		tmp = Math.pow(l, 3.0) * (J * 0.3333333333333333);
	} else {
		tmp = U + (2.0 * (l * J));
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(J, l, K, U):
	tmp = 0
	if (l <= -6e-7) or not (l <= 700000.0):
		tmp = math.pow(l, 3.0) * (J * 0.3333333333333333)
	else:
		tmp = U + (2.0 * (l * J))
	return tmp
function code(J, l, K, U)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((l <= -6e-7) || !(l <= 700000.0))
		tmp = Float64((l ^ 3.0) * Float64(J * 0.3333333333333333));
	else
		tmp = Float64(U + Float64(2.0 * Float64(l * J)));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(J, l, K, U)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((l <= -6e-7) || ~((l <= 700000.0)))
		tmp = (l ^ 3.0) * (J * 0.3333333333333333);
	else
		tmp = U + (2.0 * (l * J));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[J_, l_, K_, U_] := If[Or[LessEqual[l, -6e-7], N[Not[LessEqual[l, 700000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[Power[l, 3.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[(J * 0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(U + N[(2.0 * N[(l * J), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;\ell \leq -6 \cdot 10^{-7} \lor \neg \left(\ell \leq 700000\right):\\
\;\;\;\;{\ell}^{3} \cdot \left(J \cdot 0.3333333333333333\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;U + 2 \cdot \left(\ell \cdot J\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if l < -5.9999999999999997e-7 or 7e5 < l

    1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(J \cdot \left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right)\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) + U \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in l around 0 78.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(J \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.3333333333333333 \cdot {\ell}^{3} + 2 \cdot \ell\right)}\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) + U \]
    4. Taylor expanded in K around 0 58.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{J \cdot \left(0.3333333333333333 \cdot {\ell}^{3} + 2 \cdot \ell\right)} + U \]
    5. Taylor expanded in l around inf 58.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.3333333333333333 \cdot \left(J \cdot {\ell}^{3}\right)} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r*58.3%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.3333333333333333 \cdot J\right) \cdot {\ell}^{3}} \]
    7. Simplified58.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.3333333333333333 \cdot J\right) \cdot {\ell}^{3}} \]

    if -5.9999999999999997e-7 < l < 7e5

    1. Initial program 71.8%

      \[\left(J \cdot \left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right)\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) + U \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in l around 0 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(J \cdot \left(\ell \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot K\right)\right)\right)} + U \]
    4. Taylor expanded in K around 0 83.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(J \cdot \color{blue}{\ell}\right) + U \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification71.1%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\ell \leq -6 \cdot 10^{-7} \lor \neg \left(\ell \leq 700000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;{\ell}^{3} \cdot \left(J \cdot 0.3333333333333333\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;U + 2 \cdot \left(\ell \cdot J\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 42.1% accurate, 20.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\ell \leq -6 \cdot 10^{-7} \lor \neg \left(\ell \leq 1020\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-4 - U \cdot U\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;U\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (J l K U)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= l -6e-7) (not (<= l 1020.0))) (- -4.0 (* U U)) U))
double code(double J, double l, double K, double U) {
	double tmp;
	if ((l <= -6e-7) || !(l <= 1020.0)) {
		tmp = -4.0 - (U * U);
	} else {
		tmp = U;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(j, l, k, u)
    real(8), intent (in) :: j
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: u
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((l <= (-6d-7)) .or. (.not. (l <= 1020.0d0))) then
        tmp = (-4.0d0) - (u * u)
    else
        tmp = u
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double J, double l, double K, double U) {
	double tmp;
	if ((l <= -6e-7) || !(l <= 1020.0)) {
		tmp = -4.0 - (U * U);
	} else {
		tmp = U;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(J, l, K, U):
	tmp = 0
	if (l <= -6e-7) or not (l <= 1020.0):
		tmp = -4.0 - (U * U)
	else:
		tmp = U
	return tmp
function code(J, l, K, U)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((l <= -6e-7) || !(l <= 1020.0))
		tmp = Float64(-4.0 - Float64(U * U));
	else
		tmp = U;
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(J, l, K, U)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((l <= -6e-7) || ~((l <= 1020.0)))
		tmp = -4.0 - (U * U);
	else
		tmp = U;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[J_, l_, K_, U_] := If[Or[LessEqual[l, -6e-7], N[Not[LessEqual[l, 1020.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(-4.0 - N[(U * U), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], U]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;\ell \leq -6 \cdot 10^{-7} \lor \neg \left(\ell \leq 1020\right):\\
\;\;\;\;-4 - U \cdot U\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;U\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if l < -5.9999999999999997e-7 or 1020 < l

    1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(J \cdot \left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right)\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) + U \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*l*99.8%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{J \cdot \left(\left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right)\right)} + U \]
      2. fma-def99.8%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(J, \left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right), U\right)} \]
    3. Simplified99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(J, \left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right), U\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Applied egg-rr18.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 + \left(-U\right) \cdot U} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. cancel-sign-sub-inv18.2%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 - U \cdot U} \]
    7. Simplified18.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 - U \cdot U} \]

    if -5.9999999999999997e-7 < l < 1020

    1. Initial program 71.6%

      \[\left(J \cdot \left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right)\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) + U \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in J around 0 69.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{U} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification43.9%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\ell \leq -6 \cdot 10^{-7} \lor \neg \left(\ell \leq 1020\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-4 - U \cdot U\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;U\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 41.9% accurate, 23.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\ell \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{+56} \lor \neg \left(\ell \leq 38000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;U \cdot U\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;U\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (J l K U)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= l -1.8e+56) (not (<= l 38000000.0))) (* U U) U))
double code(double J, double l, double K, double U) {
	double tmp;
	if ((l <= -1.8e+56) || !(l <= 38000000.0)) {
		tmp = U * U;
	} else {
		tmp = U;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(j, l, k, u)
    real(8), intent (in) :: j
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: u
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((l <= (-1.8d+56)) .or. (.not. (l <= 38000000.0d0))) then
        tmp = u * u
    else
        tmp = u
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double J, double l, double K, double U) {
	double tmp;
	if ((l <= -1.8e+56) || !(l <= 38000000.0)) {
		tmp = U * U;
	} else {
		tmp = U;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(J, l, K, U):
	tmp = 0
	if (l <= -1.8e+56) or not (l <= 38000000.0):
		tmp = U * U
	else:
		tmp = U
	return tmp
function code(J, l, K, U)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((l <= -1.8e+56) || !(l <= 38000000.0))
		tmp = Float64(U * U);
	else
		tmp = U;
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(J, l, K, U)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((l <= -1.8e+56) || ~((l <= 38000000.0)))
		tmp = U * U;
	else
		tmp = U;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[J_, l_, K_, U_] := If[Or[LessEqual[l, -1.8e+56], N[Not[LessEqual[l, 38000000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(U * U), $MachinePrecision], U]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;\ell \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{+56} \lor \neg \left(\ell \leq 38000000\right):\\
\;\;\;\;U \cdot U\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;U\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if l < -1.79999999999999999e56 or 3.8e7 < l

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(J \cdot \left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right)\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) + U \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Applied egg-rr12.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{U \cdot U} \]

    if -1.79999999999999999e56 < l < 3.8e7

    1. Initial program 74.1%

      \[\left(J \cdot \left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right)\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) + U \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in J around 0 63.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{U} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification40.7%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\ell \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{+56} \lor \neg \left(\ell \leq 38000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;U \cdot U\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;U\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 53.8% accurate, 44.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ U + 2 \cdot \left(\ell \cdot J\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (J l K U) :precision binary64 (+ U (* 2.0 (* l J))))
double code(double J, double l, double K, double U) {
	return U + (2.0 * (l * J));
}
real(8) function code(j, l, k, u)
    real(8), intent (in) :: j
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: u
    code = u + (2.0d0 * (l * j))
end function
public static double code(double J, double l, double K, double U) {
	return U + (2.0 * (l * J));
}
def code(J, l, K, U):
	return U + (2.0 * (l * J))
function code(J, l, K, U)
	return Float64(U + Float64(2.0 * Float64(l * J)))
end
function tmp = code(J, l, K, U)
	tmp = U + (2.0 * (l * J));
end
code[J_, l_, K_, U_] := N[(U + N[(2.0 * N[(l * J), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
U + 2 \cdot \left(\ell \cdot J\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 85.7%

    \[\left(J \cdot \left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right)\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) + U \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in l around 0 66.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(J \cdot \left(\ell \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot K\right)\right)\right)} + U \]
  4. Taylor expanded in K around 0 54.3%

    \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(J \cdot \color{blue}{\ell}\right) + U \]
  5. Final simplification54.3%

    \[\leadsto U + 2 \cdot \left(\ell \cdot J\right) \]
  6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 2.7% accurate, 312.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 \end{array} \]
(FPCore (J l K U) :precision binary64 1.0)
double code(double J, double l, double K, double U) {
	return 1.0;
}
real(8) function code(j, l, k, u)
    real(8), intent (in) :: j
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: u
    code = 1.0d0
end function
public static double code(double J, double l, double K, double U) {
	return 1.0;
}
def code(J, l, K, U):
	return 1.0
function code(J, l, K, U)
	return 1.0
end
function tmp = code(J, l, K, U)
	tmp = 1.0;
end
code[J_, l_, K_, U_] := 1.0
\begin{array}{l}

\\
1
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 85.7%

    \[\left(J \cdot \left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right)\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) + U \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Applied egg-rr2.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{U}{U}} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-inverses2.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \]
  5. Simplified2.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \]
  6. Final simplification2.6%

    \[\leadsto 1 \]
  7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 36.5% accurate, 312.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ U \end{array} \]
(FPCore (J l K U) :precision binary64 U)
double code(double J, double l, double K, double U) {
	return U;
}
real(8) function code(j, l, k, u)
    real(8), intent (in) :: j
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: u
    code = u
end function
public static double code(double J, double l, double K, double U) {
	return U;
}
def code(J, l, K, U):
	return U
function code(J, l, K, U)
	return U
end
function tmp = code(J, l, K, U)
	tmp = U;
end
code[J_, l_, K_, U_] := U
\begin{array}{l}

\\
U
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 85.7%

    \[\left(J \cdot \left(e^{\ell} - e^{-\ell}\right)\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{K}{2}\right) + U \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in J around 0 35.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{U} \]
  4. Final simplification35.9%

    \[\leadsto U \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2024018 
(FPCore (J l K U)
  :name "Maksimov and Kolovsky, Equation (4)"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (* (* J (- (exp l) (exp (- l)))) (cos (/ K 2.0))) U))