Linear.V2:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, A

Percentage Accurate: 99.2% → 99.7%

Time: 2.7s

Alternatives: 4

Speedup: 1.0×

• 23.4% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y + z \cdot t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (* x y) (* z t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * y) + (z * t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * y) + (z * t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * y) + (z * t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * y) + (z * t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * y) + (z * t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y + z \cdot t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (* x y) (* z t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * y) + (z * t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * y) + (z * t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * y) + (z * t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * y) + (z * t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * y) + (z * t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.7% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (fma x y (* z t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(x, y, (z * t));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(x, y, Float64(z * t))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x * y + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.4%

   \[x \cdot y + z \cdot t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-def 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} \]

3. Simplified 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 67.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -6.6 \cdot 10^{+102} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{-74}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -6.6e+102) (not (<= z 6.5e-74))) (* z t) (* x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -6.6e+102) || !(z <= 6.5e-74)) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-6.6d+102)) .or. (.not. (z <= 6.5d-74))) then
        tmp = z * t
    else
        tmp = x * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -6.6e+102) || !(z <= 6.5e-74)) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -6.6e+102) or not (z <= 6.5e-74):
		tmp = z * t
	else:
		tmp = x * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -6.6e+102) || !(z <= 6.5e-74))
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -6.6e+102) || ~((z <= 6.5e-74)))
		tmp = z * t;
	else
		tmp = x * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -6.6e+102], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 6.5e-74]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -6.59999999999999997e102 or 6.5000000000000002e-74 < z

   1. Initial program 96.6%

      \[x \cdot y + z \cdot t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 75.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if -6.59999999999999997e102 < z < 6.5000000000000002e-74

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + z \cdot t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 73.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 74.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -6.6 \cdot 10^{+102} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{-74}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \cdot t + x \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (* z t) (* x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (z * t) + (x * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (z * t) + (x * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (z * t) + (x * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (z * t) + (x * y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(z * t) + Float64(x * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (z * t) + (x * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.4%

   \[x \cdot y + z \cdot t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 98.4%

   \[\leadsto z \cdot t + x \cdot y \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 51.1% accurate, 2.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \cdot t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (* z t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return z * t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = z * t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return z * t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return z * t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(z * t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = z * t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.4%

   \[x \cdot y + z \cdot t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 51.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

4. Final simplification 51.2%

   \[\leadsto z \cdot t \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024018 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Linear.V2:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, A"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (* x y) (* z t)))