SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2

Percentage Accurate: 93.4% → 96.7%

Time: 11.3s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 0.7×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 93.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 96.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x + \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_1 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+307}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ x (* (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))) (* z y)))))
   (if (<= t_1 2e+307) t_1 (+ x (* z (- t x))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x + ((tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))) * (z * y));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= 2e+307) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = x + ((tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))) * (z * y))
    if (t_1 <= 2d+307) then
        tmp = t_1
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x + ((Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))) * (z * y));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= 2e+307) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = x + ((math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))) * (z * y))
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= 2e+307:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y))) * Float64(z * y)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= 2e+307)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = x + ((tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))) * (z * y));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= 2e+307)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(x + N[(N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 2e+307], t$95$1, N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 x (*.f64 (*.f64 y z) (-.f64 (tanh.f64 (/.f64 t y)) (tanh.f64 (/.f64 x y))))) < 1.99999999999999997e307

   1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if 1.99999999999999997e307 < (+.f64 x (*.f64 (*.f64 y z) (-.f64 (tanh.f64 (/.f64 t y)) (tanh.f64 (/.f64 x y)))))

   1. Initial program 48.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right) \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+307}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 97.8% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (fma z (* y (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(z, (y * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))), x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(z, Float64(y * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))), x)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(z * N[(y * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 96.0%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

   2. *-commutative 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x \]

   3. associate-*l* 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

   4. fma-def 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

3. Simplified 98.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 98.6%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 83.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 7.8 \cdot 10^{+64}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot t_1, x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{+194}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 1 - z, y \cdot \left(z \cdot t_1\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (tanh (/ t y))))
   (if (<= y 7.8e+64)
     (fma z (* y t_1) x)
     (if (<= y 3.8e+194)
       (fma x (- 1.0 z) (* y (* z t_1)))
       (+ x (* z (- t x)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = tanh((t / y));
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 7.8e+64) {
		tmp = fma(z, (y * t_1), x);
	} else if (y <= 3.8e+194) {
		tmp = fma(x, (1.0 - z), (y * (z * t_1)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = tanh(Float64(t / y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 7.8e+64)
		tmp = fma(z, Float64(y * t_1), x);
	elseif (y <= 3.8e+194)
		tmp = fma(x, Float64(1.0 - z), Float64(y * Float64(z * t_1)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, 7.8e+64], N[(z * N[(y * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 3.8e+194], N[(x * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(z * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < 7.7999999999999996e64

   1. Initial program 98.1%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x \]

      3. associate-*l* 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      4. fma-def 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 20.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)}, x\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r* 20.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right), x\right) \]

      2. div-sub 20.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}, x\right) \]

      3. rec-exp 20.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}, x\right) \]

      4. rec-exp 20.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}, x\right) \]

      5. tanh-def-a 85.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)}, x\right) \]

   7. Simplified 85.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)}, x\right) \]

   if 7.7999999999999996e64 < y < 3.7999999999999999e194

   1. Initial program 90.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 46.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right) + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-def 46.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 1 + -1 \cdot z, y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 46.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 1 + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}, y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right) \]

      3. associate-/r* 46.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 1 + \left(-z\right), y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right)\right)\right) \]

      4. div-sub 46.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 1 + \left(-z\right), y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right)\right) \]

      5. rec-exp 46.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 1 + \left(-z\right), y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}\right)\right) \]

   5. Simplified 88.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 1 + \left(-z\right), y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if 3.7999999999999999e194 < y

   1. Initial program 84.4%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 96.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 7.8 \cdot 10^{+64}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right), x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{+194}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 1 - z, y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 83.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{+65}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot t_1, x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{+192}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(t_1 - \frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (tanh (/ t y))))
   (if (<= y 1.2e+65)
     (fma z (* y t_1) x)
     (if (<= y 2.1e+192)
       (+ x (* y (* z (- t_1 (/ x y)))))
       (+ x (* z (- t x)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = tanh((t / y));
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.2e+65) {
		tmp = fma(z, (y * t_1), x);
	} else if (y <= 2.1e+192) {
		tmp = x + (y * (z * (t_1 - (x / y))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = tanh(Float64(t / y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.2e+65)
		tmp = fma(z, Float64(y * t_1), x);
	elseif (y <= 2.1e+192)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(t_1 - Float64(x / y)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, 1.2e+65], N[(z * N[(y * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 2.1e+192], N[(x + N[(y * N[(z * N[(t$95$1 - N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < 1.2000000000000001e65

   1. Initial program 98.1%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x \]

      3. associate-*l* 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      4. fma-def 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 20.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)}, x\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r* 20.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right), x\right) \]

      2. div-sub 20.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}, x\right) \]

      3. rec-exp 20.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}, x\right) \]

      4. rec-exp 20.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}, x\right) \]

      5. tanh-def-a 85.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)}, x\right) \]

   7. Simplified 85.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)}, x\right) \]

   if 1.2000000000000001e65 < y < 2.09999999999999995e192

   1. Initial program 90.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 78.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y}}\right) \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 36.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)} + \frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 36.6%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)} + \frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 88.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \frac{x}{y}\right)\right)} \]

   if 2.09999999999999995e192 < y

   1. Initial program 84.4%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 96.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{+65}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right), x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{+192}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 83.0% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{+66}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot t_1\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{+192}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(t_1 - \frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (tanh (/ t y))))
   (if (<= y 1.85e+66)
     (+ x (* y (* z t_1)))
     (if (<= y 2.2e+192)
       (+ x (* y (* z (- t_1 (/ x y)))))
       (+ x (* z (- t x)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = tanh((t / y));
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.85e+66) {
		tmp = x + (y * (z * t_1));
	} else if (y <= 2.2e+192) {
		tmp = x + (y * (z * (t_1 - (x / y))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = tanh((t / y))
    if (y <= 1.85d+66) then
        tmp = x + (y * (z * t_1))
    else if (y <= 2.2d+192) then
        tmp = x + (y * (z * (t_1 - (x / y))))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = Math.tanh((t / y));
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.85e+66) {
		tmp = x + (y * (z * t_1));
	} else if (y <= 2.2e+192) {
		tmp = x + (y * (z * (t_1 - (x / y))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = math.tanh((t / y))
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1.85e+66:
		tmp = x + (y * (z * t_1))
	elif y <= 2.2e+192:
		tmp = x + (y * (z * (t_1 - (x / y))))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = tanh(Float64(t / y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.85e+66)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z * t_1)));
	elseif (y <= 2.2e+192)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(t_1 - Float64(x / y)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = tanh((t / y));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1.85e+66)
		tmp = x + (y * (z * t_1));
	elseif (y <= 2.2e+192)
		tmp = x + (y * (z * (t_1 - (x / y))));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, 1.85e+66], N[(x + N[(y * N[(z * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 2.2e+192], N[(x + N[(y * N[(z * N[(t$95$1 - N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < 1.85e66

   1. Initial program 98.1%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 20.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r* 20.2%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right)\right) \]

      2. div-sub 20.2%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      3. rec-exp 20.2%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}\right) \]

      4. rec-exp 20.2%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}\right) \]

      5. tanh-def-a 85.3%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 85.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right)} \]

   if 1.85e66 < y < 2.2000000000000001e192

   1. Initial program 90.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 78.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y}}\right) \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 36.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)} + \frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 36.6%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)} + \frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 88.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \frac{x}{y}\right)\right)} \]

   if 2.2000000000000001e192 < y

   1. Initial program 84.4%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 96.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{+66}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{+192}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 82.1% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.65 \cdot 10^{+186}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 1.65e+186) (+ x (* y (* z (tanh (/ t y))))) (+ x (* z (- t x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.65e+186) {
		tmp = x + (y * (z * tanh((t / y))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 1.65d+186) then
        tmp = x + (y * (z * tanh((t / y))))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.65e+186) {
		tmp = x + (y * (z * Math.tanh((t / y))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1.65e+186:
		tmp = x + (y * (z * math.tanh((t / y))))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.65e+186)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z * tanh(Float64(t / y)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1.65e+186)
		tmp = x + (y * (z * tanh((t / y))));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1.65e+186], N[(x + N[(y * N[(z * N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.65000000000000012e186

   1. Initial program 97.1%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 22.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r* 22.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right)\right) \]

      2. div-sub 22.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      3. rec-exp 22.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}\right) \]

      4. rec-exp 22.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}\right) \]

      5. tanh-def-a 85.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 85.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right)} \]

   if 1.65000000000000012e186 < y

   1. Initial program 85.7%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 92.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.65 \cdot 10^{+186}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 62.8% accurate, 10.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 7.8 \cdot 10^{+64}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{+205} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{+217}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 7.8e+64)
   x
   (if (or (<= y 1.9e+205) (not (<= y 2.3e+217))) (* x (- 1.0 z)) (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 7.8e+64) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if ((y <= 1.9e+205) || !(y <= 2.3e+217)) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 7.8d+64) then
        tmp = x
    else if ((y <= 1.9d+205) .or. (.not. (y <= 2.3d+217))) then
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - z)
    else
        tmp = z * t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 7.8e+64) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if ((y <= 1.9e+205) || !(y <= 2.3e+217)) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 7.8e+64:
		tmp = x
	elif (y <= 1.9e+205) or not (y <= 2.3e+217):
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z)
	else:
		tmp = z * t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 7.8e+64)
		tmp = x;
	elseif ((y <= 1.9e+205) || !(y <= 2.3e+217))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 7.8e+64)
		tmp = x;
	elseif ((y <= 1.9e+205) || ~((y <= 2.3e+217)))
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	else
		tmp = z * t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 7.8e+64], x, If[Or[LessEqual[y, 1.9e+205], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 2.3e+217]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < 7.7999999999999996e64

   1. Initial program 98.1%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 69.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 7.7999999999999996e64 < y < 1.9e205 or 2.2999999999999999e217 < y

   1. Initial program 89.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 79.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 60.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 60.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 60.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 60.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]

   if 1.9e205 < y < 2.2999999999999999e217

   1. Initial program 74.2%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 99.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in t around inf 99.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 74.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 74.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t} \]

   7. Simplified 74.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 67.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 7.8 \cdot 10^{+64}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{+205} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{+217}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 68.1% accurate, 17.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{+57}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 9.5e+57) x (+ x (* z (- t x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 9.5e+57) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 9.5d+57) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 9.5e+57) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 9.5e+57:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 9.5e+57)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 9.5e+57)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 9.5e+57], x, N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 9.4999999999999997e57

   1. Initial program 98.1%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 69.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 9.4999999999999997e57 < y

   1. Initial program 88.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 79.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 71.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{+57}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 64.9% accurate, 21.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+16}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (if (<= y 1.25e+16) x (+ x (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.25e+16) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 1.25d+16) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x + (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.25e+16) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1.25e+16:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.25e+16)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1.25e+16)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1.25e+16], x, N[(x + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.25e16

   1. Initial program 97.9%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 71.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 1.25e16 < y

   1. Initial program 90.4%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 72.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in t around inf 65.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+16}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 59.9% accurate, 213.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 96.0%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 64.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

4. Final simplification 64.1%

   \[\leadsto x \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 97.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y)))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + (y * (z * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y)))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024018 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

  (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))