Falkner and Boettcher, Appendix A

Percentage Accurate: 90.1% → 96.7%

Time: 11.1s

Alternatives: 9

Speedup: 1.0×

• 24.1% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. a = -1.9999999999999999e-154
  2. k = 0.0
  3. m = -2.00000000000000007e154

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (* a (pow k m)) (+ (+ 1.0 (* 10.0 k)) (* k k))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return (a * pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    code = (a * (k ** m)) / ((1.0d0 + (10.0d0 * k)) + (k * k))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return (a * Math.pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	return (a * math.pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k))

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	return Float64(Float64(a * (k ^ m)) / Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(10.0 * k)) + Float64(k * k)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = (a * (k ^ m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := N[(N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(1.0 + N[(10.0 * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 90.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (* a (pow k m)) (+ (+ 1.0 (* 10.0 k)) (* k k))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return (a * pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    code = (a * (k ** m)) / ((1.0d0 + (10.0d0 * k)) + (k * k))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return (a * Math.pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	return (a * math.pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k))

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	return Float64(Float64(a * (k ^ m)) / Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(10.0 * k)) + Float64(k * k)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = (a * (k ^ m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := N[(N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(1.0 + N[(10.0 * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 96.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \mathbf{if}\;\frac{t_0}{\left(1 + k \cdot 10\right) + k \cdot k} \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+236}:\\ \;\;\;\;{k}^{m} \cdot \frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* a (pow k m))))
   (if (<= (/ t_0 (+ (+ 1.0 (* k 10.0)) (* k k))) 4e+236)
     (* (pow k m) (/ a (+ 1.0 (* k (+ k 10.0)))))
     t_0)))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = a * pow(k, m);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_0 / ((1.0 + (k * 10.0)) + (k * k))) <= 4e+236) {
		tmp = pow(k, m) * (a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0))));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = a * (k ** m)
    if ((t_0 / ((1.0d0 + (k * 10.0d0)) + (k * k))) <= 4d+236) then
        tmp = (k ** m) * (a / (1.0d0 + (k * (k + 10.0d0))))
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = a * Math.pow(k, m);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_0 / ((1.0 + (k * 10.0)) + (k * k))) <= 4e+236) {
		tmp = Math.pow(k, m) * (a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0))));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	t_0 = a * math.pow(k, m)
	tmp = 0
	if (t_0 / ((1.0 + (k * 10.0)) + (k * k))) <= 4e+236:
		tmp = math.pow(k, m) * (a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0))))
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = Float64(a * (k ^ m))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(t_0 / Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * 10.0)) + Float64(k * k))) <= 4e+236)
		tmp = Float64((k ^ m) * Float64(a / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * Float64(k + 10.0)))));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = a * (k ^ m);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_0 / ((1.0 + (k * 10.0)) + (k * k))) <= 4e+236)
		tmp = (k ^ m) * (a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0))));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(t$95$0 / N[(N[(1.0 + N[(k * 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 4e+236], N[(N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision] * N[(a / N[(1.0 + N[(k * N[(k + 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 a (pow.f64 k m)) (+.f64 (+.f64 1 (*.f64 10 k)) (*.f64 k k))) < 4.00000000000000021e236

   1. Initial program 96.7%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]

      2. sqr-neg 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      4. sqr-neg 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      5. distribute-rgt-out 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

   3. Simplified 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 4.00000000000000021e236 < (/.f64 (*.f64 a (pow.f64 k m)) (+.f64 (+.f64 1 (*.f64 10 k)) (*.f64 k k)))

   1. Initial program 59.2%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 53.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]

      2. sqr-neg 53.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 53.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      4. sqr-neg 53.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      5. distribute-rgt-out 53.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

   3. Simplified 53.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \cdot {k}^{m} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + k \cdot 10\right) + k \cdot k} \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+236}:\\ \;\;\;\;{k}^{m} \cdot \frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 97.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq -0.00065 \lor \neg \left(m \leq 1.62 \cdot 10^{-9}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= m -0.00065) (not (<= m 1.62e-9)))
   (* a (pow k m))
   (/ a (+ 1.0 (* k (+ k 10.0))))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((m <= -0.00065) || !(m <= 1.62e-9)) {
		tmp = a * pow(k, m);
	} else {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((m <= (-0.00065d0)) .or. (.not. (m <= 1.62d-9))) then
        tmp = a * (k ** m)
    else
        tmp = a / (1.0d0 + (k * (k + 10.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((m <= -0.00065) || !(m <= 1.62e-9)) {
		tmp = a * Math.pow(k, m);
	} else {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if (m <= -0.00065) or not (m <= 1.62e-9):
		tmp = a * math.pow(k, m)
	else:
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((m <= -0.00065) || !(m <= 1.62e-9))
		tmp = Float64(a * (k ^ m));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * Float64(k + 10.0))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((m <= -0.00065) || ~((m <= 1.62e-9)))
		tmp = a * (k ^ m);
	else
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[Or[LessEqual[m, -0.00065], N[Not[LessEqual[m, 1.62e-9]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a / N[(1.0 + N[(k * N[(k + 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < -6.4999999999999997e-4 or 1.61999999999999999e-9 < m

   1. Initial program 87.2%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 85.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]

      2. sqr-neg 85.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 85.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      4. sqr-neg 85.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      5. distribute-rgt-out 85.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

   3. Simplified 85.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

   if -6.4999999999999997e-4 < m < 1.61999999999999999e-9

   1. Initial program 93.0%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 93.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]

      2. sqr-neg 93.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 93.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      4. sqr-neg 93.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      5. distribute-rgt-out 93.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

   3. Simplified 93.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 93.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 96.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq -0.00065 \lor \neg \left(m \leq 1.62 \cdot 10^{-9}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 29.5% accurate, 7.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;k \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{-306}:\\ \;\;\;\;-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;k \leq 0.1:\\ \;\;\;\;a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.1 \cdot \frac{a}{k}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= k 2.6e-306) (* -10.0 (* a k)) (if (<= k 0.1) a (* 0.1 (/ a k)))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (k <= 2.6e-306) {
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	} else if (k <= 0.1) {
		tmp = a;
	} else {
		tmp = 0.1 * (a / k);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (k <= 2.6d-306) then
        tmp = (-10.0d0) * (a * k)
    else if (k <= 0.1d0) then
        tmp = a
    else
        tmp = 0.1d0 * (a / k)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (k <= 2.6e-306) {
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	} else if (k <= 0.1) {
		tmp = a;
	} else {
		tmp = 0.1 * (a / k);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if k <= 2.6e-306:
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k)
	elif k <= 0.1:
		tmp = a
	else:
		tmp = 0.1 * (a / k)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (k <= 2.6e-306)
		tmp = Float64(-10.0 * Float64(a * k));
	elseif (k <= 0.1)
		tmp = a;
	else
		tmp = Float64(0.1 * Float64(a / k));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (k <= 2.6e-306)
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	elseif (k <= 0.1)
		tmp = a;
	else
		tmp = 0.1 * (a / k);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[k, 2.6e-306], N[(-10.0 * N[(a * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[k, 0.1], a, N[(0.1 * N[(a / k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if k < 2.6e-306

   1. Initial program 85.3%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 82.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]

      2. sqr-neg 82.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 82.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      4. sqr-neg 82.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      5. distribute-rgt-out 82.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

   3. Simplified 82.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 14.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 8.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + -10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in k around inf 11.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]

   if 2.6e-306 < k < 0.10000000000000001

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]

      2. sqr-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      4. sqr-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      5. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 59.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 59.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \]

   if 0.10000000000000001 < k

   1. Initial program 85.7%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 84.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]

      2. sqr-neg 84.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 84.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      4. sqr-neg 84.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      5. distribute-rgt-out 84.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

   3. Simplified 84.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 62.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 27.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{10 \cdot k}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 27.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}} \]

   8. Simplified 27.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in k around inf 27.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.1 \cdot \frac{a}{k}} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 31.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;k \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{-306}:\\ \;\;\;\;-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;k \leq 0.1:\\ \;\;\;\;a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.1 \cdot \frac{a}{k}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 29.7% accurate, 7.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;k \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{-306}:\\ \;\;\;\;-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;k \leq 0.1:\\ \;\;\;\;a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{0.1}{\frac{k}{a}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= k 2.6e-306) (* -10.0 (* a k)) (if (<= k 0.1) a (/ 0.1 (/ k a)))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (k <= 2.6e-306) {
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	} else if (k <= 0.1) {
		tmp = a;
	} else {
		tmp = 0.1 / (k / a);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (k <= 2.6d-306) then
        tmp = (-10.0d0) * (a * k)
    else if (k <= 0.1d0) then
        tmp = a
    else
        tmp = 0.1d0 / (k / a)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (k <= 2.6e-306) {
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	} else if (k <= 0.1) {
		tmp = a;
	} else {
		tmp = 0.1 / (k / a);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if k <= 2.6e-306:
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k)
	elif k <= 0.1:
		tmp = a
	else:
		tmp = 0.1 / (k / a)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (k <= 2.6e-306)
		tmp = Float64(-10.0 * Float64(a * k));
	elseif (k <= 0.1)
		tmp = a;
	else
		tmp = Float64(0.1 / Float64(k / a));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (k <= 2.6e-306)
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	elseif (k <= 0.1)
		tmp = a;
	else
		tmp = 0.1 / (k / a);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[k, 2.6e-306], N[(-10.0 * N[(a * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[k, 0.1], a, N[(0.1 / N[(k / a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if k < 2.6e-306

   1. Initial program 85.3%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 82.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]

      2. sqr-neg 82.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 82.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      4. sqr-neg 82.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      5. distribute-rgt-out 82.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

   3. Simplified 82.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 14.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 8.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + -10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in k around inf 11.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]

   if 2.6e-306 < k < 0.10000000000000001

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]

      2. sqr-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      4. sqr-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      5. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 59.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 59.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \]

   if 0.10000000000000001 < k

   1. Initial program 85.7%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 84.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]

      2. sqr-neg 84.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 84.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      4. sqr-neg 84.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      5. distribute-rgt-out 84.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

   3. Simplified 84.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 62.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 27.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{10 \cdot k}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 27.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}} \]

   8. Simplified 27.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in k around inf 27.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.1 \cdot \frac{a}{k}} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate-*r/ 27.8%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{0.1 \cdot a}{k}} \]

       2. associate-/l* 28.2%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{0.1}{\frac{k}{a}}} \]

   11. Simplified 28.2%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{0.1}{\frac{k}{a}}} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 31.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;k \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{-306}:\\ \;\;\;\;-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;k \leq 0.1:\\ \;\;\;\;a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{0.1}{\frac{k}{a}}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 49.8% accurate, 8.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{+31}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 4.8e+31) (/ a (+ 1.0 (* k (+ k 10.0)))) (* -10.0 (* a k))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 4.8e+31) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 4.8d+31) then
        tmp = a / (1.0d0 + (k * (k + 10.0d0)))
    else
        tmp = (-10.0d0) * (a * k)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 4.8e+31) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 4.8e+31:
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)))
	else:
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 4.8e+31)
		tmp = Float64(a / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * Float64(k + 10.0))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-10.0 * Float64(a * k));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 4.8e+31)
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	else
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, 4.8e+31], N[(a / N[(1.0 + N[(k * N[(k + 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(-10.0 * N[(a * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 4.79999999999999965e31

   1. Initial program 95.2%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]

      2. sqr-neg 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      4. sqr-neg 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      5. distribute-rgt-out 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

   3. Simplified 95.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 65.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   if 4.79999999999999965e31 < m

   1. Initial program 75.0%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 70.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]

      2. sqr-neg 70.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 70.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      4. sqr-neg 70.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      5. distribute-rgt-out 70.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

   3. Simplified 70.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 2.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 8.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + -10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in k around inf 16.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 51.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{+31}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 27.9% accurate, 9.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;k \leq 0.075:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(1 + k \cdot -10\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{0.1}{\frac{k}{a}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= k 0.075) (* a (+ 1.0 (* k -10.0))) (/ 0.1 (/ k a))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (k <= 0.075) {
		tmp = a * (1.0 + (k * -10.0));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.1 / (k / a);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (k <= 0.075d0) then
        tmp = a * (1.0d0 + (k * (-10.0d0)))
    else
        tmp = 0.1d0 / (k / a)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (k <= 0.075) {
		tmp = a * (1.0 + (k * -10.0));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.1 / (k / a);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if k <= 0.075:
		tmp = a * (1.0 + (k * -10.0))
	else:
		tmp = 0.1 / (k / a)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (k <= 0.075)
		tmp = Float64(a * Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * -10.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(0.1 / Float64(k / a));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (k <= 0.075)
		tmp = a * (1.0 + (k * -10.0));
	else
		tmp = 0.1 / (k / a);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[k, 0.075], N[(a * N[(1.0 + N[(k * -10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(0.1 / N[(k / a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if k < 0.0749999999999999972

   1. Initial program 92.4%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 91.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]

      2. sqr-neg 91.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 91.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      4. sqr-neg 91.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      5. distribute-rgt-out 91.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

   3. Simplified 91.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 36.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 33.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + -10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in a around 0 33.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(1 + -10 \cdot k\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 33.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot -10}\right) \]

   9. Simplified 33.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(1 + k \cdot -10\right)} \]

   if 0.0749999999999999972 < k

   1. Initial program 85.7%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 84.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]

      2. sqr-neg 84.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 84.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      4. sqr-neg 84.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      5. distribute-rgt-out 84.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

   3. Simplified 84.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 62.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 27.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{10 \cdot k}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 27.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}} \]

   8. Simplified 27.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in k around inf 27.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.1 \cdot \frac{a}{k}} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate-*r/ 27.8%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{0.1 \cdot a}{k}} \]

       2. associate-/l* 28.2%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{0.1}{\frac{k}{a}}} \]

   11. Simplified 28.2%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{0.1}{\frac{k}{a}}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 31.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;k \leq 0.075:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(1 + k \cdot -10\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{0.1}{\frac{k}{a}}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 33.3% accurate, 9.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{+31}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot 10}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 4.8e+31) (/ a (+ 1.0 (* k 10.0))) (* -10.0 (* a k))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 4.8e+31) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * 10.0));
	} else {
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 4.8d+31) then
        tmp = a / (1.0d0 + (k * 10.0d0))
    else
        tmp = (-10.0d0) * (a * k)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 4.8e+31) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * 10.0));
	} else {
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 4.8e+31:
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * 10.0))
	else:
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 4.8e+31)
		tmp = Float64(a / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * 10.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-10.0 * Float64(a * k));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 4.8e+31)
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * 10.0));
	else
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, 4.8e+31], N[(a / N[(1.0 + N[(k * 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(-10.0 * N[(a * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 4.79999999999999965e31

   1. Initial program 95.2%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]

      2. sqr-neg 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      4. sqr-neg 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      5. distribute-rgt-out 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

   3. Simplified 95.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 65.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 42.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{10 \cdot k}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 42.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}} \]

   8. Simplified 42.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}} \]

   if 4.79999999999999965e31 < m

   1. Initial program 75.0%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 70.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]

      2. sqr-neg 70.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 70.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      4. sqr-neg 70.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      5. distribute-rgt-out 70.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

   3. Simplified 70.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 2.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 8.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + -10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in k around inf 16.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 35.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{+31}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot 10}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 24.6% accurate, 11.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{+31}:\\ \;\;\;\;a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m) :precision binary64 (if (<= m 4.8e+31) a (* -10.0 (* a k))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 4.8e+31) {
		tmp = a;
	} else {
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 4.8d+31) then
        tmp = a
    else
        tmp = (-10.0d0) * (a * k)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 4.8e+31) {
		tmp = a;
	} else {
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 4.8e+31:
		tmp = a
	else:
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 4.8e+31)
		tmp = a;
	else
		tmp = Float64(-10.0 * Float64(a * k));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 4.8e+31)
		tmp = a;
	else
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, 4.8e+31], a, N[(-10.0 * N[(a * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 4.79999999999999965e31

   1. Initial program 95.2%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]

      2. sqr-neg 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      4. sqr-neg 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      5. distribute-rgt-out 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

   3. Simplified 95.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 65.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 25.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \]

   if 4.79999999999999965e31 < m

   1. Initial program 75.0%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 70.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]

      2. sqr-neg 70.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 70.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      4. sqr-neg 70.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

      5. distribute-rgt-out 70.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

   3. Simplified 70.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 2.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 8.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + -10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in k around inf 16.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 23.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{+31}:\\ \;\;\;\;a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 19.5% accurate, 114.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m) :precision binary64 a)

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return a;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    code = a
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return a;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	return a

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	return a
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = a;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := a

Derivation

1. Initial program 89.5%

   \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l/ 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]

   2. sqr-neg 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

   3. associate-+l+ 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

   4. sqr-neg 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

   5. distribute-rgt-out 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \cdot {k}^{m} \]

3. Simplified 88.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)} \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 47.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 19.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \]

7. Final simplification 19.4%

   \[\leadsto a \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024017 
(FPCore (a k m)
  :name "Falkner and Boettcher, Appendix A"
  :precision binary64
  (/ (* a (pow k m)) (+ (+ 1.0 (* 10.0 k)) (* k k))))