Numeric.SpecFunctions:invErfc from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 9.3s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  0.70711
  (- (/ (+ 2.30753 (* x 0.27061)) (+ 1.0 (* x (+ 0.99229 (* x 0.04481))))) x)))

C

double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 0.70711d0 * (((2.30753d0 + (x * 0.27061d0)) / (1.0d0 + (x * (0.99229d0 + (x * 0.04481d0))))) - x)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x);
}

Python

def code(x):
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x)

Julia

function code(x)
	return Float64(0.70711 * Float64(Float64(Float64(2.30753 + Float64(x * 0.27061)) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(x * Float64(0.99229 + Float64(x * 0.04481))))) - x))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x);
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := N[(0.70711 * N[(N[(N[(2.30753 + N[(x * 0.27061), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(x * N[(0.99229 + N[(x * 0.04481), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  0.70711
  (- (/ (+ 2.30753 (* x 0.27061)) (+ 1.0 (* x (+ 0.99229 (* x 0.04481))))) x)))

C

double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 0.70711d0 * (((2.30753d0 + (x * 0.27061d0)) / (1.0d0 + (x * (0.99229d0 + (x * 0.04481d0))))) - x)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x);
}

Python

def code(x):
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x)

Julia

function code(x)
	return Float64(0.70711 * Float64(Float64(Float64(2.30753 + Float64(x * 0.27061)) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(x * Float64(0.99229 + Float64(x * 0.04481))))) - x))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x);
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := N[(0.70711 * N[(N[(N[(2.30753 + N[(x * 0.27061), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(x * N[(0.99229 + N[(x * 0.04481), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  0.70711
  (- (/ (+ 2.30753 (* x 0.27061)) (+ 1.0 (* x (+ 0.99229 (* x 0.04481))))) x)))

C

double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 0.70711d0 * (((2.30753d0 + (x * 0.27061d0)) / (1.0d0 + (x * (0.99229d0 + (x * 0.04481d0))))) - x)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x);
}

Python

def code(x):
	return 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x)

Julia

function code(x)
	return Float64(0.70711 * Float64(Float64(Float64(2.30753 + Float64(x * 0.27061)) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(x * Float64(0.99229 + Float64(x * 0.04481))))) - x))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 0.70711 * (((2.30753 + (x * 0.27061)) / (1.0 + (x * (0.99229 + (x * 0.04481))))) - x);
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := N[(0.70711 * N[(N[(N[(2.30753 + N[(x * 0.27061), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(x * N[(0.99229 + N[(x * 0.04481), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.0% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.5 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2.8\right):\\ \;\;\;\;0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{6.039053782637804}{x} - x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1.6316775383 + x \cdot -2.134856267379707\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -2.5) (not (<= x 2.8)))
   (* 0.70711 (- (/ 6.039053782637804 x) x))
   (+ 1.6316775383 (* x -2.134856267379707))))

C

double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.5) || !(x <= 2.8)) {
		tmp = 0.70711 * ((6.039053782637804 / x) - x);
	} else {
		tmp = 1.6316775383 + (x * -2.134856267379707);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-2.5d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 2.8d0))) then
        tmp = 0.70711d0 * ((6.039053782637804d0 / x) - x)
    else
        tmp = 1.6316775383d0 + (x * (-2.134856267379707d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.5) || !(x <= 2.8)) {
		tmp = 0.70711 * ((6.039053782637804 / x) - x);
	} else {
		tmp = 1.6316775383 + (x * -2.134856267379707);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -2.5) or not (x <= 2.8):
		tmp = 0.70711 * ((6.039053782637804 / x) - x)
	else:
		tmp = 1.6316775383 + (x * -2.134856267379707)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -2.5) || !(x <= 2.8))
		tmp = Float64(0.70711 * Float64(Float64(6.039053782637804 / x) - x));
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.6316775383 + Float64(x * -2.134856267379707));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -2.5) || ~((x <= 2.8)))
		tmp = 0.70711 * ((6.039053782637804 / x) - x);
	else
		tmp = 1.6316775383 + (x * -2.134856267379707);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -2.5], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 2.8]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(0.70711 * N[(N[(6.039053782637804 / x), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.6316775383 + N[(x * -2.134856267379707), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -2.5 or 2.7999999999999998 < x

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.4%

      \[\leadsto 0.70711 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{6.039053782637804}{x}} - x\right) \]

   if -2.5 < x < 2.7999999999999998

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1.6316775383 + -2.134856267379707 \cdot x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto 1.6316775383 + \color{blue}{x \cdot -2.134856267379707} \]

   5. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1.6316775383 + x \cdot -2.134856267379707} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.5 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2.8\right):\\ \;\;\;\;0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{6.039053782637804}{x} - x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1.6316775383 + x \cdot -2.134856267379707\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.9% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.06 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.15\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot -0.70711\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1.6316775383 + x \cdot -2.134856267379707\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.06) (not (<= x 1.15)))
   (* x -0.70711)
   (+ 1.6316775383 (* x -2.134856267379707))))

C

double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.06) || !(x <= 1.15)) {
		tmp = x * -0.70711;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.6316775383 + (x * -2.134856267379707);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.06d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.15d0))) then
        tmp = x * (-0.70711d0)
    else
        tmp = 1.6316775383d0 + (x * (-2.134856267379707d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.06) || !(x <= 1.15)) {
		tmp = x * -0.70711;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.6316775383 + (x * -2.134856267379707);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.06) or not (x <= 1.15):
		tmp = x * -0.70711
	else:
		tmp = 1.6316775383 + (x * -2.134856267379707)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.06) || !(x <= 1.15))
		tmp = Float64(x * -0.70711);
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.6316775383 + Float64(x * -2.134856267379707));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.06) || ~((x <= 1.15)))
		tmp = x * -0.70711;
	else
		tmp = 1.6316775383 + (x * -2.134856267379707);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.06], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.15]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * -0.70711), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.6316775383 + N[(x * -2.134856267379707), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.0600000000000001 or 1.1499999999999999 < x

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.70711 \cdot x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot -0.70711} \]

   5. Simplified 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot -0.70711} \]

   if -1.0600000000000001 < x < 1.1499999999999999

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1.6316775383 + -2.134856267379707 \cdot x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto 1.6316775383 + \color{blue}{x \cdot -2.134856267379707} \]

   5. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1.6316775383 + x \cdot -2.134856267379707} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.06 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.15\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot -0.70711\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1.6316775383 + x \cdot -2.134856267379707\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 98.4% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.5 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.16\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot -0.70711\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1.6316775383\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -3.5) (not (<= x 1.16))) (* x -0.70711) 1.6316775383))

C

double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -3.5) || !(x <= 1.16)) {
		tmp = x * -0.70711;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.6316775383;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-3.5d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.16d0))) then
        tmp = x * (-0.70711d0)
    else
        tmp = 1.6316775383d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -3.5) || !(x <= 1.16)) {
		tmp = x * -0.70711;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.6316775383;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -3.5) or not (x <= 1.16):
		tmp = x * -0.70711
	else:
		tmp = 1.6316775383
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -3.5) || !(x <= 1.16))
		tmp = Float64(x * -0.70711);
	else
		tmp = 1.6316775383;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -3.5) || ~((x <= 1.16)))
		tmp = x * -0.70711;
	else
		tmp = 1.6316775383;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -3.5], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.16]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * -0.70711), $MachinePrecision], 1.6316775383]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -3.5 or 1.15999999999999992 < x

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.70711 \cdot x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot -0.70711} \]

   5. Simplified 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot -0.70711} \]

   if -3.5 < x < 1.15999999999999992

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1.6316775383} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.5 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.16\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot -0.70711\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1.6316775383\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 9.8% accurate, 19.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.1928378166664987 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 0.1928378166664987)

C

double code(double x) {
	return 0.1928378166664987;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 0.1928378166664987d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return 0.1928378166664987;
}

Python

def code(x):
	return 0.1928378166664987

Julia

function code(x)
	return 0.1928378166664987
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 0.1928378166664987;
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := 0.1928378166664987

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -0.70711, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.1913510371, 1.6316775383\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.04481, 0.99229\right), 1\right)}\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -0.70711, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 0.1913510371, 1.6316775383\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{0.99229}, 1\right)}\right) \]

6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 57.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.1928378166664987 + -0.70711 \cdot x} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 57.1%

      \[\leadsto 0.1928378166664987 + \color{blue}{x \cdot -0.70711} \]

8. Simplified 57.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.1928378166664987 + x \cdot -0.70711} \]

9. Taylor expanded in x around 0 9.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.1928378166664987} \]

10. Final simplification 9.7%

    \[\leadsto 0.1928378166664987 \]
11. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 51.6% accurate, 19.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1.6316775383 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 1.6316775383)

C

double code(double x) {
	return 1.6316775383;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 1.6316775383d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return 1.6316775383;
}

Python

def code(x):
	return 1.6316775383

Julia

function code(x)
	return 1.6316775383
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 1.6316775383;
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := 1.6316775383

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[0.70711 \cdot \left(\frac{2.30753 + x \cdot 0.27061}{1 + x \cdot \left(0.99229 + x \cdot 0.04481\right)} - x\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 50.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1.6316775383} \]

4. Final simplification 50.9%

   \[\leadsto 1.6316775383 \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024017 
(FPCore (x)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:invErfc from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B"
  :precision binary64
  (* 0.70711 (- (/ (+ 2.30753 (* x 0.27061)) (+ 1.0 (* x (+ 0.99229 (* x 0.04481))))) x)))