Diagrams.TwoD.Apollonian:descartes from diagrams-contrib-1.3.0.5

Percentage Accurate: 70.9% → 96.5%
Time: 14.8s
Alternatives: 11
Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (+ (* x y) (* x z)) (* y z)))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)))
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
}
def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)))
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(x * z)) + Float64(y * z))))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 11 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 70.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (+ (* x y) (* x z)) (* y z)))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)))
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
}
def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)))
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(x * z)) + Float64(y * z))))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 96.5% accurate, 0.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := 2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}\right)}^{2}\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{+29}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{-187}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{-308}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0
         (*
          2.0
          (pow (exp (* 0.25 (- (log (- (- y) z)) (log (/ -1.0 x))))) 2.0))))
   (if (<= y -1.8e+29)
     t_0
     (if (<= y -2.6e-187)
       (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* y x) (* z (+ y x)))))
       (if (<= y -2.7e-308) t_0 (* 2.0 (* (sqrt (+ y x)) (sqrt z))))))))
assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = 2.0 * pow(exp((0.25 * (log((-y - z)) - log((-1.0 / x))))), 2.0);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.8e+29) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= -2.6e-187) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))));
	} else if (y <= -2.7e-308) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt((y + x)) * sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = 2.0d0 * (exp((0.25d0 * (log((-y - z)) - log(((-1.0d0) / x))))) ** 2.0d0)
    if (y <= (-1.8d+29)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (y <= (-2.6d-187)) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))))
    else if (y <= (-2.7d-308)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (sqrt((y + x)) * sqrt(z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = 2.0 * Math.pow(Math.exp((0.25 * (Math.log((-y - z)) - Math.log((-1.0 / x))))), 2.0);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.8e+29) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= -2.6e-187) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))));
	} else if (y <= -2.7e-308) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (Math.sqrt((y + x)) * Math.sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}
[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = 2.0 * math.pow(math.exp((0.25 * (math.log((-y - z)) - math.log((-1.0 / x))))), 2.0)
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1.8e+29:
		tmp = t_0
	elif y <= -2.6e-187:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))))
	elif y <= -2.7e-308:
		tmp = t_0
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * (math.sqrt((y + x)) * math.sqrt(z))
	return tmp
x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(2.0 * (exp(Float64(0.25 * Float64(log(Float64(Float64(-y) - z)) - log(Float64(-1.0 / x))))) ^ 2.0))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.8e+29)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= -2.6e-187)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(y * x) + Float64(z * Float64(y + x)))));
	elseif (y <= -2.7e-308)
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(y + x)) * sqrt(z)));
	end
	return tmp
end
x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = 2.0 * (exp((0.25 * (log((-y - z)) - log((-1.0 / x))))) ^ 2.0);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1.8e+29)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= -2.6e-187)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))));
	elseif (y <= -2.7e-308)
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt((y + x)) * sqrt(z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(2.0 * N[Power[N[Exp[N[(0.25 * N[(N[Log[N[((-y) - z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Log[N[(-1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -1.8e+29], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[y, -2.6e-187], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, -2.7e-308], t$95$0, N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]]
\begin{array}{l}
[x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\
\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := 2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}\right)}^{2}\\
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{+29}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_0\\

\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{-187}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}\\

\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{-308}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_0\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if y < -1.79999999999999988e29 or -2.5999999999999999e-187 < y < -2.70000000000000015e-308

    1. Initial program 52.6%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+52.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. +-commutative52.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]
      3. distribute-rgt-in52.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified52.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative52.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}} \]
      2. distribute-rgt-in52.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      3. associate-+l+52.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z}} \]
      4. +-commutative52.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + y \cdot z} \]
      5. associate-+r+52.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      6. *-commutative52.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      7. distribute-lft-in52.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)}} \]
      8. fma-udef52.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}} \]
      9. add-sqr-sqrt52.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}} \cdot \sqrt{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}}\right)} \]
      10. pow252.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}}\right)}^{2}} \]
    6. Applied egg-rr52.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)\right)}^{0.25}\right)}^{2}} \]
    7. Taylor expanded in x around -inf 40.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(-1 \cdot y + -1 \cdot z\right) + -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}\right)}}^{2} \]

    if -1.79999999999999988e29 < y < -2.5999999999999999e-187

    1. Initial program 77.3%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+77.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. +-commutative77.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]
      3. distribute-rgt-in77.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified77.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing

    if -2.70000000000000015e-308 < y

    1. Initial program 69.6%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+69.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. +-commutative69.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]
      3. distribute-rgt-in69.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified69.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 48.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative48.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)}} \]
    7. Simplified48.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    8. Step-by-step derivation
      1. sqrt-prod51.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y + x}\right)} \]
      2. *-commutative51.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
    9. Applied egg-rr51.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification52.8%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{+29}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}\right)}^{2}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{-187}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{-308}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}\right)}^{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 94.7% accurate, 0.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.06 \cdot 10^{+33}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25}\right)}^{\left(2 \cdot \left(\log \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{-278}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(z + x\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -1.06e+33)
   (* 2.0 (pow (exp 0.25) (* 2.0 (- (log (- (- y) z)) (log (/ -1.0 x))))))
   (if (<= y 2.1e-278)
     (* 2.0 (sqrt (fma x z (* y (+ z x)))))
     (* 2.0 (* (sqrt (+ y x)) (sqrt z))))))
assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.06e+33) {
		tmp = 2.0 * pow(exp(0.25), (2.0 * (log((-y - z)) - log((-1.0 / x)))));
	} else if (y <= 2.1e-278) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(fma(x, z, (y * (z + x))));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt((y + x)) * sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}
x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.06e+33)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * (exp(0.25) ^ Float64(2.0 * Float64(log(Float64(Float64(-y) - z)) - log(Float64(-1.0 / x))))));
	elseif (y <= 2.1e-278)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(fma(x, z, Float64(y * Float64(z + x)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(y + x)) * sqrt(z)));
	end
	return tmp
end
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -1.06e+33], N[(2.0 * N[Power[N[Exp[0.25], $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Log[N[((-y) - z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Log[N[(-1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 2.1e-278], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * z + N[(y * N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}
[x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\
\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.06 \cdot 10^{+33}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25}\right)}^{\left(2 \cdot \left(\log \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)\right)}\\

\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{-278}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(z + x\right)\right)}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if y < -1.06e33

    1. Initial program 46.6%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+46.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. +-commutative46.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]
      3. distribute-rgt-in46.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified46.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative46.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}} \]
      2. distribute-rgt-in46.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      3. associate-+l+46.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z}} \]
      4. +-commutative46.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + y \cdot z} \]
      5. associate-+r+46.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      6. *-commutative46.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      7. distribute-lft-in46.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)}} \]
      8. fma-udef46.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}} \]
      9. add-sqr-sqrt46.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}} \cdot \sqrt{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}}\right)} \]
      10. pow246.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}}\right)}^{2}} \]
    6. Applied egg-rr46.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)\right)}^{0.25}\right)}^{2}} \]
    7. Taylor expanded in x around -inf 36.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(-1 \cdot y + -1 \cdot z\right) + -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}\right)}^{2}} \]
    8. Step-by-step derivation
      1. unpow236.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(-1 \cdot y + -1 \cdot z\right) + -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)} \cdot e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(-1 \cdot y + -1 \cdot z\right) + -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}\right)} \]
      2. exp-prod35.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{{\left(e^{0.25}\right)}^{\left(\log \left(-1 \cdot y + -1 \cdot z\right) + -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}} \cdot e^{0.25 \cdot \left(\log \left(-1 \cdot y + -1 \cdot z\right) + -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}\right) \]
      3. exp-prod35.1%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left({\left(e^{0.25}\right)}^{\left(\log \left(-1 \cdot y + -1 \cdot z\right) + -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)} \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(e^{0.25}\right)}^{\left(\log \left(-1 \cdot y + -1 \cdot z\right) + -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}}\right) \]
      4. pow-sqr35.1%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(e^{0.25}\right)}^{\left(2 \cdot \left(\log \left(-1 \cdot y + -1 \cdot z\right) + -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)\right)}} \]
      5. mul-1-neg35.1%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25}\right)}^{\left(2 \cdot \left(\log \left(-1 \cdot y + -1 \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}\right)\right)} \]
      6. unsub-neg35.1%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25}\right)}^{\left(2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(-1 \cdot y + -1 \cdot z\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)}\right)} \]
      7. +-commutative35.1%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25}\right)}^{\left(2 \cdot \left(\log \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z + -1 \cdot y\right)} - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)\right)} \]
      8. mul-1-neg35.1%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25}\right)}^{\left(2 \cdot \left(\log \left(-1 \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)\right)} \]
      9. unsub-neg35.1%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25}\right)}^{\left(2 \cdot \left(\log \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z - y\right)} - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)\right)} \]
      10. mul-1-neg35.1%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25}\right)}^{\left(2 \cdot \left(\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} - y\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)\right)} \]
    9. Simplified35.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(e^{0.25}\right)}^{\left(2 \cdot \left(\log \left(\left(-z\right) - y\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)\right)}} \]

    if -1.06e33 < y < 2.10000000000000014e-278

    1. Initial program 70.5%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+70.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. *-commutative70.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      3. *-commutative70.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. *-commutative70.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      5. +-commutative70.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
      6. +-commutative70.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]
      7. +-commutative70.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
      8. *-commutative70.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot z} + z \cdot x\right)} \]
      9. *-commutative70.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot z}\right)} \]
      10. associate-+l+70.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot z}} \]
      11. +-commutative70.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      12. fma-def70.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      13. distribute-lft-out70.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)}\right)} \]
    3. Simplified70.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing

    if 2.10000000000000014e-278 < y

    1. Initial program 70.6%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+70.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. +-commutative70.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]
      3. distribute-rgt-in70.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified70.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 48.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative48.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)}} \]
    7. Simplified48.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    8. Step-by-step derivation
      1. sqrt-prod49.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y + x}\right)} \]
      2. *-commutative49.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
    9. Applied egg-rr49.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification53.0%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.06 \cdot 10^{+33}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot {\left(e^{0.25}\right)}^{\left(2 \cdot \left(\log \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right) - \log \left(\frac{-1}{x}\right)\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{-278}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(z + x\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 84.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{-278}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(y + x\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 2.1e-278)
   (* 2.0 (sqrt (fma x y (* z (+ y x)))))
   (* 2.0 (* (sqrt (+ y x)) (sqrt z)))))
assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.1e-278) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(fma(x, y, (z * (y + x))));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt((y + x)) * sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}
x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 2.1e-278)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(fma(x, y, Float64(z * Float64(y + x)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(y + x)) * sqrt(z)));
	end
	return tmp
end
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 2.1e-278], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * y + N[(z * N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
[x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\
\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{-278}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(y + x\right)\right)}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < 2.10000000000000014e-278

    1. Initial program 61.3%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+61.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. *-commutative61.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      3. *-commutative61.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. *-commutative61.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      5. +-commutative61.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
      6. +-commutative61.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]
      7. associate-+l+61.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot x + y \cdot x\right)}} \]
      8. *-commutative61.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z} + y \cdot x\right)} \]
      9. *-commutative61.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)} \]
      10. +-commutative61.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) + z \cdot y}} \]
      11. +-commutative61.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)}} \]
      12. *-commutative61.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot z} + \left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
      13. associate-+r+61.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y}} \]
      14. *-commutative61.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot y} + x \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y} \]
      15. *-commutative61.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(z \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot x}\right) + x \cdot y} \]
      16. +-commutative61.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
      17. fma-def61.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified61.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing

    if 2.10000000000000014e-278 < y

    1. Initial program 70.6%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+70.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. +-commutative70.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]
      3. distribute-rgt-in70.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified70.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 48.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative48.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)}} \]
    7. Simplified48.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    8. Step-by-step derivation
      1. sqrt-prod49.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y + x}\right)} \]
      2. *-commutative49.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
    9. Applied egg-rr49.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification55.3%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{-278}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(y + x\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 85.0% accurate, 0.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{-278}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(z + x\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 2.1e-278)
   (* 2.0 (sqrt (fma x z (* y (+ z x)))))
   (* 2.0 (* (sqrt (+ y x)) (sqrt z)))))
assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.1e-278) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(fma(x, z, (y * (z + x))));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt((y + x)) * sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}
x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 2.1e-278)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(fma(x, z, Float64(y * Float64(z + x)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(y + x)) * sqrt(z)));
	end
	return tmp
end
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 2.1e-278], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * z + N[(y * N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
[x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\
\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{-278}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(z + x\right)\right)}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < 2.10000000000000014e-278

    1. Initial program 61.3%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+61.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. *-commutative61.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      3. *-commutative61.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. *-commutative61.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]
      5. +-commutative61.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
      6. +-commutative61.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]
      7. +-commutative61.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]
      8. *-commutative61.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot z} + z \cdot x\right)} \]
      9. *-commutative61.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot z}\right)} \]
      10. associate-+l+61.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot z}} \]
      11. +-commutative61.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      12. fma-def61.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      13. distribute-lft-out61.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)}\right)} \]
    3. Simplified61.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing

    if 2.10000000000000014e-278 < y

    1. Initial program 70.6%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+70.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. +-commutative70.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]
      3. distribute-rgt-in70.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified70.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 48.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative48.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)}} \]
    7. Simplified48.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    8. Step-by-step derivation
      1. sqrt-prod49.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y + x}\right)} \]
      2. *-commutative49.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
    9. Applied egg-rr49.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification55.2%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{-278}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(z + x\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 84.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{-278}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 2.1e-278)
   (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* y x) (* z (+ y x)))))
   (* 2.0 (* (sqrt (+ y x)) (sqrt z)))))
assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.1e-278) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt((y + x)) * sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 2.1d-278) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (sqrt((y + x)) * sqrt(z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.1e-278) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (Math.sqrt((y + x)) * Math.sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}
[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 2.1e-278:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * (math.sqrt((y + x)) * math.sqrt(z))
	return tmp
x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 2.1e-278)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(y * x) + Float64(z * Float64(y + x)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(y + x)) * sqrt(z)));
	end
	return tmp
end
x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 2.1e-278)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt((y + x)) * sqrt(z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 2.1e-278], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
[x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\
\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{-278}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < 2.10000000000000014e-278

    1. Initial program 61.3%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+61.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. +-commutative61.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]
      3. distribute-rgt-in61.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified61.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing

    if 2.10000000000000014e-278 < y

    1. Initial program 70.6%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+70.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. +-commutative70.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]
      3. distribute-rgt-in70.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified70.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 48.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative48.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)}} \]
    7. Simplified48.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    8. Step-by-step derivation
      1. sqrt-prod49.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y + x}\right)} \]
      2. *-commutative49.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
    9. Applied egg-rr49.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification55.2%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{-278}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 83.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 4.1 \cdot 10^{-268}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 4.1e-268)
   (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* y x) (* z (+ y x)))))
   (* 2.0 (* (sqrt z) (sqrt y)))))
assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 4.1e-268) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt(z) * sqrt(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 4.1d-268) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (sqrt(z) * sqrt(y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 4.1e-268) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (Math.sqrt(z) * Math.sqrt(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}
[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 4.1e-268:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * (math.sqrt(z) * math.sqrt(y))
	return tmp
x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 4.1e-268)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(y * x) + Float64(z * Float64(y + x)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(z) * sqrt(y)));
	end
	return tmp
end
x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 4.1e-268)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt(z) * sqrt(y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 4.1e-268], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
[x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\
\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq 4.1 \cdot 10^{-268}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < 4.0999999999999999e-268

    1. Initial program 62.5%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+62.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. +-commutative62.5%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]
      3. distribute-rgt-in62.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified62.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing

    if 4.0999999999999999e-268 < y

    1. Initial program 69.7%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+69.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. +-commutative69.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]
      3. distribute-rgt-in69.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified69.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative69.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}} \]
      2. distribute-rgt-in69.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      3. associate-+l+69.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z}} \]
      4. +-commutative69.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} + y \cdot z} \]
      5. associate-+r+69.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      6. *-commutative69.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]
      7. distribute-lft-in69.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot z + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)}} \]
      8. fma-udef69.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}} \]
      9. add-sqr-sqrt69.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}} \cdot \sqrt{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}}\right)} \]
      10. pow269.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}}\right)}^{2}} \]
    6. Applied egg-rr69.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)\right)}^{0.25}\right)}^{2}} \]
    7. Taylor expanded in x around 0 25.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left({\left(y \cdot z\right)}^{0.25}\right)}}^{2} \]
    8. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative25.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left({\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)}}^{0.25}\right)}^{2} \]
    9. Simplified25.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left({\left(z \cdot y\right)}^{0.25}\right)}}^{2} \]
    10. Step-by-step derivation
      1. pow-pow25.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(z \cdot y\right)}^{\left(0.25 \cdot 2\right)}} \]
      2. *-commutative25.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right)}}^{\left(0.25 \cdot 2\right)} \]
      3. metadata-eval25.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {\left(y \cdot z\right)}^{\color{blue}{0.5}} \]
      4. pow1/225.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot z}} \]
      5. sqrt-prod34.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
    11. Applied egg-rr34.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
    12. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative34.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \]
    13. Simplified34.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification48.5%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 4.1 \cdot 10^{-268}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 69.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{-278}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 2.1e-278) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* x (+ y z)))) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y z)))))
assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.1e-278) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 2.1d-278) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.1e-278) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}
[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 2.1e-278:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((x * (y + z)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * z))
	return tmp
x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 2.1e-278)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(x * Float64(y + z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * z)));
	end
	return tmp
end
x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 2.1e-278)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 2.1e-278], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
[x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\
\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{-278}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < 2.10000000000000014e-278

    1. Initial program 61.3%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+61.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. +-commutative61.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]
      3. distribute-rgt-in61.4%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified61.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 42.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}} \]

    if 2.10000000000000014e-278 < y

    1. Initial program 70.6%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+70.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. +-commutative70.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]
      3. distribute-rgt-in70.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified70.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 24.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot z}} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification33.4%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{-278}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 71.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-292}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -1e-292) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* x (+ y z)))) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* z (+ y x))))))
assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1e-292) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((z * (y + x)));
	}
	return tmp;
}
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-1d-292)) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((z * (y + x)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1e-292) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((z * (y + x)));
	}
	return tmp;
}
[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1e-292:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((x * (y + z)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((z * (y + x)))
	return tmp
x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1e-292)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(x * Float64(y + z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(z * Float64(y + x))));
	end
	return tmp
end
x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1e-292)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((z * (y + x)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -1e-292], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(z * N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
[x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\
\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-292}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < -1.0000000000000001e-292

    1. Initial program 61.6%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+61.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. +-commutative61.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]
      3. distribute-rgt-in61.7%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified61.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 41.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}} \]

    if -1.0000000000000001e-292 < y

    1. Initial program 69.8%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+69.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. +-commutative69.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]
      3. distribute-rgt-in69.8%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified69.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 49.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative49.1%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)}} \]
    7. Simplified49.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification45.6%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-292}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 71.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)} \end{array} \]
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* y x) (* z (+ y x))))))
assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))));
}
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))))
end function
assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))));
}
[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))))
x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(y * x) + Float64(z * Float64(y + x)))))
end
x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))));
end
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}
[x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\
\\
2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 66.1%

    \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-+l+66.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
    2. +-commutative66.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]
    3. distribute-rgt-in66.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
  3. Simplified66.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
  4. Add Preprocessing
  5. Final simplification66.1%

    \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)} \]
  6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 68.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{-310}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -2e-310) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y x))) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y z)))))
assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -2e-310) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-2d-310)) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * x))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -2e-310) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * x));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}
[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -2e-310:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * x))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * z))
	return tmp
x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -2e-310)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * x)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * z)));
	end
	return tmp
end
x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -2e-310)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -2e-310], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
[x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\
\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{-310}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < -1.999999999999994e-310

    1. Initial program 62.1%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+62.1%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. +-commutative62.1%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]
      3. distribute-rgt-in62.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified62.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 20.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot y}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative20.3%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x}} \]
    7. Simplified20.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot x}} \]

    if -1.999999999999994e-310 < y

    1. Initial program 69.6%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+l+69.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
      2. +-commutative69.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]
      3. distribute-rgt-in69.6%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    3. Simplified69.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 23.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot z}} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification22.3%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{-310}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 36.6% accurate, 1.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x} \end{array} \]
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y x))))
assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
}
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * x))
end function
assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * x));
}
[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * x))
x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * x)))
end
x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
end
NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}
[x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\
\\
2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 66.1%

    \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-+l+66.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]
    2. +-commutative66.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]
    3. distribute-rgt-in66.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
  3. Simplified66.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
  4. Add Preprocessing
  5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 22.3%

    \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot y}} \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative22.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x}} \]
  7. Simplified22.3%

    \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot x}} \]
  8. Final simplification22.3%

    \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x} \]
  9. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 83.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := 0.25 \cdot \left(\left({y}^{-0.75} \cdot \left({z}^{-0.75} \cdot x\right)\right) \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) + {z}^{0.25} \cdot {y}^{0.25}\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < 7.636950090573675 \cdot 10^{+176}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x + y\right) \cdot z + x \cdot y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(t_0 \cdot t_0\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0
         (+
          (* 0.25 (* (* (pow y -0.75) (* (pow z -0.75) x)) (+ y z)))
          (* (pow z 0.25) (pow y 0.25)))))
   (if (< z 7.636950090573675e+176)
     (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* (+ x y) z) (* x y))))
     (* (* t_0 t_0) 2.0))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (0.25 * ((pow(y, -0.75) * (pow(z, -0.75) * x)) * (y + z))) + (pow(z, 0.25) * pow(y, 0.25));
	double tmp;
	if (z < 7.636950090573675e+176) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)));
	} else {
		tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (0.25d0 * (((y ** (-0.75d0)) * ((z ** (-0.75d0)) * x)) * (y + z))) + ((z ** 0.25d0) * (y ** 0.25d0))
    if (z < 7.636950090573675d+176) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)))
    else
        tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (0.25 * ((Math.pow(y, -0.75) * (Math.pow(z, -0.75) * x)) * (y + z))) + (Math.pow(z, 0.25) * Math.pow(y, 0.25));
	double tmp;
	if (z < 7.636950090573675e+176) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)));
	} else {
		tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = (0.25 * ((math.pow(y, -0.75) * (math.pow(z, -0.75) * x)) * (y + z))) + (math.pow(z, 0.25) * math.pow(y, 0.25))
	tmp = 0
	if z < 7.636950090573675e+176:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)))
	else:
		tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(0.25 * Float64(Float64((y ^ -0.75) * Float64((z ^ -0.75) * x)) * Float64(y + z))) + Float64((z ^ 0.25) * (y ^ 0.25)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < 7.636950090573675e+176)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) * z) + Float64(x * y))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(t_0 * t_0) * 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = (0.25 * (((y ^ -0.75) * ((z ^ -0.75) * x)) * (y + z))) + ((z ^ 0.25) * (y ^ 0.25));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < 7.636950090573675e+176)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)));
	else
		tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(0.25 * N[(N[(N[Power[y, -0.75], $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Power[z, -0.75], $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Power[z, 0.25], $MachinePrecision] * N[Power[y, 0.25], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, 7.636950090573675e+176], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := 0.25 \cdot \left(\left({y}^{-0.75} \cdot \left({z}^{-0.75} \cdot x\right)\right) \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) + {z}^{0.25} \cdot {y}^{0.25}\\
\mathbf{if}\;z < 7.636950090573675 \cdot 10^{+176}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x + y\right) \cdot z + x \cdot y}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\left(t_0 \cdot t_0\right) \cdot 2\\


\end{array}
\end{array}

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2024011 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.TwoD.Apollonian:descartes from diagrams-contrib-1.3.0.5"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (if (< z 7.636950090573675e+176) (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* (+ x y) z) (* x y)))) (* (* (+ (* 0.25 (* (* (pow y -0.75) (* (pow z -0.75) x)) (+ y z))) (* (pow z 0.25) (pow y 0.25))) (+ (* 0.25 (* (* (pow y -0.75) (* (pow z -0.75) x)) (+ y z))) (* (pow z 0.25) (pow y 0.25)))) 2.0))

  (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (+ (* x y) (* x z)) (* y z)))))