Graphics.Rasterific.Shading:$sradialGradientWithFocusShader from Rasterific-0.6.1, B

Percentage Accurate: 91.1% → 94.4%

Time: 6.3s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 0.9×

• 49.8% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* x x) (* (* y 4.0) (- (* z z) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * x) - ((y * 4.0d0) * ((z * z) - t))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * x) - Float64(Float64(y * 4.0) * Float64(Float64(z * z) - t)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 91.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* x x) (* (* y 4.0) (- (* z z) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * x) - ((y * 4.0d0) * ((z * z) - t))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * x) - Float64(Float64(y * 4.0) * Float64(Float64(z * z) - t)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 94.4% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} x_m = \left|x\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x_m \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{+217}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(x_m, x_m, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x_m \cdot x_m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

x_m = (fabs.f64 x)
(FPCore (x_m y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x_m 3.6e+217) (fma x_m x_m (* (- (* z z) t) (* y -4.0))) (* x_m x_m)))

C

x_m = fabs(x);
double code(double x_m, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x_m <= 3.6e+217) {
		tmp = fma(x_m, x_m, (((z * z) - t) * (y * -4.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = x_m * x_m;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x_m = abs(x)
function code(x_m, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x_m <= 3.6e+217)
		tmp = fma(x_m, x_m, Float64(Float64(Float64(z * z) - t) * Float64(y * -4.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x_m * x_m);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

x_m = N[Abs[x], $MachinePrecision]
code[x$95$m_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[x$95$m, 3.6e+217], N[(x$95$m * x$95$m + N[(N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x$95$m * x$95$m), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < 3.6000000000000002e217

   1. Initial program 85.6%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-neg 88.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -\left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right)\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-in 88.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right)}\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 88.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(-y \cdot 4\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 88.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(-4\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 88.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{-4}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 3.6000000000000002e217 < x

   1. Initial program 80.0%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. pow2 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{+217}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 57.1% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} x_m = \left|x\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x_m \cdot x_m \leq 8.8 \cdot 10^{-238} \lor \neg \left(x_m \cdot x_m \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{-193}\right) \land x_m \cdot x_m \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{+90}:\\ \;\;\;\;4 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x_m \cdot x_m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

x_m = (fabs.f64 x)
(FPCore (x_m y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x_m x_m) 8.8e-238)
         (and (not (<= (* x_m x_m) 2.8e-193)) (<= (* x_m x_m) 4.2e+90)))
   (* 4.0 (* t y))
   (* x_m x_m)))

C

x_m = fabs(x);
double code(double x_m, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x_m * x_m) <= 8.8e-238) || (!((x_m * x_m) <= 2.8e-193) && ((x_m * x_m) <= 4.2e+90))) {
		tmp = 4.0 * (t * y);
	} else {
		tmp = x_m * x_m;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

x_m = abs(x)
real(8) function code(x_m, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x_m * x_m) <= 8.8d-238) .or. (.not. ((x_m * x_m) <= 2.8d-193)) .and. ((x_m * x_m) <= 4.2d+90)) then
        tmp = 4.0d0 * (t * y)
    else
        tmp = x_m * x_m
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

x_m = Math.abs(x);
public static double code(double x_m, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x_m * x_m) <= 8.8e-238) || (!((x_m * x_m) <= 2.8e-193) && ((x_m * x_m) <= 4.2e+90))) {
		tmp = 4.0 * (t * y);
	} else {
		tmp = x_m * x_m;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

x_m = math.fabs(x)
def code(x_m, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x_m * x_m) <= 8.8e-238) or (not ((x_m * x_m) <= 2.8e-193) and ((x_m * x_m) <= 4.2e+90)):
		tmp = 4.0 * (t * y)
	else:
		tmp = x_m * x_m
	return tmp

Julia

x_m = abs(x)
function code(x_m, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x_m * x_m) <= 8.8e-238) || (!(Float64(x_m * x_m) <= 2.8e-193) && (Float64(x_m * x_m) <= 4.2e+90)))
		tmp = Float64(4.0 * Float64(t * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x_m * x_m);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x_m = abs(x);
function tmp_2 = code(x_m, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x_m * x_m) <= 8.8e-238) || (~(((x_m * x_m) <= 2.8e-193)) && ((x_m * x_m) <= 4.2e+90)))
		tmp = 4.0 * (t * y);
	else
		tmp = x_m * x_m;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

x_m = N[Abs[x], $MachinePrecision]
code[x$95$m_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x$95$m * x$95$m), $MachinePrecision], 8.8e-238], And[N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x$95$m * x$95$m), $MachinePrecision], 2.8e-193]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[N[(x$95$m * x$95$m), $MachinePrecision], 4.2e+90]]], N[(4.0 * N[(t * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x$95$m * x$95$m), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x x) < 8.79999999999999965e-238 or 2.8000000000000002e-193 < (*.f64 x x) < 4.19999999999999961e90

   1. Initial program 90.8%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 42.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 42.9%

         \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot t\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 42.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right)} \]

   if 8.79999999999999965e-238 < (*.f64 x x) < 2.8000000000000002e-193 or 4.19999999999999961e90 < (*.f64 x x)

   1. Initial program 78.7%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 75.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. pow2 75.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 75.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 58.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot x \leq 8.8 \cdot 10^{-238} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot x \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{-193}\right) \land x \cdot x \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{+90}:\\ \;\;\;\;4 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 92.8% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} x_m = \left|x\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x_m \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{+140}:\\ \;\;\;\;x_m \cdot x_m + \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(t - z \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x_m \cdot x_m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

x_m = (fabs.f64 x)
(FPCore (x_m y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x_m 2.3e+140)
   (+ (* x_m x_m) (* (* y 4.0) (- t (* z z))))
   (* x_m x_m)))

C

x_m = fabs(x);
double code(double x_m, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x_m <= 2.3e+140) {
		tmp = (x_m * x_m) + ((y * 4.0) * (t - (z * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x_m * x_m;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

x_m = abs(x)
real(8) function code(x_m, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x_m <= 2.3d+140) then
        tmp = (x_m * x_m) + ((y * 4.0d0) * (t - (z * z)))
    else
        tmp = x_m * x_m
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

x_m = Math.abs(x);
public static double code(double x_m, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x_m <= 2.3e+140) {
		tmp = (x_m * x_m) + ((y * 4.0) * (t - (z * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x_m * x_m;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

x_m = math.fabs(x)
def code(x_m, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if x_m <= 2.3e+140:
		tmp = (x_m * x_m) + ((y * 4.0) * (t - (z * z)))
	else:
		tmp = x_m * x_m
	return tmp

Julia

x_m = abs(x)
function code(x_m, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x_m <= 2.3e+140)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x_m * x_m) + Float64(Float64(y * 4.0) * Float64(t - Float64(z * z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x_m * x_m);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x_m = abs(x);
function tmp_2 = code(x_m, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x_m <= 2.3e+140)
		tmp = (x_m * x_m) + ((y * 4.0) * (t - (z * z)));
	else
		tmp = x_m * x_m;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

x_m = N[Abs[x], $MachinePrecision]
code[x$95$m_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[x$95$m, 2.3e+140], N[(N[(x$95$m * x$95$m), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(y * 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(t - N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x$95$m * x$95$m), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < 2.2999999999999999e140

   1. Initial program 87.9%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if 2.2999999999999999e140 < x

   1. Initial program 69.2%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 89.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. pow2 89.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 89.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{+140}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x + \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(t - z \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 66.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} x_m = \left|x\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x_m \cdot x_m \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;x_m \cdot x_m - y \cdot \left(t \cdot -4\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x_m \cdot x_m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

x_m = (fabs.f64 x)
(FPCore (x_m y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x_m x_m) INFINITY) (- (* x_m x_m) (* y (* t -4.0))) (* x_m x_m)))

C

x_m = fabs(x);
double code(double x_m, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x_m * x_m) <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = (x_m * x_m) - (y * (t * -4.0));
	} else {
		tmp = x_m * x_m;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

x_m = Math.abs(x);
public static double code(double x_m, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x_m * x_m) <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = (x_m * x_m) - (y * (t * -4.0));
	} else {
		tmp = x_m * x_m;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

x_m = math.fabs(x)
def code(x_m, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x_m * x_m) <= math.inf:
		tmp = (x_m * x_m) - (y * (t * -4.0))
	else:
		tmp = x_m * x_m
	return tmp

Julia

x_m = abs(x)
function code(x_m, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x_m * x_m) <= Inf)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x_m * x_m) - Float64(y * Float64(t * -4.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x_m * x_m);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x_m = abs(x);
function tmp_2 = code(x_m, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x_m * x_m) <= Inf)
		tmp = (x_m * x_m) - (y * (t * -4.0));
	else
		tmp = x_m * x_m;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

x_m = N[Abs[x], $MachinePrecision]
code[x$95$m_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x$95$m * x$95$m), $MachinePrecision], Infinity], N[(N[(x$95$m * x$95$m), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * N[(t * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x$95$m * x$95$m), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x x) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 85.1%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 64.2%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 64.2%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot y\right) \cdot -4} \]

      2. *-commutative 64.2%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot t\right)} \cdot -4 \]

      3. associate-*l* 64.2%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(t \cdot -4\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 64.2%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(t \cdot -4\right)} \]

   if +inf.0 < (*.f64 x x)

   1. Initial program 85.1%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 41.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. pow2 41.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 41.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 64.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot x \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x - y \cdot \left(t \cdot -4\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 41.0% accurate, 4.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} x_m = \left|x\right| \\ x_m \cdot x_m \end{array} \]

FPCore

x_m = (fabs.f64 x)
(FPCore (x_m y z t) :precision binary64 (* x_m x_m))

C

x_m = fabs(x);
double code(double x_m, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x_m * x_m;
}

Fortran

x_m = abs(x)
real(8) function code(x_m, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x_m * x_m
end function

Java

x_m = Math.abs(x);
public static double code(double x_m, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x_m * x_m;
}

Python

x_m = math.fabs(x)
def code(x_m, y, z, t):
	return x_m * x_m

Julia

x_m = abs(x)
function code(x_m, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x_m * x_m)
end

MATLAB

x_m = abs(x);
function tmp = code(x_m, y, z, t)
	tmp = x_m * x_m;
end

Wolfram

x_m = N[Abs[x], $MachinePrecision]
code[x$95$m_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x$95$m * x$95$m), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 85.1%

   \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 41.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{2}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. pow2 41.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]

5. Applied egg-rr 41.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]

6. Final simplification 41.9%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot x \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 91.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot x - 4 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* x x) (* 4.0 (* y (- (* z z) t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - (4.0 * (y * ((z * z) - t)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * x) - (4.0d0 * (y * ((z * z) - t)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - (4.0 * (y * ((z * z) - t)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * x) - (4.0 * (y * ((z * z) - t)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * x) - Float64(4.0 * Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * z) - t))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * x) - (4.0 * (y * ((z * z) - t)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(4.0 * N[(y * N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024010 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Graphics.Rasterific.Shading:$sradialGradientWithFocusShader from Rasterific-0.6.1, B"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (- (* x x) (* 4.0 (* y (- (* z z) t))))

  (- (* x x) (* (* y 4.0) (- (* z z) t))))