System.Random.MWC.Distributions:truncatedExp from mwc-random-0.13.3.2

Percentage Accurate: 61.3% → 98.5%

Time: 14.1s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 30.1×

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. x = -4.4381483758437616e-209
  2. y = 1.1487895364991763e-203
  3. z = 1.4501808501369763e+128
  4. t = 1.4141930914935768e-270

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (log (+ (- 1.0 y) (* y (exp z)))) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (log(((1.0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (log(((1.0d0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (Math.log(((1.0 - y) + (y * Math.exp(z)))) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (math.log(((1.0 - y) + (y * math.exp(z)))) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(log(Float64(Float64(1.0 - y) + Float64(y * exp(z)))) / t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (log(((1.0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[Log[N[(N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 61.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (log (+ (- 1.0 y) (* y (exp z)))) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (log(((1.0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (log(((1.0d0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (Math.log(((1.0 - y) + (y * Math.exp(z)))) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (math.log(((1.0 - y) + (y * math.exp(z)))) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(log(Float64(Float64(1.0 - y) + Float64(y * exp(z)))) / t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (log(((1.0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[Log[N[(N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- x (/ (log1p (* y (expm1 z))) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (log1p((y * expm1(z))) / t);
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (Math.log1p((y * Math.expm1(z))) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (math.log1p((y * math.expm1(z))) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(log1p(Float64(y * expm1(z))) / t))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[Log[1 + N[(y * N[(Exp[z] - 1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 56.0%

   \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 56.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 71.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   3. cancel-sign-sub 71.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   4. log1p-def 78.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

   5. cancel-sign-sub 78.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

   6. +-commutative 78.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   7. unsub-neg 78.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

   8. *-rgt-identity 78.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

   9. distribute-lft-out-- 78.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   10. expm1-def 96.9%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

3. Simplified 96.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 96.9%

   \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 93.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{z} \leq 0.9996:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{t \cdot 0.5 + \frac{t}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} + -1\right)}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot z\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp z) 0.9996)
   (+ x (/ -1.0 (+ (* t 0.5) (/ t (* y (+ (exp z) -1.0))))))
   (- x (/ (log1p (* y z)) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(z) <= 0.9996) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / ((t * 0.5) + (t / (y * (exp(z) + -1.0)))));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (log1p((y * z)) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.exp(z) <= 0.9996) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / ((t * 0.5) + (t / (y * (Math.exp(z) + -1.0)))));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (Math.log1p((y * z)) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if math.exp(z) <= 0.9996:
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / ((t * 0.5) + (t / (y * (math.exp(z) + -1.0)))))
	else:
		tmp = x - (math.log1p((y * z)) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(z) <= 0.9996)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-1.0 / Float64(Float64(t * 0.5) + Float64(t / Float64(y * Float64(exp(z) + -1.0))))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(log1p(Float64(y * z)) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision], 0.9996], N[(x + N[(-1.0 / N[(N[(t * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t / N[(y * N[(N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[Log[1 + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 z) < 0.99960000000000004

   1. Initial program 79.2%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 79.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 79.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 79.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

      2. associate-/r/ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{t} \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{t} \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r/ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in y around 0 83.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{1}{\color{blue}{0.5 \cdot t + \frac{t}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}}} \]

   if 0.99960000000000004 < (exp.f64 z)

   1. Initial program 45.6%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 45.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 68.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 68.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 68.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 68.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 68.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 68.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 68.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 68.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 95.5%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 95.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 94.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot z}\right)}{t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{z} \leq 0.9996:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{t \cdot 0.5 + \frac{t}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} + -1\right)}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot z\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 90.4% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -16000000000 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{+37}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{t \cdot 0.5 + \frac{t}{y \cdot z}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right) \cdot \frac{y}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -16000000000.0) (not (<= y 4.5e+37)))
   (+ x (/ -1.0 (+ (* t 0.5) (/ t (* y z)))))
   (- x (* (expm1 z) (/ y t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -16000000000.0) || !(y <= 4.5e+37)) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / ((t * 0.5) + (t / (y * z))));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (expm1(z) * (y / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -16000000000.0) || !(y <= 4.5e+37)) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / ((t * 0.5) + (t / (y * z))));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (Math.expm1(z) * (y / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -16000000000.0) or not (y <= 4.5e+37):
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / ((t * 0.5) + (t / (y * z))))
	else:
		tmp = x - (math.expm1(z) * (y / t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -16000000000.0) || !(y <= 4.5e+37))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-1.0 / Float64(Float64(t * 0.5) + Float64(t / Float64(y * z)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(expm1(z) * Float64(y / t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -16000000000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 4.5e+37]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(-1.0 / N[(N[(t * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t / N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[(Exp[z] - 1), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.6e10 or 4.49999999999999962e37 < y

   1. Initial program 34.5%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 34.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 67.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 67.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 67.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 67.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 67.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 67.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 67.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 67.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

      2. associate-/r/ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{t} \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{t} \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around 0 82.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{1}{t} \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot z}\right) \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 82.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot z\right)}{t}} \]

      2. associate-/l* 82.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot z\right)}}} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 82.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot z\right)}}} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in y around 0 71.8%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{1}{\color{blue}{0.5 \cdot t + \frac{t}{y \cdot z}}} \]

   if -1.6e10 < y < 4.49999999999999962e37

   1. Initial program 71.7%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 71.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 74.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 74.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 86.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 86.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 86.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 86.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 86.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 86.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 94.7%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 94.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 85.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}{t}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 85.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{t}{e^{z} - 1}}} \]

      2. associate-/r/ 85.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)} \]

      3. expm1-def 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{t} \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -16000000000 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{+37}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{t \cdot 0.5 + \frac{t}{y \cdot z}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right) \cdot \frac{y}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 92.5% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -16000000000 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 0.0185\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot z\right)}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right) \cdot \frac{y}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -16000000000.0) (not (<= y 0.0185)))
   (- x (/ (log1p (* y z)) t))
   (- x (* (expm1 z) (/ y t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -16000000000.0) || !(y <= 0.0185)) {
		tmp = x - (log1p((y * z)) / t);
	} else {
		tmp = x - (expm1(z) * (y / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -16000000000.0) || !(y <= 0.0185)) {
		tmp = x - (Math.log1p((y * z)) / t);
	} else {
		tmp = x - (Math.expm1(z) * (y / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -16000000000.0) or not (y <= 0.0185):
		tmp = x - (math.log1p((y * z)) / t)
	else:
		tmp = x - (math.expm1(z) * (y / t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -16000000000.0) || !(y <= 0.0185))
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(log1p(Float64(y * z)) / t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(expm1(z) * Float64(y / t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -16000000000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 0.0185]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x - N[(N[Log[1 + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[(Exp[z] - 1), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.6e10 or 0.0184999999999999991 < y

   1. Initial program 35.4%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 35.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 68.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 68.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 68.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 68.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 68.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 68.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 68.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 68.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 84.2%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot z}\right)}{t} \]

   if -1.6e10 < y < 0.0184999999999999991

   1. Initial program 74.2%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 74.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 74.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 74.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 86.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 86.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 86.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 86.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 86.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 87.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 94.2%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 94.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 86.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}{t}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 86.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{t}{e^{z} - 1}}} \]

      2. associate-/r/ 86.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)} \]

      3. expm1-def 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{t} \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -16000000000 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 0.0185\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot z\right)}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right) \cdot \frac{y}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 89.4% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -16000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{t \cdot 0.5 + \frac{t}{y \cdot z}}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 3 \cdot 10^{+179}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right) \cdot \frac{y}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\log \left(y \cdot z\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -16000000000.0)
   (+ x (/ -1.0 (+ (* t 0.5) (/ t (* y z)))))
   (if (<= y 3e+179) (- x (* (expm1 z) (/ y t))) (- x (/ (log (* y z)) t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -16000000000.0) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / ((t * 0.5) + (t / (y * z))));
	} else if (y <= 3e+179) {
		tmp = x - (expm1(z) * (y / t));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (log((y * z)) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -16000000000.0) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / ((t * 0.5) + (t / (y * z))));
	} else if (y <= 3e+179) {
		tmp = x - (Math.expm1(z) * (y / t));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (Math.log((y * z)) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -16000000000.0:
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / ((t * 0.5) + (t / (y * z))))
	elif y <= 3e+179:
		tmp = x - (math.expm1(z) * (y / t))
	else:
		tmp = x - (math.log((y * z)) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -16000000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-1.0 / Float64(Float64(t * 0.5) + Float64(t / Float64(y * z)))));
	elseif (y <= 3e+179)
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(expm1(z) * Float64(y / t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(log(Float64(y * z)) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, -16000000000.0], N[(x + N[(-1.0 / N[(N[(t * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t / N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 3e+179], N[(x - N[(N[(Exp[z] - 1), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[Log[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -1.6e10

   1. Initial program 48.6%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 48.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 70.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 70.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 70.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 70.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 70.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 70.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 70.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 70.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

      2. associate-/r/ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{t} \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{t} \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around 0 73.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{1}{t} \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot z}\right) \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 73.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot z\right)}{t}} \]

      2. associate-/l* 73.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot z\right)}}} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 73.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot z\right)}}} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in y around 0 64.5%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{1}{\color{blue}{0.5 \cdot t + \frac{t}{y \cdot z}}} \]

   if -1.6e10 < y < 2.9999999999999998e179

   1. Initial program 63.1%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 63.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 71.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 71.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 82.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 82.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 82.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 82.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 82.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 82.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 95.3%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 95.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 81.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}{t}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 81.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{t}{e^{z} - 1}}} \]

      2. associate-/r/ 81.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)} \]

      3. expm1-def 96.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{t} \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 96.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)} \]

   if 2.9999999999999998e179 < y

   1. Initial program 16.7%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 16.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 74.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 74.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 74.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 74.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 74.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 74.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 74.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 74.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

      2. associate-/r/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{t} \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{t} \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around 0 97.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{1}{t} \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot z}\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around inf 92.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{\log z + -1 \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{y}\right)}{t}} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 92.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log z + \color{blue}{\left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{y}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. log-rec 92.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log z + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      3. remove-double-neg 92.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log z + \color{blue}{\log y}}{t} \]

      4. log-prod 92.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\log \left(z \cdot y\right)}}{t} \]

      5. *-commutative 92.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right)}}{t} \]

   10. Simplified 92.4%

       \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{\log \left(y \cdot z\right)}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -16000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{t \cdot 0.5 + \frac{t}{y \cdot z}}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 3 \cdot 10^{+179}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right) \cdot \frac{y}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\log \left(y \cdot z\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 81.5% accurate, 12.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{-67} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{-81}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{t \cdot 0.5 + \frac{t}{y \cdot z}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\frac{y}{t}}{\frac{1}{z}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -5.5e-67) (not (<= y 1.1e-81)))
   (+ x (/ -1.0 (+ (* t 0.5) (/ t (* y z)))))
   (- x (/ (/ y t) (/ 1.0 z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -5.5e-67) || !(y <= 1.1e-81)) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / ((t * 0.5) + (t / (y * z))));
	} else {
		tmp = x - ((y / t) / (1.0 / z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-5.5d-67)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.1d-81))) then
        tmp = x + ((-1.0d0) / ((t * 0.5d0) + (t / (y * z))))
    else
        tmp = x - ((y / t) / (1.0d0 / z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -5.5e-67) || !(y <= 1.1e-81)) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / ((t * 0.5) + (t / (y * z))));
	} else {
		tmp = x - ((y / t) / (1.0 / z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -5.5e-67) or not (y <= 1.1e-81):
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / ((t * 0.5) + (t / (y * z))))
	else:
		tmp = x - ((y / t) / (1.0 / z))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -5.5e-67) || !(y <= 1.1e-81))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-1.0 / Float64(Float64(t * 0.5) + Float64(t / Float64(y * z)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(Float64(y / t) / Float64(1.0 / z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -5.5e-67) || ~((y <= 1.1e-81)))
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / ((t * 0.5) + (t / (y * z))));
	else
		tmp = x - ((y / t) / (1.0 / z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -5.5e-67], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.1e-81]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(-1.0 / N[(N[(t * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t / N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -5.5000000000000003e-67 or 1.1e-81 < y

   1. Initial program 43.5%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 43.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 68.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 68.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 72.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 72.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 72.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 72.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 72.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 72.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

      2. associate-/r/ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{t} \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{t} \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around 0 81.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{1}{t} \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot z}\right) \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 82.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot z\right)}{t}} \]

      2. associate-/l* 82.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot z\right)}}} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 82.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot z\right)}}} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in y around 0 76.1%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{1}{\color{blue}{0.5 \cdot t + \frac{t}{y \cdot z}}} \]

   if -5.5000000000000003e-67 < y < 1.1e-81

   1. Initial program 76.1%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 76.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 76.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 76.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 87.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 87.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 87.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 87.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 87.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 87.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 92.0%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 92.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 73.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 81.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]

   7. Simplified 81.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r/ 82.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot z} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 82.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot z} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. clear-num 82.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{y}}} \cdot z \]

       2. associate-/r/ 82.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\frac{t}{y}}{z}}} \]

       3. div-inv 82.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{t}{y} \cdot \frac{1}{z}}} \]

       4. associate-/r* 82.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{y}}}{\frac{1}{z}}} \]

       5. clear-num 82.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{y}{t}}}{\frac{1}{z}} \]

   11. Applied egg-rr 82.9%

       \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{y}{t}}{\frac{1}{z}}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{-67} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{-81}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{t \cdot 0.5 + \frac{t}{y \cdot z}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\frac{y}{t}}{\frac{1}{z}}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 72.2% accurate, 30.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - z \cdot \frac{y}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- x (* z (/ y t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (z * (y / t));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (z * (y / t))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (z * (y / t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (z * (y / t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(z * Float64(y / t)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (z * (y / t));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(z * N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 56.0%

   \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 56.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 71.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   3. cancel-sign-sub 71.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   4. log1p-def 78.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

   5. cancel-sign-sub 78.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

   6. +-commutative 78.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   7. unsub-neg 78.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

   8. *-rgt-identity 78.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

   9. distribute-lft-out-- 78.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   10. expm1-def 96.9%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

3. Simplified 96.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 66.0%

   \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 68.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]

7. Simplified 68.3%

   \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/r/ 68.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot z} \]

9. Applied egg-rr 68.6%

   \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot z} \]

10. Final simplification 68.6%

    \[\leadsto x - z \cdot \frac{y}{t} \]
11. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 72.7% accurate, 30.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{z}{\frac{t}{y}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- x (/ z (/ t y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (z / (t / y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (z / (t / y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (z / (t / y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (z / (t / y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(z / Float64(t / y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (z / (t / y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(z / N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 56.0%

   \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 56.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 71.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   3. cancel-sign-sub 71.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   4. log1p-def 78.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

   5. cancel-sign-sub 78.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

   6. +-commutative 78.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   7. unsub-neg 78.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

   8. *-rgt-identity 78.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

   9. distribute-lft-out-- 78.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   10. expm1-def 96.9%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

3. Simplified 96.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 66.0%

   \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 68.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]

7. Simplified 68.3%

   \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/r/ 68.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot z} \]

9. Applied egg-rr 68.6%

   \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot z} \]
10. Step-by-step derivation

    1. *-commutative 68.6%

       \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{y}{t}} \]

    2. clear-num 68.6%

       \[\leadsto x - z \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{y}}} \]

    3. div-inv 68.6%

       \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{z}{\frac{t}{y}}} \]

11. Applied egg-rr 68.6%

    \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{z}{\frac{t}{y}}} \]

12. Final simplification 68.6%

    \[\leadsto x - \frac{z}{\frac{t}{y}} \]
13. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 74.7% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \frac{-0.5}{y \cdot t}\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < -2.8874623088207947 \cdot 10^{+119}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x - \frac{t_1}{z \cdot z}\right) - t_1 \cdot \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{z \cdot z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\log \left(1 + z \cdot y\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (/ (- 0.5) (* y t))))
   (if (< z -2.8874623088207947e+119)
     (- (- x (/ t_1 (* z z))) (* t_1 (/ (/ 2.0 z) (* z z))))
     (- x (/ (log (+ 1.0 (* z y))) t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = -0.5 / (y * t);
	double tmp;
	if (z < -2.8874623088207947e+119) {
		tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0 / z) / (z * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (log((1.0 + (z * y))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = -0.5d0 / (y * t)
    if (z < (-2.8874623088207947d+119)) then
        tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0d0 / z) / (z * z)))
    else
        tmp = x - (log((1.0d0 + (z * y))) / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = -0.5 / (y * t);
	double tmp;
	if (z < -2.8874623088207947e+119) {
		tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0 / z) / (z * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (Math.log((1.0 + (z * y))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = -0.5 / (y * t)
	tmp = 0
	if z < -2.8874623088207947e+119:
		tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0 / z) / (z * z)))
	else:
		tmp = x - (math.log((1.0 + (z * y))) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(-0.5) / Float64(y * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < -2.8874623088207947e+119)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x - Float64(t_1 / Float64(z * z))) - Float64(t_1 * Float64(Float64(2.0 / z) / Float64(z * z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(log(Float64(1.0 + Float64(z * y))) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = -0.5 / (y * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < -2.8874623088207947e+119)
		tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0 / z) / (z * z)));
	else
		tmp = x - (log((1.0 + (z * y))) / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[((-0.5) / N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, -2.8874623088207947e+119], N[(N[(x - N[(t$95$1 / N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(t$95$1 * N[(N[(2.0 / z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[Log[N[(1.0 + N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024010 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "System.Random.MWC.Distributions:truncatedExp from mwc-random-0.13.3.2"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (if (< z -2.8874623088207947e+119) (- (- x (/ (/ (- 0.5) (* y t)) (* z z))) (* (/ (- 0.5) (* y t)) (/ (/ 2.0 z) (* z z)))) (- x (/ (log (+ 1.0 (* z y))) t)))

  (- x (/ (log (+ (- 1.0 y) (* y (exp z)))) t)))