Exception for Rosa's FloatVsDoubleBenchmark

• 46.9% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(3 \cdot x1\right) \cdot x1\\ t_1 := x1 \cdot x1 + 1\\ t_2 := \frac{\left(t_0 + 2 \cdot x2\right) - x1}{t_1}\\ x1 + \left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(\left(2 \cdot x1\right) \cdot t_2\right) \cdot \left(t_2 - 3\right) + \left(x1 \cdot x1\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot t_2 - 6\right)\right) \cdot t_1 + t_0 \cdot t_2\right) + \left(x1 \cdot x1\right) \cdot x1\right) + x1\right) + 3 \cdot \frac{\left(t_0 - 2 \cdot x2\right) - x1}{t_1}\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x1 x2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (* 3.0 x1) x1))
        (t_1 (+ (* x1 x1) 1.0))
        (t_2 (/ (- (+ t_0 (* 2.0 x2)) x1) t_1)))
   (+
    x1
    (+
     (+
      (+
       (+
        (*
         (+
          (* (* (* 2.0 x1) t_2) (- t_2 3.0))
          (* (* x1 x1) (- (* 4.0 t_2) 6.0)))
         t_1)
        (* t_0 t_2))
       (* (* x1 x1) x1))
      x1)
     (* 3.0 (/ (- (- t_0 (* 2.0 x2)) x1) t_1))))))

C

double code(double x1, double x2) {
	double t_0 = (3.0 * x1) * x1;
	double t_1 = (x1 * x1) + 1.0;
	double t_2 = ((t_0 + (2.0 * x2)) - x1) / t_1;
	return x1 + (((((((((2.0 * x1) * t_2) * (t_2 - 3.0)) + ((x1 * x1) * ((4.0 * t_2) - 6.0))) * t_1) + (t_0 * t_2)) + ((x1 * x1) * x1)) + x1) + (3.0 * (((t_0 - (2.0 * x2)) - x1) / t_1)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x1, x2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x1
    real(8), intent (in) :: x2
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    t_0 = (3.0d0 * x1) * x1
    t_1 = (x1 * x1) + 1.0d0
    t_2 = ((t_0 + (2.0d0 * x2)) - x1) / t_1
    code = x1 + (((((((((2.0d0 * x1) * t_2) * (t_2 - 3.0d0)) + ((x1 * x1) * ((4.0d0 * t_2) - 6.0d0))) * t_1) + (t_0 * t_2)) + ((x1 * x1) * x1)) + x1) + (3.0d0 * (((t_0 - (2.0d0 * x2)) - x1) / t_1)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x1, double x2) {
	double t_0 = (3.0 * x1) * x1;
	double t_1 = (x1 * x1) + 1.0;
	double t_2 = ((t_0 + (2.0 * x2)) - x1) / t_1;
	return x1 + (((((((((2.0 * x1) * t_2) * (t_2 - 3.0)) + ((x1 * x1) * ((4.0 * t_2) - 6.0))) * t_1) + (t_0 * t_2)) + ((x1 * x1) * x1)) + x1) + (3.0 * (((t_0 - (2.0 * x2)) - x1) / t_1)));
}

Python

def code(x1, x2):
	t_0 = (3.0 * x1) * x1
	t_1 = (x1 * x1) + 1.0
	t_2 = ((t_0 + (2.0 * x2)) - x1) / t_1
	return x1 + (((((((((2.0 * x1) * t_2) * (t_2 - 3.0)) + ((x1 * x1) * ((4.0 * t_2) - 6.0))) * t_1) + (t_0 * t_2)) + ((x1 * x1) * x1)) + x1) + (3.0 * (((t_0 - (2.0 * x2)) - x1) / t_1)))

Julia

function code(x1, x2)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(3.0 * x1) * x1)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(x1 * x1) + 1.0)
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(Float64(t_0 + Float64(2.0 * x2)) - x1) / t_1)
	return Float64(x1 + Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(2.0 * x1) * t_2) * Float64(t_2 - 3.0)) + Float64(Float64(x1 * x1) * Float64(Float64(4.0 * t_2) - 6.0))) * t_1) + Float64(t_0 * t_2)) + Float64(Float64(x1 * x1) * x1)) + x1) + Float64(3.0 * Float64(Float64(Float64(t_0 - Float64(2.0 * x2)) - x1) / t_1))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x1, x2)
	t_0 = (3.0 * x1) * x1;
	t_1 = (x1 * x1) + 1.0;
	t_2 = ((t_0 + (2.0 * x2)) - x1) / t_1;
	tmp = x1 + (((((((((2.0 * x1) * t_2) * (t_2 - 3.0)) + ((x1 * x1) * ((4.0 * t_2) - 6.0))) * t_1) + (t_0 * t_2)) + ((x1 * x1) * x1)) + x1) + (3.0 * (((t_0 - (2.0 * x2)) - x1) / t_1)));
end

Wolfram

code[x1_, x2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(3.0 * x1), $MachinePrecision] * x1), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(x1 * x1), $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(N[(t$95$0 + N[(2.0 * x2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x1), $MachinePrecision] / t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(x1 + N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(2.0 * x1), $MachinePrecision] * t$95$2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(t$95$2 - 3.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x1 * x1), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(4.0 * t$95$2), $MachinePrecision] - 6.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t$95$0 * t$95$2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x1 * x1), $MachinePrecision] * x1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x1), $MachinePrecision] + N[(3.0 * N[(N[(N[(t$95$0 - N[(2.0 * x2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x1), $MachinePrecision] / t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024005 
(FPCore (x1 x2)
  :name "Rosa's FloatVsDoubleBenchmark"
  :precision binary64
  (+ x1 (+ (+ (+ (+ (* (+ (* (* (* 2.0 x1) (/ (- (+ (* (* 3.0 x1) x1) (* 2.0 x2)) x1) (+ (* x1 x1) 1.0))) (- (/ (- (+ (* (* 3.0 x1) x1) (* 2.0 x2)) x1) (+ (* x1 x1) 1.0)) 3.0)) (* (* x1 x1) (- (* 4.0 (/ (- (+ (* (* 3.0 x1) x1) (* 2.0 x2)) x1) (+ (* x1 x1) 1.0))) 6.0))) (+ (* x1 x1) 1.0)) (* (* (* 3.0 x1) x1) (/ (- (+ (* (* 3.0 x1) x1) (* 2.0 x2)) x1) (+ (* x1 x1) 1.0)))) (* (* x1 x1) x1)) x1) (* 3.0 (/ (- (- (* (* 3.0 x1) x1) (* 2.0 x2)) x1) (+ (* x1 x1) 1.0))))))

Please file a bug report with this information.

Backtrace

repr->cost: arity mismatch; the expected number of arguments does not match the given number expected: 2 given: 1		L	C
loop	.../private/map.rkt	54	19
f490	.../match/compiler.rkt	548	40
make-alt-table	/home/nightlies/herbie/platforms/src/core/alt-table.rkt	40	0
(unnamed)	/usr/share/racket/collects/racket/contract/private/arrow-val-first.rkt	486	18
initialize-alt-table!	/home/nightlies/herbie/platforms/src/mainloop.rkt	316	0
mutate!	/home/nightlies/herbie/platforms/src/mainloop.rkt	352	0
run-improve!	/home/nightlies/herbie/platforms/src/mainloop.rkt	338	0
get-alternatives/report	/home/nightlies/herbie/platforms/src/sandbox.rkt	169	0
(unnamed)	/home/nightlies/herbie/platforms/src/sandbox.rkt	262	6
(unnamed)	/usr/share/racket/pkgs/profile-lib/main.rkt	40	10
profile-thunk	/usr/share/racket/pkgs/profile-lib/main.rkt	9	0
(unnamed)	/usr/share/racket/collects/racket/engine.rkt	42	24