Toniolo and Linder, Equation (3a)

Percentage Accurate: 98.4% → 100.0%
Time: 13.5s
Alternatives: 6
Speedup: 1.4×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 + {\left(\frac{2 \cdot \ell}{Om}\right)}^{2} \cdot \left({\sin kx}^{2} + {\sin ky}^{2}\right)}}\right)} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (l Om kx ky)
 :precision binary64
 (sqrt
  (*
   (/ 1.0 2.0)
   (+
    1.0
    (/
     1.0
     (sqrt
      (+
       1.0
       (*
        (pow (/ (* 2.0 l) Om) 2.0)
        (+ (pow (sin kx) 2.0) (pow (sin ky) 2.0))))))))))
double code(double l, double Om, double kx, double ky) {
	return sqrt(((1.0 / 2.0) * (1.0 + (1.0 / sqrt((1.0 + (pow(((2.0 * l) / Om), 2.0) * (pow(sin(kx), 2.0) + pow(sin(ky), 2.0)))))))));
}

real(8) function code(l, om, kx, ky)
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    real(8), intent (in) :: om
    real(8), intent (in) :: kx
    real(8), intent (in) :: ky
    code = sqrt(((1.0d0 / 2.0d0) * (1.0d0 + (1.0d0 / sqrt((1.0d0 + ((((2.0d0 * l) / om) ** 2.0d0) * ((sin(kx) ** 2.0d0) + (sin(ky) ** 2.0d0)))))))))
end function

public static double code(double l, double Om, double kx, double ky) {
	return Math.sqrt(((1.0 / 2.0) * (1.0 + (1.0 / Math.sqrt((1.0 + (Math.pow(((2.0 * l) / Om), 2.0) * (Math.pow(Math.sin(kx), 2.0) + Math.pow(Math.sin(ky), 2.0)))))))));
}

def code(l, Om, kx, ky):
	return math.sqrt(((1.0 / 2.0) * (1.0 + (1.0 / math.sqrt((1.0 + (math.pow(((2.0 * l) / Om), 2.0) * (math.pow(math.sin(kx), 2.0) + math.pow(math.sin(ky), 2.0)))))))))

function code(l, Om, kx, ky)
	return sqrt(Float64(Float64(1.0 / 2.0) * Float64(1.0 + Float64(1.0 / sqrt(Float64(1.0 + Float64((Float64(Float64(2.0 * l) / Om) ^ 2.0) * Float64((sin(kx) ^ 2.0) + (sin(ky) ^ 2.0)))))))))
end

function tmp = code(l, Om, kx, ky)
	tmp = sqrt(((1.0 / 2.0) * (1.0 + (1.0 / sqrt((1.0 + ((((2.0 * l) / Om) ^ 2.0) * ((sin(kx) ^ 2.0) + (sin(ky) ^ 2.0)))))))));
end

code[l_, Om_, kx_, ky_] := N[Sqrt[N[(N[(1.0 / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 + N[(1.0 / N[Sqrt[N[(1.0 + N[(N[Power[N[(N[(2.0 * l), $MachinePrecision] / Om), $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Power[N[Sin[kx], $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision] + N[Power[N[Sin[ky], $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]

\begin{array}{l}

\\
\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 + {\left(\frac{2 \cdot \ell}{Om}\right)}^{2} \cdot \left({\sin kx}^{2} + {\sin ky}^{2}\right)}}\right)}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 6 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 98.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 + {\left(\frac{2 \cdot \ell}{Om}\right)}^{2} \cdot \left({\sin kx}^{2} + {\sin ky}^{2}\right)}}\right)} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (l Om kx ky)
 :precision binary64
 (sqrt
  (*
   (/ 1.0 2.0)
   (+
    1.0
    (/
     1.0
     (sqrt
      (+
       1.0
       (*
        (pow (/ (* 2.0 l) Om) 2.0)
        (+ (pow (sin kx) 2.0) (pow (sin ky) 2.0))))))))))
double code(double l, double Om, double kx, double ky) {
	return sqrt(((1.0 / 2.0) * (1.0 + (1.0 / sqrt((1.0 + (pow(((2.0 * l) / Om), 2.0) * (pow(sin(kx), 2.0) + pow(sin(ky), 2.0)))))))));
}

real(8) function code(l, om, kx, ky)
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    real(8), intent (in) :: om
    real(8), intent (in) :: kx
    real(8), intent (in) :: ky
    code = sqrt(((1.0d0 / 2.0d0) * (1.0d0 + (1.0d0 / sqrt((1.0d0 + ((((2.0d0 * l) / om) ** 2.0d0) * ((sin(kx) ** 2.0d0) + (sin(ky) ** 2.0d0)))))))))
end function

public static double code(double l, double Om, double kx, double ky) {
	return Math.sqrt(((1.0 / 2.0) * (1.0 + (1.0 / Math.sqrt((1.0 + (Math.pow(((2.0 * l) / Om), 2.0) * (Math.pow(Math.sin(kx), 2.0) + Math.pow(Math.sin(ky), 2.0)))))))));
}

def code(l, Om, kx, ky):
	return math.sqrt(((1.0 / 2.0) * (1.0 + (1.0 / math.sqrt((1.0 + (math.pow(((2.0 * l) / Om), 2.0) * (math.pow(math.sin(kx), 2.0) + math.pow(math.sin(ky), 2.0)))))))))

function code(l, Om, kx, ky)
	return sqrt(Float64(Float64(1.0 / 2.0) * Float64(1.0 + Float64(1.0 / sqrt(Float64(1.0 + Float64((Float64(Float64(2.0 * l) / Om) ^ 2.0) * Float64((sin(kx) ^ 2.0) + (sin(ky) ^ 2.0)))))))))
end

function tmp = code(l, Om, kx, ky)
	tmp = sqrt(((1.0 / 2.0) * (1.0 + (1.0 / sqrt((1.0 + ((((2.0 * l) / Om) ^ 2.0) * ((sin(kx) ^ 2.0) + (sin(ky) ^ 2.0)))))))));
end

code[l_, Om_, kx_, ky_] := N[Sqrt[N[(N[(1.0 / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 + N[(1.0 / N[Sqrt[N[(1.0 + N[(N[Power[N[(N[(2.0 * l), $MachinePrecision] / Om), $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Power[N[Sin[kx], $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision] + N[Power[N[Sin[ky], $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]

\begin{array}{l}

\\
\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 + {\left(\frac{2 \cdot \ell}{Om}\right)}^{2} \cdot \left({\sin kx}^{2} + {\sin ky}^{2}\right)}}\right)}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot {\left(1 + {\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(\sin kx, \sin ky\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \frac{\ell}{Om}\right)\right)}^{2}\right)}^{-0.5}} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (l Om kx ky)
 :precision binary64
 (sqrt
  (+
   0.5
   (*
    0.5
    (pow
     (+ 1.0 (pow (* (hypot (sin kx) (sin ky)) (* 2.0 (/ l Om))) 2.0))
     -0.5)))))
double code(double l, double Om, double kx, double ky) {
	return sqrt((0.5 + (0.5 * pow((1.0 + pow((hypot(sin(kx), sin(ky)) * (2.0 * (l / Om))), 2.0)), -0.5))));
}

public static double code(double l, double Om, double kx, double ky) {
	return Math.sqrt((0.5 + (0.5 * Math.pow((1.0 + Math.pow((Math.hypot(Math.sin(kx), Math.sin(ky)) * (2.0 * (l / Om))), 2.0)), -0.5))));
}

def code(l, Om, kx, ky):
	return math.sqrt((0.5 + (0.5 * math.pow((1.0 + math.pow((math.hypot(math.sin(kx), math.sin(ky)) * (2.0 * (l / Om))), 2.0)), -0.5))))

function code(l, Om, kx, ky)
	return sqrt(Float64(0.5 + Float64(0.5 * (Float64(1.0 + (Float64(hypot(sin(kx), sin(ky)) * Float64(2.0 * Float64(l / Om))) ^ 2.0)) ^ -0.5))))
end

function tmp = code(l, Om, kx, ky)
	tmp = sqrt((0.5 + (0.5 * ((1.0 + ((hypot(sin(kx), sin(ky)) * (2.0 * (l / Om))) ^ 2.0)) ^ -0.5))));
end

code[l_, Om_, kx_, ky_] := N[Sqrt[N[(0.5 + N[(0.5 * N[Power[N[(1.0 + N[Power[N[(N[Sqrt[N[Sin[kx], $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[Sin[ky], $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision] * N[(2.0 * N[(l / Om), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], -0.5], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]

\begin{array}{l}

\\
\sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot {\left(1 + {\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(\sin kx, \sin ky\right) \cdot \left(2 \cdot \frac{\ell}{Om}\right)\right)}^{2}\right)}^{-0.5}}
\end{array}
Derivation
    &prev;&pcontext;&pcontext2;&ctx;
  1. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 100.0% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \frac{1}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, \mathsf{hypot}\left(\sin kx, \sin ky\right) \cdot \left(\ell \cdot \frac{2}{Om}\right)\right)}} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (l Om kx ky)
 :precision binary64
 (sqrt
  (+
   0.5
   (*
    0.5
    (/ 1.0 (hypot 1.0 (* (hypot (sin kx) (sin ky)) (* l (/ 2.0 Om)))))))))
double code(double l, double Om, double kx, double ky) {
	return sqrt((0.5 + (0.5 * (1.0 / hypot(1.0, (hypot(sin(kx), sin(ky)) * (l * (2.0 / Om))))))));
}

public static double code(double l, double Om, double kx, double ky) {
	return Math.sqrt((0.5 + (0.5 * (1.0 / Math.hypot(1.0, (Math.hypot(Math.sin(kx), Math.sin(ky)) * (l * (2.0 / Om))))))));
}

def code(l, Om, kx, ky):
	return math.sqrt((0.5 + (0.5 * (1.0 / math.hypot(1.0, (math.hypot(math.sin(kx), math.sin(ky)) * (l * (2.0 / Om))))))))

function code(l, Om, kx, ky)
	return sqrt(Float64(0.5 + Float64(0.5 * Float64(1.0 / hypot(1.0, Float64(hypot(sin(kx), sin(ky)) * Float64(l * Float64(2.0 / Om))))))))
end

function tmp = code(l, Om, kx, ky)
	tmp = sqrt((0.5 + (0.5 * (1.0 / hypot(1.0, (hypot(sin(kx), sin(ky)) * (l * (2.0 / Om))))))));
end

code[l_, Om_, kx_, ky_] := N[Sqrt[N[(0.5 + N[(0.5 * N[(1.0 / N[Sqrt[1.0 ^ 2 + N[(N[Sqrt[N[Sin[kx], $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[Sin[ky], $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision] * N[(l * N[(2.0 / Om), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]

\begin{array}{l}

\\
\sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \frac{1}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, \mathsf{hypot}\left(\sin kx, \sin ky\right) \cdot \left(\ell \cdot \frac{2}{Om}\right)\right)}}
\end{array}
Derivation
    &prev;&pcontext;&pcontext2;&ctx;
  1. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 92.7% accurate, 2.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\ell \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{+144}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sqrt{0.5 + \frac{0.5}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, 2 \cdot \left(\sin kx \cdot \frac{\ell}{Om}\right)\right)}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sqrt{0.5}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (l Om kx ky)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= l 2.8e+144)
   (sqrt (+ 0.5 (/ 0.5 (hypot 1.0 (* 2.0 (* (sin kx) (/ l Om)))))))
   (sqrt 0.5)))
double code(double l, double Om, double kx, double ky) {
	double tmp;
	if (l <= 2.8e+144) {
		tmp = sqrt((0.5 + (0.5 / hypot(1.0, (2.0 * (sin(kx) * (l / Om)))))));
	} else {
		tmp = sqrt(0.5);
	}
	return tmp;
}

public static double code(double l, double Om, double kx, double ky) {
	double tmp;
	if (l <= 2.8e+144) {
		tmp = Math.sqrt((0.5 + (0.5 / Math.hypot(1.0, (2.0 * (Math.sin(kx) * (l / Om)))))));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.sqrt(0.5);
	}
	return tmp;
}

def code(l, Om, kx, ky):
	tmp = 0
	if l <= 2.8e+144:
		tmp = math.sqrt((0.5 + (0.5 / math.hypot(1.0, (2.0 * (math.sin(kx) * (l / Om)))))))
	else:
		tmp = math.sqrt(0.5)
	return tmp

function code(l, Om, kx, ky)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (l <= 2.8e+144)
		tmp = sqrt(Float64(0.5 + Float64(0.5 / hypot(1.0, Float64(2.0 * Float64(sin(kx) * Float64(l / Om)))))));
	else
		tmp = sqrt(0.5);
	end
	return tmp
end

function tmp_2 = code(l, Om, kx, ky)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (l <= 2.8e+144)
		tmp = sqrt((0.5 + (0.5 / hypot(1.0, (2.0 * (sin(kx) * (l / Om)))))));
	else
		tmp = sqrt(0.5);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

code[l_, Om_, kx_, ky_] := If[LessEqual[l, 2.8e+144], N[Sqrt[N[(0.5 + N[(0.5 / N[Sqrt[1.0 ^ 2 + N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sin[kx], $MachinePrecision] * N[(l / Om), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision], N[Sqrt[0.5], $MachinePrecision]]

\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;\ell \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{+144}:\\
\;\;\;\;\sqrt{0.5 + \frac{0.5}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, 2 \cdot \left(\sin kx \cdot \frac{\ell}{Om}\right)\right)}}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\sqrt{0.5}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
    &prev;&pcontext;&pcontext2;&ctx;
  1. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 93.8% accurate, 2.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \frac{1}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, \frac{2 \cdot \left(\sin ky \cdot \ell\right)}{Om}\right)}} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (l Om kx ky)
 :precision binary64
 (sqrt (+ 0.5 (* 0.5 (/ 1.0 (hypot 1.0 (/ (* 2.0 (* (sin ky) l)) Om)))))))
double code(double l, double Om, double kx, double ky) {
	return sqrt((0.5 + (0.5 * (1.0 / hypot(1.0, ((2.0 * (sin(ky) * l)) / Om))))));
}

public static double code(double l, double Om, double kx, double ky) {
	return Math.sqrt((0.5 + (0.5 * (1.0 / Math.hypot(1.0, ((2.0 * (Math.sin(ky) * l)) / Om))))));
}

def code(l, Om, kx, ky):
	return math.sqrt((0.5 + (0.5 * (1.0 / math.hypot(1.0, ((2.0 * (math.sin(ky) * l)) / Om))))))

function code(l, Om, kx, ky)
	return sqrt(Float64(0.5 + Float64(0.5 * Float64(1.0 / hypot(1.0, Float64(Float64(2.0 * Float64(sin(ky) * l)) / Om))))))
end

function tmp = code(l, Om, kx, ky)
	tmp = sqrt((0.5 + (0.5 * (1.0 / hypot(1.0, ((2.0 * (sin(ky) * l)) / Om))))));
end

code[l_, Om_, kx_, ky_] := N[Sqrt[N[(0.5 + N[(0.5 * N[(1.0 / N[Sqrt[1.0 ^ 2 + N[(N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sin[ky], $MachinePrecision] * l), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / Om), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]

\begin{array}{l}

\\
\sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \frac{1}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, \frac{2 \cdot \left(\sin ky \cdot \ell\right)}{Om}\right)}}
\end{array}
Derivation
    &prev;&pcontext;&pcontext2;&ctx;
  1. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 70.8% accurate, 7.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\ell \leq 31500000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sqrt{0.5}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (l Om kx ky)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= l 31500000000000.0) 1.0 (sqrt 0.5)))
double code(double l, double Om, double kx, double ky) {
	double tmp;
	if (l <= 31500000000000.0) {
		tmp = 1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = sqrt(0.5);
	}
	return tmp;
}

real(8) function code(l, om, kx, ky)
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    real(8), intent (in) :: om
    real(8), intent (in) :: kx
    real(8), intent (in) :: ky
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (l <= 31500000000000.0d0) then
        tmp = 1.0d0
    else
        tmp = sqrt(0.5d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

public static double code(double l, double Om, double kx, double ky) {
	double tmp;
	if (l <= 31500000000000.0) {
		tmp = 1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.sqrt(0.5);
	}
	return tmp;
}

def code(l, Om, kx, ky):
	tmp = 0
	if l <= 31500000000000.0:
		tmp = 1.0
	else:
		tmp = math.sqrt(0.5)
	return tmp

function code(l, Om, kx, ky)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (l <= 31500000000000.0)
		tmp = 1.0;
	else
		tmp = sqrt(0.5);
	end
	return tmp
end

function tmp_2 = code(l, Om, kx, ky)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (l <= 31500000000000.0)
		tmp = 1.0;
	else
		tmp = sqrt(0.5);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

code[l_, Om_, kx_, ky_] := If[LessEqual[l, 31500000000000.0], 1.0, N[Sqrt[0.5], $MachinePrecision]]

\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;\ell \leq 31500000000000:\\
\;\;\;\;1\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\sqrt{0.5}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
    &prev;&pcontext;&pcontext2;&ctx;
  1. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 56.3% accurate, 7.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \sqrt{0.5} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (l Om kx ky) :precision binary64 (sqrt 0.5))
double code(double l, double Om, double kx, double ky) {
	return sqrt(0.5);
}

real(8) function code(l, om, kx, ky)
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    real(8), intent (in) :: om
    real(8), intent (in) :: kx
    real(8), intent (in) :: ky
    code = sqrt(0.5d0)
end function

public static double code(double l, double Om, double kx, double ky) {
	return Math.sqrt(0.5);
}

def code(l, Om, kx, ky):
	return math.sqrt(0.5)

function code(l, Om, kx, ky)
	return sqrt(0.5)
end

function tmp = code(l, Om, kx, ky)
	tmp = sqrt(0.5);
end

code[l_, Om_, kx_, ky_] := N[Sqrt[0.5], $MachinePrecision]

\begin{array}{l}

\\
\sqrt{0.5}
\end{array}
Derivation
    &prev;&pcontext;&pcontext2;&ctx;
  1. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2023340 
(FPCore (l Om kx ky)
  :name "Toniolo and Linder, Equation (3a)"
  :precision binary64
  (sqrt (* (/ 1.0 2.0) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 (sqrt (+ 1.0 (* (pow (/ (* 2.0 l) Om) 2.0) (+ (pow (sin kx) 2.0) (pow (sin ky) 2.0))))))))))