SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2

Percentage Accurate: 93.8% → 98.1%

Time: 12.0s

Alternatives: 9

Speedup: 0.7×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 93.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.1% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x + \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_1 \leq -\infty \lor \neg \left(t_1 \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+292}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ x (* (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))) (* z y)))))
   (if (or (<= t_1 (- INFINITY)) (not (<= t_1 4e+292)))
     (+ x (* z (- t x)))
     t_1)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x + ((tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))) * (z * y));
	double tmp;
	if ((t_1 <= -((double) INFINITY)) || !(t_1 <= 4e+292)) {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x + ((Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))) * (z * y));
	double tmp;
	if ((t_1 <= -Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) || !(t_1 <= 4e+292)) {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = x + ((math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))) * (z * y))
	tmp = 0
	if (t_1 <= -math.inf) or not (t_1 <= 4e+292):
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y))) * Float64(z * y)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t_1 <= Float64(-Inf)) || !(t_1 <= 4e+292))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = x + ((tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))) * (z * y));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_1 <= -Inf) || ~((t_1 <= 4e+292)))
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(x + N[(N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t$95$1, (-Infinity)], N[Not[LessEqual[t$95$1, 4e+292]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 x (*.f64 (*.f64 y z) (-.f64 (tanh.f64 (/.f64 t y)) (tanh.f64 (/.f64 x y))))) < -inf.0 or 4.0000000000000001e292 < (+.f64 x (*.f64 (*.f64 y z) (-.f64 (tanh.f64 (/.f64 t y)) (tanh.f64 (/.f64 x y)))))

   1. Initial program 38.8%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 91.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   if -inf.0 < (+.f64 x (*.f64 (*.f64 y z) (-.f64 (tanh.f64 (/.f64 t y)) (tanh.f64 (/.f64 x y))))) < 4.0000000000000001e292

   1. Initial program 99.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right) \leq -\infty \lor \neg \left(x + \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right) \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+292}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2: 97.2% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\\ t_2 := \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;x + \left(t_1 - t_2\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right) \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+292}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot t_1\right) - y \cdot \left(z \cdot t_2\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (tanh (/ t y))) (t_2 (tanh (/ x y))))
   (if (<= (+ x (* (- t_1 t_2) (* z y))) 4e+292)
     (+ x (- (* y (* z t_1)) (* y (* z t_2))))
     (+ x (* z (- t x))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = tanh((t / y));
	double t_2 = tanh((x / y));
	double tmp;
	if ((x + ((t_1 - t_2) * (z * y))) <= 4e+292) {
		tmp = x + ((y * (z * t_1)) - (y * (z * t_2)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = tanh((t / y))
    t_2 = tanh((x / y))
    if ((x + ((t_1 - t_2) * (z * y))) <= 4d+292) then
        tmp = x + ((y * (z * t_1)) - (y * (z * t_2)))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = Math.tanh((t / y));
	double t_2 = Math.tanh((x / y));
	double tmp;
	if ((x + ((t_1 - t_2) * (z * y))) <= 4e+292) {
		tmp = x + ((y * (z * t_1)) - (y * (z * t_2)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = math.tanh((t / y))
	t_2 = math.tanh((x / y))
	tmp = 0
	if (x + ((t_1 - t_2) * (z * y))) <= 4e+292:
		tmp = x + ((y * (z * t_1)) - (y * (z * t_2)))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = tanh(Float64(t / y))
	t_2 = tanh(Float64(x / y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x + Float64(Float64(t_1 - t_2) * Float64(z * y))) <= 4e+292)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(z * t_1)) - Float64(y * Float64(z * t_2))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = tanh((t / y));
	t_2 = tanh((x / y));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x + ((t_1 - t_2) * (z * y))) <= 4e+292)
		tmp = x + ((y * (z * t_1)) - (y * (z * t_2)));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(x + N[(N[(t$95$1 - t$95$2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 4e+292], N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(z * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * N[(z * t$95$2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 x (*.f64 (*.f64 y z) (-.f64 (tanh.f64 (/.f64 t y)) (tanh.f64 (/.f64 x y))))) < 4.0000000000000001e292

   1. Initial program 96.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 96.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) + \left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-in 94.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 94.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 94.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      2. add-sqr-sqrt 55.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)}\right)} \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      3. sqrt-unprod 88.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) + \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)}} \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      4. sqr-neg 88.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) + \sqrt{\color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)}} \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      5. sqrt-unprod 42.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)}\right)} \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      6. add-sqr-sqrt 78.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) + \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)} \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      7. cancel-sign-sub 78.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      8. associate-*l* 78.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right)} - \left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      9. *-commutative 78.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right) - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)}\right) \]

      10. associate-*l* 81.7%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right) - \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]

      11. add-sqr-sqrt 48.1%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right) - y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      12. sqrt-unprod 86.3%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right) - y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)}}\right)\right) \]

      13. sqr-neg 86.3%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right) - y \cdot \left(z \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)}}\right)\right) \]

      14. sqrt-unprod 50.9%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right) - y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      15. add-sqr-sqrt 99.1%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right) - y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 99.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right) - y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if 4.0000000000000001e292 < (+.f64 x (*.f64 (*.f64 y z) (-.f64 (tanh.f64 (/.f64 t y)) (tanh.f64 (/.f64 x y)))))

   1. Initial program 31.7%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 85.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right) \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+292}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right) - y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 97.8% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (fma z (* y (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(z, (y * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))), x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(z, Float64(y * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))), x)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(z * N[(y * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 90.9%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 90.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

   2. *-commutative 90.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x \]

   3. associate-*l* 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

   4. fma-def 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

3. Simplified 97.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 97.7%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right) \]

Alternative 4: 83.2% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 0.94:\\ \;\;\;\;x + t_1 \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y \cdot t_1 - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (tanh (/ t y))))
   (if (<= y 0.94) (+ x (* t_1 (* z y))) (+ x (* z (- (* y t_1) x))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = tanh((t / y));
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 0.94) {
		tmp = x + (t_1 * (z * y));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * ((y * t_1) - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = tanh((t / y))
    if (y <= 0.94d0) then
        tmp = x + (t_1 * (z * y))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * ((y * t_1) - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = Math.tanh((t / y));
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 0.94) {
		tmp = x + (t_1 * (z * y));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * ((y * t_1) - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = math.tanh((t / y))
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 0.94:
		tmp = x + (t_1 * (z * y))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * ((y * t_1) - x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = tanh(Float64(t / y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 0.94)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(t_1 * Float64(z * y)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(y * t_1) - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = tanh((t / y));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 0.94)
		tmp = x + (t_1 * (z * y));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * ((y * t_1) - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, 0.94], N[(x + N[(t$95$1 * N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(N[(y * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 0.93999999999999995

   1. Initial program 95.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 22.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 22.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/r* 22.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      3. div-sub 22.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]

      4. rec-exp 22.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      5. rec-exp 22.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      6. tanh-def-a 80.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 80.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   if 0.93999999999999995 < y

   1. Initial program 79.4%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 48.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 48.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 82.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right), -x\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 48.9%

      \[\leadsto x + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x + y \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 48.9%

         \[\leadsto x + z \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-x\right)} + y \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 48.9%

         \[\leadsto x + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right) + \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

      3. fma-def 48.9%

         \[\leadsto x + z \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}, -x\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 82.7%

      \[\leadsto x + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 81.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 0.94:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 82.7% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 6.2 \cdot 10^{+136}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 6.2e+136) (+ x (* (tanh (/ t y)) (* z y))) (+ x (* z (- t x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 6.2e+136) {
		tmp = x + (tanh((t / y)) * (z * y));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 6.2d+136) then
        tmp = x + (tanh((t / y)) * (z * y))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 6.2e+136) {
		tmp = x + (Math.tanh((t / y)) * (z * y));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 6.2e+136:
		tmp = x + (math.tanh((t / y)) * (z * y))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 6.2e+136)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) * Float64(z * y)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 6.2e+136)
		tmp = x + (tanh((t / y)) * (z * y));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 6.2e+136], N[(x + N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 6.19999999999999967e136

   1. Initial program 94.6%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 23.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 23.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/r* 23.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      3. div-sub 23.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]

      4. rec-exp 23.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      5. rec-exp 23.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      6. tanh-def-a 80.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 80.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   if 6.19999999999999967e136 < y

   1. Initial program 71.6%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 84.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 80.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 6.2 \cdot 10^{+136}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 66.1% accurate, 19.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{+29}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{+183} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{+207}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 8.5e+29)
   x
   (if (or (<= y 2.8e+183) (not (<= y 1.35e+207)))
     (+ x (* z t))
     (* x (- 1.0 z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 8.5e+29) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if ((y <= 2.8e+183) || !(y <= 1.35e+207)) {
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 8.5d+29) then
        tmp = x
    else if ((y <= 2.8d+183) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.35d+207))) then
        tmp = x + (z * t)
    else
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 8.5e+29) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if ((y <= 2.8e+183) || !(y <= 1.35e+207)) {
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 8.5e+29:
		tmp = x
	elif (y <= 2.8e+183) or not (y <= 1.35e+207):
		tmp = x + (z * t)
	else:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 8.5e+29)
		tmp = x;
	elseif ((y <= 2.8e+183) || !(y <= 1.35e+207))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 8.5e+29)
		tmp = x;
	elseif ((y <= 2.8e+183) || ~((y <= 1.35e+207)))
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	else
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 8.5e+29], x, If[Or[LessEqual[y, 2.8e+183], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.35e+207]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < 8.5000000000000006e29

   1. Initial program 94.6%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 65.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 8.5000000000000006e29 < y < 2.80000000000000018e183 or 1.35000000000000012e207 < y

   1. Initial program 77.6%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 35.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 34.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/r* 34.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      3. div-sub 34.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]

      4. rec-exp 34.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      5. rec-exp 34.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      6. tanh-def-a 68.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 68.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 66.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 66.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot t} \]

   7. Simplified 66.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot t} \]

   if 2.80000000000000018e183 < y < 1.35000000000000012e207

   1. Initial program 88.1%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 87.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 87.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right), -x\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 75.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 75.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 75.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 75.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 66.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{+29}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{+183} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{+207}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 69.3% accurate, 23.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+22}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (if (<= y 5e+22) x (+ x (* z (- t x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 5e+22) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 5d+22) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 5e+22) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 5e+22:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 5e+22)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 5e+22)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 5e+22], x, N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 4.9999999999999996e22

   1. Initial program 94.6%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 66.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 4.9999999999999996e22 < y

   1. Initial program 79.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 76.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 68.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+22}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 64.3% accurate, 30.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.02 \cdot 10^{+58}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (if (<= y 1.02e+58) x (* x (- 1.0 z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.02e+58) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 1.02d+58) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.02e+58) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1.02e+58:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.02e+58)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1.02e+58)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1.02e+58], x, N[(x * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.02000000000000005e58

   1. Initial program 94.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 65.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 1.02000000000000005e58 < y

   1. Initial program 78.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 52.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 52.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 82.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right), -x\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 51.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 51.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 51.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 51.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 62.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.02 \cdot 10^{+58}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 61.1% accurate, 213.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 90.9%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 60.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

3. Final simplification 60.1%

   \[\leadsto x \]

Developer target: 97.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y)))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + (y * (z * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y)))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023340 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

  (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))