2-ancestry mixing, zero discriminant

Percentage Accurate: 76.7% → 98.7%

Time: 4.9s

Alternatives: 4

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \sqrt[3]{\frac{g}{2 \cdot a}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (g a) :precision binary64 (cbrt (/ g (* 2.0 a))))

C

double code(double g, double a) {
	return cbrt((g / (2.0 * a)));
}

Java

public static double code(double g, double a) {
	return Math.cbrt((g / (2.0 * a)));
}

Julia

function code(g, a)
	return cbrt(Float64(g / Float64(2.0 * a)))
end

Wolfram

code[g_, a_] := N[Power[N[(g / N[(2.0 * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 1/3], $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 76.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \sqrt[3]{\frac{g}{2 \cdot a}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (g a) :precision binary64 (cbrt (/ g (* 2.0 a))))

C

double code(double g, double a) {
	return cbrt((g / (2.0 * a)));
}

Java

public static double code(double g, double a) {
	return Math.cbrt((g / (2.0 * a)));
}

Julia

function code(g, a)
	return cbrt(Float64(g / Float64(2.0 * a)))
end

Wolfram

code[g_, a_] := N[Power[N[(g / N[(2.0 * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 1/3], $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \sqrt[3]{\frac{0.5}{a}} \cdot \sqrt[3]{g} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (g a) :precision binary64 (* (cbrt (/ 0.5 a)) (cbrt g)))

C

double code(double g, double a) {
	return cbrt((0.5 / a)) * cbrt(g);
}

Java

public static double code(double g, double a) {
	return Math.cbrt((0.5 / a)) * Math.cbrt(g);
}

Julia

function code(g, a)
	return Float64(cbrt(Float64(0.5 / a)) * cbrt(g))
end

Wolfram

code[g_, a_] := N[(N[Power[N[(0.5 / a), $MachinePrecision], 1/3], $MachinePrecision] * N[Power[g, 1/3], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 72.4%

   \[\sqrt[3]{\frac{g}{2 \cdot a}} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. pow1/3 33.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{g}{2 \cdot a}\right)}^{0.3333333333333333}} \]

   2. clear-num 33.5%

      \[\leadsto {\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{\frac{2 \cdot a}{g}}\right)}}^{0.3333333333333333} \]

   3. associate-/r/ 33.6%

      \[\leadsto {\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{2 \cdot a} \cdot g\right)}}^{0.3333333333333333} \]

   4. unpow-prod-down 22.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{1}{2 \cdot a}\right)}^{0.3333333333333333} \cdot {g}^{0.3333333333333333}} \]

   5. pow1/3 46.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{\frac{1}{2 \cdot a}}} \cdot {g}^{0.3333333333333333} \]

   6. associate-/r* 46.0%

      \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{2}}{a}}} \cdot {g}^{0.3333333333333333} \]

   7. metadata-eval 46.0%

      \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{\frac{\color{blue}{0.5}}{a}} \cdot {g}^{0.3333333333333333} \]

   8. pow1/3 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{\frac{0.5}{a}} \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{g}} \]

3. Applied egg-rr 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{\frac{0.5}{a}} \cdot \sqrt[3]{g}} \]

4. Final simplification 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{\frac{0.5}{a}} \cdot \sqrt[3]{g} \]

Alternative 2: 76.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{a \cdot \frac{2}{g}}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (g a) :precision binary64 (/ 1.0 (cbrt (* a (/ 2.0 g)))))

C

double code(double g, double a) {
	return 1.0 / cbrt((a * (2.0 / g)));
}

Java

public static double code(double g, double a) {
	return 1.0 / Math.cbrt((a * (2.0 / g)));
}

Julia

function code(g, a)
	return Float64(1.0 / cbrt(Float64(a * Float64(2.0 / g))))
end

Wolfram

code[g_, a_] := N[(1.0 / N[Power[N[(a * N[(2.0 / g), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 1/3], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 72.4%

   \[\sqrt[3]{\frac{g}{2 \cdot a}} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. clear-num 72.2%

      \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{2 \cdot a}{g}}}} \]

   2. cbrt-div 72.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\sqrt[3]{1}}{\sqrt[3]{\frac{2 \cdot a}{g}}}} \]

   3. metadata-eval 72.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{\sqrt[3]{\frac{2 \cdot a}{g}}} \]

   4. associate-/l* 72.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{\frac{g}{a}}}}} \]

3. Applied egg-rr 72.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{\frac{2}{\frac{g}{a}}}}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/r/ 72.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{g} \cdot a}}} \]

5. Simplified 72.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{\frac{2}{g} \cdot a}}} \]

6. Final simplification 72.8%

   \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{a \cdot \frac{2}{g}}} \]

Alternative 3: 76.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{\frac{a \cdot 2}{g}}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (g a) :precision binary64 (/ 1.0 (cbrt (/ (* a 2.0) g))))

C

double code(double g, double a) {
	return 1.0 / cbrt(((a * 2.0) / g));
}

Java

public static double code(double g, double a) {
	return 1.0 / Math.cbrt(((a * 2.0) / g));
}

Julia

function code(g, a)
	return Float64(1.0 / cbrt(Float64(Float64(a * 2.0) / g)))
end

Wolfram

code[g_, a_] := N[(1.0 / N[Power[N[(N[(a * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] / g), $MachinePrecision], 1/3], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 72.4%

   \[\sqrt[3]{\frac{g}{2 \cdot a}} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. clear-num 72.2%

      \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{2 \cdot a}{g}}}} \]

   2. cbrt-div 72.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\sqrt[3]{1}}{\sqrt[3]{\frac{2 \cdot a}{g}}}} \]

   3. metadata-eval 72.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{\sqrt[3]{\frac{2 \cdot a}{g}}} \]

   4. associate-/l* 72.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{\frac{g}{a}}}}} \]

3. Applied egg-rr 72.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{\frac{2}{\frac{g}{a}}}}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 72.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot a}{g}}}} \]

   2. *-commutative 72.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{\frac{\color{blue}{a \cdot 2}}{g}}} \]

5. Simplified 72.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{\frac{a \cdot 2}{g}}}} \]

6. Final simplification 72.8%

   \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{\frac{a \cdot 2}{g}}} \]

Alternative 4: 76.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \sqrt[3]{\frac{0.5}{a} \cdot g} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (g a) :precision binary64 (cbrt (* (/ 0.5 a) g)))

C

double code(double g, double a) {
	return cbrt(((0.5 / a) * g));
}

Java

public static double code(double g, double a) {
	return Math.cbrt(((0.5 / a) * g));
}

Julia

function code(g, a)
	return cbrt(Float64(Float64(0.5 / a) * g))
end

Wolfram

code[g_, a_] := N[Power[N[(N[(0.5 / a), $MachinePrecision] * g), $MachinePrecision], 1/3], $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 72.4%

   \[\sqrt[3]{\frac{g}{2 \cdot a}} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-log-exp 9.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\sqrt[3]{\frac{g}{2 \cdot a}}}\right)} \]

   2. *-un-lft-identity 9.1%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot e^{\sqrt[3]{\frac{g}{2 \cdot a}}}\right)} \]

   3. log-prod 9.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log 1 + \log \left(e^{\sqrt[3]{\frac{g}{2 \cdot a}}}\right)} \]

   4. metadata-eval 9.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0} + \log \left(e^{\sqrt[3]{\frac{g}{2 \cdot a}}}\right) \]

   5. add-log-exp 72.4%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{\frac{g}{2 \cdot a}}} \]

   6. *-un-lft-identity 72.4%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \sqrt[3]{\frac{\color{blue}{1 \cdot g}}{2 \cdot a}} \]

   7. times-frac 72.4%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{g}{a}}} \]

   8. metadata-eval 72.4%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{0.5} \cdot \frac{g}{a}} \]

3. Applied egg-rr 72.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 + \sqrt[3]{0.5 \cdot \frac{g}{a}}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-lft-identity 72.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{0.5 \cdot \frac{g}{a}}} \]

   2. metadata-eval 72.4%

      \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\frac{0.5}{1}} \cdot \frac{g}{a}} \]

   3. times-frac 72.4%

      \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\frac{0.5 \cdot g}{1 \cdot a}}} \]

   4. *-commutative 72.4%

      \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{\frac{\color{blue}{g \cdot 0.5}}{1 \cdot a}} \]

   5. times-frac 72.4%

      \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\frac{g}{1} \cdot \frac{0.5}{a}}} \]

   6. rem-square-sqrt 38.6%

      \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{\frac{\color{blue}{\sqrt{g} \cdot \sqrt{g}}}{1} \cdot \frac{0.5}{a}} \]

   7. associate-*r/ 38.6%

      \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{g} \cdot \frac{\sqrt{g}}{1}\right)} \cdot \frac{0.5}{a}} \]

   8. /-rgt-identity 38.6%

      \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{\left(\sqrt{g} \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{g}}\right) \cdot \frac{0.5}{a}} \]

   9. rem-square-sqrt 72.4%

      \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{g} \cdot \frac{0.5}{a}} \]

5. Simplified 72.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{g \cdot \frac{0.5}{a}}} \]

6. Final simplification 72.4%

   \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{\frac{0.5}{a} \cdot g} \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023339 
(FPCore (g a)
  :name "2-ancestry mixing, zero discriminant"
  :precision binary64
  (cbrt (/ g (* 2.0 a))))