Numeric.AD.Rank1.Halley:findZero from ad-4.2.4

Percentage Accurate: 81.6% → 98.5%

Time: 5.7s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 1.9×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* (* z 2.0) z) (* y t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (((y * 2.0d0) * z) / (((z * 2.0d0) * z) - (y * t)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * z) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 2.0) * z) - Float64(y * t))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 81.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* (* z 2.0) z) (* y t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (((y * 2.0d0) * z) / (((z * 2.0d0) * z) - (y * t)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * z) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 2.0) * z) - Float64(y * t))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.5% accurate, 0.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{y}{z \cdot -2 + \frac{y}{\frac{z}{t}}}, 2, x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (fma (/ y (+ (* z -2.0) (/ y (/ z t)))) 2.0 x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma((y / ((z * -2.0) + (y / (z / t)))), 2.0, x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(Float64(y / Float64(Float64(z * -2.0) + Float64(y / Float64(z / t)))), 2.0, x)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(y / N[(N[(z * -2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y / N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0 + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 83.4%

   \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]

3. Simplified 98.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{y}{z \cdot -2 + \frac{y}{\frac{z}{t}}}, 2, x\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 98.1%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{y}{z \cdot -2 + \frac{y}{\frac{z}{t}}}, 2, x\right) \]

Alternative 2: 94.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := z \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right) - y \cdot t\\ \mathbf{if}\;\frac{z \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)}{t_1} \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{t_1}{z}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (- (* z (* z 2.0)) (* y t))))
   (if (<= (/ (* z (* y 2.0)) t_1) INFINITY)
     (- x (/ (* y 2.0) (/ t_1 z)))
     (- x (/ y z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (z * (z * 2.0)) - (y * t);
	double tmp;
	if (((z * (y * 2.0)) / t_1) <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = x - ((y * 2.0) / (t_1 / z));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (z * (z * 2.0)) - (y * t);
	double tmp;
	if (((z * (y * 2.0)) / t_1) <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = x - ((y * 2.0) / (t_1 / z));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = (z * (z * 2.0)) - (y * t)
	tmp = 0
	if ((z * (y * 2.0)) / t_1) <= math.inf:
		tmp = x - ((y * 2.0) / (t_1 / z))
	else:
		tmp = x - (y / z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z * 2.0)) - Float64(y * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(z * Float64(y * 2.0)) / t_1) <= Inf)
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) / Float64(t_1 / z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = (z * (z * 2.0)) - (y * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((z * (y * 2.0)) / t_1) <= Inf)
		tmp = x - ((y * 2.0) / (t_1 / z));
	else
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(z * N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(N[(z * N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], Infinity], N[(x - N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t$95$1 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y 2) z) (-.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 z 2) z) (*.f64 y t))) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 94.5%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 97.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

      2. associate-*l* 97.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)} - y \cdot t}{z}} \]

   3. Simplified 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

   if +inf.0 < (/.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y 2) z) (-.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 z 2) z) (*.f64 y t)))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 47.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

      2. associate-*l* 47.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)} - y \cdot t}{z}} \]

   3. Simplified 47.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 80.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{z \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right) - y \cdot t} \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right) - y \cdot t}{z}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 89.1% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3100 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{+70}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - -2 \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -3100.0) (not (<= z 8.5e+70)))
   (- x (/ y z))
   (- x (* -2.0 (/ z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -3100.0) || !(z <= 8.5e+70)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x - (-2.0 * (z / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-3100.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 8.5d+70))) then
        tmp = x - (y / z)
    else
        tmp = x - ((-2.0d0) * (z / t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -3100.0) || !(z <= 8.5e+70)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x - (-2.0 * (z / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -3100.0) or not (z <= 8.5e+70):
		tmp = x - (y / z)
	else:
		tmp = x - (-2.0 * (z / t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -3100.0) || !(z <= 8.5e+70))
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(-2.0 * Float64(z / t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -3100.0) || ~((z <= 8.5e+70)))
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	else
		tmp = x - (-2.0 * (z / t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -3100.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 8.5e+70]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(-2.0 * N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -3100 or 8.4999999999999996e70 < z

   1. Initial program 78.9%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 94.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

      2. associate-*l* 94.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)} - y \cdot t}{z}} \]

   3. Simplified 94.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 97.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]

   if -3100 < z < 8.4999999999999996e70

   1. Initial program 87.1%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 90.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

      2. associate-*l* 90.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)} - y \cdot t}{z}} \]

   3. Simplified 90.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 93.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3100 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{+70}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - -2 \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 82.6% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3 \cdot 10^{-26} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{+59}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -3e-26) (not (<= z 2.8e+59))) (- x (/ y z)) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -3e-26) || !(z <= 2.8e+59)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-3d-26)) .or. (.not. (z <= 2.8d+59))) then
        tmp = x - (y / z)
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -3e-26) || !(z <= 2.8e+59)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -3e-26) or not (z <= 2.8e+59):
		tmp = x - (y / z)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -3e-26) || !(z <= 2.8e+59))
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / z));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -3e-26) || ~((z <= 2.8e+59)))
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -3e-26], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 2.8e+59]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -3.00000000000000012e-26 or 2.7999999999999998e59 < z

   1. Initial program 78.7%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 93.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

      2. associate-*l* 93.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)} - y \cdot t}{z}} \]

   3. Simplified 93.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 94.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]

   if -3.00000000000000012e-26 < z < 2.7999999999999998e59

   1. Initial program 87.7%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 90.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

      2. associate-*l* 90.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)} - y \cdot t}{z}} \]

   3. Simplified 90.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 74.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 83.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3 \cdot 10^{-26} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{+59}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 76.0% accurate, 17.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 83.4%

   \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 92.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

   2. associate-*l* 92.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)} - y \cdot t}{z}} \]

3. Simplified 92.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 75.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

5. Final simplification 75.9%

   \[\leadsto x \]

Developer target: 99.9% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{1}{\frac{z}{y} - \frac{\frac{t}{2}}{z}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ 1.0 (- (/ z y) (/ (/ t 2.0) z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (1.0d0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0d0) / z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(z / y) - Float64(Float64(t / 2.0) / z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(1.0 / N[(N[(z / y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(t / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023336 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Numeric.AD.Rank1.Halley:findZero from ad-4.2.4"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (- x (/ 1.0 (- (/ z y) (/ (/ t 2.0) z))))

  (- x (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* (* z 2.0) z) (* y t)))))