Numeric.SpecFunctions:invErfc from math-functions-0.1.5.2, A

Percentage Accurate: 95.8% → 99.9%
Time: 8.9s
Alternatives: 10
Speedup: 8.5×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (/ y (- (* 1.1283791670955126 (exp z)) (* x y)))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126 * exp(z)) - (x * y)));
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126d0 * exp(z)) - (x * y)))
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126 * Math.exp(z)) - (x * y)));
}
def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126 * math.exp(z)) - (x * y)))
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y / Float64(Float64(1.1283791670955126 * exp(z)) - Float64(x * y))))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126 * exp(z)) - (x * y)));
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y / N[(N[(1.1283791670955126 * N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 10 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 95.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (/ y (- (* 1.1283791670955126 (exp z)) (* x y)))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126 * exp(z)) - (x * y)));
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126d0 * exp(z)) - (x * y)))
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126 * Math.exp(z)) - (x * y)));
}
def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126 * math.exp(z)) - (x * y)))
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y / Float64(Float64(1.1283791670955126 * exp(z)) - Float64(x * y))))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126 * exp(z)) - (x * y)));
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y / N[(N[(1.1283791670955126 * N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{-1}{e^{z} \cdot \frac{1.1283791670955126}{y} - x} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ -1.0 (- (* (exp z) (/ 1.1283791670955126 y)) x))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x - (-1.0 / ((exp(z) * (1.1283791670955126 / y)) - x));
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x - ((-1.0d0) / ((exp(z) * (1.1283791670955126d0 / y)) - x))
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x - (-1.0 / ((Math.exp(z) * (1.1283791670955126 / y)) - x));
}
def code(x, y, z):
	return x - (-1.0 / ((math.exp(z) * (1.1283791670955126 / y)) - x))
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x - Float64(-1.0 / Float64(Float64(exp(z) * Float64(1.1283791670955126 / y)) - x)))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x - (-1.0 / ((exp(z) * (1.1283791670955126 / y)) - x));
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x - N[(-1.0 / N[(N[(N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.1283791670955126 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x - \frac{-1}{e^{z} \cdot \frac{1.1283791670955126}{y} - x}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 96.6%

    \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
  2. Simplified99.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{-1}{e^{z} \cdot \frac{1.1283791670955126}{y} - x}} \]
  3. Final simplification99.9%

    \[\leadsto x - \frac{-1}{e^{z} \cdot \frac{1.1283791670955126}{y} - x} \]

Alternative 2: 98.0% accurate, 0.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := x + \frac{y}{e^{z} \cdot 1.1283791670955126 - x \cdot y}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_0 \leq 10^{+179}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (+ x (/ y (- (* (exp z) 1.1283791670955126) (* x y))))))
   (if (<= t_0 1e+179) t_0 (+ x (/ -1.0 x)))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = x + (y / ((exp(z) * 1.1283791670955126) - (x * y)));
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= 1e+179) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = x + (y / ((exp(z) * 1.1283791670955126d0) - (x * y)))
    if (t_0 <= 1d+179) then
        tmp = t_0
    else
        tmp = x + ((-1.0d0) / x)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = x + (y / ((Math.exp(z) * 1.1283791670955126) - (x * y)));
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= 1e+179) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = x + (y / ((math.exp(z) * 1.1283791670955126) - (x * y)))
	tmp = 0
	if t_0 <= 1e+179:
		tmp = t_0
	else:
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x)
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(x + Float64(y / Float64(Float64(exp(z) * 1.1283791670955126) - Float64(x * y))))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_0 <= 1e+179)
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-1.0 / x));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = x + (y / ((exp(z) * 1.1283791670955126) - (x * y)));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_0 <= 1e+179)
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(x + N[(y / N[(N[(N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision] * 1.1283791670955126), $MachinePrecision] - N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$0, 1e+179], t$95$0, N[(x + N[(-1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := x + \frac{y}{e^{z} \cdot 1.1283791670955126 - x \cdot y}\\
\mathbf{if}\;t_0 \leq 10^{+179}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_0\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (+.f64 x (/.f64 y (-.f64 (*.f64 5641895835477563/5000000000000000 (exp.f64 z)) (*.f64 x y)))) < 9.9999999999999998e178

    1. Initial program 99.0%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]

    if 9.9999999999999998e178 < (+.f64 x (/.f64 y (-.f64 (*.f64 5641895835477563/5000000000000000 (exp.f64 z)) (*.f64 x y))))

    1. Initial program 83.6%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{1}{x}} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification99.2%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + \frac{y}{e^{z} \cdot 1.1283791670955126 - x \cdot y} \leq 10^{+179}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{e^{z} \cdot 1.1283791670955126 - x \cdot y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 98.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -250:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 4.1 \cdot 10^{-48}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{\left(1.1283791670955126 + z \cdot 1.1283791670955126\right) - x \cdot y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y \cdot -0.8862269254527579}{e^{z}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -250.0)
   (+ x (/ -1.0 x))
   (if (<= z 4.1e-48)
     (+ x (/ y (- (+ 1.1283791670955126 (* z 1.1283791670955126)) (* x y))))
     (- x (/ (* y -0.8862269254527579) (exp z))))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -250.0) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	} else if (z <= 4.1e-48) {
		tmp = x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126 + (z * 1.1283791670955126)) - (x * y)));
	} else {
		tmp = x - ((y * -0.8862269254527579) / exp(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-250.0d0)) then
        tmp = x + ((-1.0d0) / x)
    else if (z <= 4.1d-48) then
        tmp = x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126d0 + (z * 1.1283791670955126d0)) - (x * y)))
    else
        tmp = x - ((y * (-0.8862269254527579d0)) / exp(z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -250.0) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	} else if (z <= 4.1e-48) {
		tmp = x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126 + (z * 1.1283791670955126)) - (x * y)));
	} else {
		tmp = x - ((y * -0.8862269254527579) / Math.exp(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -250.0:
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x)
	elif z <= 4.1e-48:
		tmp = x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126 + (z * 1.1283791670955126)) - (x * y)))
	else:
		tmp = x - ((y * -0.8862269254527579) / math.exp(z))
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -250.0)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-1.0 / x));
	elseif (z <= 4.1e-48)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / Float64(Float64(1.1283791670955126 + Float64(z * 1.1283791670955126)) - Float64(x * y))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(Float64(y * -0.8862269254527579) / exp(z)));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -250.0)
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	elseif (z <= 4.1e-48)
		tmp = x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126 + (z * 1.1283791670955126)) - (x * y)));
	else
		tmp = x - ((y * -0.8862269254527579) / exp(z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -250.0], N[(x + N[(-1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 4.1e-48], N[(x + N[(y / N[(N[(1.1283791670955126 + N[(z * 1.1283791670955126), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[(y * -0.8862269254527579), $MachinePrecision] / N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -250:\\
\;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\

\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 4.1 \cdot 10^{-48}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{\left(1.1283791670955126 + z \cdot 1.1283791670955126\right) - x \cdot y}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x - \frac{y \cdot -0.8862269254527579}{e^{z}}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if z < -250

    1. Initial program 94.2%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{1}{x}} \]

    if -250 < z < 4.10000000000000014e-48

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\left(1.1283791670955126 + 1.1283791670955126 \cdot z\right)} - x \cdot y} \]
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\left(1.1283791670955126 + \color{blue}{z \cdot 1.1283791670955126}\right) - x \cdot y} \]
    4. Simplified99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\left(1.1283791670955126 + z \cdot 1.1283791670955126\right)} - x \cdot y} \]

    if 4.10000000000000014e-48 < z

    1. Initial program 93.2%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
    2. Simplified100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{-1}{e^{z} \cdot \frac{1.1283791670955126}{y} - x}} \]
    3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{-0.8862269254527579 \cdot \frac{y}{e^{z}}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative100.0%

        \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{e^{z}} \cdot -0.8862269254527579} \]
      2. associate-*l/100.0%

        \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot -0.8862269254527579}{e^{z}}} \]
    5. Simplified100.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot -0.8862269254527579}{e^{z}}} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification99.9%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -250:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 4.1 \cdot 10^{-48}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{\left(1.1283791670955126 + z \cdot 1.1283791670955126\right) - x \cdot y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y \cdot -0.8862269254527579}{e^{z}}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 99.7% accurate, 6.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -114:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 7.1:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{\left(1.1283791670955126 + z \cdot 1.1283791670955126\right) - x \cdot y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -114.0)
   (+ x (/ -1.0 x))
   (if (<= z 7.1)
     (+ x (/ y (- (+ 1.1283791670955126 (* z 1.1283791670955126)) (* x y))))
     x)))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -114.0) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	} else if (z <= 7.1) {
		tmp = x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126 + (z * 1.1283791670955126)) - (x * y)));
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-114.0d0)) then
        tmp = x + ((-1.0d0) / x)
    else if (z <= 7.1d0) then
        tmp = x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126d0 + (z * 1.1283791670955126d0)) - (x * y)))
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -114.0) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	} else if (z <= 7.1) {
		tmp = x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126 + (z * 1.1283791670955126)) - (x * y)));
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -114.0:
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x)
	elif z <= 7.1:
		tmp = x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126 + (z * 1.1283791670955126)) - (x * y)))
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -114.0)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-1.0 / x));
	elseif (z <= 7.1)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / Float64(Float64(1.1283791670955126 + Float64(z * 1.1283791670955126)) - Float64(x * y))));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -114.0)
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	elseif (z <= 7.1)
		tmp = x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126 + (z * 1.1283791670955126)) - (x * y)));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -114.0], N[(x + N[(-1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 7.1], N[(x + N[(y / N[(N[(1.1283791670955126 + N[(z * 1.1283791670955126), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -114:\\
\;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\

\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 7.1:\\
\;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{\left(1.1283791670955126 + z \cdot 1.1283791670955126\right) - x \cdot y}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if z < -114

    1. Initial program 94.2%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{1}{x}} \]

    if -114 < z < 7.0999999999999996

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\left(1.1283791670955126 + 1.1283791670955126 \cdot z\right)} - x \cdot y} \]
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\left(1.1283791670955126 + \color{blue}{z \cdot 1.1283791670955126}\right) - x \cdot y} \]
    4. Simplified99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\left(1.1283791670955126 + z \cdot 1.1283791670955126\right)} - x \cdot y} \]

    if 7.0999999999999996 < z

    1. Initial program 92.6%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification99.9%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -114:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 7.1:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{\left(1.1283791670955126 + z \cdot 1.1283791670955126\right) - x \cdot y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 86.0% accurate, 8.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -8 \cdot 10^{-56}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 0.0016:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 + z \cdot 1.1283791670955126}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -8e-56)
   (+ x (/ -1.0 x))
   (if (<= z 0.0016)
     (+ x (/ y (+ 1.1283791670955126 (* z 1.1283791670955126))))
     x)))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -8e-56) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	} else if (z <= 0.0016) {
		tmp = x + (y / (1.1283791670955126 + (z * 1.1283791670955126)));
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-8d-56)) then
        tmp = x + ((-1.0d0) / x)
    else if (z <= 0.0016d0) then
        tmp = x + (y / (1.1283791670955126d0 + (z * 1.1283791670955126d0)))
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -8e-56) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	} else if (z <= 0.0016) {
		tmp = x + (y / (1.1283791670955126 + (z * 1.1283791670955126)));
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -8e-56:
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x)
	elif z <= 0.0016:
		tmp = x + (y / (1.1283791670955126 + (z * 1.1283791670955126)))
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -8e-56)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-1.0 / x));
	elseif (z <= 0.0016)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / Float64(1.1283791670955126 + Float64(z * 1.1283791670955126))));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -8e-56)
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	elseif (z <= 0.0016)
		tmp = x + (y / (1.1283791670955126 + (z * 1.1283791670955126)));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -8e-56], N[(x + N[(-1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 0.0016], N[(x + N[(y / N[(1.1283791670955126 + N[(z * 1.1283791670955126), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -8 \cdot 10^{-56}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\

\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 0.0016:\\
\;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 + z \cdot 1.1283791670955126}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if z < -8.0000000000000003e-56

    1. Initial program 95.1%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 95.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{1}{x}} \]

    if -8.0000000000000003e-56 < z < 0.00160000000000000008

    1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\left(1.1283791670955126 + 1.1283791670955126 \cdot z\right)} - x \cdot y} \]
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative99.8%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\left(1.1283791670955126 + \color{blue}{z \cdot 1.1283791670955126}\right) - x \cdot y} \]
    4. Simplified99.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\left(1.1283791670955126 + z \cdot 1.1283791670955126\right)} - x \cdot y} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 78.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 + 1.1283791670955126 \cdot z}} \]

    if 0.00160000000000000008 < z

    1. Initial program 92.6%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification89.1%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -8 \cdot 10^{-56}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 0.0016:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 + z \cdot 1.1283791670955126}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 99.6% accurate, 8.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -215:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 7.1:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 - x \cdot y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -215.0)
   (+ x (/ -1.0 x))
   (if (<= z 7.1) (+ x (/ y (- 1.1283791670955126 (* x y)))) x)))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -215.0) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	} else if (z <= 7.1) {
		tmp = x + (y / (1.1283791670955126 - (x * y)));
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-215.0d0)) then
        tmp = x + ((-1.0d0) / x)
    else if (z <= 7.1d0) then
        tmp = x + (y / (1.1283791670955126d0 - (x * y)))
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -215.0) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	} else if (z <= 7.1) {
		tmp = x + (y / (1.1283791670955126 - (x * y)));
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -215.0:
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x)
	elif z <= 7.1:
		tmp = x + (y / (1.1283791670955126 - (x * y)))
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -215.0)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-1.0 / x));
	elseif (z <= 7.1)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / Float64(1.1283791670955126 - Float64(x * y))));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -215.0)
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	elseif (z <= 7.1)
		tmp = x + (y / (1.1283791670955126 - (x * y)));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -215.0], N[(x + N[(-1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 7.1], N[(x + N[(y / N[(1.1283791670955126 - N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -215:\\
\;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\

\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 7.1:\\
\;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 - x \cdot y}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if z < -215

    1. Initial program 94.2%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{1}{x}} \]

    if -215 < z < 7.0999999999999996

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 - x \cdot y}} \]
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative99.6%

        \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 - \color{blue}{y \cdot x}} \]
    4. Simplified99.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 - y \cdot x}} \]

    if 7.0999999999999996 < z

    1. Initial program 92.6%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification99.8%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -215:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 7.1:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 - x \cdot y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 99.6% accurate, 8.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -350:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 7.1:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{-1}{\frac{1.1283791670955126}{y} - x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -350.0)
   (+ x (/ -1.0 x))
   (if (<= z 7.1) (- x (/ -1.0 (- (/ 1.1283791670955126 y) x))) x)))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -350.0) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	} else if (z <= 7.1) {
		tmp = x - (-1.0 / ((1.1283791670955126 / y) - x));
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-350.0d0)) then
        tmp = x + ((-1.0d0) / x)
    else if (z <= 7.1d0) then
        tmp = x - ((-1.0d0) / ((1.1283791670955126d0 / y) - x))
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -350.0) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	} else if (z <= 7.1) {
		tmp = x - (-1.0 / ((1.1283791670955126 / y) - x));
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -350.0:
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x)
	elif z <= 7.1:
		tmp = x - (-1.0 / ((1.1283791670955126 / y) - x))
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -350.0)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-1.0 / x));
	elseif (z <= 7.1)
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(-1.0 / Float64(Float64(1.1283791670955126 / y) - x)));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -350.0)
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	elseif (z <= 7.1)
		tmp = x - (-1.0 / ((1.1283791670955126 / y) - x));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -350.0], N[(x + N[(-1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 7.1], N[(x - N[(-1.0 / N[(N[(1.1283791670955126 / y), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -350:\\
\;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\

\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 7.1:\\
\;\;\;\;x - \frac{-1}{\frac{1.1283791670955126}{y} - x}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if z < -350

    1. Initial program 94.2%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{1}{x}} \]

    if -350 < z < 7.0999999999999996

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
    2. Simplified99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{-1}{e^{z} \cdot \frac{1.1283791670955126}{y} - x}} \]
    3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot \frac{1}{y} - x}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r/99.6%

        \[\leadsto x - \frac{-1}{\color{blue}{\frac{1.1283791670955126 \cdot 1}{y}} - x} \]
      2. metadata-eval99.6%

        \[\leadsto x - \frac{-1}{\frac{\color{blue}{1.1283791670955126}}{y} - x} \]
    5. Simplified99.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{\frac{1.1283791670955126}{y} - x}} \]

    if 7.0999999999999996 < z

    1. Initial program 92.6%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification99.8%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -350:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 7.1:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{-1}{\frac{1.1283791670955126}{y} - x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 73.6% accurate, 12.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.05 \cdot 10^{-185}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{-8}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - y \cdot -0.8862269254527579\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -2.05e-185)
   x
   (if (<= z 1.45e-8) (- x (* y -0.8862269254527579)) x)))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.05e-185) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (z <= 1.45e-8) {
		tmp = x - (y * -0.8862269254527579);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-2.05d-185)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (z <= 1.45d-8) then
        tmp = x - (y * (-0.8862269254527579d0))
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.05e-185) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (z <= 1.45e-8) {
		tmp = x - (y * -0.8862269254527579);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -2.05e-185:
		tmp = x
	elif z <= 1.45e-8:
		tmp = x - (y * -0.8862269254527579)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -2.05e-185)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (z <= 1.45e-8)
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y * -0.8862269254527579));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -2.05e-185)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (z <= 1.45e-8)
		tmp = x - (y * -0.8862269254527579);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -2.05e-185], x, If[LessEqual[z, 1.45e-8], N[(x - N[(y * -0.8862269254527579), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.05 \cdot 10^{-185}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\

\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{-8}:\\
\;\;\;\;x - y \cdot -0.8862269254527579\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if z < -2.05e-185 or 1.4500000000000001e-8 < z

    1. Initial program 95.0%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 75.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

    if -2.05e-185 < z < 1.4500000000000001e-8

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
    2. Simplified99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{-1}{e^{z} \cdot \frac{1.1283791670955126}{y} - x}} \]
    3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot \frac{1}{y} - x}} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 81.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{-0.8862269254527579 \cdot y} \]
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative81.0%

        \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot -0.8862269254527579} \]
    6. Simplified81.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot -0.8862269254527579} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification77.6%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.05 \cdot 10^{-185}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{-8}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - y \cdot -0.8862269254527579\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 85.9% accurate, 12.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{-55}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 0.0132:\\ \;\;\;\;x - y \cdot -0.8862269254527579\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1.3e-55)
   (+ x (/ -1.0 x))
   (if (<= z 0.0132) (- x (* y -0.8862269254527579)) x)))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.3e-55) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	} else if (z <= 0.0132) {
		tmp = x - (y * -0.8862269254527579);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-1.3d-55)) then
        tmp = x + ((-1.0d0) / x)
    else if (z <= 0.0132d0) then
        tmp = x - (y * (-0.8862269254527579d0))
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.3e-55) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	} else if (z <= 0.0132) {
		tmp = x - (y * -0.8862269254527579);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1.3e-55:
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x)
	elif z <= 0.0132:
		tmp = x - (y * -0.8862269254527579)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.3e-55)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-1.0 / x));
	elseif (z <= 0.0132)
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y * -0.8862269254527579));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1.3e-55)
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	elseif (z <= 0.0132)
		tmp = x - (y * -0.8862269254527579);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1.3e-55], N[(x + N[(-1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 0.0132], N[(x - N[(y * -0.8862269254527579), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{-55}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\

\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 0.0132:\\
\;\;\;\;x - y \cdot -0.8862269254527579\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if z < -1.2999999999999999e-55

    1. Initial program 95.1%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 95.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{1}{x}} \]

    if -1.2999999999999999e-55 < z < 0.0132

    1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
    2. Simplified99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{-1}{e^{z} \cdot \frac{1.1283791670955126}{y} - x}} \]
    3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot \frac{1}{y} - x}} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 78.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{-0.8862269254527579 \cdot y} \]
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative78.3%

        \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot -0.8862269254527579} \]
    6. Simplified78.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot -0.8862269254527579} \]

    if 0.0132 < z

    1. Initial program 92.6%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification89.0%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{-55}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 0.0132:\\ \;\;\;\;x - y \cdot -0.8862269254527579\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 10: 69.8% accurate, 111.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	return x
function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := x
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 96.6%

    \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
  2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 70.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
  3. Final simplification70.0%

    \[\leadsto x \]

Developer target: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{1}{\frac{1.1283791670955126}{y} \cdot e^{z} - x} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (/ 1.0 (- (* (/ 1.1283791670955126 y) (exp z)) x))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (1.0 / (((1.1283791670955126 / y) * exp(z)) - x));
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (1.0d0 / (((1.1283791670955126d0 / y) * exp(z)) - x))
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (1.0 / (((1.1283791670955126 / y) * Math.exp(z)) - x));
}
def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (1.0 / (((1.1283791670955126 / y) * math.exp(z)) - x))
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(Float64(1.1283791670955126 / y) * exp(z)) - x)))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (1.0 / (((1.1283791670955126 / y) * exp(z)) - x));
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(1.0 / N[(N[(N[(1.1283791670955126 / y), $MachinePrecision] * N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x + \frac{1}{\frac{1.1283791670955126}{y} \cdot e^{z} - x}
\end{array}

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2023336 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:invErfc from math-functions-0.1.5.2, A"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (+ x (/ 1.0 (- (* (/ 1.1283791670955126 y) (exp z)) x)))

  (+ x (/ y (- (* 1.1283791670955126 (exp z)) (* x y)))))