VandenBroeck and Keller, Equation (6)

Percentage Accurate: 77.1% → 99.2%

Time: 15.6s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 1.0×

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. F = 7.10888714454473e-259
  2. l = -3050090534267836.5

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (F l)
 :precision binary64
 (- (* PI l) (* (/ 1.0 (* F F)) (tan (* PI l)))))

C

double code(double F, double l) {
	return (((double) M_PI) * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * tan((((double) M_PI) * l)));
}

Java

public static double code(double F, double l) {
	return (Math.PI * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * Math.tan((Math.PI * l)));
}

Python

def code(F, l):
	return (math.pi * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * math.tan((math.pi * l)))

Julia

function code(F, l)
	return Float64(Float64(pi * l) - Float64(Float64(1.0 / Float64(F * F)) * tan(Float64(pi * l))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(F, l)
	tmp = (pi * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * tan((pi * l)));
end

Wolfram

code[F_, l_] := N[(N[(Pi * l), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(1.0 / N[(F * F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Tan[N[(Pi * l), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 77.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (F l)
 :precision binary64
 (- (* PI l) (* (/ 1.0 (* F F)) (tan (* PI l)))))

C

double code(double F, double l) {
	return (((double) M_PI) * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * tan((((double) M_PI) * l)));
}

Java

public static double code(double F, double l) {
	return (Math.PI * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * Math.tan((Math.PI * l)));
}

Python

def code(F, l):
	return (math.pi * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * math.tan((math.pi * l)))

Julia

function code(F, l)
	return Float64(Float64(pi * l) - Float64(Float64(1.0 / Float64(F * F)) * tan(Float64(pi * l))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(F, l)
	tmp = (pi * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * tan((pi * l)));
end

Wolfram

code[F_, l_] := N[(N[(Pi * l), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(1.0 / N[(F * F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Tan[N[(Pi * l), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.2% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\pi \cdot l_m \leq 100000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l_m - \frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot l_m\right)}{F}}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l_m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

l_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l_s = (copysign.f64 1 l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  l_s
  (if (<= (* PI l_m) 100000000000.0)
    (- (* PI l_m) (/ (/ (tan (* PI l_m)) F) F))
    (* PI l_m))))

C

l_m = fabs(l);
l_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((((double) M_PI) * l_m) <= 100000000000.0) {
		tmp = (((double) M_PI) * l_m) - ((tan((((double) M_PI) * l_m)) / F) / F);
	} else {
		tmp = ((double) M_PI) * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Java

l_m = Math.abs(l);
l_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((Math.PI * l_m) <= 100000000000.0) {
		tmp = (Math.PI * l_m) - ((Math.tan((Math.PI * l_m)) / F) / F);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.PI * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Python

l_m = math.fabs(l)
l_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	tmp = 0
	if (math.pi * l_m) <= 100000000000.0:
		tmp = (math.pi * l_m) - ((math.tan((math.pi * l_m)) / F) / F)
	else:
		tmp = math.pi * l_m
	return l_s * tmp

Julia

l_m = abs(l)
l_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(pi * l_m) <= 100000000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(pi * l_m) - Float64(Float64(tan(Float64(pi * l_m)) / F) / F));
	else
		tmp = Float64(pi * l_m);
	end
	return Float64(l_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

l_m = abs(l);
l_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((pi * l_m) <= 100000000000.0)
		tmp = (pi * l_m) - ((tan((pi * l_m)) / F) / F);
	else
		tmp = pi * l_m;
	end
	tmp_2 = l_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

l_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * If[LessEqual[N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision], 100000000000.0], N[(N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[Tan[N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / F), $MachinePrecision] / F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (PI.f64) l) < 1e11

   1. Initial program 80.8%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 81.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. *-un-lft-identity 81.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

      3. associate-/r* 88.2%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}{F}} \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}{F}} \]

   if 1e11 < (*.f64 (PI.f64) l)

   1. Initial program 74.0%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sqr-neg 74.0%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]

      2. associate-*l/ 74.0%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      3. sqr-neg 74.0%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{\color{blue}{F \cdot F}} \]

      4. *-lft-identity 74.0%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. Simplified 74.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in l around 0 61.4%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi}}{F \cdot F} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in F around inf 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\pi \cdot \ell \leq 100000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2: 98.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\pi \cdot l_m \leq 100000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l_m - \frac{\pi}{F} \cdot \frac{l_m}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l_m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

l_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l_s = (copysign.f64 1 l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  l_s
  (if (<= (* PI l_m) 100000000000.0)
    (- (* PI l_m) (* (/ PI F) (/ l_m F)))
    (* PI l_m))))

C

l_m = fabs(l);
l_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((((double) M_PI) * l_m) <= 100000000000.0) {
		tmp = (((double) M_PI) * l_m) - ((((double) M_PI) / F) * (l_m / F));
	} else {
		tmp = ((double) M_PI) * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Java

l_m = Math.abs(l);
l_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((Math.PI * l_m) <= 100000000000.0) {
		tmp = (Math.PI * l_m) - ((Math.PI / F) * (l_m / F));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.PI * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Python

l_m = math.fabs(l)
l_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	tmp = 0
	if (math.pi * l_m) <= 100000000000.0:
		tmp = (math.pi * l_m) - ((math.pi / F) * (l_m / F))
	else:
		tmp = math.pi * l_m
	return l_s * tmp

Julia

l_m = abs(l)
l_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(pi * l_m) <= 100000000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(pi * l_m) - Float64(Float64(pi / F) * Float64(l_m / F)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(pi * l_m);
	end
	return Float64(l_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

l_m = abs(l);
l_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((pi * l_m) <= 100000000000.0)
		tmp = (pi * l_m) - ((pi / F) * (l_m / F));
	else
		tmp = pi * l_m;
	end
	tmp_2 = l_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

l_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * If[LessEqual[N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision], 100000000000.0], N[(N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(Pi / F), $MachinePrecision] * N[(l$95$m / F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (PI.f64) l) < 1e11

   1. Initial program 80.8%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sqr-neg 80.8%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]

      2. associate-*l/ 81.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      3. sqr-neg 81.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{\color{blue}{F \cdot F}} \]

      4. *-lft-identity 81.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. Simplified 81.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in l around 0 74.9%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi}}{F \cdot F} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 74.9%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell}}{F \cdot F} \]

      2. times-frac 81.7%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{F} \cdot \frac{\ell}{F}} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 81.7%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{F} \cdot \frac{\ell}{F}} \]

   if 1e11 < (*.f64 (PI.f64) l)

   1. Initial program 74.0%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sqr-neg 74.0%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]

      2. associate-*l/ 74.0%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      3. sqr-neg 74.0%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{\color{blue}{F \cdot F}} \]

      4. *-lft-identity 74.0%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. Simplified 74.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in l around 0 61.4%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi}}{F \cdot F} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in F around inf 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\pi \cdot \ell \leq 100000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\pi}{F} \cdot \frac{\ell}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 74.5% accurate, 2.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;F \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{-209} \lor \neg \left(F \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{-63}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l_m\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\pi}{F} \cdot \frac{-l_m}{F}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

l_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l_s = (copysign.f64 1 l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  l_s
  (if (or (<= F 2.4e-209) (not (<= F 2.4e-63)))
    (* PI l_m)
    (* (/ PI F) (/ (- l_m) F)))))

C

l_m = fabs(l);
l_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((F <= 2.4e-209) || !(F <= 2.4e-63)) {
		tmp = ((double) M_PI) * l_m;
	} else {
		tmp = (((double) M_PI) / F) * (-l_m / F);
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Java

l_m = Math.abs(l);
l_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((F <= 2.4e-209) || !(F <= 2.4e-63)) {
		tmp = Math.PI * l_m;
	} else {
		tmp = (Math.PI / F) * (-l_m / F);
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Python

l_m = math.fabs(l)
l_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	tmp = 0
	if (F <= 2.4e-209) or not (F <= 2.4e-63):
		tmp = math.pi * l_m
	else:
		tmp = (math.pi / F) * (-l_m / F)
	return l_s * tmp

Julia

l_m = abs(l)
l_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((F <= 2.4e-209) || !(F <= 2.4e-63))
		tmp = Float64(pi * l_m);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(pi / F) * Float64(Float64(-l_m) / F));
	end
	return Float64(l_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

l_m = abs(l);
l_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((F <= 2.4e-209) || ~((F <= 2.4e-63)))
		tmp = pi * l_m;
	else
		tmp = (pi / F) * (-l_m / F);
	end
	tmp_2 = l_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

l_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * If[Or[LessEqual[F, 2.4e-209], N[Not[LessEqual[F, 2.4e-63]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(Pi / F), $MachinePrecision] * N[((-l$95$m) / F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if F < 2.4000000000000001e-209 or 2.4000000000000001e-63 < F

   1. Initial program 82.0%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sqr-neg 82.0%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]

      2. associate-*l/ 82.4%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      3. sqr-neg 82.4%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{\color{blue}{F \cdot F}} \]

      4. *-lft-identity 82.4%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. Simplified 82.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in l around 0 74.9%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi}}{F \cdot F} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in F around inf 80.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi} \]

   if 2.4000000000000001e-209 < F < 2.4000000000000001e-63

   1. Initial program 61.8%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sqr-neg 61.8%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]

      2. associate-*l/ 63.2%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      3. sqr-neg 63.2%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{\color{blue}{F \cdot F}} \]

      4. *-lft-identity 63.2%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. Simplified 63.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in l around 0 53.2%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi}}{F \cdot F} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in F around 0 53.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{\ell \cdot \pi}{{F}^{2}}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 53.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\frac{\ell \cdot \pi}{{F}^{2}}} \]

      2. associate-/l* 53.1%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\frac{\ell}{\frac{{F}^{2}}{\pi}}} \]

   7. Simplified 53.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\frac{\ell}{\frac{{F}^{2}}{\pi}}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 53.2%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\frac{\ell \cdot \pi}{{F}^{2}}} \]

      2. unpow2 53.2%

         \[\leadsto -\frac{\ell \cdot \pi}{\color{blue}{F \cdot F}} \]

      3. frac-times 63.4%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\frac{\ell}{F} \cdot \frac{\pi}{F}} \]

      4. *-commutative 63.4%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{F} \cdot \frac{\ell}{F}} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 63.4%

      \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{F} \cdot \frac{\ell}{F}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;F \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{-209} \lor \neg \left(F \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{-63}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\pi}{F} \cdot \frac{-\ell}{F}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 74.6% accurate, 2.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;F \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{-206} \lor \neg \left(F \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-64}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l_m\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{-\pi}{F \cdot \frac{F}{l_m}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

l_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l_s = (copysign.f64 1 l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  l_s
  (if (or (<= F 1.15e-206) (not (<= F 1.25e-64)))
    (* PI l_m)
    (/ (- PI) (* F (/ F l_m))))))

C

l_m = fabs(l);
l_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((F <= 1.15e-206) || !(F <= 1.25e-64)) {
		tmp = ((double) M_PI) * l_m;
	} else {
		tmp = -((double) M_PI) / (F * (F / l_m));
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Java

l_m = Math.abs(l);
l_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((F <= 1.15e-206) || !(F <= 1.25e-64)) {
		tmp = Math.PI * l_m;
	} else {
		tmp = -Math.PI / (F * (F / l_m));
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Python

l_m = math.fabs(l)
l_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	tmp = 0
	if (F <= 1.15e-206) or not (F <= 1.25e-64):
		tmp = math.pi * l_m
	else:
		tmp = -math.pi / (F * (F / l_m))
	return l_s * tmp

Julia

l_m = abs(l)
l_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((F <= 1.15e-206) || !(F <= 1.25e-64))
		tmp = Float64(pi * l_m);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-pi) / Float64(F * Float64(F / l_m)));
	end
	return Float64(l_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

l_m = abs(l);
l_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((F <= 1.15e-206) || ~((F <= 1.25e-64)))
		tmp = pi * l_m;
	else
		tmp = -pi / (F * (F / l_m));
	end
	tmp_2 = l_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

l_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * If[Or[LessEqual[F, 1.15e-206], N[Not[LessEqual[F, 1.25e-64]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision], N[((-Pi) / N[(F * N[(F / l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if F < 1.15e-206 or 1.25000000000000008e-64 < F

   1. Initial program 82.0%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sqr-neg 82.0%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]

      2. associate-*l/ 82.4%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      3. sqr-neg 82.4%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{\color{blue}{F \cdot F}} \]

      4. *-lft-identity 82.4%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. Simplified 82.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in l around 0 74.9%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi}}{F \cdot F} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in F around inf 80.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi} \]

   if 1.15e-206 < F < 1.25000000000000008e-64

   1. Initial program 61.8%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sqr-neg 61.8%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]

      2. associate-*l/ 63.2%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      3. sqr-neg 63.2%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{\color{blue}{F \cdot F}} \]

      4. *-lft-identity 63.2%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. Simplified 63.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in l around 0 53.2%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi}}{F \cdot F} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in F around 0 53.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{\ell \cdot \pi}{{F}^{2}}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 53.2%

         \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell}}{{F}^{2}} \]

      2. unpow2 53.2%

         \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \frac{\pi \cdot \ell}{\color{blue}{F \cdot F}} \]

      3. times-frac 63.4%

         \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{F} \cdot \frac{\ell}{F}\right)} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 63.4%

      \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{F} \cdot \frac{\ell}{F}\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 63.4%

         \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\ell}{F} \cdot \frac{\pi}{F}\right)} \]

      2. clear-num 63.4%

         \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{F}{\ell}}} \cdot \frac{\pi}{F}\right) \]

      3. frac-times 63.6%

         \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \pi}{\frac{F}{\ell} \cdot F}} \]

      4. *-un-lft-identity 63.6%

         \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\pi}}{\frac{F}{\ell} \cdot F} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 63.6%

      \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{\frac{F}{\ell} \cdot F}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;F \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{-206} \lor \neg \left(F \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-64}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{-\pi}{F \cdot \frac{F}{\ell}}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 74.2% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l_s \cdot \left(\pi \cdot l_m\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

l_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l_s = (copysign.f64 1 l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m) :precision binary64 (* l_s (* PI l_m)))

C

l_m = fabs(l);
l_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	return l_s * (((double) M_PI) * l_m);
}

Java

l_m = Math.abs(l);
l_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	return l_s * (Math.PI * l_m);
}

Python

l_m = math.fabs(l)
l_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	return l_s * (math.pi * l_m)

Julia

l_m = abs(l)
l_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	return Float64(l_s * Float64(pi * l_m))
end

MATLAB

l_m = abs(l);
l_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = l_s * (pi * l_m);
end

Wolfram

l_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 79.4%

   \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sqr-neg 79.4%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]

   2. associate-*l/ 79.9%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

   3. sqr-neg 79.9%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{\color{blue}{F \cdot F}} \]

   4. *-lft-identity 79.9%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

3. Simplified 79.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in l around 0 72.1%

   \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi}}{F \cdot F} \]

5. Taylor expanded in F around inf 74.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi} \]

6. Final simplification 74.7%

   \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023335 
(FPCore (F l)
  :name "VandenBroeck and Keller, Equation (6)"
  :precision binary64
  (- (* PI l) (* (/ 1.0 (* F F)) (tan (* PI l)))))