Diagrams.ThreeD.Shapes:frustum from diagrams-lib-1.3.0.3, A

Percentage Accurate: 89.4% → 95.4%

Time: 10.6s

Alternatives: 13

Speedup: 0.5×

• 46.8% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (* (+ a (* b c)) c) i))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = 2.0d0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - Float64(Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * c) * i)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(2.0 * N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * c), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 89.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (* (+ a (* b c)) c) i))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = 2.0d0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - Float64(Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * c) * i)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(2.0 * N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * c), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 95.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a + b \cdot c\\ t_2 := x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_2 - i \cdot \left(c \cdot t_1\right) \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(t_2 - t_1 \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t - c \cdot \left(b \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ a (* b c))) (t_2 (+ (* x y) (* z t))))
   (if (<= (- t_2 (* i (* c t_1))) INFINITY)
     (* 2.0 (- t_2 (* t_1 (* c i))))
     (* 2.0 (- (* z t) (* c (* b (* c i))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 - (i * (c * t_1))) <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - (c * (b * (c * i))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 - (i * (c * t_1))) <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - (c * (b * (c * i))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = a + (b * c)
	t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t)
	tmp = 0
	if (t_2 - (i * (c * t_1))) <= math.inf:
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - (c * (b * (c * i))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(a + Float64(b * c))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(t_2 - Float64(i * Float64(c * t_1))) <= Inf)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(t_2 - Float64(t_1 * Float64(c * i))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(z * t) - Float64(c * Float64(b * Float64(c * i)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = a + (b * c);
	t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_2 - (i * (c * t_1))) <= Inf)
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - (c * (b * (c * i))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(t$95$2 - N[(i * N[(c * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], Infinity], N[(2.0 * N[(t$95$2 - N[(t$95$1 * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] - N[(c * N[(b * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 94.5%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 94.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot t - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 94.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      3. associate--l+ 94.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + t \cdot z\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)} \]

      4. associate--l+ 94.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(t \cdot z - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 94.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot t} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      6. associate--l+ 94.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)} \]

      7. fma-def 94.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      8. associate-*l* 97.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-def 97.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 97.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 97.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   if +inf.0 < (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 52.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z - c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 53.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(t \cdot z - c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)}\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 94.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - i \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t - c \cdot \left(b \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2: 94.2% accurate, 0.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (- (fma x y (* z t)) (* (+ a (* b c)) (* c i)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (fma(x, y, (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(2.0 * Float64(fma(x, y, Float64(z * t)) - Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * Float64(c * i))))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(2.0 * N[(N[(x * y + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 88.2%

   \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate--l+ 88.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot t - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

   2. *-commutative 88.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. associate--l+ 88.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + t \cdot z\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)} \]

   4. associate--l+ 88.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(t \cdot z - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

   5. *-commutative 88.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot t} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   6. associate--l+ 88.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)} \]

   7. fma-def 90.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   8. associate-*l* 94.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

3. Simplified 94.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 94.2%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

Alternative 3: 94.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a + b \cdot c\\ t_2 := i \cdot \left(c \cdot t_1\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_2 \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(t_1 \cdot \left(-i\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t_2 \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+285}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - t_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - c \cdot \left(t_1 \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ a (* b c))) (t_2 (* i (* c t_1))))
   (if (<= t_2 (- INFINITY))
     (* 2.0 (* c (* t_1 (- i))))
     (if (<= t_2 4e+285)
       (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) t_2))
       (* 2.0 (- (* x y) (* c (* t_1 i))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = i * (c * t_1);
	double tmp;
	if (t_2 <= -((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (c * (t_1 * -i));
	} else if (t_2 <= 4e+285) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - t_2);
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (c * (t_1 * i)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = i * (c * t_1);
	double tmp;
	if (t_2 <= -Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (c * (t_1 * -i));
	} else if (t_2 <= 4e+285) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - t_2);
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (c * (t_1 * i)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = a + (b * c)
	t_2 = i * (c * t_1)
	tmp = 0
	if t_2 <= -math.inf:
		tmp = 2.0 * (c * (t_1 * -i))
	elif t_2 <= 4e+285:
		tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - t_2)
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (c * (t_1 * i)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(a + Float64(b * c))
	t_2 = Float64(i * Float64(c * t_1))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_2 <= Float64(-Inf))
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(c * Float64(t_1 * Float64(-i))));
	elseif (t_2 <= 4e+285)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - t_2));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(x * y) - Float64(c * Float64(t_1 * i))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = a + (b * c);
	t_2 = i * (c * t_1);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_2 <= -Inf)
		tmp = 2.0 * (c * (t_1 * -i));
	elseif (t_2 <= 4e+285)
		tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - t_2);
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (c * (t_1 * i)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(i * N[(c * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$2, (-Infinity)], N[(2.0 * N[(c * N[(t$95$1 * (-i)), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t$95$2, 4e+285], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t$95$2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(c * N[(t$95$1 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i) < -inf.0

   1. Initial program 73.8%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in i around inf 89.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -inf.0 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i) < 3.9999999999999999e285

   1. Initial program 96.2%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   if 3.9999999999999999e285 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i)

   1. Initial program 76.3%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 89.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y - c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 93.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;i \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(-i\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;i \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+285}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - i \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 65.7% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+79}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -0.2:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{-37}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(-i\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 10^{+300}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t - c \cdot \left(b \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* 2.0 (- (* x y) (* a (* c i))))))
   (if (<= (* x y) -1e+79)
     t_1
     (if (<= (* x y) -0.2)
       (* 2.0 (+ (* x y) (* z t)))
       (if (<= (* x y) -2e-37)
         (* 2.0 (* c (* (+ a (* b c)) (- i))))
         (if (<= (* x y) 1e+300)
           (* 2.0 (- (* z t) (* c (* b (* c i)))))
           t_1))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (a * (c * i)));
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1e+79) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -0.2) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) + (z * t));
	} else if ((x * y) <= -2e-37) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * -i));
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1e+300) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - (c * (b * (c * i))));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = 2.0d0 * ((x * y) - (a * (c * i)))
    if ((x * y) <= (-1d+79)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if ((x * y) <= (-0.2d0)) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((x * y) + (z * t))
    else if ((x * y) <= (-2d-37)) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * -i))
    else if ((x * y) <= 1d+300) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((z * t) - (c * (b * (c * i))))
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (a * (c * i)));
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1e+79) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -0.2) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) + (z * t));
	} else if ((x * y) <= -2e-37) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * -i));
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1e+300) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - (c * (b * (c * i))));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (a * (c * i)))
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -1e+79:
		tmp = t_1
	elif (x * y) <= -0.2:
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) + (z * t))
	elif (x * y) <= -2e-37:
		tmp = 2.0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * -i))
	elif (x * y) <= 1e+300:
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - (c * (b * (c * i))))
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(x * y) - Float64(a * Float64(c * i))))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -1e+79)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= -0.2)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= -2e-37)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(c * Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * Float64(-i))));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 1e+300)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(z * t) - Float64(c * Float64(b * Float64(c * i)))));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (a * (c * i)));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -1e+79)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif ((x * y) <= -0.2)
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) + (z * t));
	elseif ((x * y) <= -2e-37)
		tmp = 2.0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * -i));
	elseif ((x * y) <= 1e+300)
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - (c * (b * (c * i))));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(2.0 * N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(a * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1e+79], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -0.2], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -2e-37], N[(2.0 * N[(c * N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * (-i)), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1e+300], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] - N[(c * N[(b * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -9.99999999999999967e78 or 1.0000000000000001e300 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 79.7%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around inf 77.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot c\right)} \cdot i\right) \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 77.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot a\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

   4. Simplified 77.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot a\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 83.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y - a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

   if -9.99999999999999967e78 < (*.f64 x y) < -0.20000000000000001

   1. Initial program 94.8%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in c around 0 75.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if -0.20000000000000001 < (*.f64 x y) < -2.00000000000000013e-37

   1. Initial program 72.1%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in i around inf 95.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -2.00000000000000013e-37 < (*.f64 x y) < 1.0000000000000001e300

   1. Initial program 91.4%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 82.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z - c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 73.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(t \cdot z - c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)}\right) \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 76.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+79}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -0.2:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{-37}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(-i\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 10^{+300}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t - c \cdot \left(b \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 76.5% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+101} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 10^{+300}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t - c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -5e+101) (not (<= (* x y) 1e+300)))
   (* 2.0 (- (* x y) (* a (* c i))))
   (* 2.0 (- (* z t) (* c (* (+ a (* b c)) i))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -5e+101) || !((x * y) <= 1e+300)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (a * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * y) <= (-5d+101)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= 1d+300))) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((x * y) - (a * (c * i)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((z * t) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -5e+101) || !((x * y) <= 1e+300)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (a * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -5e+101) or not ((x * y) <= 1e+300):
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (a * (c * i)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -5e+101) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 1e+300))
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(x * y) - Float64(a * Float64(c * i))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(z * t) - Float64(c * Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * i))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -5e+101) || ~(((x * y) <= 1e+300)))
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (a * (c * i)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -5e+101], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1e+300]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(a * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] - N[(c * N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -4.99999999999999989e101 or 1.0000000000000001e300 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 80.1%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around inf 79.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot c\right)} \cdot i\right) \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 79.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot a\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

   4. Simplified 79.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot a\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 85.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y - a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

   if -4.99999999999999989e101 < (*.f64 x y) < 1.0000000000000001e300

   1. Initial program 90.7%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 80.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z - c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 81.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+101} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 10^{+300}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t - c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 44.9% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+74} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+30} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq -0.2\right) \land x \cdot y \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+154}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -1e+74)
         (not
          (or (<= (* x y) -2e+30)
              (and (not (<= (* x y) -0.2)) (<= (* x y) 5e+154)))))
   (* 2.0 (* x y))
   (* 2.0 (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -1e+74) || !(((x * y) <= -2e+30) || (!((x * y) <= -0.2) && ((x * y) <= 5e+154)))) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * y) <= (-1d+74)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= (-2d+30)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= (-0.2d0))) .and. ((x * y) <= 5d+154))) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (x * y)
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -1e+74) || !(((x * y) <= -2e+30) || (!((x * y) <= -0.2) && ((x * y) <= 5e+154)))) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -1e+74) or not (((x * y) <= -2e+30) or (not ((x * y) <= -0.2) and ((x * y) <= 5e+154))):
		tmp = 2.0 * (x * y)
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -1e+74) || !((Float64(x * y) <= -2e+30) || (!(Float64(x * y) <= -0.2) && (Float64(x * y) <= 5e+154))))
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(x * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -1e+74) || ~((((x * y) <= -2e+30) || (~(((x * y) <= -0.2)) && ((x * y) <= 5e+154)))))
		tmp = 2.0 * (x * y);
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1e+74], N[Not[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -2e+30], And[N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -0.2]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 5e+154]]]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(2.0 * N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -9.99999999999999952e73 or -2e30 < (*.f64 x y) < -0.20000000000000001 or 5.00000000000000004e154 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 84.6%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 64.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if -9.99999999999999952e73 < (*.f64 x y) < -2e30 or -0.20000000000000001 < (*.f64 x y) < 5.00000000000000004e154

   1. Initial program 90.2%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 38.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 47.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+74} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+30} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq -0.2\right) \land x \cdot y \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+154}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 87.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{-10} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 3.65 \cdot 10^{+50}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - i \cdot \left(a \cdot c\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= c -5.8e-10) (not (<= c 3.65e+50)))
   (* 2.0 (- (* x y) (* c (* (+ a (* b c)) i))))
   (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* i (* a c))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -5.8e-10) || !(c <= 3.65e+50)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (i * (a * c)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((c <= (-5.8d-10)) .or. (.not. (c <= 3.65d+50))) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((x * y) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (i * (a * c)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -5.8e-10) || !(c <= 3.65e+50)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (i * (a * c)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (c <= -5.8e-10) or not (c <= 3.65e+50):
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (i * (a * c)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((c <= -5.8e-10) || !(c <= 3.65e+50))
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(x * y) - Float64(c * Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * i))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - Float64(i * Float64(a * c))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c <= -5.8e-10) || ~((c <= 3.65e+50)))
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (i * (a * c)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[c, -5.8e-10], N[Not[LessEqual[c, 3.65e+50]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(c * N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(i * N[(a * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if c < -5.79999999999999962e-10 or 3.6500000000000002e50 < c

   1. Initial program 79.3%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 84.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y - c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -5.79999999999999962e-10 < c < 3.6500000000000002e50

   1. Initial program 96.3%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around inf 86.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot c\right)} \cdot i\right) \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 86.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot a\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

   4. Simplified 86.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot a\right)} \cdot i\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{-10} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 3.65 \cdot 10^{+50}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - i \cdot \left(a \cdot c\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 72.0% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+62}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - t_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t - t_1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* c (* (+ a (* b c)) i))))
   (if (<= t 6.5e+62) (* 2.0 (- (* x y) t_1)) (* 2.0 (- (* z t) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = c * ((a + (b * c)) * i);
	double tmp;
	if (t <= 6.5e+62) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - t_1);
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - t_1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)
    if (t <= 6.5d+62) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((x * y) - t_1)
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((z * t) - t_1)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = c * ((a + (b * c)) * i);
	double tmp;
	if (t <= 6.5e+62) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - t_1);
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - t_1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)
	tmp = 0
	if t <= 6.5e+62:
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - t_1)
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - t_1)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(c * Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * i))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= 6.5e+62)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(x * y) - t_1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(z * t) - t_1));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = c * ((a + (b * c)) * i);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= 6.5e+62)
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - t_1);
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - t_1);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(c * N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t, 6.5e+62], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] - t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < 6.5000000000000003e62

   1. Initial program 90.6%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 76.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y - c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if 6.5000000000000003e62 < t

   1. Initial program 80.5%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 82.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z - c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+62}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t - c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 74.5% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -6.8 \cdot 10^{+72} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{+51}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(-i\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= c -6.8e+72) (not (<= c 1.5e+51)))
   (* 2.0 (* c (* (+ a (* b c)) (- i))))
   (* 2.0 (+ (* x y) (* z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -6.8e+72) || !(c <= 1.5e+51)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * -i));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) + (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((c <= (-6.8d+72)) .or. (.not. (c <= 1.5d+51))) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * -i))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((x * y) + (z * t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -6.8e+72) || !(c <= 1.5e+51)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * -i));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) + (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (c <= -6.8e+72) or not (c <= 1.5e+51):
		tmp = 2.0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * -i))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) + (z * t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((c <= -6.8e+72) || !(c <= 1.5e+51))
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(c * Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * Float64(-i))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c <= -6.8e+72) || ~((c <= 1.5e+51)))
		tmp = 2.0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * -i));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) + (z * t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[c, -6.8e+72], N[Not[LessEqual[c, 1.5e+51]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(2.0 * N[(c * N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * (-i)), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if c < -6.7999999999999997e72 or 1.5e51 < c

   1. Initial program 77.2%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in i around inf 75.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -6.7999999999999997e72 < c < 1.5e51

   1. Initial program 95.5%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in c around 0 69.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 72.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -6.8 \cdot 10^{+72} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{+51}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(-i\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 10: 61.8% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -3.7 \cdot 10^{+155} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{+36}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= a -3.7e+155) (not (<= a 3.6e+36)))
   (* 2.0 (- (* x y) (* a (* c i))))
   (* 2.0 (+ (* x y) (* z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -3.7e+155) || !(a <= 3.6e+36)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (a * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) + (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a <= (-3.7d+155)) .or. (.not. (a <= 3.6d+36))) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((x * y) - (a * (c * i)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((x * y) + (z * t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -3.7e+155) || !(a <= 3.6e+36)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (a * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) + (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (a <= -3.7e+155) or not (a <= 3.6e+36):
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (a * (c * i)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) + (z * t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((a <= -3.7e+155) || !(a <= 3.6e+36))
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(x * y) - Float64(a * Float64(c * i))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a <= -3.7e+155) || ~((a <= 3.6e+36)))
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (a * (c * i)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) + (z * t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[a, -3.7e+155], N[Not[LessEqual[a, 3.6e+36]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(a * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -3.6999999999999998e155 or 3.5999999999999997e36 < a

   1. Initial program 81.4%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around inf 74.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot c\right)} \cdot i\right) \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 74.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot a\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

   4. Simplified 74.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot a\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 73.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y - a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

   if -3.6999999999999998e155 < a < 3.5999999999999997e36

   1. Initial program 91.3%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in c around 0 61.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 65.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -3.7 \cdot 10^{+155} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{+36}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 11: 58.9% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -2.65 \cdot 10^{+206}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(a \cdot -2\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 1.02 \cdot 10^{+114}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t - c \cdot \left(a \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a -2.65e+206)
   (* (* c i) (* a -2.0))
   (if (<= a 1.02e+114)
     (* 2.0 (+ (* x y) (* z t)))
     (* 2.0 (- (* z t) (* c (* a i)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -2.65e+206) {
		tmp = (c * i) * (a * -2.0);
	} else if (a <= 1.02e+114) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - (c * (a * i)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (a <= (-2.65d+206)) then
        tmp = (c * i) * (a * (-2.0d0))
    else if (a <= 1.02d+114) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((x * y) + (z * t))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((z * t) - (c * (a * i)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -2.65e+206) {
		tmp = (c * i) * (a * -2.0);
	} else if (a <= 1.02e+114) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - (c * (a * i)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if a <= -2.65e+206:
		tmp = (c * i) * (a * -2.0)
	elif a <= 1.02e+114:
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) + (z * t))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - (c * (a * i)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -2.65e+206)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) * Float64(a * -2.0));
	elseif (a <= 1.02e+114)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(z * t) - Float64(c * Float64(a * i))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= -2.65e+206)
		tmp = (c * i) * (a * -2.0);
	elseif (a <= 1.02e+114)
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) + (z * t));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * ((z * t) - (c * (a * i)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[a, -2.65e+206], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] * N[(a * -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[a, 1.02e+114], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] - N[(c * N[(a * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if a < -2.64999999999999996e206

   1. Initial program 77.7%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around inf 82.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 82.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 82.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot a}\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 82.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(-a\right)\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 82.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(-a\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 82.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 82.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \cdot -2} \]

      2. *-commutative 82.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot a\right)} \cdot -2 \]

      3. associate-*l* 82.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(a \cdot -2\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 82.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(a \cdot -2\right)} \]

   if -2.64999999999999996e206 < a < 1.01999999999999999e114

   1. Initial program 90.9%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in c around 0 59.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if 1.01999999999999999e114 < a

   1. Initial program 78.7%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 78.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z - c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 71.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(t \cdot z - c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot i\right)}\right) \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 71.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(t \cdot z - c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(i \cdot a\right)}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 71.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(t \cdot z - c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(i \cdot a\right)}\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 63.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -2.65 \cdot 10^{+206}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(a \cdot -2\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 1.02 \cdot 10^{+114}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t - c \cdot \left(a \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 12: 57.0% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -6.4 \cdot 10^{+206} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{+113}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(a \cdot -2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= a -6.4e+206) (not (<= a 4.2e+113)))
   (* (* c i) (* a -2.0))
   (* 2.0 (+ (* x y) (* z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -6.4e+206) || !(a <= 4.2e+113)) {
		tmp = (c * i) * (a * -2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) + (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a <= (-6.4d+206)) .or. (.not. (a <= 4.2d+113))) then
        tmp = (c * i) * (a * (-2.0d0))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((x * y) + (z * t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -6.4e+206) || !(a <= 4.2e+113)) {
		tmp = (c * i) * (a * -2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) + (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (a <= -6.4e+206) or not (a <= 4.2e+113):
		tmp = (c * i) * (a * -2.0)
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) + (z * t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((a <= -6.4e+206) || !(a <= 4.2e+113))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) * Float64(a * -2.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a <= -6.4e+206) || ~((a <= 4.2e+113)))
		tmp = (c * i) * (a * -2.0);
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) + (z * t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[a, -6.4e+206], N[Not[LessEqual[a, 4.2e+113]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] * N[(a * -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -6.40000000000000011e206 or 4.1999999999999998e113 < a

   1. Initial program 78.3%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around inf 66.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 66.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 66.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot a}\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 66.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(-a\right)\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 66.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(-a\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 66.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 66.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \cdot -2} \]

      2. *-commutative 66.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot a\right)} \cdot -2 \]

      3. associate-*l* 66.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(a \cdot -2\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 66.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(a \cdot -2\right)} \]

   if -6.40000000000000011e206 < a < 4.1999999999999998e113

   1. Initial program 90.9%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in c around 0 59.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 61.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -6.4 \cdot 10^{+206} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{+113}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(a \cdot -2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 13: 29.9% accurate, 3.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i) :precision binary64 (* 2.0 (* z t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (z * t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = 2.0d0 * (z * t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (z * t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return 2.0 * (z * t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(2.0 * Float64(z * t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 2.0 * (z * t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(2.0 * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 88.2%

   \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 29.7%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right)} \]

3. Final simplification 29.7%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) \]

Developer target: 93.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (+ a (* b c)) (* c i)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = 2.0d0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * Float64(c * i))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(2.0 * N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023334 
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
  :name "Diagrams.ThreeD.Shapes:frustum from diagrams-lib-1.3.0.3, A"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (+ a (* b c)) (* c i))))

  (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (* (+ a (* b c)) c) i))))