Jmat.Real.erf

Percentage Accurate: 79.1% → 98.3%

Time: 18.9s

Alternatives: 2

Speedup: 4.2×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + 0.3275911 \cdot \left|x\right|}\\ 1 - \left(t_0 \cdot \left(0.254829592 + t_0 \cdot \left(-0.284496736 + t_0 \cdot \left(1.421413741 + t_0 \cdot \left(-1.453152027 + t_0 \cdot 1.061405429\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) \cdot e^{-\left|x\right| \cdot \left|x\right|} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (* 0.3275911 (fabs x))))))
   (-
    1.0
    (*
     (*
      t_0
      (+
       0.254829592
       (*
        t_0
        (+
         -0.284496736
         (*
          t_0
          (+ 1.421413741 (* t_0 (+ -1.453152027 (* t_0 1.061405429)))))))))
     (exp (- (* (fabs x) (fabs x))))))))

C

double code(double x) {
	double t_0 = 1.0 / (1.0 + (0.3275911 * fabs(x)));
	return 1.0 - ((t_0 * (0.254829592 + (t_0 * (-0.284496736 + (t_0 * (1.421413741 + (t_0 * (-1.453152027 + (t_0 * 1.061405429))))))))) * exp(-(fabs(x) * fabs(x))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = 1.0d0 / (1.0d0 + (0.3275911d0 * abs(x)))
    code = 1.0d0 - ((t_0 * (0.254829592d0 + (t_0 * ((-0.284496736d0) + (t_0 * (1.421413741d0 + (t_0 * ((-1.453152027d0) + (t_0 * 1.061405429d0))))))))) * exp(-(abs(x) * abs(x))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	double t_0 = 1.0 / (1.0 + (0.3275911 * Math.abs(x)));
	return 1.0 - ((t_0 * (0.254829592 + (t_0 * (-0.284496736 + (t_0 * (1.421413741 + (t_0 * (-1.453152027 + (t_0 * 1.061405429))))))))) * Math.exp(-(Math.abs(x) * Math.abs(x))));
}

Python

def code(x):
	t_0 = 1.0 / (1.0 + (0.3275911 * math.fabs(x)))
	return 1.0 - ((t_0 * (0.254829592 + (t_0 * (-0.284496736 + (t_0 * (1.421413741 + (t_0 * (-1.453152027 + (t_0 * 1.061405429))))))))) * math.exp(-(math.fabs(x) * math.fabs(x))))

Julia

function code(x)
	t_0 = Float64(1.0 / Float64(1.0 + Float64(0.3275911 * abs(x))))
	return Float64(1.0 - Float64(Float64(t_0 * Float64(0.254829592 + Float64(t_0 * Float64(-0.284496736 + Float64(t_0 * Float64(1.421413741 + Float64(t_0 * Float64(-1.453152027 + Float64(t_0 * 1.061405429))))))))) * exp(Float64(-Float64(abs(x) * abs(x))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	t_0 = 1.0 / (1.0 + (0.3275911 * abs(x)));
	tmp = 1.0 - ((t_0 * (0.254829592 + (t_0 * (-0.284496736 + (t_0 * (1.421413741 + (t_0 * (-1.453152027 + (t_0 * 1.061405429))))))))) * exp(-(abs(x) * abs(x))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(1.0 / N[(1.0 + N[(0.3275911 * N[Abs[x], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(1.0 - N[(N[(t$95$0 * N[(0.254829592 + N[(t$95$0 * N[(-0.284496736 + N[(t$95$0 * N[(1.421413741 + N[(t$95$0 * N[(-1.453152027 + N[(t$95$0 * 1.061405429), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Exp[(-N[(N[Abs[x], $MachinePrecision] * N[Abs[x], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision])], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Initial Program: 79.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + 0.3275911 \cdot \left|x\right|}\\ 1 - \left(t_0 \cdot \left(0.254829592 + t_0 \cdot \left(-0.284496736 + t_0 \cdot \left(1.421413741 + t_0 \cdot \left(-1.453152027 + t_0 \cdot 1.061405429\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) \cdot e^{-\left|x\right| \cdot \left|x\right|} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (* 0.3275911 (fabs x))))))
   (-
    1.0
    (*
     (*
      t_0
      (+
       0.254829592
       (*
        t_0
        (+
         -0.284496736
         (*
          t_0
          (+ 1.421413741 (* t_0 (+ -1.453152027 (* t_0 1.061405429)))))))))
     (exp (- (* (fabs x) (fabs x))))))))

C

double code(double x) {
	double t_0 = 1.0 / (1.0 + (0.3275911 * fabs(x)));
	return 1.0 - ((t_0 * (0.254829592 + (t_0 * (-0.284496736 + (t_0 * (1.421413741 + (t_0 * (-1.453152027 + (t_0 * 1.061405429))))))))) * exp(-(fabs(x) * fabs(x))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = 1.0d0 / (1.0d0 + (0.3275911d0 * abs(x)))
    code = 1.0d0 - ((t_0 * (0.254829592d0 + (t_0 * ((-0.284496736d0) + (t_0 * (1.421413741d0 + (t_0 * ((-1.453152027d0) + (t_0 * 1.061405429d0))))))))) * exp(-(abs(x) * abs(x))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	double t_0 = 1.0 / (1.0 + (0.3275911 * Math.abs(x)));
	return 1.0 - ((t_0 * (0.254829592 + (t_0 * (-0.284496736 + (t_0 * (1.421413741 + (t_0 * (-1.453152027 + (t_0 * 1.061405429))))))))) * Math.exp(-(Math.abs(x) * Math.abs(x))));
}

Python

def code(x):
	t_0 = 1.0 / (1.0 + (0.3275911 * math.fabs(x)))
	return 1.0 - ((t_0 * (0.254829592 + (t_0 * (-0.284496736 + (t_0 * (1.421413741 + (t_0 * (-1.453152027 + (t_0 * 1.061405429))))))))) * math.exp(-(math.fabs(x) * math.fabs(x))))

Julia

function code(x)
	t_0 = Float64(1.0 / Float64(1.0 + Float64(0.3275911 * abs(x))))
	return Float64(1.0 - Float64(Float64(t_0 * Float64(0.254829592 + Float64(t_0 * Float64(-0.284496736 + Float64(t_0 * Float64(1.421413741 + Float64(t_0 * Float64(-1.453152027 + Float64(t_0 * 1.061405429))))))))) * exp(Float64(-Float64(abs(x) * abs(x))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	t_0 = 1.0 / (1.0 + (0.3275911 * abs(x)));
	tmp = 1.0 - ((t_0 * (0.254829592 + (t_0 * (-0.284496736 + (t_0 * (1.421413741 + (t_0 * (-1.453152027 + (t_0 * 1.061405429))))))))) * exp(-(abs(x) * abs(x))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(1.0 / N[(1.0 + N[(0.3275911 * N[Abs[x], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(1.0 - N[(N[(t$95$0 * N[(0.254829592 + N[(t$95$0 * N[(-0.284496736 + N[(t$95$0 * N[(1.421413741 + N[(t$95$0 * N[(-1.453152027 + N[(t$95$0 * 1.061405429), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Exp[(-N[(N[Abs[x], $MachinePrecision] * N[Abs[x], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision])], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Alternative 1: 98.3% accurate, 4.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} x_m = \left|x\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left|x_m\right| \leq 10^{-11}:\\ \;\;\;\;x_m \cdot 1.128386358070218 + 10^{-9}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{1}^{0.3333333333333333}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

x_m = (fabs.f64 x)
(FPCore (x_m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (fabs x_m) 1e-11)
   (+ (* x_m 1.128386358070218) 1e-9)
   (pow 1.0 0.3333333333333333)))

C

x_m = fabs(x);
double code(double x_m) {
	double tmp;
	if (fabs(x_m) <= 1e-11) {
		tmp = (x_m * 1.128386358070218) + 1e-9;
	} else {
		tmp = pow(1.0, 0.3333333333333333);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

x_m = abs(x)
real(8) function code(x_m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (abs(x_m) <= 1d-11) then
        tmp = (x_m * 1.128386358070218d0) + 1d-9
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0 ** 0.3333333333333333d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

x_m = Math.abs(x);
public static double code(double x_m) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.abs(x_m) <= 1e-11) {
		tmp = (x_m * 1.128386358070218) + 1e-9;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.pow(1.0, 0.3333333333333333);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

x_m = math.fabs(x)
def code(x_m):
	tmp = 0
	if math.fabs(x_m) <= 1e-11:
		tmp = (x_m * 1.128386358070218) + 1e-9
	else:
		tmp = math.pow(1.0, 0.3333333333333333)
	return tmp

Julia

x_m = abs(x)
function code(x_m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (abs(x_m) <= 1e-11)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x_m * 1.128386358070218) + 1e-9);
	else
		tmp = 1.0 ^ 0.3333333333333333;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x_m = abs(x);
function tmp_2 = code(x_m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (abs(x_m) <= 1e-11)
		tmp = (x_m * 1.128386358070218) + 1e-9;
	else
		tmp = 1.0 ^ 0.3333333333333333;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

x_m = N[Abs[x], $MachinePrecision]
code[x$95$m_] := If[LessEqual[N[Abs[x$95$m], $MachinePrecision], 1e-11], N[(N[(x$95$m * 1.128386358070218), $MachinePrecision] + 1e-9), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[1.0, 0.3333333333333333], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (fabs.f64 x) < 9.99999999999999939e-12

   1. Initial program 57.7%

      \[1 - \left(\frac{1}{1 + 0.3275911 \cdot \left|x\right|} \cdot \left(0.254829592 + \frac{1}{1 + 0.3275911 \cdot \left|x\right|} \cdot \left(-0.284496736 + \frac{1}{1 + 0.3275911 \cdot \left|x\right|} \cdot \left(1.421413741 + \frac{1}{1 + 0.3275911 \cdot \left|x\right|} \cdot \left(-1.453152027 + \frac{1}{1 + 0.3275911 \cdot \left|x\right|} \cdot 1.061405429\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) \cdot e^{-\left|x\right| \cdot \left|x\right|} \]

   3. Simplified 57.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 - \frac{1}{1 + 0.3275911 \cdot \left|x\right|} \cdot \left(\left(0.254829592 + \frac{1}{1 + 0.3275911 \cdot \left|x\right|} \cdot \left(-0.284496736 + \frac{1}{1 + 0.3275911 \cdot \left|x\right|} \cdot \left(1.421413741 + \frac{1}{1 + 0.3275911 \cdot \left|x\right|} \cdot \left(-1.453152027 + \frac{1.061405429}{1 + 0.3275911 \cdot \left|x\right|}\right)\right)\right)\right) \cdot e^{-x \cdot x}\right)} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 57.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left({\left(1 - \frac{0.254829592 + \frac{-0.284496736 + \frac{1.421413741 + \frac{-1.453152027 + \frac{1.061405429}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.3275911, x, 1\right)}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.3275911, x, 1\right)}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.3275911, x, 1\right)}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.3275911, x, 1\right)}}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.3275911, x, 1\right)}{e^{{x}^{2}}}}\right)}^{3}\right)}^{0.3333333333333333}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 95.4%

      \[\leadsto {\left({\color{blue}{\left(10^{-9} + 1.128386358070218 \cdot x\right)}}^{3}\right)}^{0.3333333333333333} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 95.4%

         \[\leadsto {\left({\left(10^{-9} + \color{blue}{x \cdot 1.128386358070218}\right)}^{3}\right)}^{0.3333333333333333} \]

   8. Simplified 95.4%

      \[\leadsto {\left({\color{blue}{\left(10^{-9} + x \cdot 1.128386358070218\right)}}^{3}\right)}^{0.3333333333333333} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow1/3 98.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{{\left(10^{-9} + x \cdot 1.128386358070218\right)}^{3}}} \]

      2. rem-cbrt-cube 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{10^{-9} + x \cdot 1.128386358070218} \]

      3. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 1.128386358070218 + 10^{-9}} \]

   10. Applied egg-rr 99.7%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 1.128386358070218 + 10^{-9}} \]

   if 9.99999999999999939e-12 < (fabs.f64 x)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[1 - \left(\frac{1}{1 + 0.3275911 \cdot \left|x\right|} \cdot \left(0.254829592 + \frac{1}{1 + 0.3275911 \cdot \left|x\right|} \cdot \left(-0.284496736 + \frac{1}{1 + 0.3275911 \cdot \left|x\right|} \cdot \left(1.421413741 + \frac{1}{1 + 0.3275911 \cdot \left|x\right|} \cdot \left(-1.453152027 + \frac{1}{1 + 0.3275911 \cdot \left|x\right|} \cdot 1.061405429\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) \cdot e^{-\left|x\right| \cdot \left|x\right|} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 - \frac{1}{1 + 0.3275911 \cdot \left|x\right|} \cdot \left(\left(0.254829592 + \frac{1}{1 + 0.3275911 \cdot \left|x\right|} \cdot \left(-0.284496736 + \frac{1}{1 + 0.3275911 \cdot \left|x\right|} \cdot \left(1.421413741 + \frac{1}{1 + 0.3275911 \cdot \left|x\right|} \cdot \left(-1.453152027 + \frac{1.061405429}{1 + 0.3275911 \cdot \left|x\right|}\right)\right)\right)\right) \cdot e^{-x \cdot x}\right)} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 3.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left({\left(1 - \frac{0.254829592 + \frac{-0.284496736 + \frac{1.421413741 + \frac{-1.453152027 + \frac{1.061405429}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.3275911, x, 1\right)}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.3275911, x, 1\right)}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.3275911, x, 1\right)}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.3275911, x, 1\right)}}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.3275911, x, 1\right)}{e^{{x}^{2}}}}\right)}^{3}\right)}^{0.3333333333333333}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto {\left({\color{blue}{1}}^{3}\right)}^{0.3333333333333333} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left|x\right| \leq 10^{-11}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 1.128386358070218 + 10^{-9}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{1}^{0.3333333333333333}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2: 53.4% accurate, 856.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} x_m = \left|x\right| \\ 10^{-9} \end{array} \]

FPCore

x_m = (fabs.f64 x)
(FPCore (x_m) :precision binary64 1e-9)

C

x_m = fabs(x);
double code(double x_m) {
	return 1e-9;
}

Fortran

x_m = abs(x)
real(8) function code(x_m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_m
    code = 1d-9
end function

Java

x_m = Math.abs(x);
public static double code(double x_m) {
	return 1e-9;
}

Python

x_m = math.fabs(x)
def code(x_m):
	return 1e-9

Julia

x_m = abs(x)
function code(x_m)
	return 1e-9
end

MATLAB

x_m = abs(x);
function tmp = code(x_m)
	tmp = 1e-9;
end

Wolfram

x_m = N[Abs[x], $MachinePrecision]
code[x$95$m_] := 1e-9

Derivation

1. Initial program 79.9%

   \[1 - \left(\frac{1}{1 + 0.3275911 \cdot \left|x\right|} \cdot \left(0.254829592 + \frac{1}{1 + 0.3275911 \cdot \left|x\right|} \cdot \left(-0.284496736 + \frac{1}{1 + 0.3275911 \cdot \left|x\right|} \cdot \left(1.421413741 + \frac{1}{1 + 0.3275911 \cdot \left|x\right|} \cdot \left(-1.453152027 + \frac{1}{1 + 0.3275911 \cdot \left|x\right|} \cdot 1.061405429\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) \cdot e^{-\left|x\right| \cdot \left|x\right|} \]

3. Simplified 79.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 - \frac{1}{1 + 0.3275911 \cdot \left|x\right|} \cdot \left(\left(0.254829592 + \frac{1}{1 + 0.3275911 \cdot \left|x\right|} \cdot \left(-0.284496736 + \frac{1}{1 + 0.3275911 \cdot \left|x\right|} \cdot \left(1.421413741 + \frac{1}{1 + 0.3275911 \cdot \left|x\right|} \cdot \left(-1.453152027 + \frac{1.061405429}{1 + 0.3275911 \cdot \left|x\right|}\right)\right)\right)\right) \cdot e^{-x \cdot x}\right)} \]

5. Applied egg-rr 29.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left({\left(1 - \frac{0.254829592 + \frac{-0.284496736 + \frac{1.421413741 + \frac{-1.453152027 + \frac{1.061405429}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.3275911, x, 1\right)}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.3275911, x, 1\right)}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.3275911, x, 1\right)}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.3275911, x, 1\right)}}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.3275911, x, 1\right)}{e^{{x}^{2}}}}\right)}^{3}\right)}^{0.3333333333333333}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 47.1%

   \[\leadsto {\left({\color{blue}{\left(10^{-9} + 1.128386358070218 \cdot x\right)}}^{3}\right)}^{0.3333333333333333} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 47.1%

      \[\leadsto {\left({\left(10^{-9} + \color{blue}{x \cdot 1.128386358070218}\right)}^{3}\right)}^{0.3333333333333333} \]

8. Simplified 47.1%

   \[\leadsto {\left({\color{blue}{\left(10^{-9} + x \cdot 1.128386358070218\right)}}^{3}\right)}^{0.3333333333333333} \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. unpow1/3 48.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{{\left(10^{-9} + x \cdot 1.128386358070218\right)}^{3}}} \]

   2. rem-cbrt-cube 49.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{10^{-9} + x \cdot 1.128386358070218} \]

   3. +-commutative 49.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 1.128386358070218 + 10^{-9}} \]

10. Applied egg-rr 49.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 1.128386358070218 + 10^{-9}} \]

11. Taylor expanded in x around 0 52.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{10^{-9}} \]

12. Final simplification 52.6%

    \[\leadsto 10^{-9} \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023334 
(FPCore (x)
  :name "Jmat.Real.erf"
  :precision binary64
  (- 1.0 (* (* (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (* 0.3275911 (fabs x)))) (+ 0.254829592 (* (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (* 0.3275911 (fabs x)))) (+ -0.284496736 (* (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (* 0.3275911 (fabs x)))) (+ 1.421413741 (* (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (* 0.3275911 (fabs x)))) (+ -1.453152027 (* (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (* 0.3275911 (fabs x)))) 1.061405429))))))))) (exp (- (* (fabs x) (fabs x)))))))