Octave 3.8, jcobi/1

Percentage Accurate: 74.2% → 99.6%

Time: 6.5s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.2×

Specification

\[\alpha > -1 \land \beta > -1\]

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (+ (/ (- beta alpha) (+ (+ alpha beta) 2.0)) 1.0) 2.0))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	return (((beta - alpha) / ((alpha + beta) + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    code = (((beta - alpha) / ((alpha + beta) + 2.0d0)) + 1.0d0) / 2.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	return (((beta - alpha) / ((alpha + beta) + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta):
	return (((beta - alpha) / ((alpha + beta) + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0

Julia

function code(alpha, beta)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(beta - alpha) / Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(alpha, beta)
	tmp = (((beta - alpha) / ((alpha + beta) + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(beta - alpha), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 74.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (+ (/ (- beta alpha) (+ (+ alpha beta) 2.0)) 1.0) 2.0))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	return (((beta - alpha) / ((alpha + beta) + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    code = (((beta - alpha) / ((alpha + beta) + 2.0d0)) + 1.0d0) / 2.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	return (((beta - alpha) / ((alpha + beta) + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta):
	return (((beta - alpha) / ((alpha + beta) + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0

Julia

function code(alpha, beta)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(beta - alpha) / Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(alpha, beta)
	tmp = (((beta - alpha) / ((alpha + beta) + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(beta - alpha), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.6% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_0 \leq -0.5:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{\beta + 2}{{\alpha}^{2}} \cdot \left(\left(-2 - \beta\right) - \beta\right) + \frac{\beta + \left(\beta - -2\right)}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{t_0 + 1}{2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (/ (- beta alpha) (+ (+ beta alpha) 2.0))))
   (if (<= t_0 -0.5)
     (/
      (+
       (* (/ (+ beta 2.0) (pow alpha 2.0)) (- (- -2.0 beta) beta))
       (/ (+ beta (- beta -2.0)) alpha))
      2.0)
     (/ (+ t_0 1.0) 2.0))))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	double t_0 = (beta - alpha) / ((beta + alpha) + 2.0);
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= -0.5) {
		tmp = ((((beta + 2.0) / pow(alpha, 2.0)) * ((-2.0 - beta) - beta)) + ((beta + (beta - -2.0)) / alpha)) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (t_0 + 1.0) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (beta - alpha) / ((beta + alpha) + 2.0d0)
    if (t_0 <= (-0.5d0)) then
        tmp = ((((beta + 2.0d0) / (alpha ** 2.0d0)) * (((-2.0d0) - beta) - beta)) + ((beta + (beta - (-2.0d0))) / alpha)) / 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = (t_0 + 1.0d0) / 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	double t_0 = (beta - alpha) / ((beta + alpha) + 2.0);
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= -0.5) {
		tmp = ((((beta + 2.0) / Math.pow(alpha, 2.0)) * ((-2.0 - beta) - beta)) + ((beta + (beta - -2.0)) / alpha)) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (t_0 + 1.0) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta):
	t_0 = (beta - alpha) / ((beta + alpha) + 2.0)
	tmp = 0
	if t_0 <= -0.5:
		tmp = ((((beta + 2.0) / math.pow(alpha, 2.0)) * ((-2.0 - beta) - beta)) + ((beta + (beta - -2.0)) / alpha)) / 2.0
	else:
		tmp = (t_0 + 1.0) / 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(alpha, beta)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(beta - alpha) / Float64(Float64(beta + alpha) + 2.0))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_0 <= -0.5)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(beta + 2.0) / (alpha ^ 2.0)) * Float64(Float64(-2.0 - beta) - beta)) + Float64(Float64(beta + Float64(beta - -2.0)) / alpha)) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(t_0 + 1.0) / 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta)
	t_0 = (beta - alpha) / ((beta + alpha) + 2.0);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_0 <= -0.5)
		tmp = ((((beta + 2.0) / (alpha ^ 2.0)) * ((-2.0 - beta) - beta)) + ((beta + (beta - -2.0)) / alpha)) / 2.0;
	else
		tmp = (t_0 + 1.0) / 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(beta - alpha), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(beta + alpha), $MachinePrecision] + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$0, -0.5], N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(beta + 2.0), $MachinePrecision] / N[Power[alpha, 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(-2.0 - beta), $MachinePrecision] - beta), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(beta + N[(beta - -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / alpha), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(t$95$0 + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (-.f64 beta alpha) (+.f64 (+.f64 alpha beta) 2)) < -0.5

   1. Initial program 7.4%

      \[\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 7.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\color{blue}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right)} + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   3. Simplified 7.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in alpha around -inf 95.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{\beta \cdot \left(2 + \beta\right) + {\left(2 + \beta\right)}^{2}}{{\alpha}^{2}} + -1 \cdot \frac{-1 \cdot \beta - \left(2 + \beta\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]

   6. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2 + \beta}{{\alpha}^{2}} \cdot \left(\left(-2 - \beta\right) - \beta\right) - \frac{\left(-2 - \beta\right) - \beta}{\alpha}}}{2} \]

   if -0.5 < (/.f64 (-.f64 beta alpha) (+.f64 (+.f64 alpha beta) 2))

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} \leq -0.5:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{\beta + 2}{{\alpha}^{2}} \cdot \left(\left(-2 - \beta\right) - \beta\right) + \frac{\beta + \left(\beta - -2\right)}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1}{2}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2: 99.6% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_0 \leq -0.9999998:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{\beta + \left(\beta + 2\right)}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{t_0 + 1}{2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (/ (- beta alpha) (+ (+ beta alpha) 2.0))))
   (if (<= t_0 -0.9999998)
     (/ (/ (+ beta (+ beta 2.0)) alpha) 2.0)
     (/ (+ t_0 1.0) 2.0))))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	double t_0 = (beta - alpha) / ((beta + alpha) + 2.0);
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= -0.9999998) {
		tmp = ((beta + (beta + 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (t_0 + 1.0) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (beta - alpha) / ((beta + alpha) + 2.0d0)
    if (t_0 <= (-0.9999998d0)) then
        tmp = ((beta + (beta + 2.0d0)) / alpha) / 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = (t_0 + 1.0d0) / 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	double t_0 = (beta - alpha) / ((beta + alpha) + 2.0);
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= -0.9999998) {
		tmp = ((beta + (beta + 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (t_0 + 1.0) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta):
	t_0 = (beta - alpha) / ((beta + alpha) + 2.0)
	tmp = 0
	if t_0 <= -0.9999998:
		tmp = ((beta + (beta + 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0
	else:
		tmp = (t_0 + 1.0) / 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(alpha, beta)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(beta - alpha) / Float64(Float64(beta + alpha) + 2.0))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_0 <= -0.9999998)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(beta + Float64(beta + 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(t_0 + 1.0) / 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta)
	t_0 = (beta - alpha) / ((beta + alpha) + 2.0);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_0 <= -0.9999998)
		tmp = ((beta + (beta + 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	else
		tmp = (t_0 + 1.0) / 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(beta - alpha), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(beta + alpha), $MachinePrecision] + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$0, -0.9999998], N[(N[(N[(beta + N[(beta + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / alpha), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(t$95$0 + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (-.f64 beta alpha) (+.f64 (+.f64 alpha beta) 2)) < -0.999999799999999994

   1. Initial program 6.4%

      \[\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 6.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\color{blue}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right)} + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   3. Simplified 6.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in alpha around -inf 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{-1 \cdot \beta - \left(2 + \beta\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \beta - \left(2 + \beta\right)\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \beta + \left(-\left(2 + \beta\right)\right)\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      3. mul-1-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \beta + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(2 + \beta\right)}\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      4. distribute-lft-in 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \beta\right) + -1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(2 + \beta\right)\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      5. neg-mul-1 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\left(--1 \cdot \beta\right)} + -1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(2 + \beta\right)\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      6. mul-1-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\left(-\color{blue}{\left(-\beta\right)}\right) + -1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(2 + \beta\right)\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      7. remove-double-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\beta} + -1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(2 + \beta\right)\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      8. neg-mul-1 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta + \color{blue}{\left(--1 \cdot \left(2 + \beta\right)\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      9. mul-1-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-\left(2 + \beta\right)\right)}\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      10. remove-double-neg 99.7%

          \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta + \color{blue}{\left(2 + \beta\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

   6. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\beta + \left(2 + \beta\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]

   if -0.999999799999999994 < (/.f64 (-.f64 beta alpha) (+.f64 (+.f64 alpha beta) 2))

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} \leq -0.9999998:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{\beta + \left(\beta + 2\right)}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1}{2}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 86.1% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 4.55 \cdot 10^{+54}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \frac{\beta}{\beta + 2}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= alpha 4.55e+54)
   (/ (+ 1.0 (/ beta (+ beta 2.0))) 2.0)
   (/ (/ 2.0 alpha) 2.0)))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 4.55e+54) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (2.0 / alpha) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (alpha <= 4.55d+54) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0d0))) / 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = (2.0d0 / alpha) / 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 4.55e+54) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (2.0 / alpha) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta):
	tmp = 0
	if alpha <= 4.55e+54:
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0
	else:
		tmp = (2.0 / alpha) / 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(alpha, beta)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (alpha <= 4.55e+54)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(beta / Float64(beta + 2.0))) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 / alpha) / 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (alpha <= 4.55e+54)
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0;
	else
		tmp = (2.0 / alpha) / 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_] := If[LessEqual[alpha, 4.55e+54], N[(N[(1.0 + N[(beta / N[(beta + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(2.0 / alpha), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if alpha < 4.55e54

   1. Initial program 98.3%

      \[\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\color{blue}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right)} + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   3. Simplified 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in alpha around 0 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\beta}{2 + \beta}} + 1}{2} \]

   if 4.55e54 < alpha

   1. Initial program 17.9%

      \[\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 17.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\color{blue}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right)} + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   3. Simplified 17.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in beta around 0 5.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 - \frac{\alpha}{2 + \alpha}}}{2} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 5.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1 - \frac{\alpha}{\color{blue}{\alpha + 2}}}{2} \]

   6. Simplified 5.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 - \frac{\alpha}{\alpha + 2}}}{2} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in alpha around inf 79.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{\alpha}}}{2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 4.55 \cdot 10^{+54}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \frac{\beta}{\beta + 2}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 91.7% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 4.55 \cdot 10^{+54}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \frac{\beta}{\beta + 2}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{\beta + \left(\beta + 2\right)}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= alpha 4.55e+54)
   (/ (+ 1.0 (/ beta (+ beta 2.0))) 2.0)
   (/ (/ (+ beta (+ beta 2.0)) alpha) 2.0)))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 4.55e+54) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = ((beta + (beta + 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (alpha <= 4.55d+54) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0d0))) / 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = ((beta + (beta + 2.0d0)) / alpha) / 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 4.55e+54) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = ((beta + (beta + 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta):
	tmp = 0
	if alpha <= 4.55e+54:
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0
	else:
		tmp = ((beta + (beta + 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(alpha, beta)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (alpha <= 4.55e+54)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(beta / Float64(beta + 2.0))) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(beta + Float64(beta + 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (alpha <= 4.55e+54)
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0;
	else
		tmp = ((beta + (beta + 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_] := If[LessEqual[alpha, 4.55e+54], N[(N[(1.0 + N[(beta / N[(beta + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(beta + N[(beta + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / alpha), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if alpha < 4.55e54

   1. Initial program 98.3%

      \[\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\color{blue}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right)} + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   3. Simplified 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in alpha around 0 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\beta}{2 + \beta}} + 1}{2} \]

   if 4.55e54 < alpha

   1. Initial program 17.9%

      \[\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 17.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\color{blue}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right)} + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   3. Simplified 17.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in alpha around -inf 88.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{-1 \cdot \beta - \left(2 + \beta\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 88.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \beta - \left(2 + \beta\right)\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]

      2. sub-neg 88.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \beta + \left(-\left(2 + \beta\right)\right)\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      3. mul-1-neg 88.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \beta + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(2 + \beta\right)}\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      4. distribute-lft-in 88.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \beta\right) + -1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(2 + \beta\right)\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      5. neg-mul-1 88.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\left(--1 \cdot \beta\right)} + -1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(2 + \beta\right)\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      6. mul-1-neg 88.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\left(-\color{blue}{\left(-\beta\right)}\right) + -1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(2 + \beta\right)\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      7. remove-double-neg 88.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\beta} + -1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(2 + \beta\right)\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      8. neg-mul-1 88.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta + \color{blue}{\left(--1 \cdot \left(2 + \beta\right)\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      9. mul-1-neg 88.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-\left(2 + \beta\right)\right)}\right)}{\alpha}}{2} \]

      10. remove-double-neg 88.4%

          \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta + \color{blue}{\left(2 + \beta\right)}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

   6. Simplified 88.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\beta + \left(2 + \beta\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 93.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 4.55 \cdot 10^{+54}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \frac{\beta}{\beta + 2}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{\beta + \left(\beta + 2\right)}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 69.7% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 0.96:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 - \alpha \cdot 0.5}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= alpha 0.96) (/ (- 1.0 (* alpha 0.5)) 2.0) (/ (/ 2.0 alpha) 2.0)))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 0.96) {
		tmp = (1.0 - (alpha * 0.5)) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (2.0 / alpha) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (alpha <= 0.96d0) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 - (alpha * 0.5d0)) / 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = (2.0d0 / alpha) / 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 0.96) {
		tmp = (1.0 - (alpha * 0.5)) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (2.0 / alpha) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta):
	tmp = 0
	if alpha <= 0.96:
		tmp = (1.0 - (alpha * 0.5)) / 2.0
	else:
		tmp = (2.0 / alpha) / 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(alpha, beta)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (alpha <= 0.96)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - Float64(alpha * 0.5)) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 / alpha) / 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (alpha <= 0.96)
		tmp = (1.0 - (alpha * 0.5)) / 2.0;
	else
		tmp = (2.0 / alpha) / 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_] := If[LessEqual[alpha, 0.96], N[(N[(1.0 - N[(alpha * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(2.0 / alpha), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if alpha < 0.95999999999999996

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\color{blue}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right)} + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in beta around 0 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 - \frac{\alpha}{2 + \alpha}}}{2} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 77.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1 - \frac{\alpha}{\color{blue}{\alpha + 2}}}{2} \]

   6. Simplified 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 - \frac{\alpha}{\alpha + 2}}}{2} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in alpha around 0 76.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 - \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \alpha}}{2} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 76.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1 - \color{blue}{\alpha \cdot 0.5}}{2} \]

   9. Simplified 76.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 - \color{blue}{\alpha \cdot 0.5}}{2} \]

   if 0.95999999999999996 < alpha

   1. Initial program 25.7%

      \[\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 25.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\color{blue}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right)} + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   3. Simplified 25.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in beta around 0 6.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 - \frac{\alpha}{2 + \alpha}}}{2} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 6.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1 - \frac{\alpha}{\color{blue}{\alpha + 2}}}{2} \]

   6. Simplified 6.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 - \frac{\alpha}{\alpha + 2}}}{2} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in alpha around inf 73.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{\alpha}}}{2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 75.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 0.96:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 - \alpha \cdot 0.5}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 69.3% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 440:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= alpha 440.0) 0.5 (/ (/ 2.0 alpha) 2.0)))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 440.0) {
		tmp = 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = (2.0 / alpha) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (alpha <= 440.0d0) then
        tmp = 0.5d0
    else
        tmp = (2.0d0 / alpha) / 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 440.0) {
		tmp = 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = (2.0 / alpha) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta):
	tmp = 0
	if alpha <= 440.0:
		tmp = 0.5
	else:
		tmp = (2.0 / alpha) / 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(alpha, beta)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (alpha <= 440.0)
		tmp = 0.5;
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 / alpha) / 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (alpha <= 440.0)
		tmp = 0.5;
	else
		tmp = (2.0 / alpha) / 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_] := If[LessEqual[alpha, 440.0], 0.5, N[(N[(2.0 / alpha), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if alpha < 440

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\color{blue}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right)} + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in beta around 0 76.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 - \frac{\alpha}{2 + \alpha}}}{2} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 76.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1 - \frac{\alpha}{\color{blue}{\alpha + 2}}}{2} \]

   6. Simplified 76.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 - \frac{\alpha}{\alpha + 2}}}{2} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in alpha around 0 74.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{2} \]

   if 440 < alpha

   1. Initial program 24.8%

      \[\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 24.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\color{blue}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right)} + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   3. Simplified 24.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in beta around 0 6.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 - \frac{\alpha}{2 + \alpha}}}{2} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 6.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1 - \frac{\alpha}{\color{blue}{\alpha + 2}}}{2} \]

   6. Simplified 6.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 - \frac{\alpha}{\alpha + 2}}}{2} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in alpha around inf 73.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{\alpha}}}{2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 74.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 440:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 71.0% accurate, 4.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\beta \leq 2:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta) :precision binary64 (if (<= beta 2.0) 0.5 1.0))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	double tmp;
	if (beta <= 2.0) {
		tmp = 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (beta <= 2.0d0) then
        tmp = 0.5d0
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	double tmp;
	if (beta <= 2.0) {
		tmp = 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta):
	tmp = 0
	if beta <= 2.0:
		tmp = 0.5
	else:
		tmp = 1.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(alpha, beta)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (beta <= 2.0)
		tmp = 0.5;
	else
		tmp = 1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (beta <= 2.0)
		tmp = 0.5;
	else
		tmp = 1.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_] := If[LessEqual[beta, 2.0], 0.5, 1.0]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if beta < 2

   1. Initial program 69.2%

      \[\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 69.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\color{blue}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right)} + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   3. Simplified 69.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in beta around 0 67.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 - \frac{\alpha}{2 + \alpha}}}{2} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 67.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1 - \frac{\alpha}{\color{blue}{\alpha + 2}}}{2} \]

   6. Simplified 67.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 - \frac{\alpha}{\alpha + 2}}}{2} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in alpha around 0 65.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{2} \]

   if 2 < beta

   1. Initial program 90.9%

      \[\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 90.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\color{blue}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right)} + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   3. Simplified 90.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in beta around inf 87.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 71.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\beta \leq 2:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 49.7% accurate, 13.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta) :precision binary64 0.5)

C

double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	return 0.5;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    code = 0.5d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta) {
	return 0.5;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta):
	return 0.5

Julia

function code(alpha, beta)
	return 0.5
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(alpha, beta)
	tmp = 0.5;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_] := 0.5

Derivation

1. Initial program 75.0%

   \[\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 75.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\color{blue}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right)} + 2} + 1}{2} \]

3. Simplified 75.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right) + 2} + 1}{2}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in beta around 0 53.3%

   \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 - \frac{\alpha}{2 + \alpha}}}{2} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 53.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 - \frac{\alpha}{\color{blue}{\alpha + 2}}}{2} \]

6. Simplified 53.3%

   \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 - \frac{\alpha}{\alpha + 2}}}{2} \]

7. Taylor expanded in alpha around 0 52.4%

   \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{2} \]

8. Final simplification 52.4%

   \[\leadsto 0.5 \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023334 
(FPCore (alpha beta)
  :name "Octave 3.8, jcobi/1"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (and (> alpha -1.0) (> beta -1.0))
  (/ (+ (/ (- beta alpha) (+ (+ alpha beta) 2.0)) 1.0) 2.0))