Statistics.Distribution.Poisson.Internal:probability from math-functions-0.1.5.2

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 3.1s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 1.0×

• 58.1% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (exp (- (+ x (* y (log y))) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return exp(((x + (y * log(y))) - z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = exp(((x + (y * log(y))) - z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return Math.exp(((x + (y * Math.log(y))) - z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return math.exp(((x + (y * math.log(y))) - z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return exp(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * log(y))) - z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = exp(((x + (y * log(y))) - z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[Exp[N[(N[(x + N[(y * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (exp (- (+ x (* y (log y))) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return exp(((x + (y * log(y))) - z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = exp(((x + (y * log(y))) - z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return Math.exp(((x + (y * Math.log(y))) - z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return math.exp(((x + (y * math.log(y))) - z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return exp(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * log(y))) - z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = exp(((x + (y * log(y))) - z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[Exp[N[(N[(x + N[(y * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (exp (- (+ x (* y (log y))) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return exp(((x + (y * log(y))) - z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = exp(((x + (y * log(y))) - z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return Math.exp(((x + (y * Math.log(y))) - z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return math.exp(((x + (y * math.log(y))) - z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return exp(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * log(y))) - z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = exp(((x + (y * log(y))) - z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[Exp[N[(N[(x + N[(y * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]

2. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]

Alternative 2: 94.2% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := y \cdot \log y\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_0 \leq 10^{+51}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{x - z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{t_0 - z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* y (log y))))
   (if (<= t_0 1e+51) (exp (- x z)) (exp (- t_0 z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = y * log(y);
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= 1e+51) {
		tmp = exp((x - z));
	} else {
		tmp = exp((t_0 - z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = y * log(y)
    if (t_0 <= 1d+51) then
        tmp = exp((x - z))
    else
        tmp = exp((t_0 - z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = y * Math.log(y);
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= 1e+51) {
		tmp = Math.exp((x - z));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.exp((t_0 - z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = y * math.log(y)
	tmp = 0
	if t_0 <= 1e+51:
		tmp = math.exp((x - z))
	else:
		tmp = math.exp((t_0 - z))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(y * log(y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_0 <= 1e+51)
		tmp = exp(Float64(x - z));
	else
		tmp = exp(Float64(t_0 - z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = y * log(y);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_0 <= 1e+51)
		tmp = exp((x - z));
	else
		tmp = exp((t_0 - z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(y * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$0, 1e+51], N[Exp[N[(x - z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision], N[Exp[N[(t$95$0 - z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 y (log.f64 y)) < 1e51

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 97.9%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{x} - z} \]

   if 1e51 < (*.f64 y (log.f64 y))

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 93.4%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{y \cdot \log y - z}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot \log y \leq 10^{+51}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{x - z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{y \cdot \log y - z}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 90.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot \log y \leq 10^{+51}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{x - z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{y}^{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* y (log y)) 1e+51) (exp (- x z)) (pow y y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y * log(y)) <= 1e+51) {
		tmp = exp((x - z));
	} else {
		tmp = pow(y, y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y * log(y)) <= 1d+51) then
        tmp = exp((x - z))
    else
        tmp = y ** y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y * Math.log(y)) <= 1e+51) {
		tmp = Math.exp((x - z));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.pow(y, y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y * math.log(y)) <= 1e+51:
		tmp = math.exp((x - z))
	else:
		tmp = math.pow(y, y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(y * log(y)) <= 1e+51)
		tmp = exp(Float64(x - z));
	else
		tmp = y ^ y;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y * log(y)) <= 1e+51)
		tmp = exp((x - z));
	else
		tmp = y ^ y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(y * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 1e+51], N[Exp[N[(x - z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision], N[Power[y, y], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 y (log.f64 y)) < 1e51

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 97.9%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{x} - z} \]

   if 1e51 < (*.f64 y (log.f64 y))

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 93.4%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{y \cdot \log y - z}} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 82.6%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{y}\right)\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 82.6%

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-y \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{y}\right)}} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 82.6%

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{y}\right)\right)}} \]

      3. log-rec 82.6%

         \[\leadsto e^{y \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)}\right)} \]

      4. remove-double-neg 82.6%

         \[\leadsto e^{y \cdot \color{blue}{\log y}} \]

   5. Simplified 82.6%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{y \cdot \log y}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 82.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{y}^{y}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot \log y \leq 10^{+51}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{x - z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{y}^{y}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 73.9% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -850000000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+14}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{-z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{y}^{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -850000000.0) (not (<= z 5e+14))) (exp (- z)) (pow y y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -850000000.0) || !(z <= 5e+14)) {
		tmp = exp(-z);
	} else {
		tmp = pow(y, y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-850000000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 5d+14))) then
        tmp = exp(-z)
    else
        tmp = y ** y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -850000000.0) || !(z <= 5e+14)) {
		tmp = Math.exp(-z);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.pow(y, y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -850000000.0) or not (z <= 5e+14):
		tmp = math.exp(-z)
	else:
		tmp = math.pow(y, y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -850000000.0) || !(z <= 5e+14))
		tmp = exp(Float64(-z));
	else
		tmp = y ^ y;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -850000000.0) || ~((z <= 5e+14)))
		tmp = exp(-z);
	else
		tmp = y ^ y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -850000000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 5e+14]], $MachinePrecision]], N[Exp[(-z)], $MachinePrecision], N[Power[y, y], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -8.5e8 or 5e14 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 85.6%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot z}} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 85.6%

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-z}} \]

   4. Simplified 85.6%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-z}} \]

   if -8.5e8 < z < 5e14

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 73.4%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{y \cdot \log y - z}} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 72.8%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{y}\right)\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 72.8%

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-y \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{y}\right)}} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 72.8%

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{y}\right)\right)}} \]

      3. log-rec 72.8%

         \[\leadsto e^{y \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)}\right)} \]

      4. remove-double-neg 72.8%

         \[\leadsto e^{y \cdot \color{blue}{\log y}} \]

   5. Simplified 72.8%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{y \cdot \log y}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 72.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{y}^{y}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 79.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -850000000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+14}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{-z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{y}^{y}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 52.7% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{-z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (exp (- z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return exp(-z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = exp(-z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return Math.exp(-z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return math.exp(-z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return exp(Float64(-z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = exp(-z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[Exp[(-z)], $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]

2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 57.7%

   \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot z}} \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 57.7%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-z}} \]

4. Simplified 57.7%

   \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-z}} \]

5. Final simplification 57.7%

   \[\leadsto e^{-z} \]

Alternative 6: 14.9% accurate, 207.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 1.0)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 1.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return 1.0

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return 1.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := 1.0

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 82.7%

   \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{y \cdot \log y - z}} \]

3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 54.3%

   \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{y}\right)\right)}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 54.3%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-y \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{y}\right)}} \]

   2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 54.3%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{y}\right)\right)}} \]

   3. log-rec 54.3%

      \[\leadsto e^{y \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)}\right)} \]

   4. remove-double-neg 54.3%

      \[\leadsto e^{y \cdot \color{blue}{\log y}} \]

5. Simplified 54.3%

   \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{y \cdot \log y}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 14.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \]

7. Final simplification 14.8%

   \[\leadsto 1 \]

Developer target: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{\left(x - z\right) + \log y \cdot y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (exp (+ (- x z) (* (log y) y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return exp(((x - z) + (log(y) * y)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = exp(((x - z) + (log(y) * y)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return Math.exp(((x - z) + (Math.log(y) * y)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return math.exp(((x - z) + (math.log(y) * y)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return exp(Float64(Float64(x - z) + Float64(log(y) * y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = exp(((x - z) + (log(y) * y)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[Exp[N[(N[(x - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023334 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Statistics.Distribution.Poisson.Internal:probability from math-functions-0.1.5.2"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (exp (+ (- x z) (* (log y) y)))

  (exp (- (+ x (* y (log y))) z)))