System.Random.MWC.Distributions:truncatedExp from mwc-random-0.13.3.2

Percentage Accurate: 61.4% → 98.6%

Time: 14.6s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 211.0×

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. x = -3.3688461760350287e+106
  2. y = 8.859583283688573e-103
  3. z = 7.785377296688818e+85
  4. t = 3.3747734989996346e-199

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (log (+ (- 1.0 y) (* y (exp z)))) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (log(((1.0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (log(((1.0d0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (Math.log(((1.0 - y) + (y * Math.exp(z)))) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (math.log(((1.0 - y) + (y * math.exp(z)))) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(log(Float64(Float64(1.0 - y) + Float64(y * exp(z)))) / t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (log(((1.0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[Log[N[(N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 61.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (log (+ (- 1.0 y) (* y (exp z)))) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (log(((1.0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (log(((1.0d0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (Math.log(((1.0 - y) + (y * Math.exp(z)))) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (math.log(((1.0 - y) + (y * math.exp(z)))) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(log(Float64(Float64(1.0 - y) + Float64(y * exp(z)))) / t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (log(((1.0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[Log[N[(N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- x (/ (log1p (* y (expm1 z))) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (log1p((y * expm1(z))) / t);
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (Math.log1p((y * Math.expm1(z))) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (math.log1p((y * math.expm1(z))) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(log1p(Float64(y * expm1(z))) / t))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[Log[1 + N[(y * N[(Exp[z] - 1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 58.9%

   \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 58.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 76.2%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   3. cancel-sign-sub 76.2%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   4. log1p-def 81.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

   5. cancel-sign-sub 81.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

   6. +-commutative 81.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   7. unsub-neg 81.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

   8. *-rgt-identity 81.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

   9. distribute-lft-out-- 81.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   10. expm1-def 98.6%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

3. Simplified 98.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]

4. Final simplification 98.6%

   \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t} \]

Alternative 2: 87.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{z} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{t \cdot 0.5 + \frac{t}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} + -1\right)}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y \cdot \left(z + 0.5 \cdot {z}^{2}\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp z) 0.0)
   (+ x (/ -1.0 (+ (* t 0.5) (/ t (* y (+ (exp z) -1.0))))))
   (- x (/ (* y (+ z (* 0.5 (pow z 2.0)))) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(z) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / ((t * 0.5) + (t / (y * (exp(z) + -1.0)))));
	} else {
		tmp = x - ((y * (z + (0.5 * pow(z, 2.0)))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (exp(z) <= 0.0d0) then
        tmp = x + ((-1.0d0) / ((t * 0.5d0) + (t / (y * (exp(z) + (-1.0d0))))))
    else
        tmp = x - ((y * (z + (0.5d0 * (z ** 2.0d0)))) / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.exp(z) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / ((t * 0.5) + (t / (y * (Math.exp(z) + -1.0)))));
	} else {
		tmp = x - ((y * (z + (0.5 * Math.pow(z, 2.0)))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if math.exp(z) <= 0.0:
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / ((t * 0.5) + (t / (y * (math.exp(z) + -1.0)))))
	else:
		tmp = x - ((y * (z + (0.5 * math.pow(z, 2.0)))) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(z) <= 0.0)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-1.0 / Float64(Float64(t * 0.5) + Float64(t / Float64(y * Float64(exp(z) + -1.0))))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(Float64(y * Float64(z + Float64(0.5 * (z ^ 2.0)))) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (exp(z) <= 0.0)
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / ((t * 0.5) + (t / (y * (exp(z) + -1.0)))));
	else
		tmp = x - ((y * (z + (0.5 * (z ^ 2.0)))) / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision], 0.0], N[(x + N[(-1.0 / N[(N[(t * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t / N[(y * N[(N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[(y * N[(z + N[(0.5 * N[Power[z, 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 z) < 0.0

   1. Initial program 81.1%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 81.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 81.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 81.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

      2. inv-pow 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1}} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow-1 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around 0 84.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{1}{\color{blue}{0.5 \cdot t + \frac{t}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}}} \]

   if 0.0 < (exp.f64 z)

   1. Initial program 49.7%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 49.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 74.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 74.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 74.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 74.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 74.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 74.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 74.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 74.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 98.0%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 73.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}{t}} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 87.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + 0.5 \cdot {z}^{2}\right)}}{t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{z} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{t \cdot 0.5 + \frac{t}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} + -1\right)}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y \cdot \left(z + 0.5 \cdot {z}^{2}\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 87.1% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{+102}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{\left(\frac{t}{y} \cdot -0.5 + \frac{t}{y \cdot z}\right) - z \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \frac{t}{y} + \frac{t}{y} \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -3.5e+102)
   (+
    x
    (/
     -1.0
     (-
      (+ (* (/ t y) -0.5) (/ t (* y z)))
      (* z (+ (* -0.25 (/ t y)) (* (/ t y) 0.16666666666666666))))))
   (- x (* y (/ (expm1 z) t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3.5e+102) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / ((((t / y) * -0.5) + (t / (y * z))) - (z * ((-0.25 * (t / y)) + ((t / y) * 0.16666666666666666)))));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y * (expm1(z) / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3.5e+102) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / ((((t / y) * -0.5) + (t / (y * z))) - (z * ((-0.25 * (t / y)) + ((t / y) * 0.16666666666666666)))));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y * (Math.expm1(z) / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -3.5e+102:
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / ((((t / y) * -0.5) + (t / (y * z))) - (z * ((-0.25 * (t / y)) + ((t / y) * 0.16666666666666666)))))
	else:
		tmp = x - (y * (math.expm1(z) / t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -3.5e+102)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-1.0 / Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(t / y) * -0.5) + Float64(t / Float64(y * z))) - Float64(z * Float64(Float64(-0.25 * Float64(t / y)) + Float64(Float64(t / y) * 0.16666666666666666))))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y * Float64(expm1(z) / t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, -3.5e+102], N[(x + N[(-1.0 / N[(N[(N[(N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision] * -0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t / N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * N[(N[(-0.25 * N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision] * 0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(y * N[(N[(Exp[z] - 1), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -3.50000000000000011e102

   1. Initial program 37.9%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 37.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 73.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 73.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 73.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 73.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 73.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 73.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 73.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 73.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 43.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}{t}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 43.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}}} \]

      2. inv-pow 43.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{t}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}^{-1}} \]

      3. expm1-udef 55.2%

         \[\leadsto x - {\left(\frac{t}{y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}\right)}^{-1} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 55.2%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{t}{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}^{-1}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow-1 55.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}} \]

   8. Simplified 55.2%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in z around 0 65.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{1}{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \frac{t}{y} + 0.16666666666666666 \cdot \frac{t}{y}\right)\right) + \left(-0.5 \cdot \frac{t}{y} + \frac{t}{y \cdot z}\right)}} \]

   if -3.50000000000000011e102 < y

   1. Initial program 64.9%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 64.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 77.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 77.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 84.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 84.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 84.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 84.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 84.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 84.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 98.2%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 98.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

      2. inv-pow 98.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1}} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 98.2%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 81.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}{t}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. expm1-def 90.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{t} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 91.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}} \]

   8. Simplified 91.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{+102}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{\left(\frac{t}{y} \cdot -0.5 + \frac{t}{y \cdot z}\right) - z \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \frac{t}{y} + \frac{t}{y} \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 82.6% accurate, 23.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - y \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1.9e+14) x (- x (* y (/ z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.9e+14) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y * (z / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-1.9d+14)) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x - (y * (z / t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.9e+14) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y * (z / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1.9e+14:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x - (y * (z / t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.9e+14)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y * Float64(z / t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1.9e+14)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x - (y * (z / t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1.9e+14], x, N[(x - N[(y * N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.9e14

   1. Initial program 81.7%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 81.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 81.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 81.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

      2. inv-pow 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1}} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 33.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 33.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

   8. Simplified 33.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 33.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]

      2. frac-2neg 33.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{-y \cdot z}{-t}} \]

      3. neg-mul-1 33.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{-y \cdot z}{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot t}} \]

      4. associate-/r* 33.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{-y \cdot z}{-1}}{t}} \]

      5. distribute-lft-neg-in 33.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z}}{-1}}{t} \]

      6. add-sqr-sqrt 17.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{-y} \cdot \sqrt{-y}\right)} \cdot z}{-1}}{t} \]

      7. sqrt-unprod 39.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-y\right)}} \cdot z}{-1}}{t} \]

      8. sqr-neg 39.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\frac{\sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot y}} \cdot z}{-1}}{t} \]

      9. sqrt-unprod 15.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \cdot z}{-1}}{t} \]

      10. add-sqr-sqrt 31.0%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{y} \cdot z}{-1}}{t} \]

   10. Applied egg-rr 31.0%

       \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{y \cdot z}{-1}}{t}} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate-/l/ 31.0%

          \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t \cdot -1}} \]

       2. *-commutative 31.0%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot y}}{t \cdot -1} \]

       3. associate-/l* 35.0%

          \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{z}{\frac{t \cdot -1}{y}}} \]

   12. Simplified 35.0%

       \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{z}{\frac{t \cdot -1}{y}}} \]

   13. Taylor expanded in x around inf 63.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -1.9e14 < z

   1. Initial program 50.0%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 50.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 74.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 74.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 74.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 74.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 74.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 74.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 74.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 74.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 98.1%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 98.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

      2. inv-pow 98.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1}} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 98.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 86.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 86.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

   8. Simplified 86.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 79.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - y \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 81.8% accurate, 23.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+15}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y \cdot z}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (if (<= z -2e+15) x (- x (/ (* y z) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2e+15) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x - ((y * z) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-2d+15)) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x - ((y * z) / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2e+15) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x - ((y * z) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -2e+15:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x - ((y * z) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -2e+15)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(Float64(y * z) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -2e+15)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x - ((y * z) / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, -2e+15], x, N[(x - N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2e15

   1. Initial program 81.7%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 81.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 81.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 81.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 100.0%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

      2. inv-pow 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1}} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 33.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 33.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

   8. Simplified 33.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 33.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]

      2. frac-2neg 33.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{-y \cdot z}{-t}} \]

      3. neg-mul-1 33.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{-y \cdot z}{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot t}} \]

      4. associate-/r* 33.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{-y \cdot z}{-1}}{t}} \]

      5. distribute-lft-neg-in 33.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z}}{-1}}{t} \]

      6. add-sqr-sqrt 17.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{-y} \cdot \sqrt{-y}\right)} \cdot z}{-1}}{t} \]

      7. sqrt-unprod 39.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-y\right)}} \cdot z}{-1}}{t} \]

      8. sqr-neg 39.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\frac{\sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot y}} \cdot z}{-1}}{t} \]

      9. sqrt-unprod 15.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \cdot z}{-1}}{t} \]

      10. add-sqr-sqrt 31.0%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{y} \cdot z}{-1}}{t} \]

   10. Applied egg-rr 31.0%

       \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{y \cdot z}{-1}}{t}} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate-/l/ 31.0%

          \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t \cdot -1}} \]

       2. *-commutative 31.0%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot y}}{t \cdot -1} \]

       3. associate-/l* 35.0%

          \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{z}{\frac{t \cdot -1}{y}}} \]

   12. Simplified 35.0%

       \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{z}{\frac{t \cdot -1}{y}}} \]

   13. Taylor expanded in x around inf 63.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -2e15 < z

   1. Initial program 50.0%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 50.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 74.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 74.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 74.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 74.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 74.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 74.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 74.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 74.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 98.1%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 86.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 80.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+15}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y \cdot z}{t}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 71.9% accurate, 211.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 58.9%

   \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 58.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 76.2%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   3. cancel-sign-sub 76.2%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   4. log1p-def 81.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

   5. cancel-sign-sub 81.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

   6. +-commutative 81.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   7. unsub-neg 81.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

   8. *-rgt-identity 81.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

   9. distribute-lft-out-- 81.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   10. expm1-def 98.6%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

3. Simplified 98.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. clear-num 98.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

   2. inv-pow 98.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1}} \]

5. Applied egg-rr 98.5%

   \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 71.5%

   \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*r/ 71.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

8. Simplified 71.4%

   \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*r/ 71.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]

   2. frac-2neg 71.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{-y \cdot z}{-t}} \]

   3. neg-mul-1 71.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{-y \cdot z}{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot t}} \]

   4. associate-/r* 71.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{-y \cdot z}{-1}}{t}} \]

   5. distribute-lft-neg-in 71.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z}}{-1}}{t} \]

   6. add-sqr-sqrt 34.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{-y} \cdot \sqrt{-y}\right)} \cdot z}{-1}}{t} \]

   7. sqrt-unprod 59.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-y\right)}} \cdot z}{-1}}{t} \]

   8. sqr-neg 59.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\frac{\sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot y}} \cdot z}{-1}}{t} \]

   9. sqrt-unprod 31.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \cdot z}{-1}}{t} \]

   10. add-sqr-sqrt 59.2%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{y} \cdot z}{-1}}{t} \]

10. Applied egg-rr 59.2%

    \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{y \cdot z}{-1}}{t}} \]
11. Step-by-step derivation

    1. associate-/l/ 59.2%

       \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t \cdot -1}} \]

    2. *-commutative 59.2%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot y}}{t \cdot -1} \]

    3. associate-/l* 59.2%

       \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{z}{\frac{t \cdot -1}{y}}} \]

12. Simplified 59.2%

    \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{z}{\frac{t \cdot -1}{y}}} \]

13. Taylor expanded in x around inf 70.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

14. Final simplification 70.1%

    \[\leadsto x \]

Developer target: 75.0% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \frac{-0.5}{y \cdot t}\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < -2.8874623088207947 \cdot 10^{+119}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x - \frac{t_1}{z \cdot z}\right) - t_1 \cdot \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{z \cdot z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\log \left(1 + z \cdot y\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (/ (- 0.5) (* y t))))
   (if (< z -2.8874623088207947e+119)
     (- (- x (/ t_1 (* z z))) (* t_1 (/ (/ 2.0 z) (* z z))))
     (- x (/ (log (+ 1.0 (* z y))) t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = -0.5 / (y * t);
	double tmp;
	if (z < -2.8874623088207947e+119) {
		tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0 / z) / (z * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (log((1.0 + (z * y))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = -0.5d0 / (y * t)
    if (z < (-2.8874623088207947d+119)) then
        tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0d0 / z) / (z * z)))
    else
        tmp = x - (log((1.0d0 + (z * y))) / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = -0.5 / (y * t);
	double tmp;
	if (z < -2.8874623088207947e+119) {
		tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0 / z) / (z * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (Math.log((1.0 + (z * y))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = -0.5 / (y * t)
	tmp = 0
	if z < -2.8874623088207947e+119:
		tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0 / z) / (z * z)))
	else:
		tmp = x - (math.log((1.0 + (z * y))) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(-0.5) / Float64(y * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < -2.8874623088207947e+119)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x - Float64(t_1 / Float64(z * z))) - Float64(t_1 * Float64(Float64(2.0 / z) / Float64(z * z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(log(Float64(1.0 + Float64(z * y))) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = -0.5 / (y * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < -2.8874623088207947e+119)
		tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0 / z) / (z * z)));
	else
		tmp = x - (log((1.0 + (z * y))) / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[((-0.5) / N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, -2.8874623088207947e+119], N[(N[(x - N[(t$95$1 / N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(t$95$1 * N[(N[(2.0 / z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[Log[N[(1.0 + N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023334 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "System.Random.MWC.Distributions:truncatedExp from mwc-random-0.13.3.2"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (if (< z -2.8874623088207947e+119) (- (- x (/ (/ (- 0.5) (* y t)) (* z z))) (* (/ (- 0.5) (* y t)) (/ (/ 2.0 z) (* z z)))) (- x (/ (log (+ 1.0 (* z y))) t)))

  (- x (/ (log (+ (- 1.0 y) (* y (exp z)))) t)))