Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]

Percentage Accurate: 98.9% → 98.9%
Time: 12.8s
Alternatives: 9
Speedup: 1.4×

Specification

?
\[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary32 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 9 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{1}{\sqrt{s}} \cdot \frac{\pi}{\sqrt{s}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (log
    (+
     (/
      1.0
      (+
       (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI (- s)))))
       (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (* (/ 1.0 (sqrt s)) (/ PI (sqrt s))))))))
     -1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf(((1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / -s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf(((1.0f / sqrtf(s)) * (((float) M_PI) / sqrtf(s)))))))) + -1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / Float32(-s))))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / sqrt(s)) * Float32(Float32(pi) / sqrt(s)))))))) + Float32(-1.0)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log(((single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / -s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp(((single(1.0) / sqrt(s)) * (single(pi) / sqrt(s)))))))) + single(-1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{1}{\sqrt{s}} \cdot \frac{\pi}{\sqrt{s}}}}} + -1\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.8%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-un-lft-identity98.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\color{blue}{1 \cdot \pi}}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
    2. add-sqr-sqrt98.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{1 \cdot \pi}{\color{blue}{\sqrt{s} \cdot \sqrt{s}}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
    3. times-frac98.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\sqrt{s}} \cdot \frac{\pi}{\sqrt{s}}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  4. Applied egg-rr98.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\sqrt{s}} \cdot \frac{\pi}{\sqrt{s}}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  5. Final simplification98.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{1}{\sqrt{s}} \cdot \frac{\pi}{\sqrt{s}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]

Alternative 2: 98.9% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (log
    (+
     -1.0
     (/
      1.0
      (+
       (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI (- s)))))
       (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / -s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / Float32(-s))))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / -s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.8%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Final simplification98.8%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right) \]

Alternative 3: 25.3% accurate, 2.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(u \cdot 2 + \left(\log s - \log \pi\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* s (+ (* u 2.0) (- (log s) (log PI)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * ((u * 2.0f) + (logf(s) - logf(((float) M_PI))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(Float32(u * Float32(2.0)) + Float32(log(s) - log(Float32(pi)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * ((u * single(2.0)) + (log(s) - log(single(pi))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(u \cdot 2 + \left(\log s - \log \pi\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.8%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 25.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right)}\right) \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative25.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s} + 1\right)}\right) \]
    2. fma-def25.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  5. Simplified25.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  6. Taylor expanded in u around 0 25.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right) + 2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \pi}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}}} \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative25.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \pi}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} + -1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right)} \]
    2. mul-1-neg25.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \pi}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} + \color{blue}{\left(-s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right)} \]
    3. unsub-neg25.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \pi}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} - s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
    4. associate-*r/25.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}}} - s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
    5. *-commutative25.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)}}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} - s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
    6. +-commutative25.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot u\right)}{\color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{s} + 1}} - s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
    7. log1p-def25.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot u\right)}{\frac{\pi}{s} + 1} - s \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
  8. Simplified25.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot u\right)}{\frac{\pi}{s} + 1} - s \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
  9. Taylor expanded in s around 0 25.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(2 \cdot u - \left(\log \pi + -1 \cdot \log s\right)\right)} \]
  10. Step-by-step derivation
    1. mul-1-neg25.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(2 \cdot u - \left(\log \pi + \color{blue}{\left(-\log s\right)}\right)\right) \]
  11. Simplified25.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(2 \cdot u - \left(\log \pi + \left(-\log s\right)\right)\right)} \]
  12. Final simplification25.4%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot 2 + \left(\log s - \log \pi\right)\right) \]

Alternative 4: 25.3% accurate, 3.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(u \cdot 2 + \log \left(\frac{s}{\pi}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* s (+ (* u 2.0) (log (/ s PI)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * ((u * 2.0f) + logf((s / ((float) M_PI))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(Float32(u * Float32(2.0)) + log(Float32(s / Float32(pi)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * ((u * single(2.0)) + log((s / single(pi))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(u \cdot 2 + \log \left(\frac{s}{\pi}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.8%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 25.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right)}\right) \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative25.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s} + 1\right)}\right) \]
    2. fma-def25.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  5. Simplified25.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  6. Taylor expanded in u around 0 25.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right) + 2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \pi}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}}} \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative25.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \pi}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} + -1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right)} \]
    2. mul-1-neg25.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \pi}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} + \color{blue}{\left(-s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right)} \]
    3. unsub-neg25.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \pi}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} - s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
    4. associate-*r/25.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}}} - s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
    5. *-commutative25.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)}}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} - s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
    6. +-commutative25.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot u\right)}{\color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{s} + 1}} - s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
    7. log1p-def25.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot u\right)}{\frac{\pi}{s} + 1} - s \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
  8. Simplified25.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot u\right)}{\frac{\pi}{s} + 1} - s \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
  9. Taylor expanded in s around 0 25.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(2 \cdot u - \left(\log \pi + -1 \cdot \log s\right)\right)} \]
  10. Step-by-step derivation
    1. mul-1-neg25.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(2 \cdot u - \left(\log \pi + \color{blue}{\left(-\log s\right)}\right)\right) \]
  11. Simplified25.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(2 \cdot u - \left(\log \pi + \left(-\log s\right)\right)\right)} \]
  12. Step-by-step derivation
    1. unsub-neg25.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(2 \cdot u - \color{blue}{\left(\log \pi - \log s\right)}\right) \]
    2. log-div25.3%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(2 \cdot u - \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}\right) \]
    3. clear-num25.3%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(2 \cdot u - \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{\frac{s}{\pi}}\right)}\right) \]
    4. log-rec25.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(2 \cdot u - \color{blue}{\left(-\log \left(\frac{s}{\pi}\right)\right)}\right) \]
  13. Applied egg-rr25.4%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(2 \cdot u - \color{blue}{\left(-\log \left(\frac{s}{\pi}\right)\right)}\right) \]
  14. Final simplification25.4%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot 2 + \log \left(\frac{s}{\pi}\right)\right) \]

Alternative 5: 25.3% accurate, 3.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \log \left(\frac{s}{\pi}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* s (log (/ s PI))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * logf((s / ((float) M_PI)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * log(Float32(s / Float32(pi))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * log((s / single(pi)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \log \left(\frac{s}{\pi}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.8%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 25.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right)}\right) \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative25.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s} + 1\right)}\right) \]
    2. fma-def25.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  5. Simplified25.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  6. Taylor expanded in u around 0 25.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right) + 2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \pi}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}}} \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative25.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \pi}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} + -1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right)} \]
    2. mul-1-neg25.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \pi}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} + \color{blue}{\left(-s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right)} \]
    3. unsub-neg25.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \pi}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} - s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
    4. associate-*r/25.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}}} - s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
    5. *-commutative25.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)}}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} - s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
    6. +-commutative25.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot u\right)}{\color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{s} + 1}} - s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
    7. log1p-def25.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot u\right)}{\frac{\pi}{s} + 1} - s \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
  8. Simplified25.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot u\right)}{\frac{\pi}{s} + 1} - s \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
  9. Taylor expanded in s around 0 25.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(2 \cdot u - \left(\log \pi + -1 \cdot \log s\right)\right)} \]
  10. Step-by-step derivation
    1. mul-1-neg25.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(2 \cdot u - \left(\log \pi + \color{blue}{\left(-\log s\right)}\right)\right) \]
  11. Simplified25.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(2 \cdot u - \left(\log \pi + \left(-\log s\right)\right)\right)} \]
  12. Taylor expanded in u around 0 25.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(\log s - \log \pi\right)} \]
  13. Step-by-step derivation
    1. log-div25.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{s}{\pi}\right)} \]
  14. Simplified25.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \log \left(\frac{s}{\pi}\right)} \]
  15. Final simplification25.4%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \log \left(\frac{s}{\pi}\right) \]

Alternative 6: 11.7% accurate, 6.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \pi \cdot \left(-1 + u \cdot 2\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* PI (+ -1.0 (* u 2.0))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return ((float) M_PI) * (-1.0f + (u * 2.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(u * Float32(2.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(pi) * (single(-1.0) + (u * single(2.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\pi \cdot \left(-1 + u \cdot 2\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.8%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 25.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right)}\right) \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative25.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s} + 1\right)}\right) \]
    2. fma-def25.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  5. Simplified25.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  6. Taylor expanded in u around 0 25.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right) + 2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \pi}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}}} \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative25.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \pi}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} + -1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right)} \]
    2. mul-1-neg25.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \pi}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} + \color{blue}{\left(-s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right)} \]
    3. unsub-neg25.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \pi}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} - s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
    4. associate-*r/25.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}}} - s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
    5. *-commutative25.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)}}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} - s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
    6. +-commutative25.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot u\right)}{\color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{s} + 1}} - s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
    7. log1p-def25.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot u\right)}{\frac{\pi}{s} + 1} - s \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
  8. Simplified25.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot u\right)}{\frac{\pi}{s} + 1} - s \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
  9. Taylor expanded in s around inf 10.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \pi} \]
  10. Step-by-step derivation
    1. sub-neg10.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-\pi\right)} \]
    2. associate-*r*10.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} + \left(-\pi\right) \]
    3. neg-mul-110.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(2 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \pi} \]
    4. distribute-rgt-out10.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(2 \cdot u + -1\right)} \]
  11. Simplified10.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(2 \cdot u + -1\right)} \]
  12. Final simplification10.8%

    \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \left(-1 + u \cdot 2\right) \]

Alternative 7: 14.2% accurate, 7.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;s \leq 2.799999911143463 \cdot 10^{-20}:\\ \;\;\;\;s \cdot 0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-\pi\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (if (<= s 2.799999911143463e-20) (* s 0.0) (- PI)))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float tmp;
	if (s <= 2.799999911143463e-20f) {
		tmp = s * 0.0f;
	} else {
		tmp = -((float) M_PI);
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(u, s)
	tmp = Float32(0.0)
	if (s <= Float32(2.799999911143463e-20))
		tmp = Float32(s * Float32(0.0));
	else
		tmp = Float32(-Float32(pi));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(0.0);
	if (s <= single(2.799999911143463e-20))
		tmp = s * single(0.0);
	else
		tmp = -single(pi);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;s \leq 2.799999911143463 \cdot 10^{-20}:\\
\;\;\;\;s \cdot 0\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;-\pi\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if s < 2.79999991e-20

    1. Initial program 98.8%

      \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
    2. Simplified98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
    3. Taylor expanded in s around inf 13.5%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{1}\right) \]

    if 2.79999991e-20 < s

    1. Initial program 98.9%

      \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
    2. Simplified98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
    3. Taylor expanded in u around 0 14.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \pi} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. neg-mul-114.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
    5. Simplified14.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification13.8%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;s \leq 2.799999911143463 \cdot 10^{-20}:\\ \;\;\;\;s \cdot 0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-\pi\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 11.5% accurate, 7.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -\pi \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (- PI))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -((float) M_PI);
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(-Float32(pi))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -single(pi);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-\pi
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.8%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in u around 0 10.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \pi} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-mul-110.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  5. Simplified10.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  6. Final simplification10.6%

    \[\leadsto -\pi \]

Alternative 9: 8.9% accurate, 146.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \left(s \cdot u\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* 2.0 (* s u)))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return 2.0f * (s * u);
}
real(4) function code(u, s)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    code = 2.0e0 * (s * u)
end function
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(2.0) * Float32(s * u))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(2.0) * (s * u);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
2 \cdot \left(s \cdot u\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.8%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 25.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right)}\right) \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative25.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s} + 1\right)}\right) \]
    2. fma-def25.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  5. Simplified25.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  6. Taylor expanded in u around 0 25.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right) + 2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \pi}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}}} \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative25.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \pi}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} + -1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right)} \]
    2. mul-1-neg25.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \pi}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} + \color{blue}{\left(-s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right)} \]
    3. unsub-neg25.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \pi}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} - s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
    4. associate-*r/25.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}}} - s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
    5. *-commutative25.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)}}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} - s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
    6. +-commutative25.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot u\right)}{\color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{s} + 1}} - s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
    7. log1p-def25.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot u\right)}{\frac{\pi}{s} + 1} - s \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
  8. Simplified25.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot u\right)}{\frac{\pi}{s} + 1} - s \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
  9. Taylor expanded in s around 0 25.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(2 \cdot u - \left(\log \pi + -1 \cdot \log s\right)\right)} \]
  10. Step-by-step derivation
    1. mul-1-neg25.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(2 \cdot u - \left(\log \pi + \color{blue}{\left(-\log s\right)}\right)\right) \]
  11. Simplified25.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(2 \cdot u - \left(\log \pi + \left(-\log s\right)\right)\right)} \]
  12. Taylor expanded in u around inf 9.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(s \cdot u\right)} \]
  13. Final simplification9.2%

    \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(s \cdot u\right) \]

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2023333 
(FPCore (u s)
  :name "Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]"
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0)) (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
  (* (- s) (log (- (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) 1.0))))