b parameter of renormalized beta distribution

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 6.3s

Alternatives: 13

Speedup: 1.0×

• 41.2% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

\[\left(0 < m \land 0 < v\right) \land v < 0.25\]

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) (- 1.0 m)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) - 1.0d0) * (1.0d0 - m)
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * Float64(1.0 - m))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) (- 1.0 m)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) - 1.0d0) * (1.0d0 - m)
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * Float64(1.0 - m))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + -1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- 1.0 m) (+ (/ m (/ v (- 1.0 m))) -1.0)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 - m) * ((m / (v / (1.0 - m))) + -1.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (1.0d0 - m) * ((m / (v / (1.0d0 - m))) + (-1.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 - m) * ((m / (v / (1.0 - m))) + -1.0);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (1.0 - m) * ((m / (v / (1.0 - m))) + -1.0)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(Float64(m / Float64(v / Float64(1.0 - m))) + -1.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m / (v / (1.0 - m))) + -1.0);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(m / N[(v / N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + -1\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + -1\right) \]

Alternative 2: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{-15}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 + m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 8.5e-15)
   (* (- 1.0 m) (+ -1.0 (/ m v)))
   (* (/ m v) (+ 1.0 (* m (+ m -2.0))))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 8.5e-15) {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = (m / v) * (1.0 + (m * (m + -2.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 8.5d-15) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 - m) * ((-1.0d0) + (m / v))
    else
        tmp = (m / v) * (1.0d0 + (m * (m + (-2.0d0))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 8.5e-15) {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = (m / v) * (1.0 + (m * (m + -2.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 8.5e-15:
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m / v))
	else:
		tmp = (m / v) * (1.0 + (m * (m + -2.0)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 8.5e-15)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m / v)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(m / v) * Float64(1.0 + Float64(m * Float64(m + -2.0))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 8.5e-15)
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	else
		tmp = (m / v) * (1.0 + (m * (m + -2.0)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 8.5e-15], N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(-1.0 + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 + N[(m * N[(m + -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 8.50000000000000007e-15

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in m around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

   if 8.50000000000000007e-15 < m

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in v around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot {\left(1 - m\right)}^{2}}{v}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot {\left(1 - m\right)}^{2}} \]

   6. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot {\left(1 - m\right)}^{2}} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in m around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-2 \cdot m + {m}^{2}\right)\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left({m}^{2} + -2 \cdot m\right)}\right) \]

      2. unpow2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 + \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot m} + -2 \cdot m\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-out 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)}\right) \]

   9. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{-15}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 + m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(-1 + \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- 1.0 m) (+ -1.0 (* (- 1.0 m) (/ m v)))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + ((1.0 - m) * (m / v)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (1.0d0 - m) * ((-1.0d0) + ((1.0d0 - m) * (m / v)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + ((1.0 - m) * (m / v)));
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + ((1.0 - m) * (m / v)))

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(m / v))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + ((1.0 - m) * (m / v)));
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(-1.0 + N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(-1 + \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right) \]

Alternative 4: 98.2% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.4:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 + \left(m + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(m + -2\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 2.4) (+ -1.0 (+ m (/ m v))) (* m (* (/ m v) (+ m -2.0)))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.4) {
		tmp = -1.0 + (m + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = m * ((m / v) * (m + -2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 2.4d0) then
        tmp = (-1.0d0) + (m + (m / v))
    else
        tmp = m * ((m / v) * (m + (-2.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.4) {
		tmp = -1.0 + (m + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = m * ((m / v) * (m + -2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 2.4:
		tmp = -1.0 + (m + (m / v))
	else:
		tmp = m * ((m / v) * (m + -2.0))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 2.4)
		tmp = Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m + Float64(m / v)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(Float64(m / v) * Float64(m + -2.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 2.4)
		tmp = -1.0 + (m + (m / v));
	else
		tmp = m * ((m / v) * (m + -2.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 2.4], N[(-1.0 + N[(m + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(m * N[(N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision] * N[(m + -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 2.39999999999999991

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) - 1} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 35.1%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{v} + 1\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-in 35.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1}{v} + m \cdot 1} \]

      3. div-inv 35.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} + m \cdot 1 \]

      4. *-rgt-identity 35.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} + \color{blue}{m} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} + m\right)} - 1 \]

   if 2.39999999999999991 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in v around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot {\left(1 - m\right)}^{2}}{v}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot {\left(1 - m\right)}^{2}} \]

   6. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot {\left(1 - m\right)}^{2}} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in m around inf 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot m + {m}^{2}\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} \cdot \color{blue}{\left({m}^{2} + -2 \cdot m\right)} \]

      2. unpow2 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot m} + -2 \cdot m\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-out 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)\right)} \]

   9. Simplified 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate-*l/ 97.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)\right)}{v}} \]

       2. associate-/l* 97.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)}}} \]

   11. Applied egg-rr 97.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)}}} \]
   12. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate-/r/ 97.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)\right)} \]

       2. metadata-eval 97.0%

          \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(m \cdot \left(m + \color{blue}{\left(-2\right)}\right)\right) \]

       3. sub-neg 97.0%

          \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(m - 2\right)}\right) \]

       4. *-commutative 97.0%

          \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(m - 2\right) \cdot m\right)} \]

       5. associate-*r* 97.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(m - 2\right)\right) \cdot m} \]

       6. sub-neg 97.0%

          \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(m + \left(-2\right)\right)}\right) \cdot m \]

       7. metadata-eval 97.0%

          \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(m + \color{blue}{-2}\right)\right) \cdot m \]

   13. Applied egg-rr 97.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(m + -2\right)\right) \cdot m} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.4:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 + \left(m + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(m + -2\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 98.2% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.62:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(m + -2\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 1.62) (* (- 1.0 m) (+ -1.0 (/ m v))) (* m (* (/ m v) (+ m -2.0)))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.62) {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = m * ((m / v) * (m + -2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.62d0) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 - m) * ((-1.0d0) + (m / v))
    else
        tmp = m * ((m / v) * (m + (-2.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.62) {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = m * ((m / v) * (m + -2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.62:
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m / v))
	else:
		tmp = m * ((m / v) * (m + -2.0))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.62)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m / v)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(Float64(m / v) * Float64(m + -2.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.62)
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	else
		tmp = m * ((m / v) * (m + -2.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.62], N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(-1.0 + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(m * N[(N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision] * N[(m + -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1.6200000000000001

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in m around 0 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

   if 1.6200000000000001 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in v around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot {\left(1 - m\right)}^{2}}{v}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot {\left(1 - m\right)}^{2}} \]

   6. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot {\left(1 - m\right)}^{2}} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in m around inf 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot m + {m}^{2}\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} \cdot \color{blue}{\left({m}^{2} + -2 \cdot m\right)} \]

      2. unpow2 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot m} + -2 \cdot m\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-out 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)\right)} \]

   9. Simplified 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate-*l/ 97.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)\right)}{v}} \]

       2. associate-/l* 97.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)}}} \]

   11. Applied egg-rr 97.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)}}} \]
   12. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate-/r/ 97.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)\right)} \]

       2. metadata-eval 97.0%

          \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(m \cdot \left(m + \color{blue}{\left(-2\right)}\right)\right) \]

       3. sub-neg 97.0%

          \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(m - 2\right)}\right) \]

       4. *-commutative 97.0%

          \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(m - 2\right) \cdot m\right)} \]

       5. associate-*r* 97.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(m - 2\right)\right) \cdot m} \]

       6. sub-neg 97.0%

          \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(m + \left(-2\right)\right)}\right) \cdot m \]

       7. metadata-eval 97.0%

          \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(m + \color{blue}{-2}\right)\right) \cdot m \]

   13. Applied egg-rr 97.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(m + -2\right)\right) \cdot m} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.62:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(m + -2\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 98.2% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.62:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(m + -2\right) \cdot \frac{m}{\frac{v}{m}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 1.62) (* (- 1.0 m) (+ -1.0 (/ m v))) (* (+ m -2.0) (/ m (/ v m)))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.62) {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = (m + -2.0) * (m / (v / m));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.62d0) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 - m) * ((-1.0d0) + (m / v))
    else
        tmp = (m + (-2.0d0)) * (m / (v / m))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.62) {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = (m + -2.0) * (m / (v / m));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.62:
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m / v))
	else:
		tmp = (m + -2.0) * (m / (v / m))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.62)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m / v)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(m + -2.0) * Float64(m / Float64(v / m)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.62)
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	else
		tmp = (m + -2.0) * (m / (v / m));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.62], N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(-1.0 + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(m + -2.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(m / N[(v / m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1.6200000000000001

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in m around 0 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

   if 1.6200000000000001 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in v around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot {\left(1 - m\right)}^{2}}{v}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot {\left(1 - m\right)}^{2}} \]

   6. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot {\left(1 - m\right)}^{2}} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in m around inf 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot m + {m}^{2}\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} \cdot \color{blue}{\left({m}^{2} + -2 \cdot m\right)} \]

      2. unpow2 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot m} + -2 \cdot m\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-out 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)\right)} \]

   9. Simplified 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate-*l/ 97.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)\right)}{v}} \]

       2. associate-/l* 97.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)}}} \]

   11. Applied egg-rr 97.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)}}} \]
   12. Step-by-step derivation

       1. metadata-eval 97.0%

          \[\leadsto \frac{m}{\frac{v}{m \cdot \left(m + \color{blue}{\left(-2\right)}\right)}} \]

       2. sub-neg 97.0%

          \[\leadsto \frac{m}{\frac{v}{m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(m - 2\right)}}} \]

       3. associate-/r* 97.0%

          \[\leadsto \frac{m}{\color{blue}{\frac{\frac{v}{m}}{m - 2}}} \]

       4. associate-/r/ 97.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{m}} \cdot \left(m - 2\right)} \]

       5. sub-neg 97.0%

          \[\leadsto \frac{m}{\frac{v}{m}} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(m + \left(-2\right)\right)} \]

       6. metadata-eval 97.0%

          \[\leadsto \frac{m}{\frac{v}{m}} \cdot \left(m + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

   13. Applied egg-rr 97.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{m}} \cdot \left(m + -2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.62:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(m + -2\right) \cdot \frac{m}{\frac{v}{m}}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 98.2% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.62:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{\frac{v}{m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 1.62) (* (- 1.0 m) (+ -1.0 (/ m v))) (/ m (/ v (* m (+ m -2.0))))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.62) {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = m / (v / (m * (m + -2.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.62d0) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 - m) * ((-1.0d0) + (m / v))
    else
        tmp = m / (v / (m * (m + (-2.0d0))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.62) {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = m / (v / (m * (m + -2.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.62:
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m / v))
	else:
		tmp = m / (v / (m * (m + -2.0)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.62)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m / v)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(m / Float64(v / Float64(m * Float64(m + -2.0))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.62)
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	else
		tmp = m / (v / (m * (m + -2.0)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.62], N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(-1.0 + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(m / N[(v / N[(m * N[(m + -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1.6200000000000001

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in m around 0 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

   if 1.6200000000000001 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in v around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot {\left(1 - m\right)}^{2}}{v}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot {\left(1 - m\right)}^{2}} \]

   6. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot {\left(1 - m\right)}^{2}} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in m around inf 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot m + {m}^{2}\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} \cdot \color{blue}{\left({m}^{2} + -2 \cdot m\right)} \]

      2. unpow2 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot m} + -2 \cdot m\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-out 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)\right)} \]

   9. Simplified 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate-*l/ 97.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)\right)}{v}} \]

       2. associate-/l* 97.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)}}} \]

   11. Applied egg-rr 97.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)}}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.62:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{\frac{v}{m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)}}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 62.6% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{-137}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m + \frac{m}{v}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (if (<= m 1.5e-137) -1.0 (+ m (/ m v))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.5e-137) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = m + (m / v);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.5d-137) then
        tmp = -1.0d0
    else
        tmp = m + (m / v)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.5e-137) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = m + (m / v);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.5e-137:
		tmp = -1.0
	else:
		tmp = m + (m / v)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.5e-137)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(m + Float64(m / v));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.5e-137)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = m + (m / v);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.5e-137], -1.0, N[(m + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1.4999999999999999e-137

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 82.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

   if 1.4999999999999999e-137 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 62.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) - 1} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in m around inf 57.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 57.2%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{v} + 1\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-in 57.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1}{v} + m \cdot 1} \]

      3. div-inv 57.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} + m \cdot 1 \]

      4. *-rgt-identity 57.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} + \color{blue}{m} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 57.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} + m} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 65.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{-137}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m + \frac{m}{v}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 76.6% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -1 + \left(m + \frac{m}{v}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (+ -1.0 (+ m (/ m v))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return -1.0 + (m + (m / v));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (-1.0d0) + (m + (m / v))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return -1.0 + (m + (m / v));
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return -1.0 + (m + (m / v))

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m + Float64(m / v)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = -1.0 + (m + (m / v));
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(-1.0 + N[(m + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 74.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) - 1} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 44.0%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{v} + 1\right)} \]

   2. distribute-lft-in 44.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1}{v} + m \cdot 1} \]

   3. div-inv 44.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} + m \cdot 1 \]

   4. *-rgt-identity 44.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} + \color{blue}{m} \]

6. Applied egg-rr 74.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} + m\right)} - 1 \]

7. Final simplification 74.4%

   \[\leadsto -1 + \left(m + \frac{m}{v}\right) \]

Alternative 10: 62.6% accurate, 2.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-137}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{v}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (if (<= m 4e-137) -1.0 (/ m v)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 4e-137) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = m / v;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 4d-137) then
        tmp = -1.0d0
    else
        tmp = m / v
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 4e-137) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = m / v;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 4e-137:
		tmp = -1.0
	else:
		tmp = m / v
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 4e-137)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(m / v);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 4e-137)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = m / v;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 4e-137], -1.0, N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 3.99999999999999991e-137

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 82.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

   if 3.99999999999999991e-137 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in v around 0 95.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot {\left(1 - m\right)}^{2}}{v}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot {\left(1 - m\right)}^{2}} \]

   6. Simplified 95.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot {\left(1 - m\right)}^{2}} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in m around 0 95.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-2 \cdot m + {m}^{2}\right)\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left({m}^{2} + -2 \cdot m\right)}\right) \]

      2. unpow2 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 + \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot m} + -2 \cdot m\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-out 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)}\right) \]

   9. Simplified 95.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)\right)} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in v around 0 95.1%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot \left(1 + m \cdot \left(m - 2\right)\right)}{v}} \]

   11. Taylor expanded in m around 0 57.3%

       \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 65.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-137}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{v}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 11: 26.5% accurate, 4.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 6.6 \cdot 10^{-59}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (if (<= m 6.6e-59) -1.0 m))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 6.6e-59) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = m;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 6.6d-59) then
        tmp = -1.0d0
    else
        tmp = m
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 6.6e-59) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = m;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 6.6e-59:
		tmp = -1.0
	else:
		tmp = m
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 6.6e-59)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = m;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 6.6e-59)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = m;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 6.6e-59], -1.0, m]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 6.59999999999999964e-59

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 71.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

   if 6.59999999999999964e-59 < m

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 56.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) - 1} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in m around inf 55.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in v around inf 5.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 32.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 6.6 \cdot 10^{-59}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 12: 26.9% accurate, 4.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ m + -1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (+ m -1.0))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return m + -1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = m + (-1.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return m + -1.0;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return m + -1.0

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(m + -1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = m + -1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(m + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in v around inf 32.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 32.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\left(1 - m\right)} \]

   2. neg-sub0 32.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 - \left(1 - m\right)} \]

   3. associate--r- 32.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0 - 1\right) + m} \]

   4. metadata-eval 32.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} + m \]

6. Simplified 32.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + m} \]

7. Final simplification 32.7%

   \[\leadsto m + -1 \]

Alternative 13: 24.5% accurate, 13.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 -1.0)

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return -1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = -1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return -1.0;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return -1.0

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return -1.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = -1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := -1.0

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 30.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

5. Final simplification 30.1%

   \[\leadsto -1 \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023332 
(FPCore (m v)
  :name "b parameter of renormalized beta distribution"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (and (and (< 0.0 m) (< 0.0 v)) (< v 0.25))
  (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) (- 1.0 m)))