SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2

Percentage Accurate: 93.7% → 98.7%

Time: 11.3s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 0.4×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 93.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.7% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot t_1 \leq 10^{+306}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot t_1, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))))
   (if (<= (+ x (* (* y z) t_1)) 1e+306) (fma z (* y t_1) x) (* z (- t x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y));
	double tmp;
	if ((x + ((y * z) * t_1)) <= 1e+306) {
		tmp = fma(z, (y * t_1), x);
	} else {
		tmp = z * (t - x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * t_1)) <= 1e+306)
		tmp = fma(z, Float64(y * t_1), x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(t - x));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 1e+306], N[(z * N[(y * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 x (*.f64 (*.f64 y z) (-.f64 (tanh.f64 (/.f64 t y)) (tanh.f64 (/.f64 x y))))) < 1.00000000000000002e306

   1. Initial program 96.7%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x \]

      3. associate-*l* 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      4. fma-def 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   if 1.00000000000000002e306 < (+.f64 x (*.f64 (*.f64 y z) (-.f64 (tanh.f64 (/.f64 t y)) (tanh.f64 (/.f64 x y)))))

   1. Initial program 54.7%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 99.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \leq 10^{+306}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2: 98.7% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_1 \leq -\infty \lor \neg \left(t_1 \leq 10^{+306}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))))))
   (if (or (<= t_1 (- INFINITY)) (not (<= t_1 1e+306))) (* z (- t x)) t_1)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
	double tmp;
	if ((t_1 <= -((double) INFINITY)) || !(t_1 <= 1e+306)) {
		tmp = z * (t - x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
	double tmp;
	if ((t_1 <= -Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) || !(t_1 <= 1e+306)) {
		tmp = z * (t - x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))
	tmp = 0
	if (t_1 <= -math.inf) or not (t_1 <= 1e+306):
		tmp = z * (t - x)
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t_1 <= Float64(-Inf)) || !(t_1 <= 1e+306))
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(t - x));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_1 <= -Inf) || ~((t_1 <= 1e+306)))
		tmp = z * (t - x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t$95$1, (-Infinity)], N[Not[LessEqual[t$95$1, 1e+306]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 x (*.f64 (*.f64 y z) (-.f64 (tanh.f64 (/.f64 t y)) (tanh.f64 (/.f64 x y))))) < -inf.0 or 1.00000000000000002e306 < (+.f64 x (*.f64 (*.f64 y z) (-.f64 (tanh.f64 (/.f64 t y)) (tanh.f64 (/.f64 x y)))))

   1. Initial program 60.2%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 99.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   if -inf.0 < (+.f64 x (*.f64 (*.f64 y z) (-.f64 (tanh.f64 (/.f64 t y)) (tanh.f64 (/.f64 x y))))) < 1.00000000000000002e306

   1. Initial program 99.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \leq -\infty \lor \neg \left(x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \leq 10^{+306}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 82.7% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 3.9 \cdot 10^{-53}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot t_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y \cdot t_1 - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (tanh (/ t y))))
   (if (<= y 3.9e-53) (+ x (* (* y z) t_1)) (+ x (* z (- (* y t_1) x))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = tanh((t / y));
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 3.9e-53) {
		tmp = x + ((y * z) * t_1);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * ((y * t_1) - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = tanh((t / y))
    if (y <= 3.9d-53) then
        tmp = x + ((y * z) * t_1)
    else
        tmp = x + (z * ((y * t_1) - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = Math.tanh((t / y));
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 3.9e-53) {
		tmp = x + ((y * z) * t_1);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * ((y * t_1) - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = math.tanh((t / y))
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 3.9e-53:
		tmp = x + ((y * z) * t_1)
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * ((y * t_1) - x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = tanh(Float64(t / y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 3.9e-53)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * t_1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(y * t_1) - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = tanh((t / y));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 3.9e-53)
		tmp = x + ((y * z) * t_1);
	else
		tmp = x + (z * ((y * t_1) - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, 3.9e-53], N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(N[(y * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 3.9000000000000002e-53

   1. Initial program 96.1%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 20.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r* 20.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      2. rec-exp 20.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}\right) \]

      3. div-sub 20.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]

      4. rec-exp 20.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      5. tanh-def-a 84.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 84.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   if 3.9000000000000002e-53 < y

   1. Initial program 87.7%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 40.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 40.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 85.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right), -x\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 42.1%

      \[\leadsto x + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x + y \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 42.1%

         \[\leadsto x + z \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-x\right)} + y \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 42.1%

         \[\leadsto x + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right) + \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

      3. fma-def 42.1%

         \[\leadsto x + z \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}, -x\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 85.3%

      \[\leadsto x + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 3.9 \cdot 10^{-53}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 82.0% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{+186}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 2.1e+186) (+ x (* (* y z) (tanh (/ t y)))) (+ x (* z (- t x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.1e+186) {
		tmp = x + ((y * z) * tanh((t / y)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 2.1d+186) then
        tmp = x + ((y * z) * tanh((t / y)))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.1e+186) {
		tmp = x + ((y * z) * Math.tanh((t / y)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 2.1e+186:
		tmp = x + ((y * z) * math.tanh((t / y)))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 2.1e+186)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * tanh(Float64(t / y))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 2.1e+186)
		tmp = x + ((y * z) * tanh((t / y)));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 2.1e+186], N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 2.1e186

   1. Initial program 96.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 23.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r* 23.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      2. rec-exp 23.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}\right) \]

      3. div-sub 23.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]

      4. rec-exp 23.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      5. tanh-def-a 83.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 83.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   if 2.1e186 < y

   1. Initial program 72.6%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 83.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 83.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{+186}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 62.3% accurate, 19.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{+61}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 8.2 \cdot 10^{+187} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 4.1 \cdot 10^{+225}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 7.2e+61)
   x
   (if (or (<= y 8.2e+187) (not (<= y 4.1e+225)))
     (* z (- t x))
     (* x (- 1.0 z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 7.2e+61) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if ((y <= 8.2e+187) || !(y <= 4.1e+225)) {
		tmp = z * (t - x);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 7.2d+61) then
        tmp = x
    else if ((y <= 8.2d+187) .or. (.not. (y <= 4.1d+225))) then
        tmp = z * (t - x)
    else
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 7.2e+61) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if ((y <= 8.2e+187) || !(y <= 4.1e+225)) {
		tmp = z * (t - x);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 7.2e+61:
		tmp = x
	elif (y <= 8.2e+187) or not (y <= 4.1e+225):
		tmp = z * (t - x)
	else:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 7.2e+61)
		tmp = x;
	elseif ((y <= 8.2e+187) || !(y <= 4.1e+225))
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(t - x));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 7.2e+61)
		tmp = x;
	elseif ((y <= 8.2e+187) || ~((y <= 4.1e+225)))
		tmp = z * (t - x);
	else
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 7.2e+61], x, If[Or[LessEqual[y, 8.2e+187], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 4.1e+225]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < 7.20000000000000021e61

   1. Initial program 96.6%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 58.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 62.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 7.20000000000000021e61 < y < 8.2e187 or 4.0999999999999999e225 < y

   1. Initial program 86.4%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 84.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 68.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   if 8.2e187 < y < 4.0999999999999999e225

   1. Initial program 72.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 66.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 60.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 60.2%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 60.2%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 60.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 63.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{+61}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 8.2 \cdot 10^{+187} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 4.1 \cdot 10^{+225}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 59.3% accurate, 23.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{+98} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 5.4 \cdot 10^{+187}\right) \land y \leq 4.1 \cdot 10^{+225}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y 3.2e+98) (and (not (<= y 5.4e+187)) (<= y 4.1e+225)))
   x
   (* z t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= 3.2e+98) || (!(y <= 5.4e+187) && (y <= 4.1e+225))) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = z * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= 3.2d+98) .or. (.not. (y <= 5.4d+187)) .and. (y <= 4.1d+225)) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = z * t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= 3.2e+98) || (!(y <= 5.4e+187) && (y <= 4.1e+225))) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = z * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= 3.2e+98) or (not (y <= 5.4e+187) and (y <= 4.1e+225)):
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = z * t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= 3.2e+98) || (!(y <= 5.4e+187) && (y <= 4.1e+225)))
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= 3.2e+98) || (~((y <= 5.4e+187)) && (y <= 4.1e+225)))
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = z * t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, 3.2e+98], And[N[Not[LessEqual[y, 5.4e+187]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[y, 4.1e+225]]], x, N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 3.2000000000000002e98 or 5.40000000000000016e187 < y < 4.0999999999999999e225

   1. Initial program 94.7%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 59.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 60.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 3.2000000000000002e98 < y < 5.40000000000000016e187 or 4.0999999999999999e225 < y

   1. Initial program 85.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in t around 0 73.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{t}{y}} - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 71.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + t \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 71.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 71.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t} + x \]

   5. Simplified 71.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t + x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 58.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 60.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{+98} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 5.4 \cdot 10^{+187}\right) \land y \leq 4.1 \cdot 10^{+225}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 62.6% accurate, 23.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{-48}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 6.2 \cdot 10^{+283}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 1.15e-48) x (if (<= y 6.2e+283) (* x (- 1.0 z)) (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.15e-48) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 6.2e+283) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 1.15d-48) then
        tmp = x
    else if (y <= 6.2d+283) then
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - z)
    else
        tmp = z * t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.15e-48) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 6.2e+283) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1.15e-48:
		tmp = x
	elif y <= 6.2e+283:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z)
	else:
		tmp = z * t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.15e-48)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 6.2e+283)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1.15e-48)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 6.2e+283)
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	else
		tmp = z * t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1.15e-48], x, If[LessEqual[y, 6.2e+283], N[(x * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < 1.15e-48

   1. Initial program 96.1%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 58.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 62.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 1.15e-48 < y < 6.19999999999999976e283

   1. Initial program 89.2%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 72.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 50.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 50.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 50.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 50.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]

   if 6.19999999999999976e283 < y

   1. Initial program 67.6%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in t around 0 67.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{t}{y}} - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 84.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + t \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 84.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 84.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t} + x \]

   5. Simplified 84.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t + x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 84.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 59.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{-48}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 6.2 \cdot 10^{+283}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 69.0% accurate, 23.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 5.4 \cdot 10^{-30}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 5.4e-30) x (+ x (* z (- t x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 5.4e-30) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 5.4d-30) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 5.4e-30) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 5.4e-30:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 5.4e-30)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 5.4e-30)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 5.4e-30], x, N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 5.39999999999999975e-30

   1. Initial program 96.2%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 58.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 63.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 5.39999999999999975e-30 < y

   1. Initial program 86.8%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 74.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 67.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 5.4 \cdot 10^{-30}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 66.0% accurate, 30.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 5.4 \cdot 10^{-30}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (if (<= y 5.4e-30) x (+ x (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 5.4e-30) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 5.4d-30) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x + (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 5.4e-30) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 5.4e-30:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 5.4e-30)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 5.4e-30)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 5.4e-30], x, N[(x + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 5.39999999999999975e-30

   1. Initial program 96.2%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 58.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 63.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 5.39999999999999975e-30 < y

   1. Initial program 86.8%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in t around 0 68.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{t}{y}} - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 62.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + t \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 62.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 62.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t} + x \]

   5. Simplified 62.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 63.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 5.4 \cdot 10^{-30}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 10: 60.5% accurate, 213.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 93.2%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 63.5%

   \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 53.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

4. Final simplification 53.8%

   \[\leadsto x \]

Developer target: 97.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y)))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + (y * (z * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y)))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023332 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

  (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))