Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]

Percentage Accurate: 99.0% → 99.0%
Time: 17.1s
Alternatives: 9
Speedup: N/A×

Specification

?
\[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary32 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 9 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 99.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 99.0% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\pi \cdot \frac{1}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (log
    (+
     (/
      1.0
      (+
       (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI (- s)))))
       (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (* PI (/ 1.0 s)))))))
     -1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf(((1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / -s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) * (1.0f / s))))))) + -1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / Float32(-s))))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(1.0) / s))))))) + Float32(-1.0)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log(((single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / -s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) * (single(1.0) / s))))))) + single(-1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\pi \cdot \frac{1}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. clear-num98.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{s}{\pi}}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
    2. associate-/r/98.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{s} \cdot \pi}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  4. Applied egg-rr98.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{s} \cdot \pi}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  5. Final simplification98.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\pi \cdot \frac{1}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]

Alternative 2: 99.0% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (log
    (+
     -1.0
     (/
      1.0
      (+
       (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI (- s)))))
       (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / -s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / Float32(-s))))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / -s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Final simplification98.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right) \]

Alternative 3: 37.7% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{2} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{e^{\log \left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (log
    (+
     -1.0
     (/
      1.0
      (+ (/ u 2.0) (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (exp (log (/ PI s)))))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / ((u / 2.0f) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf(expf(logf((((float) M_PI) / s))))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(2.0)) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(exp(log(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / ((u / single(2.0)) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp(exp(log((single(pi) / s))))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{2} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{e^{\log \left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around inf 37.6%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{1}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. add-exp-log37.6%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{e^{\log \left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  5. Applied egg-rr37.6%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{e^{\log \left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  6. Final simplification37.6%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{2} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{e^{\log \left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}}\right)\right) \]

Alternative 4: 37.7% accurate, 1.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{2} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{{\left(\frac{s}{\pi}\right)}^{-1}}}}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (log
    (+
     -1.0
     (/ 1.0 (+ (/ u 2.0) (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (pow (/ s PI) -1.0)))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / ((u / 2.0f) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf(powf((s / ((float) M_PI)), -1.0f))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(2.0)) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp((Float32(s / Float32(pi)) ^ Float32(-1.0)))))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / ((u / single(2.0)) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp(((s / single(pi)) ^ single(-1.0)))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{2} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{{\left(\frac{s}{\pi}\right)}^{-1}}}}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around inf 37.6%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{1}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. clear-num37.6%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{s}{\pi}}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
    2. inv-pow37.6%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{s}{\pi}\right)}^{-1}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  5. Applied egg-rr37.6%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{s}{\pi}\right)}^{-1}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  6. Final simplification37.6%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{2} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{{\left(\frac{s}{\pi}\right)}^{-1}}}}\right)\right) \]

Alternative 5: 37.7% accurate, 2.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{2}}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (log (+ -1.0 (/ 1.0 (+ (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))) (/ u 2.0))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / (((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)))) + (u / 2.0f)))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))) + Float32(u / Float32(2.0))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / (((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)))) + (u / single(2.0))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{2}}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around inf 37.6%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{1}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  4. Final simplification37.6%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{2}}\right)\right) \]

Alternative 6: 36.3% accurate, 3.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{2} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (log
    (+ -1.0 (/ 1.0 (+ (/ u 2.0) (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (/ PI s)))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / ((u / 2.0f) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + (1.0f + (((float) M_PI) / s))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(2.0)) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / ((u / single(2.0)) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + (single(1.0) + (single(pi) / s))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{2} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around inf 37.6%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{1}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 36.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative36.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{s} + 1\right)}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  6. Simplified36.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{s} + 1\right)}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  7. Final simplification36.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{2} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}\right)\right) \]

Alternative 7: 11.5% accurate, 6.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* 4.0 (* PI (+ (* u 0.5) -0.25))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return 4.0f * (((float) M_PI) * ((u * 0.5f) + -0.25f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(4.0) * Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(u * Float32(0.5)) + Float32(-0.25))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(4.0) * (single(pi) * ((u * single(0.5)) + single(-0.25)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around inf 11.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+11.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) - 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv11.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    3. distribute-rgt-out--11.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    4. *-commutative11.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    5. metadata-eval11.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    6. metadata-eval11.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \pi\right) \]
    7. *-commutative11.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot -0.25}\right) \]
  5. Simplified11.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right)} \]
  6. Taylor expanded in u around 0 11.9%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative11.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    2. associate-*r*11.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} + -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \]
    3. *-commutative11.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \pi + -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \]
    4. *-commutative11.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5\right)} + -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \]
    5. *-commutative11.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5\right) + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot -0.25}\right) \]
    6. fma-udef11.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi, u \cdot 0.5, \pi \cdot -0.25\right)} \]
  8. Simplified11.9%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi, u \cdot 0.5, \pi \cdot -0.25\right)} \]
  9. Taylor expanded in u around 0 11.9%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  10. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative11.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\pi \cdot -0.25} + 0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    2. associate-*r*11.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25 + \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi}\right) \]
    3. *-commutative11.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25 + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot u\right)}\right) \]
    4. *-commutative11.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25 + \pi \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot 0.5\right)}\right) \]
    5. +-commutative11.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5\right) + \pi \cdot -0.25\right)} \]
    6. distribute-lft-out11.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right)} \]
  11. Simplified11.9%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right)} \]
  12. Final simplification11.9%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right) \]

Alternative 8: 11.3% accurate, 7.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -\pi \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (- PI))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -((float) M_PI);
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(-Float32(pi))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -single(pi);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-\pi
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in u around 0 11.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \pi} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-mul-111.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  5. Simplified11.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  6. Final simplification11.6%

    \[\leadsto -\pi \]

Alternative 9: 4.6% accurate, 7.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \pi \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 PI)
float code(float u, float s) {
	return (float) M_PI;
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(pi)
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(pi);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\pi
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around inf 37.6%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{1}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. clear-num37.6%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{s}{\pi}}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
    2. inv-pow37.6%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{s}{\pi}\right)}^{-1}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  5. Applied egg-rr37.6%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{s}{\pi}\right)}^{-1}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  6. Applied egg-rr10.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(s \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(u, 0.5, \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)}\right)\right)} - 1} \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. expm1-def7.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(s \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(u, 0.5, \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right)} \]
    2. expm1-log1p7.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(u, 0.5, \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)}\right)} \]
    3. log-pow10.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left({\left(-1 + \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(u, 0.5, \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)}\right)}^{s}\right)} \]
  8. Simplified10.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left({\left(-1 + \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(u, 0.5, \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)}\right)}^{s}\right)} \]
  9. Taylor expanded in u around 0 4.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi} \]
  10. Final simplification4.7%

    \[\leadsto \pi \]

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2023331 
(FPCore (u s)
  :name "Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]"
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0)) (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
  (* (- s) (log (- (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) 1.0))))