VandenBroeck and Keller, Equation (6)

Percentage Accurate: 76.3% → 99.2%

Time: 23.4s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.0×

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. F = -2.9847135811383203e+254
  2. l = 3450863749980879.5

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (F l)
 :precision binary64
 (- (* PI l) (* (/ 1.0 (* F F)) (tan (* PI l)))))

C

double code(double F, double l) {
	return (((double) M_PI) * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * tan((((double) M_PI) * l)));
}

Java

public static double code(double F, double l) {
	return (Math.PI * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * Math.tan((Math.PI * l)));
}

Python

def code(F, l):
	return (math.pi * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * math.tan((math.pi * l)))

Julia

function code(F, l)
	return Float64(Float64(pi * l) - Float64(Float64(1.0 / Float64(F * F)) * tan(Float64(pi * l))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(F, l)
	tmp = (pi * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * tan((pi * l)));
end

Wolfram

code[F_, l_] := N[(N[(Pi * l), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(1.0 / N[(F * F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Tan[N[(Pi * l), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 76.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (F l)
 :precision binary64
 (- (* PI l) (* (/ 1.0 (* F F)) (tan (* PI l)))))

C

double code(double F, double l) {
	return (((double) M_PI) * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * tan((((double) M_PI) * l)));
}

Java

public static double code(double F, double l) {
	return (Math.PI * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * Math.tan((Math.PI * l)));
}

Python

def code(F, l):
	return (math.pi * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * math.tan((math.pi * l)))

Julia

function code(F, l)
	return Float64(Float64(pi * l) - Float64(Float64(1.0 / Float64(F * F)) * tan(Float64(pi * l))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(F, l)
	tmp = (pi * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * tan((pi * l)));
end

Wolfram

code[F_, l_] := N[(N[(Pi * l), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(1.0 / N[(F * F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Tan[N[(Pi * l), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.2% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\pi \cdot l_m \leq 20000000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l_m + \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot l_m\right)}{F} \cdot \frac{-1}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l_m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

l_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l_s = (copysign.f64 1 l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  l_s
  (if (<= (* PI l_m) 20000000000000.0)
    (+ (* PI l_m) (* (/ (tan (* PI l_m)) F) (/ -1.0 F)))
    (* PI l_m))))

C

l_m = fabs(l);
l_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((((double) M_PI) * l_m) <= 20000000000000.0) {
		tmp = (((double) M_PI) * l_m) + ((tan((((double) M_PI) * l_m)) / F) * (-1.0 / F));
	} else {
		tmp = ((double) M_PI) * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Java

l_m = Math.abs(l);
l_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((Math.PI * l_m) <= 20000000000000.0) {
		tmp = (Math.PI * l_m) + ((Math.tan((Math.PI * l_m)) / F) * (-1.0 / F));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.PI * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Python

l_m = math.fabs(l)
l_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	tmp = 0
	if (math.pi * l_m) <= 20000000000000.0:
		tmp = (math.pi * l_m) + ((math.tan((math.pi * l_m)) / F) * (-1.0 / F))
	else:
		tmp = math.pi * l_m
	return l_s * tmp

Julia

l_m = abs(l)
l_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(pi * l_m) <= 20000000000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(pi * l_m) + Float64(Float64(tan(Float64(pi * l_m)) / F) * Float64(-1.0 / F)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(pi * l_m);
	end
	return Float64(l_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

l_m = abs(l);
l_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((pi * l_m) <= 20000000000000.0)
		tmp = (pi * l_m) + ((tan((pi * l_m)) / F) * (-1.0 / F));
	else
		tmp = pi * l_m;
	end
	tmp_2 = l_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

l_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * If[LessEqual[N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision], 20000000000000.0], N[(N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(N[Tan[N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / F), $MachinePrecision] * N[(-1.0 / F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (PI.f64) l) < 2e13

   1. Initial program 79.4%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 79.4%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. *-lft-identity 79.4%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. Simplified 79.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r* 84.3%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}{F}} \]

      2. div-inv 84.3%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F} \cdot \frac{1}{F}} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 84.3%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F} \cdot \frac{1}{F}} \]

   if 2e13 < (*.f64 (PI.f64) l)

   1. Initial program 64.0%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 64.0%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. *-lft-identity 64.0%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. Simplified 64.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in l around 0 48.6%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi}}{F \cdot F} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in F around inf 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\pi \cdot \ell \leq 20000000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell + \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F} \cdot \frac{-1}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2: 99.2% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\pi \cdot l_m \leq 20000000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l_m - \frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot l_m\right)}{F}}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l_m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

l_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l_s = (copysign.f64 1 l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  l_s
  (if (<= (* PI l_m) 20000000000000.0)
    (- (* PI l_m) (/ (/ (tan (* PI l_m)) F) F))
    (* PI l_m))))

C

l_m = fabs(l);
l_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((((double) M_PI) * l_m) <= 20000000000000.0) {
		tmp = (((double) M_PI) * l_m) - ((tan((((double) M_PI) * l_m)) / F) / F);
	} else {
		tmp = ((double) M_PI) * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Java

l_m = Math.abs(l);
l_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((Math.PI * l_m) <= 20000000000000.0) {
		tmp = (Math.PI * l_m) - ((Math.tan((Math.PI * l_m)) / F) / F);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.PI * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Python

l_m = math.fabs(l)
l_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	tmp = 0
	if (math.pi * l_m) <= 20000000000000.0:
		tmp = (math.pi * l_m) - ((math.tan((math.pi * l_m)) / F) / F)
	else:
		tmp = math.pi * l_m
	return l_s * tmp

Julia

l_m = abs(l)
l_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(pi * l_m) <= 20000000000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(pi * l_m) - Float64(Float64(tan(Float64(pi * l_m)) / F) / F));
	else
		tmp = Float64(pi * l_m);
	end
	return Float64(l_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

l_m = abs(l);
l_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((pi * l_m) <= 20000000000000.0)
		tmp = (pi * l_m) - ((tan((pi * l_m)) / F) / F);
	else
		tmp = pi * l_m;
	end
	tmp_2 = l_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

l_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * If[LessEqual[N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision], 20000000000000.0], N[(N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[Tan[N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / F), $MachinePrecision] / F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (PI.f64) l) < 2e13

   1. Initial program 79.4%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 79.4%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. div-inv 79.4%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

      3. associate-/r* 84.3%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}{F}} \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 84.3%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}{F}} \]

   if 2e13 < (*.f64 (PI.f64) l)

   1. Initial program 64.0%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 64.0%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. *-lft-identity 64.0%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. Simplified 64.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in l around 0 48.6%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi}}{F \cdot F} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in F around inf 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\pi \cdot \ell \leq 20000000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 98.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\pi \cdot l_m \leq 10000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l_m - \frac{\pi}{F} \cdot \frac{l_m}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l_m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

l_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l_s = (copysign.f64 1 l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  l_s
  (if (<= (* PI l_m) 10000000.0)
    (- (* PI l_m) (* (/ PI F) (/ l_m F)))
    (* PI l_m))))

C

l_m = fabs(l);
l_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((((double) M_PI) * l_m) <= 10000000.0) {
		tmp = (((double) M_PI) * l_m) - ((((double) M_PI) / F) * (l_m / F));
	} else {
		tmp = ((double) M_PI) * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Java

l_m = Math.abs(l);
l_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((Math.PI * l_m) <= 10000000.0) {
		tmp = (Math.PI * l_m) - ((Math.PI / F) * (l_m / F));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.PI * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Python

l_m = math.fabs(l)
l_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	tmp = 0
	if (math.pi * l_m) <= 10000000.0:
		tmp = (math.pi * l_m) - ((math.pi / F) * (l_m / F))
	else:
		tmp = math.pi * l_m
	return l_s * tmp

Julia

l_m = abs(l)
l_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(pi * l_m) <= 10000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(pi * l_m) - Float64(Float64(pi / F) * Float64(l_m / F)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(pi * l_m);
	end
	return Float64(l_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

l_m = abs(l);
l_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((pi * l_m) <= 10000000.0)
		tmp = (pi * l_m) - ((pi / F) * (l_m / F));
	else
		tmp = pi * l_m;
	end
	tmp_2 = l_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

l_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * If[LessEqual[N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision], 10000000.0], N[(N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(Pi / F), $MachinePrecision] * N[(l$95$m / F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (PI.f64) l) < 1e7

   1. Initial program 79.6%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 79.6%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. *-lft-identity 79.6%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. Simplified 79.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in l around 0 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi}}{F \cdot F} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. times-frac 80.6%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\ell}{F} \cdot \frac{\pi}{F}} \]

      2. *-commutative 80.6%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{F} \cdot \frac{\ell}{F}} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 80.6%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{F} \cdot \frac{\ell}{F}} \]

   if 1e7 < (*.f64 (PI.f64) l)

   1. Initial program 63.7%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 63.7%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. *-lft-identity 63.7%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. Simplified 63.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in l around 0 47.9%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi}}{F \cdot F} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in F around inf 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\pi \cdot \ell \leq 10000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\pi}{F} \cdot \frac{\ell}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 98.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\pi \cdot l_m \leq 10000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l_m - \frac{\frac{l_m}{\frac{F}{\pi}}}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l_m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

l_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l_s = (copysign.f64 1 l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  l_s
  (if (<= (* PI l_m) 10000000.0)
    (- (* PI l_m) (/ (/ l_m (/ F PI)) F))
    (* PI l_m))))

C

l_m = fabs(l);
l_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((((double) M_PI) * l_m) <= 10000000.0) {
		tmp = (((double) M_PI) * l_m) - ((l_m / (F / ((double) M_PI))) / F);
	} else {
		tmp = ((double) M_PI) * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Java

l_m = Math.abs(l);
l_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((Math.PI * l_m) <= 10000000.0) {
		tmp = (Math.PI * l_m) - ((l_m / (F / Math.PI)) / F);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.PI * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Python

l_m = math.fabs(l)
l_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	tmp = 0
	if (math.pi * l_m) <= 10000000.0:
		tmp = (math.pi * l_m) - ((l_m / (F / math.pi)) / F)
	else:
		tmp = math.pi * l_m
	return l_s * tmp

Julia

l_m = abs(l)
l_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(pi * l_m) <= 10000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(pi * l_m) - Float64(Float64(l_m / Float64(F / pi)) / F));
	else
		tmp = Float64(pi * l_m);
	end
	return Float64(l_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

l_m = abs(l);
l_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((pi * l_m) <= 10000000.0)
		tmp = (pi * l_m) - ((l_m / (F / pi)) / F);
	else
		tmp = pi * l_m;
	end
	tmp_2 = l_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

l_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * If[LessEqual[N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision], 10000000.0], N[(N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(l$95$m / N[(F / Pi), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (PI.f64) l) < 1e7

   1. Initial program 79.6%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 79.6%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. div-inv 79.6%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

      3. associate-/r* 84.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}{F}} \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 84.5%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}{F}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in l around 0 80.6%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\ell \cdot \pi}{F}}}{F} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 80.6%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\ell}{\frac{F}{\pi}}}}{F} \]

   6. Simplified 80.6%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\ell}{\frac{F}{\pi}}}}{F} \]

   if 1e7 < (*.f64 (PI.f64) l)

   1. Initial program 63.7%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 63.7%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. *-lft-identity 63.7%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. Simplified 63.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in l around 0 47.9%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi}}{F \cdot F} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in F around inf 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\pi \cdot \ell \leq 10000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{\ell}{\frac{F}{\pi}}}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 92.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\pi \cdot l_m \leq 10000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \left(l_m - l_m \cdot {F}^{-2}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l_m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

l_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l_s = (copysign.f64 1 l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  l_s
  (if (<= (* PI l_m) 10000000.0)
    (* PI (- l_m (* l_m (pow F -2.0))))
    (* PI l_m))))

C

l_m = fabs(l);
l_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((((double) M_PI) * l_m) <= 10000000.0) {
		tmp = ((double) M_PI) * (l_m - (l_m * pow(F, -2.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = ((double) M_PI) * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Java

l_m = Math.abs(l);
l_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((Math.PI * l_m) <= 10000000.0) {
		tmp = Math.PI * (l_m - (l_m * Math.pow(F, -2.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.PI * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Python

l_m = math.fabs(l)
l_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	tmp = 0
	if (math.pi * l_m) <= 10000000.0:
		tmp = math.pi * (l_m - (l_m * math.pow(F, -2.0)))
	else:
		tmp = math.pi * l_m
	return l_s * tmp

Julia

l_m = abs(l)
l_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(pi * l_m) <= 10000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(pi * Float64(l_m - Float64(l_m * (F ^ -2.0))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(pi * l_m);
	end
	return Float64(l_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

l_m = abs(l);
l_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((pi * l_m) <= 10000000.0)
		tmp = pi * (l_m - (l_m * (F ^ -2.0)));
	else
		tmp = pi * l_m;
	end
	tmp_2 = l_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

l_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * If[LessEqual[N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision], 10000000.0], N[(Pi * N[(l$95$m - N[(l$95$m * N[Power[F, -2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (PI.f64) l) < 1e7

   1. Initial program 79.6%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 79.6%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. *-lft-identity 79.6%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. Simplified 79.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in l around 0 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi}}{F \cdot F} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-un-lft-identity 75.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\ell \cdot \pi}{F \cdot F}\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 75.6%

         \[\leadsto 1 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell}}{F \cdot F}\right) \]

      3. div-inv 75.6%

         \[\leadsto 1 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{F \cdot F}}\right) \]

      4. associate-*l* 75.6%

         \[\leadsto 1 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(\ell \cdot \frac{1}{F \cdot F}\right)}\right) \]

      5. unpow2 75.6%

         \[\leadsto 1 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \ell - \pi \cdot \left(\ell \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{{F}^{2}}}\right)\right) \]

      6. pow-flip 75.6%

         \[\leadsto 1 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \ell - \pi \cdot \left(\ell \cdot \color{blue}{{F}^{\left(-2\right)}}\right)\right) \]

      7. metadata-eval 75.6%

         \[\leadsto 1 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \ell - \pi \cdot \left(\ell \cdot {F}^{\color{blue}{-2}}\right)\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \ell - \pi \cdot \left(\ell \cdot {F}^{-2}\right)\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lft-identity 75.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \pi \cdot \left(\ell \cdot {F}^{-2}\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-out-- 75.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(\ell - \ell \cdot {F}^{-2}\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(\ell - \ell \cdot {F}^{-2}\right)} \]

   if 1e7 < (*.f64 (PI.f64) l)

   1. Initial program 63.7%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 63.7%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. *-lft-identity 63.7%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. Simplified 63.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in l around 0 47.9%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi}}{F \cdot F} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in F around inf 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 81.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\pi \cdot \ell \leq 10000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \left(\ell - \ell \cdot {F}^{-2}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 69.3% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;l_m \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{-122}:\\ \;\;\;\;l_m \cdot \frac{-\pi}{{F}^{2}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l_m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

l_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l_s = (copysign.f64 1 l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (* l_s (if (<= l_m 2.6e-122) (* l_m (/ (- PI) (pow F 2.0))) (* PI l_m))))

C

l_m = fabs(l);
l_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if (l_m <= 2.6e-122) {
		tmp = l_m * (-((double) M_PI) / pow(F, 2.0));
	} else {
		tmp = ((double) M_PI) * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Java

l_m = Math.abs(l);
l_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if (l_m <= 2.6e-122) {
		tmp = l_m * (-Math.PI / Math.pow(F, 2.0));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.PI * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Python

l_m = math.fabs(l)
l_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	tmp = 0
	if l_m <= 2.6e-122:
		tmp = l_m * (-math.pi / math.pow(F, 2.0))
	else:
		tmp = math.pi * l_m
	return l_s * tmp

Julia

l_m = abs(l)
l_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (l_m <= 2.6e-122)
		tmp = Float64(l_m * Float64(Float64(-pi) / (F ^ 2.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(pi * l_m);
	end
	return Float64(l_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

l_m = abs(l);
l_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (l_m <= 2.6e-122)
		tmp = l_m * (-pi / (F ^ 2.0));
	else
		tmp = pi * l_m;
	end
	tmp_2 = l_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

l_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * If[LessEqual[l$95$m, 2.6e-122], N[(l$95$m * N[((-Pi) / N[Power[F, 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if l < 2.59999999999999975e-122

   1. Initial program 75.6%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 75.7%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. *-lft-identity 75.7%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. Simplified 75.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in l around 0 71.2%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi}}{F \cdot F} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in F around 0 29.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{\ell \cdot \pi}{{F}^{2}}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 29.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\frac{\ell \cdot \pi}{{F}^{2}}} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 29.6%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \frac{\pi}{{F}^{2}}} \]

   7. Simplified 29.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\ell \cdot \frac{\pi}{{F}^{2}}} \]

   if 2.59999999999999975e-122 < l

   1. Initial program 74.4%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 74.4%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. *-lft-identity 74.4%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. Simplified 74.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in l around 0 63.0%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi}}{F \cdot F} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in F around inf 87.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 52.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\ell \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{-122}:\\ \;\;\;\;\ell \cdot \frac{-\pi}{{F}^{2}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 69.5% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;l_m \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{-122}:\\ \;\;\;\;-\frac{\pi \cdot l_m}{{F}^{2}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l_m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

l_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l_s = (copysign.f64 1 l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (* l_s (if (<= l_m 1.2e-122) (- (/ (* PI l_m) (pow F 2.0))) (* PI l_m))))

C

l_m = fabs(l);
l_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if (l_m <= 1.2e-122) {
		tmp = -((((double) M_PI) * l_m) / pow(F, 2.0));
	} else {
		tmp = ((double) M_PI) * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Java

l_m = Math.abs(l);
l_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if (l_m <= 1.2e-122) {
		tmp = -((Math.PI * l_m) / Math.pow(F, 2.0));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.PI * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Python

l_m = math.fabs(l)
l_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	tmp = 0
	if l_m <= 1.2e-122:
		tmp = -((math.pi * l_m) / math.pow(F, 2.0))
	else:
		tmp = math.pi * l_m
	return l_s * tmp

Julia

l_m = abs(l)
l_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (l_m <= 1.2e-122)
		tmp = Float64(-Float64(Float64(pi * l_m) / (F ^ 2.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(pi * l_m);
	end
	return Float64(l_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

l_m = abs(l);
l_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (l_m <= 1.2e-122)
		tmp = -((pi * l_m) / (F ^ 2.0));
	else
		tmp = pi * l_m;
	end
	tmp_2 = l_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

l_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * If[LessEqual[l$95$m, 1.2e-122], (-N[(N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision] / N[Power[F, 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if l < 1.19999999999999994e-122

   1. Initial program 75.6%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 75.7%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. *-lft-identity 75.7%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. Simplified 75.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in l around 0 71.2%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi}}{F \cdot F} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in F around 0 29.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{\ell \cdot \pi}{{F}^{2}}} \]

   if 1.19999999999999994e-122 < l

   1. Initial program 74.4%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 74.4%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. *-lft-identity 74.4%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. Simplified 74.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in l around 0 63.0%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi}}{F \cdot F} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in F around inf 87.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 52.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\ell \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{-122}:\\ \;\;\;\;-\frac{\pi \cdot \ell}{{F}^{2}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 74.1% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l_s \cdot \left(\pi \cdot l_m\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

l_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l_s = (copysign.f64 1 l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m) :precision binary64 (* l_s (* PI l_m)))

C

l_m = fabs(l);
l_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	return l_s * (((double) M_PI) * l_m);
}

Java

l_m = Math.abs(l);
l_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	return l_s * (Math.PI * l_m);
}

Python

l_m = math.fabs(l)
l_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	return l_s * (math.pi * l_m)

Julia

l_m = abs(l)
l_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	return Float64(l_s * Float64(pi * l_m))
end

MATLAB

l_m = abs(l);
l_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = l_s * (pi * l_m);
end

Wolfram

l_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 75.2%

   \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l/ 75.2%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

   2. *-lft-identity 75.2%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

3. Simplified 75.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in l around 0 67.9%

   \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi}}{F \cdot F} \]

5. Taylor expanded in F around inf 74.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi} \]

6. Final simplification 74.3%

   \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023326 
(FPCore (F l)
  :name "VandenBroeck and Keller, Equation (6)"
  :precision binary64
  (- (* PI l) (* (/ 1.0 (* F F)) (tan (* PI l)))))