b parameter of renormalized beta distribution

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 5.4s

Alternatives: 9

Speedup: 1.0×

• 41.2% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

\[\left(0 < m \land 0 < v\right) \land v < 0.25\]

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) (- 1.0 m)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) - 1.0d0) * (1.0d0 - m)
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * Float64(1.0 - m))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) (- 1.0 m)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) - 1.0d0) * (1.0d0 - m)
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * Float64(1.0 - m))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + -1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- 1.0 m) (+ (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) -1.0)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 - m) * (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) + -1.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (1.0d0 - m) * (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) + (-1.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 - m) * (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) + -1.0);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (1.0 - m) * (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) + -1.0)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) + -1.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (1.0 - m) * (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) + -1.0);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

2. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + -1\right) \]

Alternative 2: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{-15}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m \cdot \left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right)\right)}{v}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 1.3e-15)
   (* (- 1.0 m) (+ (/ m v) -1.0))
   (/ (* m (* (- 1.0 m) (- 1.0 m))) v)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.3e-15) {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m / v) + -1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = (m * ((1.0 - m) * (1.0 - m))) / v;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.3d-15) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 - m) * ((m / v) + (-1.0d0))
    else
        tmp = (m * ((1.0d0 - m) * (1.0d0 - m))) / v
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.3e-15) {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m / v) + -1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = (m * ((1.0 - m) * (1.0 - m))) / v;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.3e-15:
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m / v) + -1.0)
	else:
		tmp = (m * ((1.0 - m) * (1.0 - m))) / v
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.3e-15)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(Float64(m / v) + -1.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(m * Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(1.0 - m))) / v);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.3e-15)
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m / v) + -1.0);
	else
		tmp = (m * ((1.0 - m) * (1.0 - m))) / v;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.3e-15], N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(m * N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1.30000000000000002e-15

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} + -1\right) \]

   if 1.30000000000000002e-15 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in v around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot {\left(1 - m\right)}^{2}}{v}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right)\right)}}{v} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right)\right)}}{v} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{-15}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m \cdot \left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right)\right)}{v}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v} + -1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- 1.0 m) (+ (* (- 1.0 m) (/ m v)) -1.0)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 - m) * (((1.0 - m) * (m / v)) + -1.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (1.0d0 - m) * (((1.0d0 - m) * (m / v)) + (-1.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 - m) * (((1.0 - m) * (m / v)) + -1.0);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (1.0 - m) * (((1.0 - m) * (m / v)) + -1.0)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(m / v)) + -1.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (1.0 - m) * (((1.0 - m) * (m / v)) + -1.0);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v} + -1\right) \]

Alternative 4: 98.4% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.6:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 1.6) (* (- 1.0 m) (+ (/ m v) -1.0)) (* (/ m v) (* m (+ m -2.0)))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.6) {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m / v) + -1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = (m / v) * (m * (m + -2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.6d0) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 - m) * ((m / v) + (-1.0d0))
    else
        tmp = (m / v) * (m * (m + (-2.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.6) {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m / v) + -1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = (m / v) * (m * (m + -2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.6:
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m / v) + -1.0)
	else:
		tmp = (m / v) * (m * (m + -2.0))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.6)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(Float64(m / v) + -1.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(m / v) * Float64(m * Float64(m + -2.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.6)
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m / v) + -1.0);
	else
		tmp = (m / v) * (m * (m + -2.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.6], N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision] * N[(m * N[(m + -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1.6000000000000001

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} + -1\right) \]

   if 1.6000000000000001 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in v around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot {\left(1 - m\right)}^{2}}{v}} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in m around inf 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot m + {m}^{2}\right)}}{v} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m \cdot \color{blue}{\left({m}^{2} + -2 \cdot m\right)}}{v} \]

      2. unpow2 99.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot m} + -2 \cdot m\right)}{v} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-out 99.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)\right)}}{v} \]

   7. Simplified 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)\right)}}{v} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 99.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)}}} \]

      2. associate-/r/ 99.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)\right)} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.6:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 98.4% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.6:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)\right)}{v}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 1.6) (* (- 1.0 m) (+ (/ m v) -1.0)) (/ (* m (* m (+ m -2.0))) v)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.6) {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m / v) + -1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = (m * (m * (m + -2.0))) / v;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.6d0) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 - m) * ((m / v) + (-1.0d0))
    else
        tmp = (m * (m * (m + (-2.0d0)))) / v
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.6) {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m / v) + -1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = (m * (m * (m + -2.0))) / v;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.6:
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m / v) + -1.0)
	else:
		tmp = (m * (m * (m + -2.0))) / v
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.6)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(Float64(m / v) + -1.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(m * Float64(m * Float64(m + -2.0))) / v);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.6)
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m / v) + -1.0);
	else
		tmp = (m * (m * (m + -2.0))) / v;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.6], N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(m * N[(m * N[(m + -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1.6000000000000001

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} + -1\right) \]

   if 1.6000000000000001 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in v around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot {\left(1 - m\right)}^{2}}{v}} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in m around inf 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot m + {m}^{2}\right)}}{v} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m \cdot \color{blue}{\left({m}^{2} + -2 \cdot m\right)}}{v} \]

      2. unpow2 99.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot m} + -2 \cdot m\right)}{v} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-out 99.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)\right)}}{v} \]

   7. Simplified 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)\right)}}{v} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.6:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \left(m + -2\right)\right)}{v}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 60.5% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 10^{-219}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;m \leq 1.95 \cdot 10^{-197} \lor \neg \left(m \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{-130}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{v}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 1e-219)
   -1.0
   (if (or (<= m 1.95e-197) (not (<= m 1.2e-130))) (/ m v) -1.0)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1e-219) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else if ((m <= 1.95e-197) || !(m <= 1.2e-130)) {
		tmp = m / v;
	} else {
		tmp = -1.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1d-219) then
        tmp = -1.0d0
    else if ((m <= 1.95d-197) .or. (.not. (m <= 1.2d-130))) then
        tmp = m / v
    else
        tmp = -1.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1e-219) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else if ((m <= 1.95e-197) || !(m <= 1.2e-130)) {
		tmp = m / v;
	} else {
		tmp = -1.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1e-219:
		tmp = -1.0
	elif (m <= 1.95e-197) or not (m <= 1.2e-130):
		tmp = m / v
	else:
		tmp = -1.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1e-219)
		tmp = -1.0;
	elseif ((m <= 1.95e-197) || !(m <= 1.2e-130))
		tmp = Float64(m / v);
	else
		tmp = -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1e-219)
		tmp = -1.0;
	elseif ((m <= 1.95e-197) || ~((m <= 1.2e-130)))
		tmp = m / v;
	else
		tmp = -1.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1e-219], -1.0, If[Or[LessEqual[m, 1.95e-197], N[Not[LessEqual[m, 1.2e-130]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision], -1.0]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1e-219 or 1.95e-197 < m < 1.19999999999999998e-130

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 83.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

   if 1e-219 < m < 1.95e-197 or 1.19999999999999998e-130 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in v around 0 91.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot {\left(1 - m\right)}^{2}}{v}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 91.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right)\right)}}{v} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 91.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right)\right)}}{v} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in m around 0 56.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 61.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 10^{-219}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;m \leq 1.95 \cdot 10^{-197} \lor \neg \left(m \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{-130}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{v}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 75.2% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -1 + \left(m + \frac{m}{v}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (+ -1.0 (+ m (/ m v))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return -1.0 + (m + (m / v));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (-1.0d0) + (m + (m / v))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return -1.0 + (m + (m / v));
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return -1.0 + (m + (m / v))

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m + Float64(m / v)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = -1.0 + (m + (m / v));
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(-1.0 + N[(m + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 71.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) - 1} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 71.2%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{v} + 1\right)} - 1 \]

   2. distribute-lft-in 71.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot \frac{1}{v} + m \cdot 1\right)} - 1 \]

   3. div-inv 71.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} + m \cdot 1\right) - 1 \]

   4. *-rgt-identity 71.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} + \color{blue}{m}\right) - 1 \]

6. Applied egg-rr 71.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} + m\right)} - 1 \]

7. Final simplification 71.3%

   \[\leadsto -1 + \left(m + \frac{m}{v}\right) \]

Alternative 8: 27.3% accurate, 4.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ m + -1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (+ m -1.0))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return m + -1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = m + (-1.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return m + -1.0;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return m + -1.0

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(m + -1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = m + -1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(m + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in v around inf 25.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 25.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\left(1 - m\right)} \]

   2. neg-sub0 25.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 - \left(1 - m\right)} \]

   3. associate--r- 25.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0 - 1\right) + m} \]

   4. metadata-eval 25.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} + m \]

6. Simplified 25.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + m} \]

7. Final simplification 25.5%

   \[\leadsto m + -1 \]

Alternative 9: 24.8% accurate, 13.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 -1.0)

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return -1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = -1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return -1.0;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return -1.0

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return -1.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = -1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := -1.0

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 22.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

5. Final simplification 22.9%

   \[\leadsto -1 \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023325 
(FPCore (m v)
  :name "b parameter of renormalized beta distribution"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (and (and (< 0.0 m) (< 0.0 v)) (< v 0.25))
  (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) (- 1.0 m)))