Given's Rotation SVD example

Percentage Accurate: 79.3% → 99.7%
Time: 5.5s
Alternatives: 5
Speedup: 0.7×

Specification

?
\[10^{-150} < \left|x\right| \land \left|x\right| < 10^{+150}\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \sqrt{0.5 \cdot \left(1 + \frac{x}{\sqrt{\left(4 \cdot p\right) \cdot p + x \cdot x}}\right)} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (p x)
 :precision binary64
 (sqrt (* 0.5 (+ 1.0 (/ x (sqrt (+ (* (* 4.0 p) p) (* x x))))))))
double code(double p, double x) {
	return sqrt((0.5 * (1.0 + (x / sqrt((((4.0 * p) * p) + (x * x)))))));
}
real(8) function code(p, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: p
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = sqrt((0.5d0 * (1.0d0 + (x / sqrt((((4.0d0 * p) * p) + (x * x)))))))
end function
public static double code(double p, double x) {
	return Math.sqrt((0.5 * (1.0 + (x / Math.sqrt((((4.0 * p) * p) + (x * x)))))));
}
def code(p, x):
	return math.sqrt((0.5 * (1.0 + (x / math.sqrt((((4.0 * p) * p) + (x * x)))))))
function code(p, x)
	return sqrt(Float64(0.5 * Float64(1.0 + Float64(x / sqrt(Float64(Float64(Float64(4.0 * p) * p) + Float64(x * x)))))))
end
function tmp = code(p, x)
	tmp = sqrt((0.5 * (1.0 + (x / sqrt((((4.0 * p) * p) + (x * x)))))));
end
code[p_, x_] := N[Sqrt[N[(0.5 * N[(1.0 + N[(x / N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[(4.0 * p), $MachinePrecision] * p), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\sqrt{0.5 \cdot \left(1 + \frac{x}{\sqrt{\left(4 \cdot p\right) \cdot p + x \cdot x}}\right)}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 5 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 79.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \sqrt{0.5 \cdot \left(1 + \frac{x}{\sqrt{\left(4 \cdot p\right) \cdot p + x \cdot x}}\right)} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (p x)
 :precision binary64
 (sqrt (* 0.5 (+ 1.0 (/ x (sqrt (+ (* (* 4.0 p) p) (* x x))))))))
double code(double p, double x) {
	return sqrt((0.5 * (1.0 + (x / sqrt((((4.0 * p) * p) + (x * x)))))));
}
real(8) function code(p, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: p
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = sqrt((0.5d0 * (1.0d0 + (x / sqrt((((4.0d0 * p) * p) + (x * x)))))))
end function
public static double code(double p, double x) {
	return Math.sqrt((0.5 * (1.0 + (x / Math.sqrt((((4.0 * p) * p) + (x * x)))))));
}
def code(p, x):
	return math.sqrt((0.5 * (1.0 + (x / math.sqrt((((4.0 * p) * p) + (x * x)))))))
function code(p, x)
	return sqrt(Float64(0.5 * Float64(1.0 + Float64(x / sqrt(Float64(Float64(Float64(4.0 * p) * p) + Float64(x * x)))))))
end
function tmp = code(p, x)
	tmp = sqrt((0.5 * (1.0 + (x / sqrt((((4.0 * p) * p) + (x * x)))))));
end
code[p_, x_] := N[Sqrt[N[(0.5 * N[(1.0 + N[(x / N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[(4.0 * p), $MachinePrecision] * p), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\sqrt{0.5 \cdot \left(1 + \frac{x}{\sqrt{\left(4 \cdot p\right) \cdot p + x \cdot x}}\right)}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 99.7% accurate, 0.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} p_m = \left|p\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x}{\sqrt{p_m \cdot \left(4 \cdot p_m\right) + x \cdot x}} \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{-p_m}{x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sqrt{0.5 + \frac{x \cdot 0.5}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(x, p_m \cdot 2\right)}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
p_m = (fabs.f64 p)
(FPCore (p_m x)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (/ x (sqrt (+ (* p_m (* 4.0 p_m)) (* x x)))) -1.0)
   (/ (- p_m) x)
   (sqrt (+ 0.5 (/ (* x 0.5) (hypot x (* p_m 2.0)))))))
p_m = fabs(p);
double code(double p_m, double x) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x / sqrt(((p_m * (4.0 * p_m)) + (x * x)))) <= -1.0) {
		tmp = -p_m / x;
	} else {
		tmp = sqrt((0.5 + ((x * 0.5) / hypot(x, (p_m * 2.0)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}
p_m = Math.abs(p);
public static double code(double p_m, double x) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x / Math.sqrt(((p_m * (4.0 * p_m)) + (x * x)))) <= -1.0) {
		tmp = -p_m / x;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.sqrt((0.5 + ((x * 0.5) / Math.hypot(x, (p_m * 2.0)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}
p_m = math.fabs(p)
def code(p_m, x):
	tmp = 0
	if (x / math.sqrt(((p_m * (4.0 * p_m)) + (x * x)))) <= -1.0:
		tmp = -p_m / x
	else:
		tmp = math.sqrt((0.5 + ((x * 0.5) / math.hypot(x, (p_m * 2.0)))))
	return tmp
p_m = abs(p)
function code(p_m, x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x / sqrt(Float64(Float64(p_m * Float64(4.0 * p_m)) + Float64(x * x)))) <= -1.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-p_m) / x);
	else
		tmp = sqrt(Float64(0.5 + Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) / hypot(x, Float64(p_m * 2.0)))));
	end
	return tmp
end
p_m = abs(p);
function tmp_2 = code(p_m, x)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x / sqrt(((p_m * (4.0 * p_m)) + (x * x)))) <= -1.0)
		tmp = -p_m / x;
	else
		tmp = sqrt((0.5 + ((x * 0.5) / hypot(x, (p_m * 2.0)))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
p_m = N[Abs[p], $MachinePrecision]
code[p$95$m_, x_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x / N[Sqrt[N[(N[(p$95$m * N[(4.0 * p$95$m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], N[((-p$95$m) / x), $MachinePrecision], N[Sqrt[N[(0.5 + N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] / N[Sqrt[x ^ 2 + N[(p$95$m * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
p_m = \left|p\right|

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;\frac{x}{\sqrt{p_m \cdot \left(4 \cdot p_m\right) + x \cdot x}} \leq -1:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{-p_m}{x}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\sqrt{0.5 + \frac{x \cdot 0.5}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(x, p_m \cdot 2\right)}}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (/.f64 x (sqrt.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 4 p) p) (*.f64 x x)))) < -1

    1. Initial program 15.1%

      \[\sqrt{0.5 \cdot \left(1 + \frac{x}{\sqrt{\left(4 \cdot p\right) \cdot p + x \cdot x}}\right)} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in x around -inf 54.4%

      \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{\frac{{p}^{2}}{{x}^{2}}}} \]
    3. Taylor expanded in p around -inf 42.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{p}{x}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r/42.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot p}{x}} \]
      2. neg-mul-142.9%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{-p}}{x} \]
    5. Simplified42.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-p}{x}} \]

    if -1 < (/.f64 x (sqrt.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 4 p) p) (*.f64 x x))))

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\sqrt{0.5 \cdot \left(1 + \frac{x}{\sqrt{\left(4 \cdot p\right) \cdot p + x \cdot x}}\right)} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative100.0%

        \[\leadsto \sqrt{0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{\sqrt{\left(4 \cdot p\right) \cdot p + x \cdot x}} + 1\right)}} \]
      2. distribute-lft-in100.0%

        \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \frac{x}{\sqrt{\left(4 \cdot p\right) \cdot p + x \cdot x}} + 0.5 \cdot 1}} \]
      3. associate-*r/100.0%

        \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{\frac{0.5 \cdot x}{\sqrt{\left(4 \cdot p\right) \cdot p + x \cdot x}}} + 0.5 \cdot 1} \]
      4. +-commutative100.0%

        \[\leadsto \sqrt{\frac{0.5 \cdot x}{\sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot x + \left(4 \cdot p\right) \cdot p}}} + 0.5 \cdot 1} \]
      5. add-sqr-sqrt100.0%

        \[\leadsto \sqrt{\frac{0.5 \cdot x}{\sqrt{x \cdot x + \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(4 \cdot p\right) \cdot p} \cdot \sqrt{\left(4 \cdot p\right) \cdot p}}}} + 0.5 \cdot 1} \]
      6. hypot-def100.0%

        \[\leadsto \sqrt{\frac{0.5 \cdot x}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(x, \sqrt{\left(4 \cdot p\right) \cdot p}\right)}} + 0.5 \cdot 1} \]
      7. associate-*l*100.0%

        \[\leadsto \sqrt{\frac{0.5 \cdot x}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(x, \sqrt{\color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(p \cdot p\right)}}\right)} + 0.5 \cdot 1} \]
      8. sqrt-prod100.0%

        \[\leadsto \sqrt{\frac{0.5 \cdot x}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(x, \color{blue}{\sqrt{4} \cdot \sqrt{p \cdot p}}\right)} + 0.5 \cdot 1} \]
      9. metadata-eval100.0%

        \[\leadsto \sqrt{\frac{0.5 \cdot x}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(x, \color{blue}{2} \cdot \sqrt{p \cdot p}\right)} + 0.5 \cdot 1} \]
      10. sqrt-unprod48.4%

        \[\leadsto \sqrt{\frac{0.5 \cdot x}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(x, 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{p} \cdot \sqrt{p}\right)}\right)} + 0.5 \cdot 1} \]
      11. add-sqr-sqrt100.0%

        \[\leadsto \sqrt{\frac{0.5 \cdot x}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(x, 2 \cdot \color{blue}{p}\right)} + 0.5 \cdot 1} \]
      12. metadata-eval100.0%

        \[\leadsto \sqrt{\frac{0.5 \cdot x}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(x, 2 \cdot p\right)} + \color{blue}{0.5}} \]
    3. Applied egg-rr100.0%

      \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{\frac{0.5 \cdot x}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(x, 2 \cdot p\right)} + 0.5}} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification85.3%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x}{\sqrt{p \cdot \left(4 \cdot p\right) + x \cdot x}} \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{-p}{x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sqrt{0.5 + \frac{x \cdot 0.5}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(x, p \cdot 2\right)}}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2: 67.4% accurate, 2.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} p_m = \left|p\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{-p_m}{x}\\ \mathbf{if}\;p_m \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{-273}:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;p_m \leq 4.3 \cdot 10^{-200}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;p_m \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{-163}:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;p_m \leq 2.75 \cdot 10^{-90}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sqrt{0.5}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
p_m = (fabs.f64 p)
(FPCore (p_m x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (/ (- p_m) x)))
   (if (<= p_m 2.8e-273)
     1.0
     (if (<= p_m 4.3e-200)
       t_0
       (if (<= p_m 1.9e-163) 1.0 (if (<= p_m 2.75e-90) t_0 (sqrt 0.5)))))))
p_m = fabs(p);
double code(double p_m, double x) {
	double t_0 = -p_m / x;
	double tmp;
	if (p_m <= 2.8e-273) {
		tmp = 1.0;
	} else if (p_m <= 4.3e-200) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (p_m <= 1.9e-163) {
		tmp = 1.0;
	} else if (p_m <= 2.75e-90) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = sqrt(0.5);
	}
	return tmp;
}
p_m = abs(p)
real(8) function code(p_m, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: p_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = -p_m / x
    if (p_m <= 2.8d-273) then
        tmp = 1.0d0
    else if (p_m <= 4.3d-200) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (p_m <= 1.9d-163) then
        tmp = 1.0d0
    else if (p_m <= 2.75d-90) then
        tmp = t_0
    else
        tmp = sqrt(0.5d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
p_m = Math.abs(p);
public static double code(double p_m, double x) {
	double t_0 = -p_m / x;
	double tmp;
	if (p_m <= 2.8e-273) {
		tmp = 1.0;
	} else if (p_m <= 4.3e-200) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (p_m <= 1.9e-163) {
		tmp = 1.0;
	} else if (p_m <= 2.75e-90) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.sqrt(0.5);
	}
	return tmp;
}
p_m = math.fabs(p)
def code(p_m, x):
	t_0 = -p_m / x
	tmp = 0
	if p_m <= 2.8e-273:
		tmp = 1.0
	elif p_m <= 4.3e-200:
		tmp = t_0
	elif p_m <= 1.9e-163:
		tmp = 1.0
	elif p_m <= 2.75e-90:
		tmp = t_0
	else:
		tmp = math.sqrt(0.5)
	return tmp
p_m = abs(p)
function code(p_m, x)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(-p_m) / x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (p_m <= 2.8e-273)
		tmp = 1.0;
	elseif (p_m <= 4.3e-200)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (p_m <= 1.9e-163)
		tmp = 1.0;
	elseif (p_m <= 2.75e-90)
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = sqrt(0.5);
	end
	return tmp
end
p_m = abs(p);
function tmp_2 = code(p_m, x)
	t_0 = -p_m / x;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (p_m <= 2.8e-273)
		tmp = 1.0;
	elseif (p_m <= 4.3e-200)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (p_m <= 1.9e-163)
		tmp = 1.0;
	elseif (p_m <= 2.75e-90)
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = sqrt(0.5);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
p_m = N[Abs[p], $MachinePrecision]
code[p$95$m_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[((-p$95$m) / x), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[p$95$m, 2.8e-273], 1.0, If[LessEqual[p$95$m, 4.3e-200], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[p$95$m, 1.9e-163], 1.0, If[LessEqual[p$95$m, 2.75e-90], t$95$0, N[Sqrt[0.5], $MachinePrecision]]]]]]
\begin{array}{l}
p_m = \left|p\right|

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{-p_m}{x}\\
\mathbf{if}\;p_m \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{-273}:\\
\;\;\;\;1\\

\mathbf{elif}\;p_m \leq 4.3 \cdot 10^{-200}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_0\\

\mathbf{elif}\;p_m \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{-163}:\\
\;\;\;\;1\\

\mathbf{elif}\;p_m \leq 2.75 \cdot 10^{-90}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_0\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\sqrt{0.5}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if p < 2.79999999999999985e-273 or 4.29999999999999975e-200 < p < 1.9e-163

    1. Initial program 74.5%

      \[\sqrt{0.5 \cdot \left(1 + \frac{x}{\sqrt{\left(4 \cdot p\right) \cdot p + x \cdot x}}\right)} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 35.4%

      \[\leadsto \sqrt{0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{2}} \]

    if 2.79999999999999985e-273 < p < 4.29999999999999975e-200 or 1.9e-163 < p < 2.75000000000000015e-90

    1. Initial program 58.5%

      \[\sqrt{0.5 \cdot \left(1 + \frac{x}{\sqrt{\left(4 \cdot p\right) \cdot p + x \cdot x}}\right)} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in x around -inf 23.1%

      \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{\frac{{p}^{2}}{{x}^{2}}}} \]
    3. Taylor expanded in p around -inf 53.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{p}{x}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r/53.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot p}{x}} \]
      2. neg-mul-153.4%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{-p}}{x} \]
    5. Simplified53.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-p}{x}} \]

    if 2.75000000000000015e-90 < p

    1. Initial program 91.4%

      \[\sqrt{0.5 \cdot \left(1 + \frac{x}{\sqrt{\left(4 \cdot p\right) \cdot p + x \cdot x}}\right)} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 84.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{0.5}} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification52.0%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;p \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{-273}:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;p \leq 4.3 \cdot 10^{-200}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{-p}{x}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;p \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{-163}:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;p \leq 2.75 \cdot 10^{-90}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{-p}{x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sqrt{0.5}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 66.8% accurate, 2.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} p_m = \left|p\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;p_m \leq 8 \cdot 10^{-90}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{-p_m}{x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sqrt{0.5}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
p_m = (fabs.f64 p)
(FPCore (p_m x)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= p_m 8e-90) (/ (- p_m) x) (sqrt 0.5)))
p_m = fabs(p);
double code(double p_m, double x) {
	double tmp;
	if (p_m <= 8e-90) {
		tmp = -p_m / x;
	} else {
		tmp = sqrt(0.5);
	}
	return tmp;
}
p_m = abs(p)
real(8) function code(p_m, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: p_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (p_m <= 8d-90) then
        tmp = -p_m / x
    else
        tmp = sqrt(0.5d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
p_m = Math.abs(p);
public static double code(double p_m, double x) {
	double tmp;
	if (p_m <= 8e-90) {
		tmp = -p_m / x;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.sqrt(0.5);
	}
	return tmp;
}
p_m = math.fabs(p)
def code(p_m, x):
	tmp = 0
	if p_m <= 8e-90:
		tmp = -p_m / x
	else:
		tmp = math.sqrt(0.5)
	return tmp
p_m = abs(p)
function code(p_m, x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (p_m <= 8e-90)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-p_m) / x);
	else
		tmp = sqrt(0.5);
	end
	return tmp
end
p_m = abs(p);
function tmp_2 = code(p_m, x)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (p_m <= 8e-90)
		tmp = -p_m / x;
	else
		tmp = sqrt(0.5);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
p_m = N[Abs[p], $MachinePrecision]
code[p$95$m_, x_] := If[LessEqual[p$95$m, 8e-90], N[((-p$95$m) / x), $MachinePrecision], N[Sqrt[0.5], $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
p_m = \left|p\right|

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;p_m \leq 8 \cdot 10^{-90}:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{-p_m}{x}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\sqrt{0.5}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if p < 7.99999999999999996e-90

    1. Initial program 72.3%

      \[\sqrt{0.5 \cdot \left(1 + \frac{x}{\sqrt{\left(4 \cdot p\right) \cdot p + x \cdot x}}\right)} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in x around -inf 19.9%

      \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{\frac{{p}^{2}}{{x}^{2}}}} \]
    3. Taylor expanded in p around -inf 14.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{p}{x}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r/14.5%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot p}{x}} \]
      2. neg-mul-114.5%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{-p}}{x} \]
    5. Simplified14.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-p}{x}} \]

    if 7.99999999999999996e-90 < p

    1. Initial program 91.4%

      \[\sqrt{0.5 \cdot \left(1 + \frac{x}{\sqrt{\left(4 \cdot p\right) \cdot p + x \cdot x}}\right)} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 84.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{0.5}} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification35.7%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;p \leq 8 \cdot 10^{-90}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{-p}{x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sqrt{0.5}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 28.5% accurate, 35.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} p_m = \left|p\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-310}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{-p_m}{x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{p_m}{x}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
p_m = (fabs.f64 p)
(FPCore (p_m x)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -1e-310) (/ (- p_m) x) (/ p_m x)))
p_m = fabs(p);
double code(double p_m, double x) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1e-310) {
		tmp = -p_m / x;
	} else {
		tmp = p_m / x;
	}
	return tmp;
}
p_m = abs(p)
real(8) function code(p_m, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: p_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1d-310)) then
        tmp = -p_m / x
    else
        tmp = p_m / x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
p_m = Math.abs(p);
public static double code(double p_m, double x) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1e-310) {
		tmp = -p_m / x;
	} else {
		tmp = p_m / x;
	}
	return tmp;
}
p_m = math.fabs(p)
def code(p_m, x):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1e-310:
		tmp = -p_m / x
	else:
		tmp = p_m / x
	return tmp
p_m = abs(p)
function code(p_m, x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1e-310)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-p_m) / x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(p_m / x);
	end
	return tmp
end
p_m = abs(p);
function tmp_2 = code(p_m, x)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1e-310)
		tmp = -p_m / x;
	else
		tmp = p_m / x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
p_m = N[Abs[p], $MachinePrecision]
code[p$95$m_, x_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1e-310], N[((-p$95$m) / x), $MachinePrecision], N[(p$95$m / x), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
p_m = \left|p\right|

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-310}:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{-p_m}{x}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{p_m}{x}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if x < -9.999999999999969e-311

    1. Initial program 57.5%

      \[\sqrt{0.5 \cdot \left(1 + \frac{x}{\sqrt{\left(4 \cdot p\right) \cdot p + x \cdot x}}\right)} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in x around -inf 29.4%

      \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{\frac{{p}^{2}}{{x}^{2}}}} \]
    3. Taylor expanded in p around -inf 22.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{p}{x}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r/22.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot p}{x}} \]
      2. neg-mul-122.9%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{-p}}{x} \]
    5. Simplified22.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-p}{x}} \]

    if -9.999999999999969e-311 < x

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\sqrt{0.5 \cdot \left(1 + \frac{x}{\sqrt{\left(4 \cdot p\right) \cdot p + x \cdot x}}\right)} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in x around -inf 4.8%

      \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{\frac{{p}^{2}}{{x}^{2}}}} \]
    3. Taylor expanded in p around 0 3.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{p}{x}} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification13.5%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-310}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{-p}{x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{p}{x}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 6.3% accurate, 71.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} p_m = \left|p\right| \\ \frac{p_m}{x} \end{array} \]
p_m = (fabs.f64 p)
(FPCore (p_m x) :precision binary64 (/ p_m x))
p_m = fabs(p);
double code(double p_m, double x) {
	return p_m / x;
}
p_m = abs(p)
real(8) function code(p_m, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: p_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = p_m / x
end function
p_m = Math.abs(p);
public static double code(double p_m, double x) {
	return p_m / x;
}
p_m = math.fabs(p)
def code(p_m, x):
	return p_m / x
p_m = abs(p)
function code(p_m, x)
	return Float64(p_m / x)
end
p_m = abs(p);
function tmp = code(p_m, x)
	tmp = p_m / x;
end
p_m = N[Abs[p], $MachinePrecision]
code[p$95$m_, x_] := N[(p$95$m / x), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}
p_m = \left|p\right|

\\
\frac{p_m}{x}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 78.1%

    \[\sqrt{0.5 \cdot \left(1 + \frac{x}{\sqrt{\left(4 \cdot p\right) \cdot p + x \cdot x}}\right)} \]
  2. Taylor expanded in x around -inf 17.5%

    \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{\frac{{p}^{2}}{{x}^{2}}}} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in p around 0 20.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{p}{x}} \]
  4. Final simplification20.7%

    \[\leadsto \frac{p}{x} \]

Developer target: 79.3% accurate, 0.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \sqrt{0.5 + \frac{\mathsf{copysign}\left(0.5, x\right)}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, \frac{2 \cdot p}{x}\right)}} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (p x)
 :precision binary64
 (sqrt (+ 0.5 (/ (copysign 0.5 x) (hypot 1.0 (/ (* 2.0 p) x))))))
double code(double p, double x) {
	return sqrt((0.5 + (copysign(0.5, x) / hypot(1.0, ((2.0 * p) / x)))));
}
public static double code(double p, double x) {
	return Math.sqrt((0.5 + (Math.copySign(0.5, x) / Math.hypot(1.0, ((2.0 * p) / x)))));
}
def code(p, x):
	return math.sqrt((0.5 + (math.copysign(0.5, x) / math.hypot(1.0, ((2.0 * p) / x)))))
function code(p, x)
	return sqrt(Float64(0.5 + Float64(copysign(0.5, x) / hypot(1.0, Float64(Float64(2.0 * p) / x)))))
end
function tmp = code(p, x)
	tmp = sqrt((0.5 + ((sign(x) * abs(0.5)) / hypot(1.0, ((2.0 * p) / x)))));
end
code[p_, x_] := N[Sqrt[N[(0.5 + N[(N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[0.5], TMP2 = Sign[x]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision] / N[Sqrt[1.0 ^ 2 + N[(N[(2.0 * p), $MachinePrecision] / x), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\sqrt{0.5 + \frac{\mathsf{copysign}\left(0.5, x\right)}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, \frac{2 \cdot p}{x}\right)}}
\end{array}

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2023322 
(FPCore (p x)
  :name "Given's Rotation SVD example"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (and (< 1e-150 (fabs x)) (< (fabs x) 1e+150))

  :herbie-target
  (sqrt (+ 0.5 (/ (copysign 0.5 x) (hypot 1.0 (/ (* 2.0 p) x)))))

  (sqrt (* 0.5 (+ 1.0 (/ x (sqrt (+ (* (* 4.0 p) p) (* x x))))))))