Equirectangular approximation to distance on a great circle

Percentage Accurate: 60.8% → 99.9%

Time: 23.1s

Alternatives: 15

Speedup: 3.0×

• 30.8% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\\ R \cdot \sqrt{t_0 \cdot t_0 + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))))
   (* R (sqrt (+ (* t_0 t_0) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2)))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0d0))
    code = r * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * Math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))
	return R * math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi1 + phi2) / 2.0)))
	return Float64(R * sqrt(Float64(Float64(t_0 * t_0) + Float64(Float64(phi1 - phi2) * Float64(phi1 - phi2)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	tmp = R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi1 + phi2), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Initial Program: 60.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\\ R \cdot \sqrt{t_0 \cdot t_0 + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))))
   (* R (sqrt (+ (* t_0 t_0) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2)))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0d0))
    code = r * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * Math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))
	return R * math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi1 + phi2) / 2.0)))
	return Float64(R * sqrt(Float64(Float64(t_0 * t_0) + Float64(Float64(phi1 - phi2) * Float64(phi1 - phi2)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	tmp = R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi1 + phi2), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(-\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  R
  (hypot
   (*
    (- lambda1 lambda2)
    (fma
     (cos (* phi1 0.5))
     (cos (* 0.5 phi2))
     (* (sin (* phi1 0.5)) (- (sin (* 0.5 phi2))))))
   (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * fma(cos((phi1 * 0.5)), cos((0.5 * phi2)), (sin((phi1 * 0.5)) * -sin((0.5 * phi2))))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * fma(cos(Float64(phi1 * 0.5)), cos(Float64(0.5 * phi2)), Float64(sin(Float64(phi1 * 0.5)) * Float64(-sin(Float64(0.5 * phi2)))))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Cos[N[(phi1 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Sin[N[(phi1 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * (-N[Sin[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision])), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 55.6%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-def 94.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 94.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-log-exp 94.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. div-inv 94.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. metadata-eval 94.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

5. Applied egg-rr 94.8%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 94.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. distribute-lft-in 94.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1 + 0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. cos-sum 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   4. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)} - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

7. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\color{blue}{\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

   1. rem-log-exp 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) + \left(-\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) + \left(-\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   4. fma-def 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \left(-\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)}, \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \left(-\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \left(-\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \left(-\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \sin \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

9. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \left(-\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

10. Final simplification 99.9%

    \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(-\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

Alternative 2: 87.3% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\\ t_1 := \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_2 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-285}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 \cdot \left(t_1 - t_0\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\lambda_2 \leq 2.95 \cdot 10^{+119}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_2 \cdot \left(t_0 - t_1\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (sin (* phi1 0.5)) (sin (* 0.5 phi2))))
        (t_1 (* (cos (* 0.5 phi2)) (cos (* phi1 0.5)))))
   (if (<= lambda2 5e-285)
     (* R (hypot (* lambda1 (- t_1 t_0)) (- phi1 phi2)))
     (if (<= lambda2 2.95e+119)
       (*
        R
        (hypot
         (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))
         (- phi1 phi2)))
       (* R (hypot (* lambda2 (- t_0 t_1)) (- phi1 phi2)))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = sin((phi1 * 0.5)) * sin((0.5 * phi2));
	double t_1 = cos((0.5 * phi2)) * cos((phi1 * 0.5));
	double tmp;
	if (lambda2 <= 5e-285) {
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 * (t_1 - t_0)), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else if (lambda2 <= 2.95e+119) {
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda2 * (t_0 - t_1)), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = Math.sin((phi1 * 0.5)) * Math.sin((0.5 * phi2));
	double t_1 = Math.cos((0.5 * phi2)) * Math.cos((phi1 * 0.5));
	double tmp;
	if (lambda2 <= 5e-285) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((lambda1 * (t_1 - t_0)), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else if (lambda2 <= 2.95e+119) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((lambda2 * (t_0 - t_1)), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	t_0 = math.sin((phi1 * 0.5)) * math.sin((0.5 * phi2))
	t_1 = math.cos((0.5 * phi2)) * math.cos((phi1 * 0.5))
	tmp = 0
	if lambda2 <= 5e-285:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((lambda1 * (t_1 - t_0)), (phi1 - phi2))
	elif lambda2 <= 2.95e+119:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((lambda2 * (t_0 - t_1)), (phi1 - phi2))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = Float64(sin(Float64(phi1 * 0.5)) * sin(Float64(0.5 * phi2)))
	t_1 = Float64(cos(Float64(0.5 * phi2)) * cos(Float64(phi1 * 0.5)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (lambda2 <= 5e-285)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(lambda1 * Float64(t_1 - t_0)), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	elseif (lambda2 <= 2.95e+119)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(lambda2 * Float64(t_0 - t_1)), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = sin((phi1 * 0.5)) * sin((0.5 * phi2));
	t_1 = cos((0.5 * phi2)) * cos((phi1 * 0.5));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (lambda2 <= 5e-285)
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 * (t_1 - t_0)), (phi1 - phi2));
	elseif (lambda2 <= 2.95e+119)
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda2 * (t_0 - t_1)), (phi1 - phi2));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[Sin[N[(phi1 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(phi1 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[lambda2, 5e-285], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(lambda1 * N[(t$95$1 - t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[lambda2, 2.95e+119], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi1 + phi2), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(lambda2 * N[(t$95$0 - t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if lambda2 < 5.00000000000000018e-285

   1. Initial program 53.2%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 93.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 93.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-log-exp 93.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      2. div-inv 93.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 93.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 93.2%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 93.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      2. distribute-lft-in 93.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1 + 0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      3. cos-sum 99.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)} - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\color{blue}{\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around inf 76.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 76.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_1}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 76.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)} - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_1, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 76.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) - \color{blue}{\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}\right) \cdot \lambda_1, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   10. Simplified 76.6%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_1}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   if 5.00000000000000018e-285 < lambda2 < 2.95e119

   1. Initial program 62.3%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 99.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   if 2.95e119 < lambda2

   1. Initial program 45.3%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 89.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 89.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-log-exp 89.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      2. div-inv 89.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 89.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 89.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 89.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      2. distribute-lft-in 89.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1 + 0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      3. cos-sum 99.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)} - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 99.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\color{blue}{\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around 0 84.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 84.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{-\lambda_2 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 84.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(-\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 84.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 84.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)} - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 84.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) - \color{blue}{\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   10. Simplified 84.8%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_2 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-285}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\lambda_2 \leq 2.95 \cdot 10^{+119}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_2 \cdot \left(\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 87.6% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_2 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-285}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= lambda2 5e-285)
   (*
    R
    (hypot
     (*
      lambda1
      (-
       (* (cos (* 0.5 phi2)) (cos (* phi1 0.5)))
       (* (sin (* phi1 0.5)) (sin (* 0.5 phi2)))))
     (- phi1 phi2)))
   (*
    R
    (hypot
     (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))
     (- phi1 phi2)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda2 <= 5e-285) {
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 * ((cos((0.5 * phi2)) * cos((phi1 * 0.5))) - (sin((phi1 * 0.5)) * sin((0.5 * phi2))))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda2 <= 5e-285) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((lambda1 * ((Math.cos((0.5 * phi2)) * Math.cos((phi1 * 0.5))) - (Math.sin((phi1 * 0.5)) * Math.sin((0.5 * phi2))))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if lambda2 <= 5e-285:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((lambda1 * ((math.cos((0.5 * phi2)) * math.cos((phi1 * 0.5))) - (math.sin((phi1 * 0.5)) * math.sin((0.5 * phi2))))), (phi1 - phi2))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (lambda2 <= 5e-285)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(lambda1 * Float64(Float64(cos(Float64(0.5 * phi2)) * cos(Float64(phi1 * 0.5))) - Float64(sin(Float64(phi1 * 0.5)) * sin(Float64(0.5 * phi2))))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (lambda2 <= 5e-285)
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 * ((cos((0.5 * phi2)) * cos((phi1 * 0.5))) - (sin((phi1 * 0.5)) * sin((0.5 * phi2))))), (phi1 - phi2));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[lambda2, 5e-285], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(lambda1 * N[(N[(N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(phi1 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[Sin[N[(phi1 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi1 + phi2), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if lambda2 < 5.00000000000000018e-285

   1. Initial program 53.2%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 93.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 93.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-log-exp 93.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      2. div-inv 93.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 93.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 93.2%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 93.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      2. distribute-lft-in 93.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1 + 0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      3. cos-sum 99.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)} - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\color{blue}{\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around inf 76.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 76.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_1}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 76.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)} - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_1, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 76.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) - \color{blue}{\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}\right) \cdot \lambda_1, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   10. Simplified 76.6%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_1}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   if 5.00000000000000018e-285 < lambda2

   1. Initial program 57.9%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 96.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_2 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-285}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 93.3% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -1.12 \cdot 10^{-6}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi1 -1.12e-6)
   (* R (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (* phi1 0.5))) (- phi1 phi2)))
   (* R (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (* 0.5 phi2))) (- phi1 phi2)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -1.12e-6) {
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((phi1 * 0.5))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi2))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -1.12e-6) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((phi1 * 0.5))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((0.5 * phi2))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi1 <= -1.12e-6:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((phi1 * 0.5))), (phi1 - phi2))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((0.5 * phi2))), (phi1 - phi2))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi1 <= -1.12e-6)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(phi1 * 0.5))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi2))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi1 <= -1.12e-6)
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((phi1 * 0.5))), (phi1 - phi2));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi2))), (phi1 - phi2));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi1, -1.12e-6], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(phi1 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi1 < -1.12000000000000008e-6

   1. Initial program 45.4%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 88.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 88.3%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   if -1.12000000000000008e-6 < phi1

   1. Initial program 59.2%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 97.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 92.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -1.12 \cdot 10^{-6}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 95.8% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  R
  (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0))) (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi1 + phi2), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 55.6%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-def 94.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 94.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 94.9%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

Alternative 6: 79.3% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_1 \leq -5.6 \cdot 10^{+87}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 \cdot t_0, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(t_0 \cdot \left(-\lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (cos (* phi1 0.5))))
   (if (<= lambda1 -5.6e+87)
     (* R (hypot (* lambda1 t_0) (- phi1 phi2)))
     (* R (hypot (* t_0 (- lambda2)) (- phi1 phi2))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = cos((phi1 * 0.5));
	double tmp;
	if (lambda1 <= -5.6e+87) {
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 * t_0), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot((t_0 * -lambda2), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = Math.cos((phi1 * 0.5));
	double tmp;
	if (lambda1 <= -5.6e+87) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((lambda1 * t_0), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((t_0 * -lambda2), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	t_0 = math.cos((phi1 * 0.5))
	tmp = 0
	if lambda1 <= -5.6e+87:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((lambda1 * t_0), (phi1 - phi2))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((t_0 * -lambda2), (phi1 - phi2))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = cos(Float64(phi1 * 0.5))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (lambda1 <= -5.6e+87)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(lambda1 * t_0), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(t_0 * Float64(-lambda2)), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = cos((phi1 * 0.5));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (lambda1 <= -5.6e+87)
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 * t_0), (phi1 - phi2));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot((t_0 * -lambda2), (phi1 - phi2));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[Cos[N[(phi1 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[lambda1, -5.6e+87], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(lambda1 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(t$95$0 * (-lambda2)), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if lambda1 < -5.6000000000000003e87

   1. Initial program 56.2%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 91.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 91.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 86.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around inf 79.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 79.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \lambda_1}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. Simplified 79.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \lambda_1}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   if -5.6000000000000003e87 < lambda1

   1. Initial program 55.4%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 95.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 89.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around 0 77.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 77.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{-\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 77.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(-\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \lambda_2}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 77.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. Simplified 77.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 77.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_1 \leq -5.6 \cdot 10^{+87}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 85.1% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_1 \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{+101}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= lambda1 -1.8e+101)
   (* R (hypot (* lambda1 (cos (* phi1 0.5))) (- phi1 phi2)))
   (* R (hypot (- lambda1 lambda2) (- phi1 phi2)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda1 <= -1.8e+101) {
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 * cos((phi1 * 0.5))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda1 <= -1.8e+101) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((lambda1 * Math.cos((phi1 * 0.5))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if lambda1 <= -1.8e+101:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((lambda1 * math.cos((phi1 * 0.5))), (phi1 - phi2))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), (phi1 - phi2))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (lambda1 <= -1.8e+101)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(lambda1 * cos(Float64(phi1 * 0.5))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (lambda1 <= -1.8e+101)
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 * cos((phi1 * 0.5))), (phi1 - phi2));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), (phi1 - phi2));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[lambda1, -1.8e+101], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(lambda1 * N[Cos[N[(phi1 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if lambda1 < -1.80000000000000015e101

   1. Initial program 53.2%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 90.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 90.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 84.3%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around inf 79.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 79.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \lambda_1}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. Simplified 79.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \lambda_1}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   if -1.80000000000000015e101 < lambda1

   1. Initial program 56.0%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 95.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 95.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 90.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 84.2%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\lambda_1 - \lambda_2}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 83.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_1 \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{+101}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 89.8% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (* R (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (* phi1 0.5))) (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((phi1 * 0.5))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((phi1 * 0.5))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((phi1 * 0.5))), (phi1 - phi2))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(phi1 * 0.5))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((phi1 * 0.5))), (phi1 - phi2));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(phi1 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 55.6%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-def 94.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 94.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 89.1%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

5. Final simplification 89.1%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

Alternative 9: 69.6% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 0.031:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 0.031)
   (* R (hypot phi1 (- lambda1 lambda2)))
   (* R (- phi2 phi1))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 0.031) {
		tmp = R * hypot(phi1, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 0.031) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(phi1, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 0.031:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(phi1, (lambda1 - lambda2))
	else:
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 0.031)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(phi1, Float64(lambda1 - lambda2)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(phi2 - phi1));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 0.031)
		tmp = R * hypot(phi1, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	else
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 0.031], N[(R * N[Sqrt[phi1 ^ 2 + N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[(phi2 - phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 0.031

   1. Initial program 57.1%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-udef 96.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

      2. expm1-log1p-u 90.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\right)\right)} \]

      3. div-inv 90.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 90.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\right)\right) \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 90.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 82.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\right)\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 47.3%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{{\phi_1}^{2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 47.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      2. unpow2 47.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}} \]

      3. hypot-def 73.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 73.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   if 0.031 < phi2

   1. Initial program 50.8%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 53.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + -1 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 53.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 53.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 53.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 68.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 0.031:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 10: 84.6% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (* R (hypot (- lambda1 lambda2) (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * Math.hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * math.hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), (phi1 - phi2))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), (phi1 - phi2));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 55.6%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-def 94.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 94.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 89.1%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

5. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 82.4%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\lambda_1 - \lambda_2}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

6. Final simplification 82.4%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

Alternative 11: 56.9% accurate, 3.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -2.15 \cdot 10^{+40}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi1 -2.15e+40) (* R (- phi2 phi1)) (* R (hypot phi2 lambda1))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -2.15e+40) {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot(phi2, lambda1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -2.15e+40) {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(phi2, lambda1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi1 <= -2.15e+40:
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1)
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(phi2, lambda1)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi1 <= -2.15e+40)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(phi2 - phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(phi2, lambda1));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi1 <= -2.15e+40)
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	else
		tmp = R * hypot(phi2, lambda1);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi1, -2.15e+40], N[(R * N[(phi2 - phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[phi2 ^ 2 + lambda1 ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi1 < -2.1500000000000001e40

   1. Initial program 42.1%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 69.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + -1 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 69.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 69.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 69.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   if -2.1500000000000001e40 < phi1

   1. Initial program 59.2%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 96.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 89.1%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around inf 69.3%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 69.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \lambda_1}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. Simplified 69.3%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \lambda_1}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 36.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\lambda_1}^{2} + {\phi_2}^{2}}} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 36.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{{\phi_2}^{2} + {\lambda_1}^{2}}} \]

      2. unpow2 36.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2} + {\lambda_1}^{2}} \]

      3. unpow2 36.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot \lambda_1}} \]

      4. hypot-def 48.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1\right)} \]

   10. Simplified 48.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 53.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -2.15 \cdot 10^{+40}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 12: 28.4% accurate, 40.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{-130}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\phi_2 \leq 0.00028:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\lambda_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 7.5e-130)
   (* R (- phi1))
   (if (<= phi2 0.00028) (* R (- lambda1)) (* R phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 7.5e-130) {
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	} else if (phi2 <= 0.00028) {
		tmp = R * -lambda1;
	} else {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (phi2 <= 7.5d-130) then
        tmp = r * -phi1
    else if (phi2 <= 0.00028d0) then
        tmp = r * -lambda1
    else
        tmp = r * phi2
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 7.5e-130) {
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	} else if (phi2 <= 0.00028) {
		tmp = R * -lambda1;
	} else {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 7.5e-130:
		tmp = R * -phi1
	elif phi2 <= 0.00028:
		tmp = R * -lambda1
	else:
		tmp = R * phi2
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 7.5e-130)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(-phi1));
	elseif (phi2 <= 0.00028)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(-lambda1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * phi2);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 7.5e-130)
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	elseif (phi2 <= 0.00028)
		tmp = R * -lambda1;
	else
		tmp = R * phi2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 7.5e-130], N[(R * (-phi1)), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[phi2, 0.00028], N[(R * (-lambda1)), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if phi2 < 7.4999999999999994e-130

   1. Initial program 58.5%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 95.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 95.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 15.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 15.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-R \cdot \phi_1} \]

      2. *-commutative 15.8%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot R} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 15.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 15.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)} \]

   if 7.4999999999999994e-130 < phi2 < 2.7999999999999998e-4

   1. Initial program 50.1%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 99.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 99.3%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around -inf 8.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \left(\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 8.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-R \cdot \left(\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r* 8.9%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(R \cdot \lambda_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 8.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(R \cdot \lambda_1\right) \cdot \left(-\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 8.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(R \cdot \lambda_1\right) \cdot \left(-\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 11.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \lambda_1\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 11.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-R \cdot \lambda_1} \]

      2. *-commutative 11.0%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot R} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 11.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)} \]

   10. Simplified 11.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)} \]

   if 2.7999999999999998e-4 < phi2

   1. Initial program 50.8%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 91.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 91.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 50.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 50.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]

   6. Simplified 50.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 23.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{-130}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\phi_2 \leq 0.00028:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\lambda_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 13: 34.3% accurate, 46.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_1 \leq -4.5 \cdot 10^{+151}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\lambda_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= lambda1 -4.5e+151) (* R (- lambda1)) (* R (- phi2 phi1))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda1 <= -4.5e+151) {
		tmp = R * -lambda1;
	} else {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (lambda1 <= (-4.5d+151)) then
        tmp = r * -lambda1
    else
        tmp = r * (phi2 - phi1)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda1 <= -4.5e+151) {
		tmp = R * -lambda1;
	} else {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if lambda1 <= -4.5e+151:
		tmp = R * -lambda1
	else:
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (lambda1 <= -4.5e+151)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(-lambda1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(phi2 - phi1));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (lambda1 <= -4.5e+151)
		tmp = R * -lambda1;
	else
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[lambda1, -4.5e+151], N[(R * (-lambda1)), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[(phi2 - phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if lambda1 < -4.4999999999999999e151

   1. Initial program 45.4%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 86.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 86.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 81.1%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around -inf 54.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \left(\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 54.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-R \cdot \left(\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r* 54.4%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(R \cdot \lambda_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 54.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(R \cdot \lambda_1\right) \cdot \left(-\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 54.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(R \cdot \lambda_1\right) \cdot \left(-\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 58.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \lambda_1\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 58.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-R \cdot \lambda_1} \]

      2. *-commutative 58.4%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot R} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 58.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)} \]

   10. Simplified 58.4%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)} \]

   if -4.4999999999999999e151 < lambda1

   1. Initial program 56.8%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 26.1%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + -1 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 26.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 26.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 26.1%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 29.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_1 \leq -4.5 \cdot 10^{+151}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\lambda_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 14: 26.0% accurate, 54.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 0.028:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\lambda_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 0.028) (* R (- lambda1)) (* R phi2)))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 0.028) {
		tmp = R * -lambda1;
	} else {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (phi2 <= 0.028d0) then
        tmp = r * -lambda1
    else
        tmp = r * phi2
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 0.028) {
		tmp = R * -lambda1;
	} else {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 0.028:
		tmp = R * -lambda1
	else:
		tmp = R * phi2
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 0.028)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(-lambda1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * phi2);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 0.028)
		tmp = R * -lambda1;
	else
		tmp = R * phi2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 0.028], N[(R * (-lambda1)), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 0.0280000000000000006

   1. Initial program 57.1%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 96.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 92.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around -inf 17.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \left(\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 17.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-R \cdot \left(\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r* 17.4%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(R \cdot \lambda_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 17.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(R \cdot \lambda_1\right) \cdot \left(-\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 17.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(R \cdot \lambda_1\right) \cdot \left(-\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 14.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \lambda_1\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 14.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-R \cdot \lambda_1} \]

      2. *-commutative 14.4%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot R} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 14.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)} \]

   10. Simplified 14.4%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)} \]

   if 0.0280000000000000006 < phi2

   1. Initial program 50.8%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 91.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 91.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 50.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 50.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]

   6. Simplified 50.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 23.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 0.028:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\lambda_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 15: 17.2% accurate, 109.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \phi_2 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2) :precision binary64 (* R phi2))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * phi2;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    code = r * phi2
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * phi2;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * phi2

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * phi2)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * phi2;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 55.6%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-def 94.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 94.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 14.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 14.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]

6. Simplified 14.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]

7. Final simplification 14.8%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \phi_2 \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023322 
(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
  :name "Equirectangular approximation to distance on a great circle"
  :precision binary64
  (* R (sqrt (+ (* (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0))) (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2))))))