Data.Histogram.Bin.BinF:$cfromIndex from histogram-fill-0.8.4.1

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 3.7s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.3×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (/ x 2.0) (* y x)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x / 2.0d0) + (y * x)) + z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x / 2.0) + Float64(y * x)) + z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (/ x 2.0) (* y x)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x / 2.0d0) + (y * x)) + z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x / 2.0) + Float64(y * x)) + z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{x}{2} + x \cdot y\right) + z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (/ x 2.0) (* x y)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x / 2.0) + (x * y)) + z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x / 2.0d0) + (x * y)) + z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x / 2.0) + (x * y)) + z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x / 2.0) + (x * y)) + z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x / 2.0) + Float64(x * y)) + z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x / 2.0) + (x * y)) + z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]

2. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \left(\frac{x}{2} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]

Alternative 2: 59.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -0.5:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -2.9 \cdot 10^{-120}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{-304}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{-213}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{-58}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{-39}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+23}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -0.5)
   (* x y)
   (if (<= y -2.9e-120)
     (* x 0.5)
     (if (<= y 1.05e-304)
       z
       (if (<= y 3.8e-213)
         (* x 0.5)
         (if (<= y 1.4e-58)
           z
           (if (<= y 4.8e-39) (* x 0.5) (if (<= y 1.25e+23) z (* x y)))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -0.5) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (y <= -2.9e-120) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else if (y <= 1.05e-304) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (y <= 3.8e-213) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else if (y <= 1.4e-58) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (y <= 4.8e-39) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else if (y <= 1.25e+23) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-0.5d0)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if (y <= (-2.9d-120)) then
        tmp = x * 0.5d0
    else if (y <= 1.05d-304) then
        tmp = z
    else if (y <= 3.8d-213) then
        tmp = x * 0.5d0
    else if (y <= 1.4d-58) then
        tmp = z
    else if (y <= 4.8d-39) then
        tmp = x * 0.5d0
    else if (y <= 1.25d+23) then
        tmp = z
    else
        tmp = x * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -0.5) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (y <= -2.9e-120) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else if (y <= 1.05e-304) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (y <= 3.8e-213) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else if (y <= 1.4e-58) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (y <= 4.8e-39) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else if (y <= 1.25e+23) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -0.5:
		tmp = x * y
	elif y <= -2.9e-120:
		tmp = x * 0.5
	elif y <= 1.05e-304:
		tmp = z
	elif y <= 3.8e-213:
		tmp = x * 0.5
	elif y <= 1.4e-58:
		tmp = z
	elif y <= 4.8e-39:
		tmp = x * 0.5
	elif y <= 1.25e+23:
		tmp = z
	else:
		tmp = x * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -0.5)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (y <= -2.9e-120)
		tmp = Float64(x * 0.5);
	elseif (y <= 1.05e-304)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (y <= 3.8e-213)
		tmp = Float64(x * 0.5);
	elseif (y <= 1.4e-58)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (y <= 4.8e-39)
		tmp = Float64(x * 0.5);
	elseif (y <= 1.25e+23)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -0.5)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif (y <= -2.9e-120)
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	elseif (y <= 1.05e-304)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (y <= 3.8e-213)
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	elseif (y <= 1.4e-58)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (y <= 4.8e-39)
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	elseif (y <= 1.25e+23)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = x * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -0.5], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, -2.9e-120], N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 1.05e-304], z, If[LessEqual[y, 3.8e-213], N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 1.4e-58], z, If[LessEqual[y, 4.8e-39], N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 1.25e+23], z, N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -0.5 or 1.25e23 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(y \cdot x + z\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{2} + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(x \cdot y + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 69.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -0.5 < y < -2.9e-120 or 1.05000000000000004e-304 < y < 3.8e-213 or 1.4e-58 < y < 4.80000000000000031e-39

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(y \cdot x + z\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{2} + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(x \cdot y + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 71.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(0.5 + y\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 71.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot x} \]

   if -2.9e-120 < y < 1.05000000000000004e-304 or 3.8e-213 < y < 1.4e-58 or 4.80000000000000031e-39 < y < 1.25e23

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(y \cdot x + z\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{2} + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(x \cdot y + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 62.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 67.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -0.5:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -2.9 \cdot 10^{-120}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{-304}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{-213}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{-58}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{-39}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+23}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 49.5% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{+97} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{-113} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{-35}\right) \land x \leq 3.7 \cdot 10^{+83}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.8e+97)
         (not (or (<= x 1.8e-113) (and (not (<= x 4.4e-35)) (<= x 3.7e+83)))))
   (* x 0.5)
   z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.8e+97) || !((x <= 1.8e-113) || (!(x <= 4.4e-35) && (x <= 3.7e+83)))) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.8d+97)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.8d-113) .or. (.not. (x <= 4.4d-35)) .and. (x <= 3.7d+83))) then
        tmp = x * 0.5d0
    else
        tmp = z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.8e+97) || !((x <= 1.8e-113) || (!(x <= 4.4e-35) && (x <= 3.7e+83)))) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.8e+97) or not ((x <= 1.8e-113) or (not (x <= 4.4e-35) and (x <= 3.7e+83))):
		tmp = x * 0.5
	else:
		tmp = z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.8e+97) || !((x <= 1.8e-113) || (!(x <= 4.4e-35) && (x <= 3.7e+83))))
		tmp = Float64(x * 0.5);
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.8e+97) || ~(((x <= 1.8e-113) || (~((x <= 4.4e-35)) && (x <= 3.7e+83)))))
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.8e+97], N[Not[Or[LessEqual[x, 1.8e-113], And[N[Not[LessEqual[x, 4.4e-35]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[x, 3.7e+83]]]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision], z]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.79999999999999983e97 or 1.79999999999999987e-113 < x < 4.39999999999999987e-35 or 3.7000000000000002e83 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(y \cdot x + z\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{2} + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(x \cdot y + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 90.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(0.5 + y\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 56.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot x} \]

   if -1.79999999999999983e97 < x < 1.79999999999999987e-113 or 4.39999999999999987e-35 < x < 3.7000000000000002e83

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(y \cdot x + z\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{2} + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(x \cdot y + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 60.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 58.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{+97} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{-113} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{-35}\right) \land x \leq 3.7 \cdot 10^{+83}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 73.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.3 \cdot 10^{-37} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{-142}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -3.3e-37) (not (<= x 1.8e-142))) (* x (+ y 0.5)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -3.3e-37) || !(x <= 1.8e-142)) {
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-3.3d-37)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.8d-142))) then
        tmp = x * (y + 0.5d0)
    else
        tmp = z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -3.3e-37) || !(x <= 1.8e-142)) {
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -3.3e-37) or not (x <= 1.8e-142):
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5)
	else:
		tmp = z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -3.3e-37) || !(x <= 1.8e-142))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y + 0.5));
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -3.3e-37) || ~((x <= 1.8e-142)))
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5);
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -3.3e-37], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.8e-142]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(y + 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], z]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -3.29999999999999982e-37 or 1.8e-142 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(y \cdot x + z\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{2} + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(x \cdot y + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 79.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(0.5 + y\right)} \]

   if -3.29999999999999982e-37 < x < 1.8e-142

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(y \cdot x + z\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{2} + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(x \cdot y + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 72.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 76.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.3 \cdot 10^{-37} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{-142}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.7 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 0.5\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z - x \cdot -0.5\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -3.7) (not (<= y 0.5))) (+ z (* x y)) (- z (* x -0.5))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -3.7) || !(y <= 0.5)) {
		tmp = z + (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = z - (x * -0.5);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-3.7d0)) .or. (.not. (y <= 0.5d0))) then
        tmp = z + (x * y)
    else
        tmp = z - (x * (-0.5d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -3.7) || !(y <= 0.5)) {
		tmp = z + (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = z - (x * -0.5);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -3.7) or not (y <= 0.5):
		tmp = z + (x * y)
	else:
		tmp = z - (x * -0.5)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -3.7) || !(y <= 0.5))
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(x * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z - Float64(x * -0.5));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -3.7) || ~((y <= 0.5)))
		tmp = z + (x * y);
	else
		tmp = z - (x * -0.5);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -3.7], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 0.5]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z - N[(x * -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -3.7000000000000002 or 0.5 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right)\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-neg-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\frac{x}{2}\right) + \left(-y \cdot x\right)\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-frac-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(-\left(\color{blue}{\frac{-x}{2}} + \left(-y \cdot x\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(-\left(\frac{-x}{2} + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)}\right)\right) \]

      6. unsub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \left(\frac{-x}{2} + y \cdot \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(\frac{-x}{2} + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot x\right)}\right) \]

      8. unsub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-x}{2} - y \cdot x\right)} \]

      9. neg-mul-1 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(\frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot x}}{2} - y \cdot x\right) \]

      10. associate-/l* 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{\frac{-1}{\frac{2}{x}}} - y \cdot x\right) \]

      11. associate-/r/ 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{\frac{-1}{2} \cdot x} - y \cdot x\right) \]

      12. distribute-rgt-out-- 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{2} - y\right)} \]

      13. metadata-eval 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-0.5} - y\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - x \cdot \left(-0.5 - y\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 98.0%

      \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 98.0%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-out 98.0%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 98.0%

      \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]

   if -3.7000000000000002 < y < 0.5

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right)\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-neg-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\frac{x}{2}\right) + \left(-y \cdot x\right)\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-frac-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(-\left(\color{blue}{\frac{-x}{2}} + \left(-y \cdot x\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(-\left(\frac{-x}{2} + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)}\right)\right) \]

      6. unsub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \left(\frac{-x}{2} + y \cdot \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(\frac{-x}{2} + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot x\right)}\right) \]

      8. unsub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-x}{2} - y \cdot x\right)} \]

      9. neg-mul-1 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(\frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot x}}{2} - y \cdot x\right) \]

      10. associate-/l* 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{\frac{-1}{\frac{2}{x}}} - y \cdot x\right) \]

      11. associate-/r/ 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{\frac{-1}{2} \cdot x} - y \cdot x\right) \]

      12. distribute-rgt-out-- 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{2} - y\right)} \]

      13. metadata-eval 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-0.5} - y\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - x \cdot \left(-0.5 - y\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.1%

      \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot x} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.1%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot -0.5} \]

   6. Simplified 99.1%

      \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot -0.5} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.7 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 0.5\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z - x \cdot -0.5\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 84.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -12:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 7.6 \cdot 10^{+26}:\\ \;\;\;\;z - x \cdot -0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -12.0)
   (* x (+ y 0.5))
   (if (<= y 7.6e+26) (- z (* x -0.5)) (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -12.0) {
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5);
	} else if (y <= 7.6e+26) {
		tmp = z - (x * -0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-12.0d0)) then
        tmp = x * (y + 0.5d0)
    else if (y <= 7.6d+26) then
        tmp = z - (x * (-0.5d0))
    else
        tmp = x * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -12.0) {
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5);
	} else if (y <= 7.6e+26) {
		tmp = z - (x * -0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -12.0:
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5)
	elif y <= 7.6e+26:
		tmp = z - (x * -0.5)
	else:
		tmp = x * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -12.0)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y + 0.5));
	elseif (y <= 7.6e+26)
		tmp = Float64(z - Float64(x * -0.5));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -12.0)
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5);
	elseif (y <= 7.6e+26)
		tmp = z - (x * -0.5);
	else
		tmp = x * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -12.0], N[(x * N[(y + 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 7.6e+26], N[(z - N[(x * -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -12

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(y \cdot x + z\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{2} + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(x \cdot y + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 73.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(0.5 + y\right)} \]

   if -12 < y < 7.6000000000000004e26

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right)\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-neg-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\frac{x}{2}\right) + \left(-y \cdot x\right)\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-frac-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(-\left(\color{blue}{\frac{-x}{2}} + \left(-y \cdot x\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(-\left(\frac{-x}{2} + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)}\right)\right) \]

      6. unsub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \left(\frac{-x}{2} + y \cdot \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(\frac{-x}{2} + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot x\right)}\right) \]

      8. unsub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-x}{2} - y \cdot x\right)} \]

      9. neg-mul-1 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(\frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot x}}{2} - y \cdot x\right) \]

      10. associate-/l* 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{\frac{-1}{\frac{2}{x}}} - y \cdot x\right) \]

      11. associate-/r/ 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{\frac{-1}{2} \cdot x} - y \cdot x\right) \]

      12. distribute-rgt-out-- 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{2} - y\right)} \]

      13. metadata-eval 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-0.5} - y\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - x \cdot \left(-0.5 - y\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 97.4%

      \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot x} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 97.4%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot -0.5} \]

   6. Simplified 97.4%

      \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot -0.5} \]

   if 7.6000000000000004e26 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(y \cdot x + z\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{2} + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(x \cdot y + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 69.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -12:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 7.6 \cdot 10^{+26}:\\ \;\;\;\;z - x \cdot -0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 100.0% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z + x \cdot \left(y - -0.5\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ z (* x (- y -0.5))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z + (x * (y - -0.5));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z + (x * (y - (-0.5d0)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z + (x * (y - -0.5));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z + (x * (y - -0.5))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(z + Float64(x * Float64(y - -0.5)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z + (x * (y - -0.5));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z + N[(x * N[(y - -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

   2. remove-double-neg 100.0%

      \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. distribute-neg-in 100.0%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\frac{x}{2}\right) + \left(-y \cdot x\right)\right)}\right) \]

   4. distribute-frac-neg 100.0%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(-\left(\color{blue}{\frac{-x}{2}} + \left(-y \cdot x\right)\right)\right) \]

   5. distribute-rgt-neg-out 100.0%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(-\left(\frac{-x}{2} + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)}\right)\right) \]

   6. unsub-neg 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \left(\frac{-x}{2} + y \cdot \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

   7. distribute-rgt-neg-out 100.0%

      \[\leadsto z - \left(\frac{-x}{2} + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot x\right)}\right) \]

   8. unsub-neg 100.0%

      \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-x}{2} - y \cdot x\right)} \]

   9. neg-mul-1 100.0%

      \[\leadsto z - \left(\frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot x}}{2} - y \cdot x\right) \]

   10. associate-/l* 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{\frac{-1}{\frac{2}{x}}} - y \cdot x\right) \]

   11. associate-/r/ 100.0%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{\frac{-1}{2} \cdot x} - y \cdot x\right) \]

   12. distribute-rgt-out-- 100.0%

       \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{2} - y\right)} \]

   13. metadata-eval 100.0%

       \[\leadsto z - x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-0.5} - y\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - x \cdot \left(-0.5 - y\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto z + x \cdot \left(y - -0.5\right) \]

Alternative 8: 41.2% accurate, 9.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 z)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return z
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := z

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(y \cdot x + z\right)} \]

   2. *-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{2} + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(x \cdot y + z\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 41.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

5. Final simplification 41.6%

   \[\leadsto z \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023322 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Data.Histogram.Bin.BinF:$cfromIndex from histogram-fill-0.8.4.1"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (/ x 2.0) (* y x)) z))