Linear.Quaternion:$c/ from linear-1.19.1.3, D

Percentage Accurate: 69.3% → 100.0%

Time: 4.4s

Alternatives: 3

Speedup: 3.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y - y \cdot y\right) + y \cdot y\right) - y \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (- (+ (- (* x y) (* y y)) (* y y)) (* y z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) - (y * y)) + (y * y)) - (y * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (((x * y) - (y * y)) + (y * y)) - (y * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) - (y * y)) + (y * y)) - (y * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (((x * y) - (y * y)) + (y * y)) - (y * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) - Float64(y * y)) + Float64(y * y)) - Float64(y * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (((x * y) - (y * y)) + (y * y)) - (y * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 69.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y - y \cdot y\right) + y \cdot y\right) - y \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (- (+ (- (* x y) (* y y)) (* y y)) (* y z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) - (y * y)) + (y * y)) - (y * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (((x * y) - (y * y)) + (y * y)) - (y * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) - (y * y)) + (y * y)) - (y * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (((x * y) - (y * y)) + (y * y)) - (y * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) - Float64(y * y)) + Float64(y * y)) - Float64(y * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (((x * y) - (y * y)) + (y * y)) - (y * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \cdot \left(x - z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* y (- x z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y * (x - z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = y * (x - z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y * (x - z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return y * (x - z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(y * Float64(x - z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = y * (x - z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y * N[(x - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 69.0%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y - y \cdot y\right) + y \cdot y\right) - y \cdot z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l- 78.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y - \left(y \cdot y - y \cdot y\right)\right)} - y \cdot z \]

   2. *-commutative 78.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} - \left(y \cdot y - y \cdot y\right)\right) - y \cdot z \]

   3. +-inverses 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot x - \color{blue}{0}\right) - y \cdot z \]

   4. --rgt-identity 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} - y \cdot z \]

   5. distribute-lft-out-- 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x - z\right)} \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x - z\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x - z\right) \]

Alternative 2: 76.1% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{+90} \lor \neg \left(z \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{+62}\right) \land \left(z \leq -4.2 \cdot 10^{-36} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{-20}\right)\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.6e+90)
         (and (not (<= z -1.3e+62)) (or (<= z -4.2e-36) (not (<= z 1.8e-20)))))
   (* y (- z))
   (* y x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.6e+90) || (!(z <= -1.3e+62) && ((z <= -4.2e-36) || !(z <= 1.8e-20)))) {
		tmp = y * -z;
	} else {
		tmp = y * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.6d+90)) .or. (.not. (z <= (-1.3d+62))) .and. (z <= (-4.2d-36)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.8d-20))) then
        tmp = y * -z
    else
        tmp = y * x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.6e+90) || (!(z <= -1.3e+62) && ((z <= -4.2e-36) || !(z <= 1.8e-20)))) {
		tmp = y * -z;
	} else {
		tmp = y * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.6e+90) or (not (z <= -1.3e+62) and ((z <= -4.2e-36) or not (z <= 1.8e-20))):
		tmp = y * -z
	else:
		tmp = y * x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.6e+90) || (!(z <= -1.3e+62) && ((z <= -4.2e-36) || !(z <= 1.8e-20))))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(-z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.6e+90) || (~((z <= -1.3e+62)) && ((z <= -4.2e-36) || ~((z <= 1.8e-20)))))
		tmp = y * -z;
	else
		tmp = y * x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.6e+90], And[N[Not[LessEqual[z, -1.3e+62]], $MachinePrecision], Or[LessEqual[z, -4.2e-36], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.8e-20]], $MachinePrecision]]]], N[(y * (-z)), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.59999999999999999e90 or -1.29999999999999992e62 < z < -4.19999999999999982e-36 or 1.79999999999999987e-20 < z

   1. Initial program 77.2%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y - y \cdot y\right) + y \cdot y\right) - y \cdot z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 78.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y - \left(y \cdot y - y \cdot y\right)\right)} - y \cdot z \]

      2. *-commutative 78.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} - \left(y \cdot y - y \cdot y\right)\right) - y \cdot z \]

      3. +-inverses 96.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot x - \color{blue}{0}\right) - y \cdot z \]

      4. --rgt-identity 96.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} - y \cdot z \]

      5. distribute-lft-out-- 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x - z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x - z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 78.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 78.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y \cdot z} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-out 78.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 78.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   if -1.59999999999999999e90 < z < -1.29999999999999992e62 or -4.19999999999999982e-36 < z < 1.79999999999999987e-20

   1. Initial program 60.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y - y \cdot y\right) + y \cdot y\right) - y \cdot z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 78.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y - \left(y \cdot y - y \cdot y\right)\right)} - y \cdot z \]

      2. *-commutative 78.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} - \left(y \cdot y - y \cdot y\right)\right) - y \cdot z \]

      3. +-inverses 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot x - \color{blue}{0}\right) - y \cdot z \]

      4. --rgt-identity 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} - y \cdot z \]

      5. distribute-lft-out-- 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x - z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x - z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 83.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 83.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   6. Simplified 83.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 81.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{+90} \lor \neg \left(z \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{+62}\right) \land \left(z \leq -4.2 \cdot 10^{-36} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{-20}\right)\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 53.5% accurate, 5.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \cdot x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* y x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y * x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = y * x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y * x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return y * x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(y * x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = y * x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 69.0%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y - y \cdot y\right) + y \cdot y\right) - y \cdot z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l- 78.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y - \left(y \cdot y - y \cdot y\right)\right)} - y \cdot z \]

   2. *-commutative 78.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} - \left(y \cdot y - y \cdot y\right)\right) - y \cdot z \]

   3. +-inverses 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot x - \color{blue}{0}\right) - y \cdot z \]

   4. --rgt-identity 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} - y \cdot z \]

   5. distribute-lft-out-- 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x - z\right)} \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x - z\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 52.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 52.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

6. Simplified 52.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

7. Final simplification 52.9%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot x \]

Developer target: 100.0% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x - z\right) \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (- x z) y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x - z) * y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x - z) * y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x - z) * y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x - z) * y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x - z) * y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x - z) * y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x - z), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023322 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Linear.Quaternion:$c/ from linear-1.19.1.3, D"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (* (- x z) y)

  (- (+ (- (* x y) (* y y)) (* y y)) (* y z)))