Numeric.Signal.Multichannel:$cget from hsignal-0.2.7.1

Percentage Accurate: 97.9% → 97.9%

Time: 4.4s

Alternatives: 4

Speedup: 1.0×

• 25.5% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{x}{y} \cdot \left(z - t\right) + t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (* (/ x y) (- z t)) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x / y) * (z - t)) + t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((x / y) * (z - t)) + t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x / y) * (z - t)) + t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return ((x / y) * (z - t)) + t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x / y) * Float64(z - t)) + t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = ((x / y) * (z - t)) + t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z - t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 97.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{x}{y} \cdot \left(z - t\right) + t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (* (/ x y) (- z t)) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x / y) * (z - t)) + t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((x / y) * (z - t)) + t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x / y) * (z - t)) + t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return ((x / y) * (z - t)) + t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x / y) * Float64(z - t)) + t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = ((x / y) * (z - t)) + t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z - t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 97.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ t + \frac{x}{y} \cdot \left(z - t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ t (* (/ x y) (- z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t + ((x / y) * (z - t));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = t + ((x / y) * (z - t))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t + ((x / y) * (z - t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return t + ((x / y) * (z - t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(t + Float64(Float64(x / y) * Float64(z - t)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = t + ((x / y) * (z - t));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(t + N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z - t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.2%

   \[\frac{x}{y} \cdot \left(z - t\right) + t \]

2. Final simplification 98.2%

   \[\leadsto t + \frac{x}{y} \cdot \left(z - t\right) \]

Alternative 2: 84.8% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{+28} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{+74}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t + \frac{x}{y} \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(1 - \frac{x}{y}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.3e+28) (not (<= z 1.5e+74)))
   (+ t (* (/ x y) z))
   (* t (- 1.0 (/ x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.3e+28) || !(z <= 1.5e+74)) {
		tmp = t + ((x / y) * z);
	} else {
		tmp = t * (1.0 - (x / y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.3d+28)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.5d+74))) then
        tmp = t + ((x / y) * z)
    else
        tmp = t * (1.0d0 - (x / y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.3e+28) || !(z <= 1.5e+74)) {
		tmp = t + ((x / y) * z);
	} else {
		tmp = t * (1.0 - (x / y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.3e+28) or not (z <= 1.5e+74):
		tmp = t + ((x / y) * z)
	else:
		tmp = t * (1.0 - (x / y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.3e+28) || !(z <= 1.5e+74))
		tmp = Float64(t + Float64(Float64(x / y) * z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t * Float64(1.0 - Float64(x / y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.3e+28) || ~((z <= 1.5e+74)))
		tmp = t + ((x / y) * z);
	else
		tmp = t * (1.0 - (x / y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.3e+28], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.5e+74]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(t + N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(t * N[(1.0 - N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.3000000000000001e28 or 1.5e74 < z

   1. Initial program 98.4%

      \[\frac{x}{y} \cdot \left(z - t\right) + t \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 75.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x \cdot z}{y}} + t \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 93.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} \cdot z} + t \]

      2. *-commutative 93.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{x}{y}} + t \]

   4. Simplified 93.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{x}{y}} + t \]

   if -1.3000000000000001e28 < z < 1.5e74

   1. Initial program 98.1%

      \[\frac{x}{y} \cdot \left(z - t\right) + t \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 80.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t + -1 \cdot \frac{t \cdot x}{y}} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 80.3%

         \[\leadsto t + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{t \cdot x}{y}\right)} \]

      2. unsub-neg 80.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t - \frac{t \cdot x}{y}} \]

      3. *-commutative 80.3%

         \[\leadsto t - \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot t}}{y} \]

      4. associate-*l/ 83.3%

         \[\leadsto t - \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} \cdot t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub-inv 83.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t + \left(-\frac{x}{y}\right) \cdot t} \]

      6. *-lft-identity 83.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 \cdot t} + \left(-\frac{x}{y}\right) \cdot t \]

      7. mul-1-neg 83.3%

         \[\leadsto 1 \cdot t + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{x}{y}\right)} \cdot t \]

      8. distribute-rgt-in 83.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{x}{y}\right)} \]

      9. mul-1-neg 83.3%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{x}{y}\right)}\right) \]

      10. unsub-neg 83.3%

          \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{x}{y}\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 83.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(1 - \frac{x}{y}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{+28} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{+74}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t + \frac{x}{y} \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(1 - \frac{x}{y}\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 65.5% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ t \cdot \left(1 - \frac{x}{y}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (* t (- 1.0 (/ x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t * (1.0 - (x / y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = t * (1.0d0 - (x / y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t * (1.0 - (x / y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return t * (1.0 - (x / y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(t * Float64(1.0 - Float64(x / y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = t * (1.0 - (x / y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(t * N[(1.0 - N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.2%

   \[\frac{x}{y} \cdot \left(z - t\right) + t \]

2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 62.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t + -1 \cdot \frac{t \cdot x}{y}} \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 62.3%

      \[\leadsto t + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{t \cdot x}{y}\right)} \]

   2. unsub-neg 62.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t - \frac{t \cdot x}{y}} \]

   3. *-commutative 62.3%

      \[\leadsto t - \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot t}}{y} \]

   4. associate-*l/ 66.5%

      \[\leadsto t - \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} \cdot t} \]

   5. cancel-sign-sub-inv 66.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t + \left(-\frac{x}{y}\right) \cdot t} \]

   6. *-lft-identity 66.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 \cdot t} + \left(-\frac{x}{y}\right) \cdot t \]

   7. mul-1-neg 66.5%

      \[\leadsto 1 \cdot t + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{x}{y}\right)} \cdot t \]

   8. distribute-rgt-in 66.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{x}{y}\right)} \]

   9. mul-1-neg 66.5%

      \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{x}{y}\right)}\right) \]

   10. unsub-neg 66.5%

       \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{x}{y}\right)} \]

4. Simplified 66.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(1 - \frac{x}{y}\right)} \]

5. Final simplification 66.5%

   \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 - \frac{x}{y}\right) \]

Alternative 4: 38.6% accurate, 9.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 t)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return t
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := t

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.2%

   \[\frac{x}{y} \cdot \left(z - t\right) + t \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 36.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t} \]

3. Final simplification 36.6%

   \[\leadsto t \]

Developer target: 97.6% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \frac{x}{y} \cdot \left(z - t\right) + t\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < 2.759456554562692 \cdot 10^{-282}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z < 2.326994450874436 \cdot 10^{-110}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \frac{z - t}{y} + t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* (/ x y) (- z t)) t)))
   (if (< z 2.759456554562692e-282)
     t_1
     (if (< z 2.326994450874436e-110) (+ (* x (/ (- z t) y)) t) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = ((x / y) * (z - t)) + t;
	double tmp;
	if (z < 2.759456554562692e-282) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z < 2.326994450874436e-110) {
		tmp = (x * ((z - t) / y)) + t;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = ((x / y) * (z - t)) + t
    if (z < 2.759456554562692d-282) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (z < 2.326994450874436d-110) then
        tmp = (x * ((z - t) / y)) + t
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = ((x / y) * (z - t)) + t;
	double tmp;
	if (z < 2.759456554562692e-282) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z < 2.326994450874436e-110) {
		tmp = (x * ((z - t) / y)) + t;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = ((x / y) * (z - t)) + t
	tmp = 0
	if z < 2.759456554562692e-282:
		tmp = t_1
	elif z < 2.326994450874436e-110:
		tmp = (x * ((z - t) / y)) + t
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(Float64(x / y) * Float64(z - t)) + t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < 2.759456554562692e-282)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z < 2.326994450874436e-110)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * Float64(Float64(z - t) / y)) + t);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = ((x / y) * (z - t)) + t;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < 2.759456554562692e-282)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z < 2.326994450874436e-110)
		tmp = (x * ((z - t) / y)) + t;
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z - t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, 2.759456554562692e-282], t$95$1, If[Less[z, 2.326994450874436e-110], N[(N[(x * N[(N[(z - t), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023322 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Numeric.Signal.Multichannel:$cget from hsignal-0.2.7.1"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (if (< z 2.759456554562692e-282) (+ (* (/ x y) (- z t)) t) (if (< z 2.326994450874436e-110) (+ (* x (/ (- z t) y)) t) (+ (* (/ x y) (- z t)) t)))

  (+ (* (/ x y) (- z t)) t))