Numeric.SpecFunctions.Extra:bd0 from math-functions-0.1.5.2

Percentage Accurate: 77.2% → 99.7%

Time: 11.0s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 0.5×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* x (log (/ x y))) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * log((x / y))) - z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * log((x / y))) - z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * Math.log((x / y))) - z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * math.log((x / y))) - z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * log(Float64(x / y))) - z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * log((x / y))) - z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[Log[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 77.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* x (log (/ x y))) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * log((x / y))) - z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * log((x / y))) - z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * Math.log((x / y))) - z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * math.log((x / y))) - z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * log(Float64(x / y))) - z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * log((x / y))) - z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[Log[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.7% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(3 \cdot \log \left(\frac{\sqrt[3]{x}}{\sqrt[3]{y}}\right)\right) - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (- (* x (* 3.0 (log (/ (cbrt x) (cbrt y))))) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (3.0 * log((cbrt(x) / cbrt(y))))) - z;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (3.0 * Math.log((Math.cbrt(x) / Math.cbrt(y))))) - z;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(3.0 * log(Float64(cbrt(x) / cbrt(y))))) - z)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(3.0 * N[Log[N[(N[Power[x, 1/3], $MachinePrecision] / N[Power[y, 1/3], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 78.0%

   \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-cube-cbrt 78.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right)} - z \]

   2. log-prod 77.9%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right) + \log \left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right)\right)} - z \]

   3. pow2 77.9%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\log \color{blue}{\left({\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right)}^{2}\right)} + \log \left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right)\right) - z \]

3. Applied egg-rr 77.9%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \left({\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right)}^{2}\right) + \log \left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right)\right)} - z \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. log-pow 77.9%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \log \left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right)} + \log \left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right)\right) - z \]

   2. distribute-lft1-in 77.9%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(2 + 1\right) \cdot \log \left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right)\right)} - z \]

   3. metadata-eval 77.9%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{3} \cdot \log \left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right)\right) - z \]

5. Simplified 77.9%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(3 \cdot \log \left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right)\right)} - z \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. cbrt-div 99.7%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(3 \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\sqrt[3]{x}}{\sqrt[3]{y}}\right)}\right) - z \]

   2. div-inv 99.7%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(3 \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{x} \cdot \frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{y}}\right)}\right) - z \]

7. Applied egg-rr 99.7%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(3 \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{x} \cdot \frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{y}}\right)}\right) - z \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*r/ 99.7%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(3 \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\sqrt[3]{x} \cdot 1}{\sqrt[3]{y}}\right)}\right) - z \]

   2. *-rgt-identity 99.7%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(3 \cdot \log \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{x}}}{\sqrt[3]{y}}\right)\right) - z \]

9. Simplified 99.7%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(3 \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\sqrt[3]{x}}{\sqrt[3]{y}}\right)}\right) - z \]

10. Final simplification 99.7%

    \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(3 \cdot \log \left(\frac{\sqrt[3]{x}}{\sqrt[3]{y}}\right)\right) - z \]

Alternative 2: 82.2% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_0 \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t_0 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0 - z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\log x - \log y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* x (log (/ x y)))))
   (if (<= t_0 (- INFINITY))
     (- z)
     (if (<= t_0 INFINITY) (- t_0 z) (* x (- (log x) (log y)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = x * log((x / y));
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= -((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else if (t_0 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_0 - z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * (log(x) - log(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = x * Math.log((x / y));
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= -Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else if (t_0 <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = t_0 - z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * (Math.log(x) - Math.log(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = x * math.log((x / y))
	tmp = 0
	if t_0 <= -math.inf:
		tmp = -z
	elif t_0 <= math.inf:
		tmp = t_0 - z
	else:
		tmp = x * (math.log(x) - math.log(y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(x * log(Float64(x / y)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_0 <= Float64(-Inf))
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	elseif (t_0 <= Inf)
		tmp = Float64(t_0 - z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(log(x) - log(y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = x * log((x / y));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_0 <= -Inf)
		tmp = -z;
	elseif (t_0 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_0 - z;
	else
		tmp = x * (log(x) - log(y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(x * N[Log[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$0, (-Infinity)], (-z), If[LessEqual[t$95$0, Infinity], N[(t$95$0 - z), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(N[Log[x], $MachinePrecision] - N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x (log.f64 (/.f64 x y))) < -inf.0

   1. Initial program 8.1%

      \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 8.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\left(-\left(x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z\right)\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 8.1%

         \[\leadsto -\left(-\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) + \left(-z\right)\right)}\right) \]

      3. distribute-neg-in 8.1%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(\left(-x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + \left(-\left(-z\right)\right)\right)} \]

      4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 8.1%

         \[\leadsto -\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)} + \left(-\left(-z\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. remove-double-neg 8.1%

         \[\leadsto -\left(x \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + \color{blue}{z}\right) \]

      6. fma-udef 8.1%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -\log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right), z\right)} \]

      7. log-div 38.7%

         \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -\color{blue}{\left(\log x - \log y\right)}, z\right) \]

      8. sub-neg 38.7%

         \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -\color{blue}{\left(\log x + \left(-\log y\right)\right)}, z\right) \]

      9. distribute-neg-in 38.7%

         \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(-\log x\right) + \left(-\left(-\log y\right)\right)}, z\right) \]

      10. remove-double-neg 38.7%

          \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(-\log x\right) + \color{blue}{\log y}, z\right) \]

      11. +-commutative 38.7%

          \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\log y + \left(-\log x\right)}, z\right) \]

      12. sub-neg 38.7%

          \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\log y - \log x}, z\right) \]

      13. log-div 15.4%

          \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{y}{x}\right)}, z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 15.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log \left(\frac{y}{x}\right), z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 34.6%

      \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{z} \]

   if -inf.0 < (*.f64 x (log.f64 (/.f64 x y))) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 87.6%

      \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]

   if +inf.0 < (*.f64 x (log.f64 (/.f64 x y)))

   1. Initial program 78.0%

      \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 40.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log-div 24.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log x - \log y\right)} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 24.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log x - \log y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 81.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\log x - \log y\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 82.0% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_0 \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\log \left(-x\right) - \log \left(-y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t_0 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0 - z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\log x - \log y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* x (log (/ x y)))))
   (if (<= t_0 (- INFINITY))
     (* x (- (log (- x)) (log (- y))))
     (if (<= t_0 INFINITY) (- t_0 z) (* x (- (log x) (log y)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = x * log((x / y));
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= -((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = x * (log(-x) - log(-y));
	} else if (t_0 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_0 - z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * (log(x) - log(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = x * Math.log((x / y));
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= -Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = x * (Math.log(-x) - Math.log(-y));
	} else if (t_0 <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = t_0 - z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * (Math.log(x) - Math.log(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = x * math.log((x / y))
	tmp = 0
	if t_0 <= -math.inf:
		tmp = x * (math.log(-x) - math.log(-y))
	elif t_0 <= math.inf:
		tmp = t_0 - z
	else:
		tmp = x * (math.log(x) - math.log(y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(x * log(Float64(x / y)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_0 <= Float64(-Inf))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(log(Float64(-x)) - log(Float64(-y))));
	elseif (t_0 <= Inf)
		tmp = Float64(t_0 - z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(log(x) - log(y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = x * log((x / y));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_0 <= -Inf)
		tmp = x * (log(-x) - log(-y));
	elseif (t_0 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_0 - z;
	else
		tmp = x * (log(x) - log(y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(x * N[Log[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$0, (-Infinity)], N[(x * N[(N[Log[(-x)], $MachinePrecision] - N[Log[(-y)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t$95$0, Infinity], N[(t$95$0 - z), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(N[Log[x], $MachinePrecision] - N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x (log.f64 (/.f64 x y))) < -inf.0

   1. Initial program 8.1%

      \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 8.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. frac-2neg 8.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-x}{-y}\right)} \]

      2. log-div 56.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(-x\right) - \log \left(-y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 56.1%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(-x\right) - \log \left(-y\right)\right)} \]

   if -inf.0 < (*.f64 x (log.f64 (/.f64 x y))) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 87.6%

      \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]

   if +inf.0 < (*.f64 x (log.f64 (/.f64 x y)))

   1. Initial program 78.0%

      \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 40.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log-div 24.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log x - \log y\right)} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 24.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log x - \log y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 83.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\log \left(-x\right) - \log \left(-y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\log x - \log y\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 82.2% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_0 \leq -\infty \lor \neg \left(t_0 \leq \infty\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0 - z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* x (log (/ x y)))))
   (if (or (<= t_0 (- INFINITY)) (not (<= t_0 INFINITY))) (- z) (- t_0 z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = x * log((x / y));
	double tmp;
	if ((t_0 <= -((double) INFINITY)) || !(t_0 <= ((double) INFINITY))) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0 - z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = x * Math.log((x / y));
	double tmp;
	if ((t_0 <= -Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) || !(t_0 <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY)) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0 - z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = x * math.log((x / y))
	tmp = 0
	if (t_0 <= -math.inf) or not (t_0 <= math.inf):
		tmp = -z
	else:
		tmp = t_0 - z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(x * log(Float64(x / y)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t_0 <= Float64(-Inf)) || !(t_0 <= Inf))
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(t_0 - z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = x * log((x / y));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_0 <= -Inf) || ~((t_0 <= Inf)))
		tmp = -z;
	else
		tmp = t_0 - z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(x * N[Log[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t$95$0, (-Infinity)], N[Not[LessEqual[t$95$0, Infinity]], $MachinePrecision]], (-z), N[(t$95$0 - z), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x (log.f64 (/.f64 x y))) < -inf.0 or +inf.0 < (*.f64 x (log.f64 (/.f64 x y)))

   1. Initial program 8.1%

      \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 8.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\left(-\left(x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z\right)\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 8.1%

         \[\leadsto -\left(-\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) + \left(-z\right)\right)}\right) \]

      3. distribute-neg-in 8.1%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(\left(-x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + \left(-\left(-z\right)\right)\right)} \]

      4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 8.1%

         \[\leadsto -\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)} + \left(-\left(-z\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. remove-double-neg 8.1%

         \[\leadsto -\left(x \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + \color{blue}{z}\right) \]

      6. fma-udef 8.1%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -\log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right), z\right)} \]

      7. log-div 38.7%

         \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -\color{blue}{\left(\log x - \log y\right)}, z\right) \]

      8. sub-neg 38.7%

         \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -\color{blue}{\left(\log x + \left(-\log y\right)\right)}, z\right) \]

      9. distribute-neg-in 38.7%

         \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(-\log x\right) + \left(-\left(-\log y\right)\right)}, z\right) \]

      10. remove-double-neg 38.7%

          \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(-\log x\right) + \color{blue}{\log y}, z\right) \]

      11. +-commutative 38.7%

          \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\log y + \left(-\log x\right)}, z\right) \]

      12. sub-neg 38.7%

          \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\log y - \log x}, z\right) \]

      13. log-div 15.4%

          \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{y}{x}\right)}, z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 15.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log \left(\frac{y}{x}\right), z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 34.6%

      \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{z} \]

   if -inf.0 < (*.f64 x (log.f64 (/.f64 x y))) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 87.6%

      \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 81.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) \leq -\infty \lor \neg \left(x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) \leq \infty\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 92.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.15 \cdot 10^{+76}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\log \left(-x\right) - \log \left(-y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -2.85 \cdot 10^{-167}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-308}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\log x - \log y\right) - z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -2.15e+76)
   (* x (- (log (- x)) (log (- y))))
   (if (<= x -2.85e-167)
     (- (* x (log (/ x y))) z)
     (if (<= x -5e-308) (- z) (- (* x (- (log x) (log y))) z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -2.15e+76) {
		tmp = x * (log(-x) - log(-y));
	} else if (x <= -2.85e-167) {
		tmp = (x * log((x / y))) - z;
	} else if (x <= -5e-308) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else {
		tmp = (x * (log(x) - log(y))) - z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-2.15d+76)) then
        tmp = x * (log(-x) - log(-y))
    else if (x <= (-2.85d-167)) then
        tmp = (x * log((x / y))) - z
    else if (x <= (-5d-308)) then
        tmp = -z
    else
        tmp = (x * (log(x) - log(y))) - z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -2.15e+76) {
		tmp = x * (Math.log(-x) - Math.log(-y));
	} else if (x <= -2.85e-167) {
		tmp = (x * Math.log((x / y))) - z;
	} else if (x <= -5e-308) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else {
		tmp = (x * (Math.log(x) - Math.log(y))) - z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -2.15e+76:
		tmp = x * (math.log(-x) - math.log(-y))
	elif x <= -2.85e-167:
		tmp = (x * math.log((x / y))) - z
	elif x <= -5e-308:
		tmp = -z
	else:
		tmp = (x * (math.log(x) - math.log(y))) - z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -2.15e+76)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(log(Float64(-x)) - log(Float64(-y))));
	elseif (x <= -2.85e-167)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * log(Float64(x / y))) - z);
	elseif (x <= -5e-308)
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * Float64(log(x) - log(y))) - z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -2.15e+76)
		tmp = x * (log(-x) - log(-y));
	elseif (x <= -2.85e-167)
		tmp = (x * log((x / y))) - z;
	elseif (x <= -5e-308)
		tmp = -z;
	else
		tmp = (x * (log(x) - log(y))) - z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -2.15e+76], N[(x * N[(N[Log[(-x)], $MachinePrecision] - N[Log[(-y)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, -2.85e-167], N[(N[(x * N[Log[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, -5e-308], (-z), N[(N[(x * N[(N[Log[x], $MachinePrecision] - N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if x < -2.14999999999999989e76

   1. Initial program 67.7%

      \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 65.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. frac-2neg 65.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-x}{-y}\right)} \]

      2. log-div 95.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(-x\right) - \log \left(-y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 95.5%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(-x\right) - \log \left(-y\right)\right)} \]

   if -2.14999999999999989e76 < x < -2.84999999999999994e-167

   1. Initial program 91.3%

      \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]

   if -2.84999999999999994e-167 < x < -4.99999999999999955e-308

   1. Initial program 64.8%

      \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 64.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\left(-\left(x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z\right)\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 64.8%

         \[\leadsto -\left(-\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) + \left(-z\right)\right)}\right) \]

      3. distribute-neg-in 64.8%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(\left(-x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + \left(-\left(-z\right)\right)\right)} \]

      4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 64.8%

         \[\leadsto -\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)} + \left(-\left(-z\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. remove-double-neg 64.8%

         \[\leadsto -\left(x \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + \color{blue}{z}\right) \]

      6. fma-udef 64.8%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -\log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right), z\right)} \]

      7. log-div 0.0%

         \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -\color{blue}{\left(\log x - \log y\right)}, z\right) \]

      8. sub-neg 0.0%

         \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -\color{blue}{\left(\log x + \left(-\log y\right)\right)}, z\right) \]

      9. distribute-neg-in 0.0%

         \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(-\log x\right) + \left(-\left(-\log y\right)\right)}, z\right) \]

      10. remove-double-neg 0.0%

          \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(-\log x\right) + \color{blue}{\log y}, z\right) \]

      11. +-commutative 0.0%

          \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\log y + \left(-\log x\right)}, z\right) \]

      12. sub-neg 0.0%

          \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\log y - \log x}, z\right) \]

      13. log-div 64.8%

          \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{y}{x}\right)}, z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 64.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log \left(\frac{y}{x}\right), z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 88.9%

      \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{z} \]

   if -4.99999999999999955e-308 < x

   1. Initial program 78.4%

      \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log-div 47.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log x - \log y\right)} \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 99.4%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log x - \log y\right)} - z \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.15 \cdot 10^{+76}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\log \left(-x\right) - \log \left(-y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -2.85 \cdot 10^{-167}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-308}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\log x - \log y\right) - z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 93.3% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -8 \cdot 10^{+109}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\log \left(-x\right) - \log \left(-y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -9.8 \cdot 10^{-166}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(3 \cdot \log \left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right)\right) - z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-311}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\log x - \log y\right) - z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -8e+109)
   (* x (- (log (- x)) (log (- y))))
   (if (<= x -9.8e-166)
     (- (* x (* 3.0 (log (cbrt (/ x y))))) z)
     (if (<= x -1e-311) (- z) (- (* x (- (log x) (log y))) z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -8e+109) {
		tmp = x * (log(-x) - log(-y));
	} else if (x <= -9.8e-166) {
		tmp = (x * (3.0 * log(cbrt((x / y))))) - z;
	} else if (x <= -1e-311) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else {
		tmp = (x * (log(x) - log(y))) - z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -8e+109) {
		tmp = x * (Math.log(-x) - Math.log(-y));
	} else if (x <= -9.8e-166) {
		tmp = (x * (3.0 * Math.log(Math.cbrt((x / y))))) - z;
	} else if (x <= -1e-311) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else {
		tmp = (x * (Math.log(x) - Math.log(y))) - z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -8e+109)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(log(Float64(-x)) - log(Float64(-y))));
	elseif (x <= -9.8e-166)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * Float64(3.0 * log(cbrt(Float64(x / y))))) - z);
	elseif (x <= -1e-311)
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * Float64(log(x) - log(y))) - z);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -8e+109], N[(x * N[(N[Log[(-x)], $MachinePrecision] - N[Log[(-y)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, -9.8e-166], N[(N[(x * N[(3.0 * N[Log[N[Power[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], 1/3], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, -1e-311], (-z), N[(N[(x * N[(N[Log[x], $MachinePrecision] - N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if x < -7.99999999999999985e109

   1. Initial program 65.4%

      \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 65.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. frac-2neg 65.4%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-x}{-y}\right)} \]

      2. log-div 97.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(-x\right) - \log \left(-y\right)\right)} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 97.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(-x\right) - \log \left(-y\right)\right)} \]

   if -7.99999999999999985e109 < x < -9.7999999999999998e-166

   1. Initial program 90.5%

      \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cube-cbrt 90.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right)} - z \]

      2. log-prod 90.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right) + \log \left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right)\right)} - z \]

      3. pow2 90.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\log \color{blue}{\left({\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right)}^{2}\right)} + \log \left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right)\right) - z \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 90.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \left({\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right)}^{2}\right) + \log \left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right)\right)} - z \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log-pow 90.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \log \left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right)} + \log \left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right)\right) - z \]

      2. distribute-lft1-in 90.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(2 + 1\right) \cdot \log \left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right)\right)} - z \]

      3. metadata-eval 90.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{3} \cdot \log \left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right)\right) - z \]

   5. Simplified 90.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(3 \cdot \log \left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right)\right)} - z \]

   if -9.7999999999999998e-166 < x < -9.99999999999948e-312

   1. Initial program 64.8%

      \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 64.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\left(-\left(x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z\right)\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 64.8%

         \[\leadsto -\left(-\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) + \left(-z\right)\right)}\right) \]

      3. distribute-neg-in 64.8%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(\left(-x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + \left(-\left(-z\right)\right)\right)} \]

      4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 64.8%

         \[\leadsto -\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)} + \left(-\left(-z\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. remove-double-neg 64.8%

         \[\leadsto -\left(x \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + \color{blue}{z}\right) \]

      6. fma-udef 64.8%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -\log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right), z\right)} \]

      7. log-div 0.0%

         \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -\color{blue}{\left(\log x - \log y\right)}, z\right) \]

      8. sub-neg 0.0%

         \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -\color{blue}{\left(\log x + \left(-\log y\right)\right)}, z\right) \]

      9. distribute-neg-in 0.0%

         \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(-\log x\right) + \left(-\left(-\log y\right)\right)}, z\right) \]

      10. remove-double-neg 0.0%

          \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(-\log x\right) + \color{blue}{\log y}, z\right) \]

      11. +-commutative 0.0%

          \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\log y + \left(-\log x\right)}, z\right) \]

      12. sub-neg 0.0%

          \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\log y - \log x}, z\right) \]

      13. log-div 64.8%

          \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{y}{x}\right)}, z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 64.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log \left(\frac{y}{x}\right), z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 88.9%

      \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{z} \]

   if -9.99999999999948e-312 < x

   1. Initial program 78.4%

      \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log-div 47.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log x - \log y\right)} \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 99.4%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log x - \log y\right)} - z \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -8 \cdot 10^{+109}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\log \left(-x\right) - \log \left(-y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -9.8 \cdot 10^{-166}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(3 \cdot \log \left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{x}{y}}\right)\right) - z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-311}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\log x - \log y\right) - z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 99.5% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-310}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\log \left(-x\right) - \log \left(-y\right)\right) - z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\log x - \log y\right) - z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -5e-310)
   (- (* x (- (log (- x)) (log (- y)))) z)
   (- (* x (- (log x) (log y))) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -5e-310) {
		tmp = (x * (log(-x) - log(-y))) - z;
	} else {
		tmp = (x * (log(x) - log(y))) - z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-5d-310)) then
        tmp = (x * (log(-x) - log(-y))) - z
    else
        tmp = (x * (log(x) - log(y))) - z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -5e-310) {
		tmp = (x * (Math.log(-x) - Math.log(-y))) - z;
	} else {
		tmp = (x * (Math.log(x) - Math.log(y))) - z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -5e-310:
		tmp = (x * (math.log(-x) - math.log(-y))) - z
	else:
		tmp = (x * (math.log(x) - math.log(y))) - z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -5e-310)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * Float64(log(Float64(-x)) - log(Float64(-y)))) - z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * Float64(log(x) - log(y))) - z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -5e-310)
		tmp = (x * (log(-x) - log(-y))) - z;
	else
		tmp = (x * (log(x) - log(y))) - z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -5e-310], N[(N[(x * N[(N[Log[(-x)], $MachinePrecision] - N[Log[(-y)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * N[(N[Log[x], $MachinePrecision] - N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -4.999999999999985e-310

   1. Initial program 77.5%

      \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. frac-2neg 44.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-x}{-y}\right)} \]

      2. log-div 58.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(-x\right) - \log \left(-y\right)\right)} \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 99.4%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(-x\right) - \log \left(-y\right)\right)} - z \]

   if -4.999999999999985e-310 < y

   1. Initial program 78.4%

      \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log-div 47.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log x - \log y\right)} \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 99.4%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log x - \log y\right)} - z \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-310}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\log \left(-x\right) - \log \left(-y\right)\right) - z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\log x - \log y\right) - z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 63.8% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{+52} \lor \neg \left(x \leq -4.6 \cdot 10^{-39} \lor \neg \left(x \leq -9.5 \cdot 10^{-73}\right) \land x \leq 1.32 \cdot 10^{+84}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.3e+52)
         (not
          (or (<= x -4.6e-39) (and (not (<= x -9.5e-73)) (<= x 1.32e+84)))))
   (* x (log (/ x y)))
   (- z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.3e+52) || !((x <= -4.6e-39) || (!(x <= -9.5e-73) && (x <= 1.32e+84)))) {
		tmp = x * log((x / y));
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.3d+52)) .or. (.not. (x <= (-4.6d-39)) .or. (.not. (x <= (-9.5d-73))) .and. (x <= 1.32d+84))) then
        tmp = x * log((x / y))
    else
        tmp = -z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.3e+52) || !((x <= -4.6e-39) || (!(x <= -9.5e-73) && (x <= 1.32e+84)))) {
		tmp = x * Math.log((x / y));
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.3e+52) or not ((x <= -4.6e-39) or (not (x <= -9.5e-73) and (x <= 1.32e+84))):
		tmp = x * math.log((x / y))
	else:
		tmp = -z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.3e+52) || !((x <= -4.6e-39) || (!(x <= -9.5e-73) && (x <= 1.32e+84))))
		tmp = Float64(x * log(Float64(x / y)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.3e+52) || ~(((x <= -4.6e-39) || (~((x <= -9.5e-73)) && (x <= 1.32e+84)))))
		tmp = x * log((x / y));
	else
		tmp = -z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.3e+52], N[Not[Or[LessEqual[x, -4.6e-39], And[N[Not[LessEqual[x, -9.5e-73]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[x, 1.32e+84]]]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[Log[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], (-z)]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.3e52 or -4.60000000000000016e-39 < x < -9.50000000000000005e-73 or 1.31999999999999994e84 < x

   1. Initial program 72.1%

      \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 62.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)} \]

   if -1.3e52 < x < -4.60000000000000016e-39 or -9.50000000000000005e-73 < x < 1.31999999999999994e84

   1. Initial program 82.5%

      \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 82.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\left(-\left(x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z\right)\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 82.5%

         \[\leadsto -\left(-\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) + \left(-z\right)\right)}\right) \]

      3. distribute-neg-in 82.5%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(\left(-x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + \left(-\left(-z\right)\right)\right)} \]

      4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 82.5%

         \[\leadsto -\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)} + \left(-\left(-z\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. remove-double-neg 82.5%

         \[\leadsto -\left(x \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + \color{blue}{z}\right) \]

      6. fma-udef 82.5%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -\log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right), z\right)} \]

      7. log-div 58.1%

         \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -\color{blue}{\left(\log x - \log y\right)}, z\right) \]

      8. sub-neg 58.1%

         \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -\color{blue}{\left(\log x + \left(-\log y\right)\right)}, z\right) \]

      9. distribute-neg-in 58.1%

         \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(-\log x\right) + \left(-\left(-\log y\right)\right)}, z\right) \]

      10. remove-double-neg 58.1%

          \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(-\log x\right) + \color{blue}{\log y}, z\right) \]

      11. +-commutative 58.1%

          \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\log y + \left(-\log x\right)}, z\right) \]

      12. sub-neg 58.1%

          \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\log y - \log x}, z\right) \]

      13. log-div 82.2%

          \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{y}{x}\right)}, z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 82.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log \left(\frac{y}{x}\right), z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 74.5%

      \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{+52} \lor \neg \left(x \leq -4.6 \cdot 10^{-39} \lor \neg \left(x \leq -9.5 \cdot 10^{-73}\right) \land x \leq 1.32 \cdot 10^{+84}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 64.0% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.65 \cdot 10^{+52}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-x\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{x}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -5.6 \cdot 10^{-39} \lor \neg \left(x \leq -9.5 \cdot 10^{-73}\right) \land x \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{+86}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -1.65e+52)
   (* (- x) (log (/ y x)))
   (if (or (<= x -5.6e-39) (and (not (<= x -9.5e-73)) (<= x 1.8e+86)))
     (- z)
     (* x (log (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.65e+52) {
		tmp = -x * log((y / x));
	} else if ((x <= -5.6e-39) || (!(x <= -9.5e-73) && (x <= 1.8e+86))) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * log((x / y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.65d+52)) then
        tmp = -x * log((y / x))
    else if ((x <= (-5.6d-39)) .or. (.not. (x <= (-9.5d-73))) .and. (x <= 1.8d+86)) then
        tmp = -z
    else
        tmp = x * log((x / y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.65e+52) {
		tmp = -x * Math.log((y / x));
	} else if ((x <= -5.6e-39) || (!(x <= -9.5e-73) && (x <= 1.8e+86))) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * Math.log((x / y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.65e+52:
		tmp = -x * math.log((y / x))
	elif (x <= -5.6e-39) or (not (x <= -9.5e-73) and (x <= 1.8e+86)):
		tmp = -z
	else:
		tmp = x * math.log((x / y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.65e+52)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-x) * log(Float64(y / x)));
	elseif ((x <= -5.6e-39) || (!(x <= -9.5e-73) && (x <= 1.8e+86)))
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * log(Float64(x / y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.65e+52)
		tmp = -x * log((y / x));
	elseif ((x <= -5.6e-39) || (~((x <= -9.5e-73)) && (x <= 1.8e+86)))
		tmp = -z;
	else
		tmp = x * log((x / y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.65e+52], N[((-x) * N[Log[N[(y / x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[Or[LessEqual[x, -5.6e-39], And[N[Not[LessEqual[x, -9.5e-73]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[x, 1.8e+86]]], (-z), N[(x * N[Log[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -1.65e52

   1. Initial program 73.2%

      \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 73.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\left(-\left(x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z\right)\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 73.2%

         \[\leadsto -\left(-\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) + \left(-z\right)\right)}\right) \]

      3. distribute-neg-in 73.2%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(\left(-x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + \left(-\left(-z\right)\right)\right)} \]

      4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 73.2%

         \[\leadsto -\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)} + \left(-\left(-z\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. remove-double-neg 73.2%

         \[\leadsto -\left(x \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + \color{blue}{z}\right) \]

      6. fma-udef 73.2%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -\log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right), z\right)} \]

      7. log-div 0.0%

         \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -\color{blue}{\left(\log x - \log y\right)}, z\right) \]

      8. sub-neg 0.0%

         \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -\color{blue}{\left(\log x + \left(-\log y\right)\right)}, z\right) \]

      9. distribute-neg-in 0.0%

         \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(-\log x\right) + \left(-\left(-\log y\right)\right)}, z\right) \]

      10. remove-double-neg 0.0%

          \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(-\log x\right) + \color{blue}{\log y}, z\right) \]

      11. +-commutative 0.0%

          \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\log y + \left(-\log x\right)}, z\right) \]

      12. sub-neg 0.0%

          \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\log y - \log x}, z\right) \]

      13. log-div 75.3%

          \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{y}{x}\right)}, z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 75.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log \left(\frac{y}{x}\right), z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 0.0%

      \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\log y + \log \left(\frac{1}{x}\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log-rec 0.0%

         \[\leadsto -x \cdot \left(\log y + \color{blue}{\left(-\log x\right)}\right) \]

      2. neg-mul-1 0.0%

         \[\leadsto -x \cdot \left(\log y + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \log x}\right) \]

      3. neg-mul-1 0.0%

         \[\leadsto -x \cdot \left(\log y + \color{blue}{\left(-\log x\right)}\right) \]

      4. sub-neg 0.0%

         \[\leadsto -x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log y - \log x\right)} \]

      5. log-div 67.6%

         \[\leadsto -x \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{y}{x}\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 67.6%

      \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{x \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{x}\right)} \]

   if -1.65e52 < x < -5.6000000000000003e-39 or -9.50000000000000005e-73 < x < 1.80000000000000003e86

   1. Initial program 82.5%

      \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 82.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\left(-\left(x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z\right)\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 82.5%

         \[\leadsto -\left(-\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) + \left(-z\right)\right)}\right) \]

      3. distribute-neg-in 82.5%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(\left(-x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + \left(-\left(-z\right)\right)\right)} \]

      4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 82.5%

         \[\leadsto -\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)} + \left(-\left(-z\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. remove-double-neg 82.5%

         \[\leadsto -\left(x \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + \color{blue}{z}\right) \]

      6. fma-udef 82.5%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -\log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right), z\right)} \]

      7. log-div 58.1%

         \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -\color{blue}{\left(\log x - \log y\right)}, z\right) \]

      8. sub-neg 58.1%

         \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -\color{blue}{\left(\log x + \left(-\log y\right)\right)}, z\right) \]

      9. distribute-neg-in 58.1%

         \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(-\log x\right) + \left(-\left(-\log y\right)\right)}, z\right) \]

      10. remove-double-neg 58.1%

          \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(-\log x\right) + \color{blue}{\log y}, z\right) \]

      11. +-commutative 58.1%

          \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\log y + \left(-\log x\right)}, z\right) \]

      12. sub-neg 58.1%

          \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\log y - \log x}, z\right) \]

      13. log-div 82.2%

          \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{y}{x}\right)}, z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 82.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log \left(\frac{y}{x}\right), z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 74.5%

      \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{z} \]

   if -5.6000000000000003e-39 < x < -9.50000000000000005e-73 or 1.80000000000000003e86 < x

   1. Initial program 71.0%

      \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 59.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.65 \cdot 10^{+52}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-x\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{x}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -5.6 \cdot 10^{-39} \lor \neg \left(x \leq -9.5 \cdot 10^{-73}\right) \land x \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{+86}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 10: 49.2% accurate, 53.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return -z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = -z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return -z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return -z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(-z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = -z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := (-z)

Derivation

1. Initial program 78.0%

   \[x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. remove-double-neg 78.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\left(-\left(x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z\right)\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 78.0%

      \[\leadsto -\left(-\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) + \left(-z\right)\right)}\right) \]

   3. distribute-neg-in 78.0%

      \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(\left(-x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + \left(-\left(-z\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 78.0%

      \[\leadsto -\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)} + \left(-\left(-z\right)\right)\right) \]

   5. remove-double-neg 78.0%

      \[\leadsto -\left(x \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + \color{blue}{z}\right) \]

   6. fma-udef 78.0%

      \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -\log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right), z\right)} \]

   7. log-div 50.1%

      \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -\color{blue}{\left(\log x - \log y\right)}, z\right) \]

   8. sub-neg 50.1%

      \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -\color{blue}{\left(\log x + \left(-\log y\right)\right)}, z\right) \]

   9. distribute-neg-in 50.1%

      \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(-\log x\right) + \left(-\left(-\log y\right)\right)}, z\right) \]

   10. remove-double-neg 50.1%

       \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(-\log x\right) + \color{blue}{\log y}, z\right) \]

   11. +-commutative 50.1%

       \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\log y + \left(-\log x\right)}, z\right) \]

   12. sub-neg 50.1%

       \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\log y - \log x}, z\right) \]

   13. log-div 78.0%

       \[\leadsto -\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{y}{x}\right)}, z\right) \]

3. Simplified 78.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log \left(\frac{y}{x}\right), z\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 47.7%

   \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{z} \]

5. Final simplification 47.7%

   \[\leadsto -z \]

Developer target: 88.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y < 7.595077799083773 \cdot 10^{-308}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) - z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\log x - \log y\right) - z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (< y 7.595077799083773e-308)
   (- (* x (log (/ x y))) z)
   (- (* x (- (log x) (log y))) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y < 7.595077799083773e-308) {
		tmp = (x * log((x / y))) - z;
	} else {
		tmp = (x * (log(x) - log(y))) - z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y < 7.595077799083773d-308) then
        tmp = (x * log((x / y))) - z
    else
        tmp = (x * (log(x) - log(y))) - z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y < 7.595077799083773e-308) {
		tmp = (x * Math.log((x / y))) - z;
	} else {
		tmp = (x * (Math.log(x) - Math.log(y))) - z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y < 7.595077799083773e-308:
		tmp = (x * math.log((x / y))) - z
	else:
		tmp = (x * (math.log(x) - math.log(y))) - z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y < 7.595077799083773e-308)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * log(Float64(x / y))) - z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * Float64(log(x) - log(y))) - z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y < 7.595077799083773e-308)
		tmp = (x * log((x / y))) - z;
	else
		tmp = (x * (log(x) - log(y))) - z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Less[y, 7.595077799083773e-308], N[(N[(x * N[Log[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * N[(N[Log[x], $MachinePrecision] - N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023322 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions.Extra:bd0 from math-functions-0.1.5.2"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (if (< y 7.595077799083773e-308) (- (* x (log (/ x y))) z) (- (* x (- (log x) (log y))) z))

  (- (* x (log (/ x y))) z))