Statistics.Distribution.Beta:$cdensity from math-functions-0.1.5.2

Percentage Accurate: 89.0% → 99.8%

Time: 14.0s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.9×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (+ (* (- x 1.0) (log y)) (* (- z 1.0) (log (- 1.0 y)))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x - 1.0) * log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x - 1.0d0) * log(y)) + ((z - 1.0d0) * log((1.0d0 - y)))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x - 1.0) * Math.log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * Math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x - 1.0) * math.log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x - 1.0) * log(y)) + Float64(Float64(z - 1.0) * log(Float64(1.0 - y)))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x - 1.0) * log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 89.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (+ (* (- x 1.0) (log y)) (* (- z 1.0) (log (- 1.0 y)))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x - 1.0) * log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x - 1.0d0) * log(y)) + ((z - 1.0d0) * log((1.0d0 - y)))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x - 1.0) * Math.log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * Math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x - 1.0) * math.log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x - 1.0) * log(y)) + Float64(Float64(z - 1.0) * log(Float64(1.0 - y)))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x - 1.0) * log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (fma (+ z -1.0) (log1p (- y)) (* (log y) (+ -1.0 x))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma((z + -1.0), log1p(-y), (log(y) * (-1.0 + x))) - t;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(fma(Float64(z + -1.0), log1p(Float64(-y)), Float64(log(y) * Float64(-1.0 + x))) - t)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(z + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[1 + (-y)], $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] * N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 88.2%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

   2. fma-def 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z - 1, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

   3. sub-neg 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + \left(-1\right)}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   4. metadata-eval 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + \color{blue}{-1}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   5. sub-neg 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   6. log1p-def 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   7. sub-neg 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   8. metadata-eval 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t} \]

4. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right)\right) - t \]

Alternative 2: 99.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) + z \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (+ (* (log y) (+ -1.0 x)) (* z (log1p (- y)))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((log(y) * (-1.0 + x)) + (z * log1p(-y))) - t;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((Math.log(y) * (-1.0 + x)) + (z * Math.log1p(-y))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return ((math.log(y) * (-1.0 + x)) + (z * math.log1p(-y))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(log(y) * Float64(-1.0 + x)) + Float64(z * log1p(Float64(-y)))) - t)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] * N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[Log[1 + (-y)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 88.2%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 88.1%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)}\right) - t \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 88.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\log \left(1 - y\right) \cdot z}\right) - t \]

   2. sub-neg 88.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} \cdot z\right) - t \]

   3. mul-1-neg 88.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \log \left(1 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y}\right) \cdot z\right) - t \]

   4. log1p-def 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-1 \cdot y\right)} \cdot z\right) - t \]

   5. mul-1-neg 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{-y}\right) \cdot z\right) - t \]

4. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) \cdot z}\right) - t \]

5. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) + z \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)\right) - t \]

Alternative 3: 99.2% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) + y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (+ (* (log y) (+ -1.0 x)) (* y (- 1.0 z))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((log(y) * (-1.0 + x)) + (y * (1.0 - z))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((log(y) * ((-1.0d0) + x)) + (y * (1.0d0 - z))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((Math.log(y) * (-1.0 + x)) + (y * (1.0 - z))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return ((math.log(y) * (-1.0 + x)) + (y * (1.0 - z))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(log(y) * Float64(-1.0 + x)) + Float64(y * Float64(1.0 - z))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = ((log(y) * (-1.0 + x)) + (y * (1.0 - z))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] * N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 88.2%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.3%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   2. sub-neg 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(-y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right)\right) - t \]

   3. metadata-eval 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(-y \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(z + -1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   5. mul-1-neg 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(z + -1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   6. +-commutative 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + z\right)}\right)\right) - t \]

   7. distribute-lft-in 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot -1 + -1 \cdot z\right)}\right) - t \]

   8. metadata-eval 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{1} + -1 \cdot z\right)\right) - t \]

   9. neg-mul-1 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + y \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right)\right) - t \]

   10. unsub-neg 99.3%

       \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)}\right) - t \]

4. Simplified 99.3%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)}\right) - t \]

5. Final simplification 99.3%

   \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) + y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\right) - t \]

Alternative 4: 99.1% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - z \cdot y\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (- (* (log y) (+ -1.0 x)) (* z y)) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((log(y) * (-1.0 + x)) - (z * y)) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((log(y) * ((-1.0d0) + x)) - (z * y)) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((Math.log(y) * (-1.0 + x)) - (z * y)) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return ((math.log(y) * (-1.0 + x)) - (z * y)) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(log(y) * Float64(-1.0 + x)) - Float64(z * y)) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = ((log(y) * (-1.0 + x)) - (z * y)) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] * N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 88.2%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 88.1%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)}\right) - t \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 88.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\log \left(1 - y\right) \cdot z}\right) - t \]

   2. sub-neg 88.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} \cdot z\right) - t \]

   3. mul-1-neg 88.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \log \left(1 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y}\right) \cdot z\right) - t \]

   4. log1p-def 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-1 \cdot y\right)} \cdot z\right) - t \]

   5. mul-1-neg 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{-y}\right) \cdot z\right) - t \]

4. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) \cdot z}\right) - t \]

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + \log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)\right)} - t \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} - t \]

   2. sub-neg 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) - t \]

   3. metadata-eval 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) - t \]

   4. *-commutative 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y} + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) - t \]

   5. mul-1-neg 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)}\right) - t \]

   6. unsub-neg 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y - y \cdot z\right)} - t \]

   7. *-commutative 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\log y \cdot \left(x + -1\right)} - y \cdot z\right) - t \]

   8. +-commutative 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + x\right)} - y \cdot z\right) - t \]

7. Simplified 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot z\right)} - t \]

8. Final simplification 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - z \cdot y\right) - t \]

Alternative 5: 86.6% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.25 \cdot 10^{-18} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 6 \cdot 10^{-17}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\log y}{-1} - t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.25e-18) (not (<= x 6e-17)))
   (- (* x (log y)) t)
   (- (/ (log y) -1.0) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.25e-18) || !(x <= 6e-17)) {
		tmp = (x * log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = (log(y) / -1.0) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.25d-18)) .or. (.not. (x <= 6d-17))) then
        tmp = (x * log(y)) - t
    else
        tmp = (log(y) / (-1.0d0)) - t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.25e-18) || !(x <= 6e-17)) {
		tmp = (x * Math.log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = (Math.log(y) / -1.0) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.25e-18) or not (x <= 6e-17):
		tmp = (x * math.log(y)) - t
	else:
		tmp = (math.log(y) / -1.0) - t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.25e-18) || !(x <= 6e-17))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(log(y) / -1.0) - t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.25e-18) || ~((x <= 6e-17)))
		tmp = (x * log(y)) - t;
	else
		tmp = (log(y) / -1.0) - t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.25e-18], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 6e-17]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] / -1.0), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.25000000000000009e-18 or 6.00000000000000012e-17 < x

   1. Initial program 91.2%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 91.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)}\right) - t \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 91.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\log \left(1 - y\right) \cdot z}\right) - t \]

      2. sub-neg 91.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} \cdot z\right) - t \]

      3. mul-1-neg 91.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \log \left(1 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y}\right) \cdot z\right) - t \]

      4. log1p-def 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-1 \cdot y\right)} \cdot z\right) - t \]

      5. mul-1-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{-y}\right) \cdot z\right) - t \]

   4. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) \cdot z}\right) - t \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 90.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y} - t \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 90.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot x} - t \]

   7. Simplified 90.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot x} - t \]

   if -1.25000000000000009e-18 < x < 6.00000000000000012e-17

   1. Initial program 85.3%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 85.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)}\right) - t \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 85.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\log \left(1 - y\right) \cdot z}\right) - t \]

      2. sub-neg 85.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} \cdot z\right) - t \]

      3. mul-1-neg 85.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \log \left(1 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y}\right) \cdot z\right) - t \]

      4. log1p-def 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-1 \cdot y\right)} \cdot z\right) - t \]

      5. mul-1-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{-y}\right) \cdot z\right) - t \]

   4. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) \cdot z}\right) - t \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)} + \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) \cdot z\right) - t \]

      2. sub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} + \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) \cdot z\right) - t \]

      3. metadata-eval 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) + \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) \cdot z\right) - t \]

      4. flip-+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{x \cdot x - -1 \cdot -1}{x - -1}} + \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) \cdot z\right) - t \]

      5. associate-*r/ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\frac{\log y \cdot \left(x \cdot x - -1 \cdot -1\right)}{x - -1}} + \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) \cdot z\right) - t \]

      6. metadata-eval 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\log y \cdot \left(x \cdot x - \color{blue}{1}\right)}{x - -1} + \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) \cdot z\right) - t \]

      7. fma-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -1\right)}}{x - -1} + \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) \cdot z\right) - t \]

      8. metadata-eval 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\log y \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \color{blue}{-1}\right)}{x - -1} + \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) \cdot z\right) - t \]

      9. sub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\log y \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -1\right)}{\color{blue}{x + \left(--1\right)}} + \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) \cdot z\right) - t \]

      10. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\log y \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -1\right)}{x + \color{blue}{1}} + \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) \cdot z\right) - t \]

      11. +-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\log y \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -1\right)}{\color{blue}{1 + x}} + \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) \cdot z\right) - t \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\frac{\log y \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -1\right)}{1 + x}} + \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) \cdot z\right) - t \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\frac{\log y}{\frac{1 + x}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -1\right)}}} + \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) \cdot z\right) - t \]

   8. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\frac{\log y}{\frac{1 + x}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -1\right)}}} + \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) \cdot z\right) - t \]

   9. Taylor expanded in y around 0 83.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\log y \cdot \left({x}^{2} - 1\right)}{1 + x} - t} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate-/l* 83.7%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\log y}{\frac{1 + x}{{x}^{2} - 1}}} - t \]

       2. +-commutative 83.7%

          \[\leadsto \frac{\log y}{\frac{\color{blue}{x + 1}}{{x}^{2} - 1}} - t \]

       3. unpow2 83.7%

          \[\leadsto \frac{\log y}{\frac{x + 1}{\color{blue}{x \cdot x} - 1}} - t \]

       4. fma-neg 83.7%

          \[\leadsto \frac{\log y}{\frac{x + 1}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -1\right)}}} - t \]

       5. metadata-eval 83.7%

          \[\leadsto \frac{\log y}{\frac{x + 1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \color{blue}{-1}\right)}} - t \]

   11. Simplified 83.7%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\log y}{\frac{x + 1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -1\right)}} - t} \]

   12. Taylor expanded in x around 0 83.7%

       \[\leadsto \frac{\log y}{\color{blue}{-1}} - t \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.25 \cdot 10^{-18} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 6 \cdot 10^{-17}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\log y}{-1} - t\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 87.9% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* (log y) (+ -1.0 x)) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (log(y) * (-1.0 + x)) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (log(y) * ((-1.0d0) + x)) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (Math.log(y) * (-1.0 + x)) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (math.log(y) * (-1.0 + x)) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(log(y) * Float64(-1.0 + x)) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (log(y) * (-1.0 + x)) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] * N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 88.2%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

   2. fma-def 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z - 1, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

   3. sub-neg 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + \left(-1\right)}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   4. metadata-eval 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + \color{blue}{-1}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   5. sub-neg 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   6. log1p-def 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   7. sub-neg 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   8. metadata-eval 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t} \]

4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 87.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) - t} \]

5. Final simplification 87.3%

   \[\leadsto \log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - t \]

Alternative 7: 69.1% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \log y - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* x (log y)) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * log(y)) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * log(y)) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * Math.log(y)) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * math.log(y)) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * log(y)) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 88.2%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 88.1%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)}\right) - t \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 88.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\log \left(1 - y\right) \cdot z}\right) - t \]

   2. sub-neg 88.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} \cdot z\right) - t \]

   3. mul-1-neg 88.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \log \left(1 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y}\right) \cdot z\right) - t \]

   4. log1p-def 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-1 \cdot y\right)} \cdot z\right) - t \]

   5. mul-1-neg 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{-y}\right) \cdot z\right) - t \]

4. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) \cdot z}\right) - t \]

5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 68.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y} - t \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 68.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot x} - t \]

7. Simplified 68.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot x} - t \]

8. Final simplification 68.2%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \log y - t \]

Alternative 8: 36.1% accurate, 107.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = -t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return -t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(-t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = -t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := (-t)

Derivation

1. Initial program 88.2%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

   2. fma-def 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z - 1, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

   3. sub-neg 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + \left(-1\right)}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   4. metadata-eval 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + \color{blue}{-1}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   5. sub-neg 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   6. log1p-def 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   7. sub-neg 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   8. metadata-eval 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t} \]

4. Taylor expanded in t around inf 37.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot t} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 37.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-t} \]

6. Simplified 37.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-t} \]

7. Final simplification 37.8%

   \[\leadsto -t \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023322 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Statistics.Distribution.Beta:$cdensity from math-functions-0.1.5.2"
  :precision binary64
  (- (+ (* (- x 1.0) (log y)) (* (- z 1.0) (log (- 1.0 y)))) t))