Equirectangular approximation to distance on a great circle

Percentage Accurate: 59.6% → 99.8%

Time: 20.2s

Alternatives: 14

Speedup: 3.0×

• 30.6% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\\ R \cdot \sqrt{t_0 \cdot t_0 + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))))
   (* R (sqrt (+ (* t_0 t_0) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2)))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0d0))
    code = r * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * Math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))
	return R * math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi1 + phi2) / 2.0)))
	return Float64(R * sqrt(Float64(Float64(t_0 * t_0) + Float64(Float64(phi1 - phi2) * Float64(phi1 - phi2)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	tmp = R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi1 + phi2), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Initial Program: 59.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\\ R \cdot \sqrt{t_0 \cdot t_0 + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))))
   (* R (sqrt (+ (* t_0 t_0) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2)))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0d0))
    code = r * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * Math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))
	return R * math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi1 + phi2) / 2.0)))
	return Float64(R * sqrt(Float64(Float64(t_0 * t_0) + Float64(Float64(phi1 - phi2) * Float64(phi1 - phi2)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	tmp = R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi1 + phi2), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(-\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)\right)\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  R
  (hypot
   (*
    (- lambda1 lambda2)
    (cbrt
     (pow
      (fma
       (cos (* 0.5 phi2))
       (cos (* 0.5 phi1))
       (* (sin (* 0.5 phi1)) (- (sin (* 0.5 phi2)))))
      3.0)))
   (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cbrt(pow(fma(cos((0.5 * phi2)), cos((0.5 * phi1)), (sin((0.5 * phi1)) * -sin((0.5 * phi2)))), 3.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cbrt((fma(cos(Float64(0.5 * phi2)), cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1)), Float64(sin(Float64(0.5 * phi1)) * Float64(-sin(Float64(0.5 * phi2))))) ^ 3.0))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Power[N[Power[N[(N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Sin[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * (-N[Sin[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision])), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 3.0], $MachinePrecision], 1/3], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 59.6%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-def 96.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 96.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-cbrt-cube 96.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{\left(\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. pow3 96.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{{\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)}^{3}}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. div-inv 96.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 96.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

5. Applied egg-rr 96.8%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)}^{3}}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 96.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. distribute-rgt-in 96.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5 + \phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. cos-sum 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

7. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)} - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)} - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   4. fma-neg 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), -\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), -\color{blue}{\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)}\right)\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), -\sin \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)} \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), -\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \sin \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}\right)\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   8. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \color{blue}{\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(-\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)}\right)\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

9. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(-\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right)\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

10. Final simplification 99.8%

    \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(-\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)\right)\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

Alternative 2: 99.8% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  R
  (hypot
   (*
    (- lambda1 lambda2)
    (cbrt
     (pow
      (-
       (* (cos (* 0.5 phi2)) (cos (* 0.5 phi1)))
       (* (sin (* 0.5 phi2)) (sin (* 0.5 phi1))))
      3.0)))
   (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cbrt(pow(((cos((0.5 * phi2)) * cos((0.5 * phi1))) - (sin((0.5 * phi2)) * sin((0.5 * phi1)))), 3.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cbrt(Math.pow(((Math.cos((0.5 * phi2)) * Math.cos((0.5 * phi1))) - (Math.sin((0.5 * phi2)) * Math.sin((0.5 * phi1)))), 3.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cbrt((Float64(Float64(cos(Float64(0.5 * phi2)) * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1))) - Float64(sin(Float64(0.5 * phi2)) * sin(Float64(0.5 * phi1)))) ^ 3.0))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Power[N[Power[N[(N[(N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[Sin[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 3.0], $MachinePrecision], 1/3], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 59.6%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-def 96.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 96.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-cbrt-cube 96.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{\left(\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. pow3 96.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{{\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)}^{3}}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. div-inv 96.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 96.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

5. Applied egg-rr 96.8%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)}^{3}}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 96.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. distribute-rgt-in 96.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5 + \phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. cos-sum 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

7. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

8. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

Alternative 3: 96.4% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_1 \leq -8 \cdot 10^{+164}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_2 + \phi_1}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= lambda1 -8e+164)
   (*
    R
    (hypot
     (*
      lambda1
      (-
       (* (cos (* 0.5 phi2)) (cos (* 0.5 phi1)))
       (* (sin (* 0.5 phi2)) (sin (* 0.5 phi1)))))
     (- phi1 phi2)))
   (*
    R
    (hypot
     (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi2 phi1) 2.0)))
     (- phi1 phi2)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda1 <= -8e+164) {
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 * ((cos((0.5 * phi2)) * cos((0.5 * phi1))) - (sin((0.5 * phi2)) * sin((0.5 * phi1))))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda1 <= -8e+164) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((lambda1 * ((Math.cos((0.5 * phi2)) * Math.cos((0.5 * phi1))) - (Math.sin((0.5 * phi2)) * Math.sin((0.5 * phi1))))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if lambda1 <= -8e+164:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((lambda1 * ((math.cos((0.5 * phi2)) * math.cos((0.5 * phi1))) - (math.sin((0.5 * phi2)) * math.sin((0.5 * phi1))))), (phi1 - phi2))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (lambda1 <= -8e+164)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(lambda1 * Float64(Float64(cos(Float64(0.5 * phi2)) * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1))) - Float64(sin(Float64(0.5 * phi2)) * sin(Float64(0.5 * phi1))))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (lambda1 <= -8e+164)
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 * ((cos((0.5 * phi2)) * cos((0.5 * phi1))) - (sin((0.5 * phi2)) * sin((0.5 * phi1))))), (phi1 - phi2));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[lambda1, -8e+164], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(lambda1 * N[(N[(N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[Sin[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi2 + phi1), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if lambda1 < -8e164

   1. Initial program 46.3%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 90.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 90.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cbrt-cube 90.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{\left(\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      2. pow3 90.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{{\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)}^{3}}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      3. div-inv 90.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 90.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 90.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)}^{3}}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 90.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 90.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5 + \phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      3. cos-sum 99.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 99.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)} - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 99.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 99.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)} - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      4. fma-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), -\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), -\color{blue}{\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)}\right)\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), -\sin \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)} \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), -\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \sin \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}\right)\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      8. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \color{blue}{\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(-\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)}\right)\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   9. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(-\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right)\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   10. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around inf 99.8%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) + \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) + \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_1}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

       2. +-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) + -1 \cdot \left(\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)\right)} \cdot \lambda_1, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

       3. *-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)} + -1 \cdot \left(\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_1, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

       4. mul-1-neg 99.8%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)}\right) \cdot \lambda_1, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

       5. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.8%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}\right) \cdot \lambda_1, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

       6. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.8%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)} \cdot \lambda_1, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

       7. *-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)} - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_1, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   12. Simplified 99.8%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_1}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   if -8e164 < lambda1

   1. Initial program 61.1%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 97.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_1 \leq -8 \cdot 10^{+164}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_2 + \phi_1}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 91.4% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 6.6 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 6.6e-5)
   (* R (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (* 0.5 phi1))) (- phi1 phi2)))
   (* R (hypot (* (cos (* 0.5 phi2)) (- lambda2)) (- phi1 phi2)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 6.6e-5) {
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot((cos((0.5 * phi2)) * -lambda2), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 6.6e-5) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((Math.cos((0.5 * phi2)) * -lambda2), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 6.6e-5:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((math.cos((0.5 * phi2)) * -lambda2), (phi1 - phi2))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 6.6e-5)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(cos(Float64(0.5 * phi2)) * Float64(-lambda2)), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 6.6e-5)
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot((cos((0.5 * phi2)) * -lambda2), (phi1 - phi2));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 6.6e-5], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * (-lambda2)), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 6.6000000000000005e-5

   1. Initial program 62.6%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 97.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 95.1%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   if 6.6000000000000005e-5 < phi2

   1. Initial program 51.8%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 94.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 94.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 94.3%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around 0 86.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 86.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      2. mul-1-neg 86.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-\lambda_2\right)} \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. Simplified 86.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-\lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 6.6 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 93.4% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{-9}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 2.8e-9)
   (* R (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (* 0.5 phi1))) (- phi1 phi2)))
   (* R (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (* 0.5 phi2))) (- phi1 phi2)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 2.8e-9) {
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi2))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 2.8e-9) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((0.5 * phi2))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 2.8e-9:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((0.5 * phi2))), (phi1 - phi2))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 2.8e-9)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi2))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 2.8e-9)
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi2))), (phi1 - phi2));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 2.8e-9], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 2.79999999999999984e-9

   1. Initial program 63.0%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 97.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 95.3%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   if 2.79999999999999984e-9 < phi2

   1. Initial program 51.1%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 94.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 94.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 94.3%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{-9}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 96.2% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_2 + \phi_1}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  R
  (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi2 phi1) 2.0))) (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi2 + phi1), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 59.6%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-def 96.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 96.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 96.8%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_2 + \phi_1}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

Alternative 7: 80.4% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_1 \leq -1.2 \cdot 10^{+43}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_2 \cdot \left(-\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= lambda1 -1.2e+43)
   (* R (hypot (* lambda1 (cos (* 0.5 phi2))) (- phi1 phi2)))
   (* R (hypot (* lambda2 (- (cos (* 0.5 phi1)))) (- phi1 phi2)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda1 <= -1.2e+43) {
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 * cos((0.5 * phi2))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda2 * -cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda1 <= -1.2e+43) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((lambda1 * Math.cos((0.5 * phi2))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((lambda2 * -Math.cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if lambda1 <= -1.2e+43:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((lambda1 * math.cos((0.5 * phi2))), (phi1 - phi2))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((lambda2 * -math.cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (lambda1 <= -1.2e+43)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(lambda1 * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi2))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(lambda2 * Float64(-cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1)))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (lambda1 <= -1.2e+43)
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 * cos((0.5 * phi2))), (phi1 - phi2));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda2 * -cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[lambda1, -1.2e+43], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(lambda1 * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(lambda2 * (-N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision])), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if lambda1 < -1.20000000000000012e43

   1. Initial program 58.8%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 93.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 93.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 89.3%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around inf 80.3%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 80.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \lambda_1}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. Simplified 80.3%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \lambda_1}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   if -1.20000000000000012e43 < lambda1

   1. Initial program 59.8%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 97.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 94.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around 0 82.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 82.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{-\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 82.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(-\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \lambda_2}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 82.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. Simplified 82.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 82.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_1 \leq -1.2 \cdot 10^{+43}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_2 \cdot \left(-\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 79.8% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_2 \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{-24}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 \cdot t_0, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(t_0 \cdot \left(-\lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (cos (* 0.5 phi2))))
   (if (<= lambda2 1.1e-24)
     (* R (hypot (* lambda1 t_0) (- phi1 phi2)))
     (* R (hypot (* t_0 (- lambda2)) (- phi1 phi2))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = cos((0.5 * phi2));
	double tmp;
	if (lambda2 <= 1.1e-24) {
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 * t_0), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot((t_0 * -lambda2), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = Math.cos((0.5 * phi2));
	double tmp;
	if (lambda2 <= 1.1e-24) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((lambda1 * t_0), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((t_0 * -lambda2), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	t_0 = math.cos((0.5 * phi2))
	tmp = 0
	if lambda2 <= 1.1e-24:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((lambda1 * t_0), (phi1 - phi2))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((t_0 * -lambda2), (phi1 - phi2))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = cos(Float64(0.5 * phi2))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (lambda2 <= 1.1e-24)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(lambda1 * t_0), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(t_0 * Float64(-lambda2)), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = cos((0.5 * phi2));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (lambda2 <= 1.1e-24)
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 * t_0), (phi1 - phi2));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot((t_0 * -lambda2), (phi1 - phi2));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[lambda2, 1.1e-24], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(lambda1 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(t$95$0 * (-lambda2)), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if lambda2 < 1.10000000000000001e-24

   1. Initial program 61.3%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 96.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 93.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around inf 85.3%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 85.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \lambda_1}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. Simplified 85.3%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \lambda_1}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   if 1.10000000000000001e-24 < lambda2

   1. Initial program 55.3%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 97.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 87.3%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around 0 79.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 79.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      2. mul-1-neg 79.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-\lambda_2\right)} \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. Simplified 79.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-\lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 83.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_2 \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{-24}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 74.7% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{-6}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 2.4e-6)
   (* R (hypot phi1 (- lambda1 lambda2)))
   (* R (hypot (* lambda1 (cos (* 0.5 phi2))) (- phi1 phi2)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 2.4e-6) {
		tmp = R * hypot(phi1, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 * cos((0.5 * phi2))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 2.4e-6) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(phi1, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((lambda1 * Math.cos((0.5 * phi2))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 2.4e-6:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(phi1, (lambda1 - lambda2))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((lambda1 * math.cos((0.5 * phi2))), (phi1 - phi2))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 2.4e-6)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(phi1, Float64(lambda1 - lambda2)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(lambda1 * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi2))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 2.4e-6)
		tmp = R * hypot(phi1, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 * cos((0.5 * phi2))), (phi1 - phi2));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 2.4e-6], N[(R * N[Sqrt[phi1 ^ 2 + N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(lambda1 * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 2.3999999999999999e-6

   1. Initial program 63.0%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 97.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 90.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 52.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\phi_1}^{2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 52.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      2. unpow2 52.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}} \]

      3. hypot-def 70.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 70.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   if 2.3999999999999999e-6 < phi2

   1. Initial program 51.1%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 94.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 94.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 94.3%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around inf 86.1%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 86.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \lambda_1}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. Simplified 86.1%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \lambda_1}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 75.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{-6}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 10: 70.6% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{+28}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 4.5e+28)
   (* R (hypot phi1 (- lambda1 lambda2)))
   (* R (- phi2 phi1))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 4.5e+28) {
		tmp = R * hypot(phi1, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 4.5e+28) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(phi1, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 4.5e+28:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(phi1, (lambda1 - lambda2))
	else:
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 4.5e+28)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(phi1, Float64(lambda1 - lambda2)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(phi2 - phi1));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 4.5e+28)
		tmp = R * hypot(phi1, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	else
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 4.5e+28], N[(R * N[Sqrt[phi1 ^ 2 + N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[(phi2 - phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 4.4999999999999997e28

   1. Initial program 62.6%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 97.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 91.2%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 51.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\phi_1}^{2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 51.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      2. unpow2 51.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}} \]

      3. hypot-def 70.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 70.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   if 4.4999999999999997e28 < phi2

   1. Initial program 51.0%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 74.2%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + -1 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 74.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 74.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 74.2%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 71.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{+28}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 11: 71.3% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -5.6 \cdot 10^{-40}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi1 -5.6e-40)
   (* R (hypot phi1 (- lambda1 lambda2)))
   (* R (hypot phi2 (- lambda1 lambda2)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -5.6e-40) {
		tmp = R * hypot(phi1, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot(phi2, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -5.6e-40) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(phi1, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(phi2, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi1 <= -5.6e-40:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(phi1, (lambda1 - lambda2))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(phi2, (lambda1 - lambda2))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi1 <= -5.6e-40)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(phi1, Float64(lambda1 - lambda2)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(phi2, Float64(lambda1 - lambda2)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi1 <= -5.6e-40)
		tmp = R * hypot(phi1, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot(phi2, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi1, -5.6e-40], N[(R * N[Sqrt[phi1 ^ 2 + N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[phi2 ^ 2 + N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi1 < -5.5999999999999999e-40

   1. Initial program 60.6%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 96.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 89.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 56.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\phi_1}^{2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 56.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      2. unpow2 56.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}} \]

      3. hypot-def 77.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   if -5.5999999999999999e-40 < phi1

   1. Initial program 59.2%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 97.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 91.3%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 50.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\phi_2}^{2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 50.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      2. unpow2 50.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}} \]

      3. hypot-def 72.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 72.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 73.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -5.6 \cdot 10^{-40}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 12: 29.2% accurate, 54.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{-40}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi1 -2.7e-40) (* R (- phi1)) (* R phi2)))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -2.7e-40) {
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	} else {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (phi1 <= (-2.7d-40)) then
        tmp = r * -phi1
    else
        tmp = r * phi2
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -2.7e-40) {
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	} else {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi1 <= -2.7e-40:
		tmp = R * -phi1
	else:
		tmp = R * phi2
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi1 <= -2.7e-40)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(-phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * phi2);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi1 <= -2.7e-40)
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	else
		tmp = R * phi2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi1, -2.7e-40], N[(R * (-phi1)), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi1 < -2.7e-40

   1. Initial program 60.6%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 96.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 61.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 61.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-R \cdot \phi_1} \]

      2. *-commutative 61.0%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot R} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 61.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 61.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)} \]

   if -2.7e-40 < phi1

   1. Initial program 59.2%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 97.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 18.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 18.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]

   6. Simplified 18.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 31.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{-40}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 13: 30.4% accurate, 65.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2) :precision binary64 (* R (- phi2 phi1)))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * (phi2 - phi1);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    code = r * (phi2 - phi1)
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * (phi2 - phi1);
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * (phi2 - phi1)

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * Float64(phi2 - phi1))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[(phi2 - phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 59.6%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

2. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 32.0%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + -1 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 32.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right)}\right) \]

   2. unsub-neg 32.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

4. Simplified 32.0%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

5. Final simplification 32.0%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right) \]

Alternative 14: 17.5% accurate, 109.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \phi_2 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2) :precision binary64 (* R phi2))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * phi2;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    code = r * phi2
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * phi2;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * phi2

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * phi2)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * phi2;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 59.6%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-def 96.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 96.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 17.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 17.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]

6. Simplified 17.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]

7. Final simplification 17.8%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \phi_2 \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023321 
(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
  :name "Equirectangular approximation to distance on a great circle"
  :precision binary64
  (* R (sqrt (+ (* (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0))) (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2))))))