Numeric.SpecFunctions:logBeta from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B

Percentage Accurate: 99.8% → 99.8%

Time: 18.0s

Alternatives: 18

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ (* x (log y)) z) t) a) (* (- b 0.5) (log c))) (* y i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((((x * log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5) * log(c))) + (y * i);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((((x * log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5d0) * log(c))) + (y * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((((x * Math.log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5) * Math.log(c))) + (y * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((((x * math.log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5) * math.log(c))) + (y * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + Float64(Float64(b - 0.5) * log(c))) + Float64(y * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((((x * log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5) * log(c))) + (y * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision] + a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ (* x (log y)) z) t) a) (* (- b 0.5) (log c))) (* y i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((((x * log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5) * log(c))) + (y * i);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((((x * log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5d0) * log(c))) + (y * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((((x * Math.log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5) * Math.log(c))) + (y * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((((x * math.log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5) * math.log(c))) + (y * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + Float64(Float64(b - 0.5) * log(c))) + Float64(y * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((((x * log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5) * log(c))) + (y * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision] + a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \log c \cdot \left(b + -0.5\right) + \left(z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, t + a\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (fma y i (+ (* (log c) (+ b -0.5)) (+ z (fma x (log y) (+ t a))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return fma(y, i, ((log(c) * (b + -0.5)) + (z + fma(x, log(y), (t + a)))));
}

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return fma(y, i, Float64(Float64(log(c) * Float64(b + -0.5)) + Float64(z + fma(x, log(y), Float64(t + a)))))
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(y * i + N[(N[(N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision] * N[(b + -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z + N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] + N[(t + a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   3. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(a + t\right)}\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   4. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)} + \left(a + t\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   5. associate-+r+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \left(a + t\right)\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   6. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right)}\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   7. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   8. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i} \]

   9. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot i + \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

   10. fma-def 99.9%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

   11. +-commutative 99.9%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

   12. fma-def 99.9%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b - 0.5, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

   13. sub-neg 99.9%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b + \left(-0.5\right)}, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)\right) \]

   14. metadata-eval 99.9%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)\right) \]

   15. +-commutative 99.9%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right)}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, t + a\right)\right)\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-udef 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\left(b + -0.5\right) \cdot \log c + \left(z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, t + a\right)\right)}\right) \]

   2. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\log c \cdot \left(b + -0.5\right)} + \left(z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, t + a\right)\right)\right) \]

5. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\log c \cdot \left(b + -0.5\right) + \left(z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, t + a\right)\right)}\right) \]

6. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \log c \cdot \left(b + -0.5\right) + \left(z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, t + a\right)\right)\right) \]

Alternative 2: 99.8% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \left(\left(t + a\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right)\right) + \left(\log c \cdot \left(b + -0.5\right) + y \cdot i\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ t a) (fma x (log y) z)) (+ (* (log c) (+ b -0.5)) (* y i))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return ((t + a) + fma(x, log(y), z)) + ((log(c) * (b + -0.5)) + (y * i));
}

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(t + a) + fma(x, log(y), z)) + Float64(Float64(log(c) * Float64(b + -0.5)) + Float64(y * i)))
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(t + a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision] * N[(b + -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   3. fma-def 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right)} + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   4. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\color{blue}{\left(b + \left(-0.5\right)\right)} \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   5. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b + -0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(t + a\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, z\right)\right) + \left(\log c \cdot \left(b + -0.5\right) + y \cdot i\right) \]

Alternative 3: 94.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x \cdot \log y\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.45 \cdot 10^{+91}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(z + \left(y \cdot i + t_1\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{+188}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(y \cdot i + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(\log c \cdot b + \left(a + \left(t + t_1\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* x (log y))))
   (if (<= x -1.45e+91)
     (+ a (+ z (+ (* y i) t_1)))
     (if (<= x 4.5e+188)
       (+ a (+ t (+ z (+ (* y i) (* (log c) (- b 0.5))))))
       (+ (* y i) (+ (* (log c) b) (+ a (+ t t_1))))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = x * log(y);
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.45e+91) {
		tmp = a + (z + ((y * i) + t_1));
	} else if (x <= 4.5e+188) {
		tmp = a + (t + (z + ((y * i) + (log(c) * (b - 0.5)))));
	} else {
		tmp = (y * i) + ((log(c) * b) + (a + (t + t_1)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = x * log(y)
    if (x <= (-1.45d+91)) then
        tmp = a + (z + ((y * i) + t_1))
    else if (x <= 4.5d+188) then
        tmp = a + (t + (z + ((y * i) + (log(c) * (b - 0.5d0)))))
    else
        tmp = (y * i) + ((log(c) * b) + (a + (t + t_1)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = x * Math.log(y);
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.45e+91) {
		tmp = a + (z + ((y * i) + t_1));
	} else if (x <= 4.5e+188) {
		tmp = a + (t + (z + ((y * i) + (Math.log(c) * (b - 0.5)))));
	} else {
		tmp = (y * i) + ((Math.log(c) * b) + (a + (t + t_1)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = x * math.log(y)
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.45e+91:
		tmp = a + (z + ((y * i) + t_1))
	elif x <= 4.5e+188:
		tmp = a + (t + (z + ((y * i) + (math.log(c) * (b - 0.5)))))
	else:
		tmp = (y * i) + ((math.log(c) * b) + (a + (t + t_1)))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(x * log(y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.45e+91)
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(z + Float64(Float64(y * i) + t_1)));
	elseif (x <= 4.5e+188)
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(t + Float64(z + Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(log(c) * Float64(b - 0.5))))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(Float64(log(c) * b) + Float64(a + Float64(t + t_1))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = x * log(y);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.45e+91)
		tmp = a + (z + ((y * i) + t_1));
	elseif (x <= 4.5e+188)
		tmp = a + (t + (z + ((y * i) + (log(c) * (b - 0.5)))));
	else
		tmp = (y * i) + ((log(c) * b) + (a + (t + t_1)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[x, -1.45e+91], N[(a + N[(z + N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 4.5e+188], N[(a + N[(t + N[(z + N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision] * N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a + N[(t + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -1.45000000000000007e91

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in b around inf 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{b \cdot \log c}\right) + y \cdot i \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   5. Taylor expanded in b around 0 96.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(i \cdot y + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 85.2%

      \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(i \cdot y + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)} \]

   if -1.45000000000000007e91 < x < 4.5000000000000001e188

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(i \cdot y + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if 4.5000000000000001e188 < x

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in b around inf 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{b \cdot \log c}\right) + y \cdot i \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 91.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \log y} + t\right) + a\right) + \log c \cdot b\right) + y \cdot i \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 94.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.45 \cdot 10^{+91}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(z + \left(y \cdot i + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{+188}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(y \cdot i + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(\log c \cdot b + \left(a + \left(t + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ y \cdot i + \left(\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right) + \left(a + \left(t + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (* y i) (+ (* (log c) (- b 0.5)) (+ a (+ t (+ z (* x (log y))))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (y * i) + ((log(c) * (b - 0.5)) + (a + (t + (z + (x * log(y))))));
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (y * i) + ((log(c) * (b - 0.5d0)) + (a + (t + (z + (x * log(y))))))
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (y * i) + ((Math.log(c) * (b - 0.5)) + (a + (t + (z + (x * Math.log(y))))));
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (y * i) + ((math.log(c) * (b - 0.5)) + (a + (t + (z + (x * math.log(y))))))

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(Float64(log(c) * Float64(b - 0.5)) + Float64(a + Float64(t + Float64(z + Float64(x * log(y)))))))
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (y * i) + ((log(c) * (b - 0.5)) + (a + (t + (z + (x * log(y))))));
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision] * N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a + N[(t + N[(z + N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

2. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot i + \left(\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right) + \left(a + \left(t + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

Alternative 5: 98.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ y \cdot i + \left(\log c \cdot b + \left(a + \left(t + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (* y i) (+ (* (log c) b) (+ a (+ t (+ z (* x (log y))))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (y * i) + ((log(c) * b) + (a + (t + (z + (x * log(y))))));
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (y * i) + ((log(c) * b) + (a + (t + (z + (x * log(y))))))
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (y * i) + ((Math.log(c) * b) + (a + (t + (z + (x * Math.log(y))))));
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (y * i) + ((math.log(c) * b) + (a + (t + (z + (x * math.log(y))))))

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(Float64(log(c) * b) + Float64(a + Float64(t + Float64(z + Float64(x * log(y)))))))
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (y * i) + ((log(c) * b) + (a + (t + (z + (x * log(y))))));
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a + N[(t + N[(z + N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

2. Taylor expanded in b around inf 98.3%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{b \cdot \log c}\right) + y \cdot i \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

4. Simplified 98.3%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

5. Final simplification 98.3%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot i + \left(\log c \cdot b + \left(a + \left(t + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

Alternative 6: 92.5% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b - 0.5 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+151} \lor \neg \left(b - 0.5 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+52}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(y \cdot i + \log c \cdot b\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(z + \left(y \cdot i + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (- b 0.5) -1e+151) (not (<= (- b 0.5) 5e+52)))
   (+ a (+ t (+ z (+ (* y i) (* (log c) b)))))
   (+ a (+ z (+ (* y i) (* x (log y)))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((b - 0.5) <= -1e+151) || !((b - 0.5) <= 5e+52)) {
		tmp = a + (t + (z + ((y * i) + (log(c) * b))));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (z + ((y * i) + (x * log(y))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((b - 0.5d0) <= (-1d+151)) .or. (.not. ((b - 0.5d0) <= 5d+52))) then
        tmp = a + (t + (z + ((y * i) + (log(c) * b))))
    else
        tmp = a + (z + ((y * i) + (x * log(y))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((b - 0.5) <= -1e+151) || !((b - 0.5) <= 5e+52)) {
		tmp = a + (t + (z + ((y * i) + (Math.log(c) * b))));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (z + ((y * i) + (x * Math.log(y))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((b - 0.5) <= -1e+151) or not ((b - 0.5) <= 5e+52):
		tmp = a + (t + (z + ((y * i) + (math.log(c) * b))))
	else:
		tmp = a + (z + ((y * i) + (x * math.log(y))))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(b - 0.5) <= -1e+151) || !(Float64(b - 0.5) <= 5e+52))
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(t + Float64(z + Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(log(c) * b)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(z + Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(x * log(y)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((b - 0.5) <= -1e+151) || ~(((b - 0.5) <= 5e+52)))
		tmp = a + (t + (z + ((y * i) + (log(c) * b))));
	else
		tmp = a + (z + ((y * i) + (x * log(y))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision], -1e+151], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision], 5e+52]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(a + N[(t + N[(z + N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a + N[(z + N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 b 1/2) < -1.00000000000000002e151 or 5e52 < (-.f64 b 1/2)

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in b around inf 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{b \cdot \log c}\right) + y \cdot i \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 94.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(b \cdot \log c + i \cdot y\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -1.00000000000000002e151 < (-.f64 b 1/2) < 5e52

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in b around inf 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{b \cdot \log c}\right) + y \cdot i \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Simplified 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   5. Taylor expanded in b around 0 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(i \cdot y + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 80.7%

      \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(i \cdot y + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b - 0.5 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+151} \lor \neg \left(b - 0.5 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+52}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(y \cdot i + \log c \cdot b\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(z + \left(y \cdot i + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 93.0% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b - 0.5 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+151} \lor \neg \left(b - 0.5 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+52}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(y \cdot i + \log c \cdot b\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(y \cdot i + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (- b 0.5) -1e+151) (not (<= (- b 0.5) 5e+52)))
   (+ a (+ t (+ z (+ (* y i) (* (log c) b)))))
   (+ a (+ t (+ z (+ (* y i) (* x (log y))))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((b - 0.5) <= -1e+151) || !((b - 0.5) <= 5e+52)) {
		tmp = a + (t + (z + ((y * i) + (log(c) * b))));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (t + (z + ((y * i) + (x * log(y)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((b - 0.5d0) <= (-1d+151)) .or. (.not. ((b - 0.5d0) <= 5d+52))) then
        tmp = a + (t + (z + ((y * i) + (log(c) * b))))
    else
        tmp = a + (t + (z + ((y * i) + (x * log(y)))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((b - 0.5) <= -1e+151) || !((b - 0.5) <= 5e+52)) {
		tmp = a + (t + (z + ((y * i) + (Math.log(c) * b))));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (t + (z + ((y * i) + (x * Math.log(y)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((b - 0.5) <= -1e+151) or not ((b - 0.5) <= 5e+52):
		tmp = a + (t + (z + ((y * i) + (math.log(c) * b))))
	else:
		tmp = a + (t + (z + ((y * i) + (x * math.log(y)))))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(b - 0.5) <= -1e+151) || !(Float64(b - 0.5) <= 5e+52))
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(t + Float64(z + Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(log(c) * b)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(t + Float64(z + Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(x * log(y))))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((b - 0.5) <= -1e+151) || ~(((b - 0.5) <= 5e+52)))
		tmp = a + (t + (z + ((y * i) + (log(c) * b))));
	else
		tmp = a + (t + (z + ((y * i) + (x * log(y)))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision], -1e+151], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision], 5e+52]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(a + N[(t + N[(z + N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a + N[(t + N[(z + N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 b 1/2) < -1.00000000000000002e151 or 5e52 < (-.f64 b 1/2)

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in b around inf 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{b \cdot \log c}\right) + y \cdot i \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 94.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(b \cdot \log c + i \cdot y\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -1.00000000000000002e151 < (-.f64 b 1/2) < 5e52

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in b around inf 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{b \cdot \log c}\right) + y \cdot i \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Simplified 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   5. Taylor expanded in b around 0 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(i \cdot y + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b - 0.5 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+151} \lor \neg \left(b - 0.5 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+52}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(y \cdot i + \log c \cdot b\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(y \cdot i + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 94.2% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.1 \cdot 10^{+91} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 6.4 \cdot 10^{+199}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(z + \left(y \cdot i + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(y \cdot i + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.1e+91) (not (<= x 6.4e+199)))
   (+ a (+ z (+ (* y i) (* x (log y)))))
   (+ a (+ t (+ z (+ (* y i) (* (log c) (- b 0.5))))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.1e+91) || !(x <= 6.4e+199)) {
		tmp = a + (z + ((y * i) + (x * log(y))));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (t + (z + ((y * i) + (log(c) * (b - 0.5)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.1d+91)) .or. (.not. (x <= 6.4d+199))) then
        tmp = a + (z + ((y * i) + (x * log(y))))
    else
        tmp = a + (t + (z + ((y * i) + (log(c) * (b - 0.5d0)))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.1e+91) || !(x <= 6.4e+199)) {
		tmp = a + (z + ((y * i) + (x * Math.log(y))));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (t + (z + ((y * i) + (Math.log(c) * (b - 0.5)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.1e+91) or not (x <= 6.4e+199):
		tmp = a + (z + ((y * i) + (x * math.log(y))))
	else:
		tmp = a + (t + (z + ((y * i) + (math.log(c) * (b - 0.5)))))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.1e+91) || !(x <= 6.4e+199))
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(z + Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(x * log(y)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(t + Float64(z + Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(log(c) * Float64(b - 0.5))))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.1e+91) || ~((x <= 6.4e+199)))
		tmp = a + (z + ((y * i) + (x * log(y))));
	else
		tmp = a + (t + (z + ((y * i) + (log(c) * (b - 0.5)))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.1e+91], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 6.4e+199]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(a + N[(z + N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a + N[(t + N[(z + N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision] * N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.1e91 or 6.40000000000000011e199 < x

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in b around inf 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{b \cdot \log c}\right) + y \cdot i \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   5. Taylor expanded in b around 0 96.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(i \cdot y + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 85.8%

      \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(i \cdot y + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)} \]

   if -1.1e91 < x < 6.40000000000000011e199

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(i \cdot y + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 93.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.1 \cdot 10^{+91} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 6.4 \cdot 10^{+199}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(z + \left(y \cdot i + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(y \cdot i + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 88.2% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b - 0.5 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+216}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(t + \left(y \cdot i + \log c \cdot b\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b - 0.5 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+136}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(z + \left(y \cdot i + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(t + \left(z + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (- b 0.5) -1e+216)
   (+ a (+ t (+ (* y i) (* (log c) b))))
   (if (<= (- b 0.5) 5e+136)
     (+ a (+ z (+ (* y i) (* x (log y)))))
     (+ a (+ t (+ z (* (log c) (- b 0.5))))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((b - 0.5) <= -1e+216) {
		tmp = a + (t + ((y * i) + (log(c) * b)));
	} else if ((b - 0.5) <= 5e+136) {
		tmp = a + (z + ((y * i) + (x * log(y))));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (t + (z + (log(c) * (b - 0.5))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((b - 0.5d0) <= (-1d+216)) then
        tmp = a + (t + ((y * i) + (log(c) * b)))
    else if ((b - 0.5d0) <= 5d+136) then
        tmp = a + (z + ((y * i) + (x * log(y))))
    else
        tmp = a + (t + (z + (log(c) * (b - 0.5d0))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((b - 0.5) <= -1e+216) {
		tmp = a + (t + ((y * i) + (Math.log(c) * b)));
	} else if ((b - 0.5) <= 5e+136) {
		tmp = a + (z + ((y * i) + (x * Math.log(y))));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (t + (z + (Math.log(c) * (b - 0.5))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (b - 0.5) <= -1e+216:
		tmp = a + (t + ((y * i) + (math.log(c) * b)))
	elif (b - 0.5) <= 5e+136:
		tmp = a + (z + ((y * i) + (x * math.log(y))))
	else:
		tmp = a + (t + (z + (math.log(c) * (b - 0.5))))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(b - 0.5) <= -1e+216)
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(t + Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(log(c) * b))));
	elseif (Float64(b - 0.5) <= 5e+136)
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(z + Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(x * log(y)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(t + Float64(z + Float64(log(c) * Float64(b - 0.5)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((b - 0.5) <= -1e+216)
		tmp = a + (t + ((y * i) + (log(c) * b)));
	elseif ((b - 0.5) <= 5e+136)
		tmp = a + (z + ((y * i) + (x * log(y))));
	else
		tmp = a + (t + (z + (log(c) * (b - 0.5))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision], -1e+216], N[(a + N[(t + N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision], 5e+136], N[(a + N[(z + N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a + N[(t + N[(z + N[(N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision] * N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (-.f64 b 1/2) < -1e216

   1. Initial program 99.5%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in b around inf 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{b \cdot \log c}\right) + y \cdot i \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \log y} + t\right) + a\right) + \log c \cdot b\right) + y \cdot i \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 94.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(b \cdot \log c + i \cdot y\right)\right)} \]

   if -1e216 < (-.f64 b 1/2) < 5.0000000000000002e136

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in b around inf 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{b \cdot \log c}\right) + y \cdot i \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Simplified 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   5. Taylor expanded in b around 0 94.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(i \cdot y + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 79.5%

      \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(i \cdot y + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)} \]

   if 5.0000000000000002e136 < (-.f64 b 1/2)

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(i \cdot y + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in i around 0 84.4%

      \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(z + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 81.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b - 0.5 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+216}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(t + \left(y \cdot i + \log c \cdot b\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b - 0.5 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+136}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(z + \left(y \cdot i + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(t + \left(z + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 10: 93.7% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -9.5 \cdot 10^{+90} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 6.4 \cdot 10^{+199}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(z + \left(y \cdot i + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(z + \left(y \cdot i + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -9.5e+90) (not (<= x 6.4e+199)))
   (+ a (+ z (+ (* y i) (* x (log y)))))
   (+ a (+ z (+ (* y i) (* (log c) (- b 0.5)))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -9.5e+90) || !(x <= 6.4e+199)) {
		tmp = a + (z + ((y * i) + (x * log(y))));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (z + ((y * i) + (log(c) * (b - 0.5))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-9.5d+90)) .or. (.not. (x <= 6.4d+199))) then
        tmp = a + (z + ((y * i) + (x * log(y))))
    else
        tmp = a + (z + ((y * i) + (log(c) * (b - 0.5d0))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -9.5e+90) || !(x <= 6.4e+199)) {
		tmp = a + (z + ((y * i) + (x * Math.log(y))));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (z + ((y * i) + (Math.log(c) * (b - 0.5))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -9.5e+90) or not (x <= 6.4e+199):
		tmp = a + (z + ((y * i) + (x * math.log(y))))
	else:
		tmp = a + (z + ((y * i) + (math.log(c) * (b - 0.5))))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -9.5e+90) || !(x <= 6.4e+199))
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(z + Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(x * log(y)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(z + Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(log(c) * Float64(b - 0.5)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -9.5e+90) || ~((x <= 6.4e+199)))
		tmp = a + (z + ((y * i) + (x * log(y))));
	else
		tmp = a + (z + ((y * i) + (log(c) * (b - 0.5))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -9.5e+90], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 6.4e+199]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(a + N[(z + N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a + N[(z + N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision] * N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -9.4999999999999994e90 or 6.40000000000000011e199 < x

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in b around inf 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{b \cdot \log c}\right) + y \cdot i \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   5. Taylor expanded in b around 0 96.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(i \cdot y + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 85.8%

      \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(i \cdot y + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)} \]

   if -9.4999999999999994e90 < x < 6.40000000000000011e199

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(i \cdot y + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0 77.6%

      \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(i \cdot y + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 79.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -9.5 \cdot 10^{+90} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 6.4 \cdot 10^{+199}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(z + \left(y \cdot i + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(z + \left(y \cdot i + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 11: 71.0% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 48000:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(t + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(t + \left(y \cdot i + \log c \cdot b\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 48000.0)
   (+ a (+ t (+ z (* x (log y)))))
   (+ a (+ t (+ (* y i) (* (log c) b))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 48000.0) {
		tmp = a + (t + (z + (x * log(y))));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (t + ((y * i) + (log(c) * b)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 48000.0d0) then
        tmp = a + (t + (z + (x * log(y))))
    else
        tmp = a + (t + ((y * i) + (log(c) * b)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 48000.0) {
		tmp = a + (t + (z + (x * Math.log(y))));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (t + ((y * i) + (Math.log(c) * b)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 48000.0:
		tmp = a + (t + (z + (x * math.log(y))))
	else:
		tmp = a + (t + ((y * i) + (math.log(c) * b)))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 48000.0)
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(t + Float64(z + Float64(x * log(y)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(t + Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(log(c) * b))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 48000.0)
		tmp = a + (t + (z + (x * log(y))));
	else
		tmp = a + (t + ((y * i) + (log(c) * b)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[y, 48000.0], N[(a + N[(t + N[(z + N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a + N[(t + N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 48000

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in b around inf 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{b \cdot \log c}\right) + y \cdot i \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Simplified 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   5. Taylor expanded in b around 0 83.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(i \cdot y + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in i around 0 80.4%

      \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 80.4%

         \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z + x \cdot \log y\right) + t\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 80.4%

         \[\leadsto a + \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right)} + t\right) \]

   8. Simplified 80.4%

      \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right)} \]

   if 48000 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in b around inf 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{b \cdot \log c}\right) + y \cdot i \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Simplified 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \log y} + t\right) + a\right) + \log c \cdot b\right) + y \cdot i \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 81.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(b \cdot \log c + i \cdot y\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 81.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 48000:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(t + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(t + \left(y \cdot i + \log c \cdot b\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 12: 65.2% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 66000:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(t + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + y \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 66000.0) (+ a (+ t (+ z (* x (log y))))) (+ a (* y i))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 66000.0) {
		tmp = a + (t + (z + (x * log(y))));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (y * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 66000.0d0) then
        tmp = a + (t + (z + (x * log(y))))
    else
        tmp = a + (y * i)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 66000.0) {
		tmp = a + (t + (z + (x * Math.log(y))));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (y * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 66000.0:
		tmp = a + (t + (z + (x * math.log(y))))
	else:
		tmp = a + (y * i)
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 66000.0)
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(t + Float64(z + Float64(x * log(y)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(y * i));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 66000.0)
		tmp = a + (t + (z + (x * log(y))));
	else
		tmp = a + (y * i);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[y, 66000.0], N[(a + N[(t + N[(z + N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a + N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 66000

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in b around inf 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{b \cdot \log c}\right) + y \cdot i \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Simplified 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   5. Taylor expanded in b around 0 83.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(i \cdot y + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in i around 0 80.4%

      \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 80.4%

         \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{\left(\left(z + x \cdot \log y\right) + t\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 80.4%

         \[\leadsto a + \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right)} + t\right) \]

   8. Simplified 80.4%

      \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right)} \]

   if 66000 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 93.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(i \cdot y + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in i around inf 60.0%

      \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{i \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 60.0%

         \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   5. Simplified 60.0%

      \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 66000:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(t + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + y \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 13: 59.5% accurate, 2.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{+114}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + y \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a 7.2e+114) (fma y i z) (+ a (* y i))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= 7.2e+114) {
		tmp = fma(y, i, z);
	} else {
		tmp = a + (y * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= 7.2e+114)
		tmp = fma(y, i, z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(y * i));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[a, 7.2e+114], N[(y * i + z), $MachinePrecision], N[(a + N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < 7.2000000000000001e114

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(a + t\right)}\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)} + \left(a + t\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      5. associate-+r+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \left(a + t\right)\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      6. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right)}\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      8. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i} \]

      9. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot i + \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

      10. fma-def 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

      11. +-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

      12. fma-def 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b - 0.5, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

      13. sub-neg 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b + \left(-0.5\right)}, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)\right) \]

      14. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)\right) \]

      15. +-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, t + a\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-udef 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\left(b + -0.5\right) \cdot \log c + \left(z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, t + a\right)\right)}\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\log c \cdot \left(b + -0.5\right)} + \left(z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, t + a\right)\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\log c \cdot \left(b + -0.5\right) + \left(z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, t + a\right)\right)}\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 41.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{z}\right) \]

   if 7.2000000000000001e114 < a

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(i \cdot y + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in i around inf 77.3%

      \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{i \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 77.3%

         \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   5. Simplified 77.3%

      \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 47.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{+114}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + y \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 14: 34.0% accurate, 23.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq 7 \cdot 10^{+118} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 2.45 \cdot 10^{+181}\right) \land a \leq 9.2 \cdot 10^{+198}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= a 7e+118) (and (not (<= a 2.45e+181)) (<= a 9.2e+198)))
   (* y i)
   a))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= 7e+118) || (!(a <= 2.45e+181) && (a <= 9.2e+198))) {
		tmp = y * i;
	} else {
		tmp = a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a <= 7d+118) .or. (.not. (a <= 2.45d+181)) .and. (a <= 9.2d+198)) then
        tmp = y * i
    else
        tmp = a
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= 7e+118) || (!(a <= 2.45e+181) && (a <= 9.2e+198))) {
		tmp = y * i;
	} else {
		tmp = a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (a <= 7e+118) or (not (a <= 2.45e+181) and (a <= 9.2e+198)):
		tmp = y * i
	else:
		tmp = a
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((a <= 7e+118) || (!(a <= 2.45e+181) && (a <= 9.2e+198)))
		tmp = Float64(y * i);
	else
		tmp = a;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a <= 7e+118) || (~((a <= 2.45e+181)) && (a <= 9.2e+198)))
		tmp = y * i;
	else
		tmp = a;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[a, 7e+118], And[N[Not[LessEqual[a, 2.45e+181]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[a, 9.2e+198]]], N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision], a]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < 7.00000000000000033e118 or 2.44999999999999991e181 < a < 9.2000000000000002e198

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 31.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot y} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 31.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   4. Simplified 31.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   if 7.00000000000000033e118 < a < 2.44999999999999991e181 or 9.2000000000000002e198 < a

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around inf 66.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 37.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq 7 \cdot 10^{+118} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 2.45 \cdot 10^{+181}\right) \land a \leq 9.2 \cdot 10^{+198}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 15: 34.1% accurate, 23.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq 9.6 \cdot 10^{+118}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+181}:\\ \;\;\;\;a\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{+200}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + a\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a 9.6e+118)
   (* y i)
   (if (<= a 2e+181) a (if (<= a 1.8e+200) (* y i) (+ t a)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= 9.6e+118) {
		tmp = y * i;
	} else if (a <= 2e+181) {
		tmp = a;
	} else if (a <= 1.8e+200) {
		tmp = y * i;
	} else {
		tmp = t + a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (a <= 9.6d+118) then
        tmp = y * i
    else if (a <= 2d+181) then
        tmp = a
    else if (a <= 1.8d+200) then
        tmp = y * i
    else
        tmp = t + a
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= 9.6e+118) {
		tmp = y * i;
	} else if (a <= 2e+181) {
		tmp = a;
	} else if (a <= 1.8e+200) {
		tmp = y * i;
	} else {
		tmp = t + a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if a <= 9.6e+118:
		tmp = y * i
	elif a <= 2e+181:
		tmp = a
	elif a <= 1.8e+200:
		tmp = y * i
	else:
		tmp = t + a
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= 9.6e+118)
		tmp = Float64(y * i);
	elseif (a <= 2e+181)
		tmp = a;
	elseif (a <= 1.8e+200)
		tmp = Float64(y * i);
	else
		tmp = Float64(t + a);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= 9.6e+118)
		tmp = y * i;
	elseif (a <= 2e+181)
		tmp = a;
	elseif (a <= 1.8e+200)
		tmp = y * i;
	else
		tmp = t + a;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[a, 9.6e+118], N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[a, 2e+181], a, If[LessEqual[a, 1.8e+200], N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision], N[(t + a), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if a < 9.6e118 or 1.9999999999999998e181 < a < 1.7999999999999999e200

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 31.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot y} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 31.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   4. Simplified 31.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   if 9.6e118 < a < 1.9999999999999998e181

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in a around inf 33.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \]

   if 1.7999999999999999e200 < a

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(i \cdot y + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 85.6%

      \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{t} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 37.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq 9.6 \cdot 10^{+118}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+181}:\\ \;\;\;\;a\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{+200}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + a\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 16: 55.0% accurate, 31.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 3.4 \cdot 10^{-33}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(z + t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + y \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 3.4e-33) (+ a (+ z t)) (+ a (* y i))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 3.4e-33) {
		tmp = a + (z + t);
	} else {
		tmp = a + (y * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 3.4d-33) then
        tmp = a + (z + t)
    else
        tmp = a + (y * i)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 3.4e-33) {
		tmp = a + (z + t);
	} else {
		tmp = a + (y * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 3.4e-33:
		tmp = a + (z + t)
	else:
		tmp = a + (y * i)
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 3.4e-33)
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(z + t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(y * i));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 3.4e-33)
		tmp = a + (z + t);
	else
		tmp = a + (y * i);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[y, 3.4e-33], N[(a + N[(z + t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a + N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 3.4000000000000001e-33

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in b around inf 96.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{b \cdot \log c}\right) + y \cdot i \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 96.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Simplified 96.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   5. Taylor expanded in b around 0 81.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(i \cdot y + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 56.4%

      \[\leadsto a + \left(t + \color{blue}{z}\right) \]

   if 3.4000000000000001e-33 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 90.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(i \cdot y + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in i around inf 58.9%

      \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{i \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 58.9%

         \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   5. Simplified 58.9%

      \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 57.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 3.4 \cdot 10^{-33}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(z + t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + y \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 17: 44.1% accurate, 43.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ a + y \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i) :precision binary64 (+ a (* y i)))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return a + (y * i);
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = a + (y * i)
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return a + (y * i);
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return a + (y * i)

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(a + Float64(y * i))
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = a + (y * i);
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(a + N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 84.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(i \cdot y + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

3. Taylor expanded in i around inf 45.6%

   \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{i \cdot y} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 45.6%

      \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

5. Simplified 45.6%

   \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

6. Final simplification 45.6%

   \[\leadsto a + y \cdot i \]

Alternative 18: 22.1% accurate, 219.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ a \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i) :precision binary64 a)

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return a;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = a
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return a;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return a

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return a
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = a;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := a

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

2. Taylor expanded in a around inf 19.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \]

3. Final simplification 19.7%

   \[\leadsto a \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023321 
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:logBeta from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ (* x (log y)) z) t) a) (* (- b 0.5) (log c))) (* y i)))