Numeric.Histogram:binBounds from Chart-1.5.3

Percentage Accurate: 92.8% → 98.6%

Time: 5.4s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.0×

• 24.8% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ x (/ (* (- y x) z) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (((y - x) * z) / t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + (((y - x) * z) / t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (((y - x) * z) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + (((y - x) * z) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(Float64(y - x) * z) / t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + (((y - x) * z) / t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 92.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ x (/ (* (- y x) z) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (((y - x) * z) / t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + (((y - x) * z) / t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (((y - x) * z) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + (((y - x) * z) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(Float64(y - x) * z) / t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + (((y - x) * z) / t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.6% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x + \frac{z \cdot \left(y - x\right)}{t}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_1 \leq -\infty \lor \neg \left(t_1 \leq 10^{+280}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \frac{y - x}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ x (/ (* z (- y x)) t))))
   (if (or (<= t_1 (- INFINITY)) (not (<= t_1 1e+280)))
     (+ x (* z (/ (- y x) t)))
     t_1)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x + ((z * (y - x)) / t);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_1 <= -((double) INFINITY)) || !(t_1 <= 1e+280)) {
		tmp = x + (z * ((y - x) / t));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x + ((z * (y - x)) / t);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_1 <= -Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) || !(t_1 <= 1e+280)) {
		tmp = x + (z * ((y - x) / t));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = x + ((z * (y - x)) / t)
	tmp = 0
	if (t_1 <= -math.inf) or not (t_1 <= 1e+280):
		tmp = x + (z * ((y - x) / t))
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(z * Float64(y - x)) / t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t_1 <= Float64(-Inf)) || !(t_1 <= 1e+280))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(y - x) / t)));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = x + ((z * (y - x)) / t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_1 <= -Inf) || ~((t_1 <= 1e+280)))
		tmp = x + (z * ((y - x) / t));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(x + N[(N[(z * N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t$95$1, (-Infinity)], N[Not[LessEqual[t$95$1, 1e+280]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(z * N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 x (/.f64 (*.f64 (-.f64 y x) z) t)) < -inf.0 or 1e280 < (+.f64 x (/.f64 (*.f64 (-.f64 y x) z) t))

   1. Initial program 80.3%

      \[x + \frac{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y - x}{t} \cdot z} \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y - x}{t} \cdot z} \]

   if -inf.0 < (+.f64 x (/.f64 (*.f64 (-.f64 y x) z) t)) < 1e280

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x + \frac{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z}{t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + \frac{z \cdot \left(y - x\right)}{t} \leq -\infty \lor \neg \left(x + \frac{z \cdot \left(y - x\right)}{t} \leq 10^{+280}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \frac{y - x}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{z \cdot \left(y - x\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2: 97.4% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{z}{t}, y - x, x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (fma (/ z t) (- y x) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma((z / t), (y - x), x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(Float64(z / t), Float64(y - x), x)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 92.5%

   \[x + \frac{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 92.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z}{t} + x} \]

   2. *-commutative 92.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y - x\right)}}{t} + x \]

   3. associate-*l/ 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{z}{t} \cdot \left(y - x\right)} + x \]

   4. fma-def 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{z}{t}, y - x, x\right)} \]

3. Simplified 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{z}{t}, y - x, x\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{z}{t}, y - x, x\right) \]

Alternative 3: 85.9% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.1 \cdot 10^{-26} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 4000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{z}{t} \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -2.1e-26) (not (<= y 4000000.0)))
   (+ x (* (/ z t) y))
   (* x (- 1.0 (/ z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2.1e-26) || !(y <= 4000000.0)) {
		tmp = x + ((z / t) * y);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (z / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-2.1d-26)) .or. (.not. (y <= 4000000.0d0))) then
        tmp = x + ((z / t) * y)
    else
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - (z / t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2.1e-26) || !(y <= 4000000.0)) {
		tmp = x + ((z / t) * y);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (z / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -2.1e-26) or not (y <= 4000000.0):
		tmp = x + ((z / t) * y)
	else:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (z / t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -2.1e-26) || !(y <= 4000000.0))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(z / t) * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - Float64(z / t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -2.1e-26) || ~((y <= 4000000.0)))
		tmp = x + ((z / t) * y);
	else
		tmp = x * (1.0 - (z / t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -2.1e-26], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 4000000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(1.0 - N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -2.10000000000000008e-26 or 4e6 < y

   1. Initial program 88.6%

      \[x + \frac{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z}{t} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 84.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 92.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

   4. Simplified 92.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

   if -2.10000000000000008e-26 < y < 4e6

   1. Initial program 96.8%

      \[x + \frac{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z}{t} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 93.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 93.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{z}{t}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 93.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 93.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 93.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.1 \cdot 10^{-26} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 4000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{z}{t} \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 92.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + z \cdot \frac{y - x}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ x (* z (/ (- y x) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (z * ((y - x) / t));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + (z * ((y - x) / t))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (z * ((y - x) / t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + (z * ((y - x) / t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(y - x) / t)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + (z * ((y - x) / t));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(z * N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 92.5%

   \[x + \frac{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l/ 94.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y - x}{t} \cdot z} \]

3. Applied egg-rr 94.3%

   \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y - x}{t} \cdot z} \]

4. Final simplification 94.3%

   \[\leadsto x + z \cdot \frac{y - x}{t} \]

Alternative 5: 97.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y - x}{\frac{t}{z}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ x (/ (- y x) (/ t z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y - x) / (t / z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y - x) / (t / z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y - x) / (t / z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y - x) / (t / z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y - x) / Float64(t / z)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y - x) / (t / z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 92.5%

   \[x + \frac{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 98.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y - x}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]

3. Simplified 98.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y - x}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]

4. Final simplification 98.7%

   \[\leadsto x + \frac{y - x}{\frac{t}{z}} \]

Alternative 6: 66.6% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (* x (- 1.0 (/ z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x * (1.0 - (z / t));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x * (1.0d0 - (z / t))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x * (1.0 - (z / t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x * (1.0 - (z / t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - Float64(z / t)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x * (1.0 - (z / t));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x * N[(1.0 - N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 92.5%

   \[x + \frac{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z}{t} \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 67.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 67.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{z}{t}\right)}\right) \]

   2. unsub-neg 67.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]

4. Simplified 67.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]

5. Final simplification 67.6%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{z}{t}\right) \]

Alternative 7: 39.4% accurate, 9.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 92.5%

   \[x + \frac{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z}{t} \]

2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 36.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

3. Final simplification 36.2%

   \[\leadsto x \]

Developer target: 97.6% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x < -9.025511195533005 \cdot 10^{-135}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{z}{t} \cdot \left(x - y\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x < 4.275032163700715 \cdot 10^{-250}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y - x}{t} \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y - x}{\frac{t}{z}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (< x -9.025511195533005e-135)
   (- x (* (/ z t) (- x y)))
   (if (< x 4.275032163700715e-250)
     (+ x (* (/ (- y x) t) z))
     (+ x (/ (- y x) (/ t z))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x < -9.025511195533005e-135) {
		tmp = x - ((z / t) * (x - y));
	} else if (x < 4.275032163700715e-250) {
		tmp = x + (((y - x) / t) * z);
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((y - x) / (t / z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x < (-9.025511195533005d-135)) then
        tmp = x - ((z / t) * (x - y))
    else if (x < 4.275032163700715d-250) then
        tmp = x + (((y - x) / t) * z)
    else
        tmp = x + ((y - x) / (t / z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x < -9.025511195533005e-135) {
		tmp = x - ((z / t) * (x - y));
	} else if (x < 4.275032163700715e-250) {
		tmp = x + (((y - x) / t) * z);
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((y - x) / (t / z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if x < -9.025511195533005e-135:
		tmp = x - ((z / t) * (x - y))
	elif x < 4.275032163700715e-250:
		tmp = x + (((y - x) / t) * z)
	else:
		tmp = x + ((y - x) / (t / z))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x < -9.025511195533005e-135)
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(Float64(z / t) * Float64(x - y)));
	elseif (x < 4.275032163700715e-250)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(Float64(y - x) / t) * z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y - x) / Float64(t / z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x < -9.025511195533005e-135)
		tmp = x - ((z / t) * (x - y));
	elseif (x < 4.275032163700715e-250)
		tmp = x + (((y - x) / t) * z);
	else
		tmp = x + ((y - x) / (t / z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Less[x, -9.025511195533005e-135], N[(x - N[(N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision] * N[(x - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[Less[x, 4.275032163700715e-250], N[(x + N[(N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023321 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Numeric.Histogram:binBounds from Chart-1.5.3"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (if (< x -9.025511195533005e-135) (- x (* (/ z t) (- x y))) (if (< x 4.275032163700715e-250) (+ x (* (/ (- y x) t) z)) (+ x (/ (- y x) (/ t z)))))

  (+ x (/ (* (- y x) z) t)))