Numeric.SpecFunctions:logGamma from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B

Percentage Accurate: 69.3% → 99.3%

Time: 9.0s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 4.2×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  x
  (/
   (*
    y
    (+
     (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z)
     0.279195317918525))
   (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0) * z) + 0.279195317918525d0)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103d0) * z) + 3.350343815022304d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 69.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  x
  (/
   (*
    y
    (+
     (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z)
     0.279195317918525))
   (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0) * z) + 0.279195317918525d0)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103d0) * z) + 3.350343815022304d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.3% accurate, 0.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -190000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 6.2\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936 + \left(\frac{101.23733352003822}{{z}^{2}} - \frac{15.646356830292042}{z}\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{12.000000000000014 + z \cdot 0.39999999996247915}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -190000.0) (not (<= z 6.2)))
   (+
    x
    (/
     y
     (+
      14.431876219268936
      (- (/ 101.23733352003822 (pow z 2.0)) (/ 15.646356830292042 z)))))
   (+ x (/ y (+ 12.000000000000014 (* z 0.39999999996247915))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -190000.0) || !(z <= 6.2)) {
		tmp = x + (y / (14.431876219268936 + ((101.23733352003822 / pow(z, 2.0)) - (15.646356830292042 / z))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y / (12.000000000000014 + (z * 0.39999999996247915)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-190000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 6.2d0))) then
        tmp = x + (y / (14.431876219268936d0 + ((101.23733352003822d0 / (z ** 2.0d0)) - (15.646356830292042d0 / z))))
    else
        tmp = x + (y / (12.000000000000014d0 + (z * 0.39999999996247915d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -190000.0) || !(z <= 6.2)) {
		tmp = x + (y / (14.431876219268936 + ((101.23733352003822 / Math.pow(z, 2.0)) - (15.646356830292042 / z))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y / (12.000000000000014 + (z * 0.39999999996247915)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -190000.0) or not (z <= 6.2):
		tmp = x + (y / (14.431876219268936 + ((101.23733352003822 / math.pow(z, 2.0)) - (15.646356830292042 / z))))
	else:
		tmp = x + (y / (12.000000000000014 + (z * 0.39999999996247915)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -190000.0) || !(z <= 6.2))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / Float64(14.431876219268936 + Float64(Float64(101.23733352003822 / (z ^ 2.0)) - Float64(15.646356830292042 / z)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / Float64(12.000000000000014 + Float64(z * 0.39999999996247915))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -190000.0) || ~((z <= 6.2)))
		tmp = x + (y / (14.431876219268936 + ((101.23733352003822 / (z ^ 2.0)) - (15.646356830292042 / z))));
	else
		tmp = x + (y / (12.000000000000014 + (z * 0.39999999996247915)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -190000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 6.2]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y / N[(14.431876219268936 + N[(N[(101.23733352003822 / N[Power[z, 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(15.646356830292042 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y / N[(12.000000000000014 + N[(z * 0.39999999996247915), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.9e5 or 6.20000000000000018 < z

   1. Initial program 41.0%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 50.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}} \]

      2. fma-def 50.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}} \]

      3. fma-def 50.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

      4. fma-def 50.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 50.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\left(14.431876219268936 + 101.23733352003822 \cdot \frac{1}{{z}^{2}}\right) - 15.646356830292042 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{14.431876219268936 + \left(101.23733352003822 \cdot \frac{1}{{z}^{2}} - 15.646356830292042 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right)}} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936 + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{101.23733352003822 \cdot 1}{{z}^{2}}} - 15.646356830292042 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right)} \]

      3. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936 + \left(\frac{\color{blue}{101.23733352003822}}{{z}^{2}} - 15.646356830292042 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right)} \]

      4. associate-*r/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936 + \left(\frac{101.23733352003822}{{z}^{2}} - \color{blue}{\frac{15.646356830292042 \cdot 1}{z}}\right)} \]

      5. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936 + \left(\frac{101.23733352003822}{{z}^{2}} - \frac{\color{blue}{15.646356830292042}}{z}\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{14.431876219268936 + \left(\frac{101.23733352003822}{{z}^{2}} - \frac{15.646356830292042}{z}\right)}} \]

   if -1.9e5 < z < 6.20000000000000018

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}} \]

      2. fma-def 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}} \]

      3. fma-def 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

      4. fma-def 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{12.000000000000014 + 0.39999999996247915 \cdot z}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{12.000000000000014 + \color{blue}{z \cdot 0.39999999996247915}} \]

   6. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{12.000000000000014 + z \cdot 0.39999999996247915}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -190000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 6.2\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936 + \left(\frac{101.23733352003822}{{z}^{2}} - \frac{15.646356830292042}{z}\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{12.000000000000014 + z \cdot 0.39999999996247915}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2: 99.5% accurate, 0.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 10^{+300}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936 - \frac{15.646356830292042}{z}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<=
      (/
       (*
        y
        (+
         (* z (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968))
         0.279195317918525))
       (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304))
      1e+300)
   (fma
    y
    (/
     (fma z (fma z 0.0692910599291889 0.4917317610505968) 0.279195317918525)
     (fma z (+ z 6.012459259764103) 3.350343815022304))
    x)
   (+ x (/ y (- 14.431876219268936 (/ 15.646356830292042 z))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 1e+300) {
		tmp = fma(y, (fma(z, fma(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968), 0.279195317918525) / fma(z, (z + 6.012459259764103), 3.350343815022304)), x);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y / (14.431876219268936 - (15.646356830292042 / z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 1e+300)
		tmp = fma(y, Float64(fma(z, fma(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968), 0.279195317918525) / fma(z, Float64(z + 6.012459259764103), 3.350343815022304)), x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / Float64(14.431876219268936 - Float64(15.646356830292042 / z))));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 1e+300], N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(z * 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision] / N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y / N[(14.431876219268936 - N[(15.646356830292042 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z 692910599291889/10000000000000000) 307332350656623/625000000000000) z) 11167812716741/40000000000000)) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z 6012459259764103/1000000000000000) z) 104698244219447/31250000000000)) < 1.0000000000000001e300

   1. Initial program 97.1%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-x\right)\right)} \]

      3. unsub-neg 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} - \left(-x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot y}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} - \left(-x\right) \]

      5. associate-*l/ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \cdot y} - \left(-x\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} - \left(-x\right) \]

      7. fma-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, -\left(-x\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, -\left(-x\right)\right) \]

      9. fma-def 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, -\left(-x\right)\right) \]

      10. fma-def 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, -\left(-x\right)\right) \]

      11. *-commutative 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, -\left(-x\right)\right) \]

      12. fma-def 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, -\left(-x\right)\right) \]

      13. remove-double-neg 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, \color{blue}{x}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]

   if 1.0000000000000001e300 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z 692910599291889/10000000000000000) 307332350656623/625000000000000) z) 11167812716741/40000000000000)) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z 6012459259764103/1000000000000000) z) 104698244219447/31250000000000))

   1. Initial program 0.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 12.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}} \]

      2. fma-def 12.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}} \]

      3. fma-def 12.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

      4. fma-def 12.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 12.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{14.431876219268936 - 15.646356830292042 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936 - \color{blue}{\frac{15.646356830292042 \cdot 1}{z}}} \]

      2. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936 - \frac{\color{blue}{15.646356830292042}}{z}} \]

   6. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{14.431876219268936 - \frac{15.646356830292042}{z}}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 10^{+300}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936 - \frac{15.646356830292042}{z}}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 98.5% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 10^{+300}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936 - \frac{15.646356830292042}{z}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<=
      (/
       (*
        y
        (+
         (* z (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968))
         0.279195317918525))
       (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304))
      1e+300)
   (+
    x
    (*
     (fma z (fma z 0.0692910599291889 0.4917317610505968) 0.279195317918525)
     (/ y (fma z (+ z 6.012459259764103) 3.350343815022304))))
   (+ x (/ y (- 14.431876219268936 (/ 15.646356830292042 z))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 1e+300) {
		tmp = x + (fma(z, fma(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968), 0.279195317918525) * (y / fma(z, (z + 6.012459259764103), 3.350343815022304)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y / (14.431876219268936 - (15.646356830292042 / z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 1e+300)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(fma(z, fma(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968), 0.279195317918525) * Float64(y / fma(z, Float64(z + 6.012459259764103), 3.350343815022304))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / Float64(14.431876219268936 - Float64(15.646356830292042 / z))));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 1e+300], N[(x + N[(N[(z * N[(z * 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y / N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y / N[(14.431876219268936 - N[(15.646356830292042 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z 692910599291889/10000000000000000) 307332350656623/625000000000000) z) 11167812716741/40000000000000)) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z 6012459259764103/1000000000000000) z) 104698244219447/31250000000000)) < 1.0000000000000001e300

   1. Initial program 97.1%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 99.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304} \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \]

      3. fma-def 99.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 99.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525\right) \]

      5. fma-def 99.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)} \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)} \]

      6. fma-def 99.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)} \]

   if 1.0000000000000001e300 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z 692910599291889/10000000000000000) 307332350656623/625000000000000) z) 11167812716741/40000000000000)) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z 6012459259764103/1000000000000000) z) 104698244219447/31250000000000))

   1. Initial program 0.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 12.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}} \]

      2. fma-def 12.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}} \]

      3. fma-def 12.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

      4. fma-def 12.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 12.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{14.431876219268936 - 15.646356830292042 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936 - \color{blue}{\frac{15.646356830292042 \cdot 1}{z}}} \]

      2. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936 - \frac{\color{blue}{15.646356830292042}}{z}} \]

   6. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{14.431876219268936 - \frac{15.646356830292042}{z}}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 10^{+300}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936 - \frac{15.646356830292042}{z}}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 99.3% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 10^{+300}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936 - \frac{15.646356830292042}{z}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<=
      (/
       (*
        y
        (+
         (* z (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968))
         0.279195317918525))
       (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304))
      1e+300)
   (+
    x
    (/
     y
     (/
      (fma (+ z 6.012459259764103) z 3.350343815022304)
      (fma
       (fma z 0.0692910599291889 0.4917317610505968)
       z
       0.279195317918525))))
   (+ x (/ y (- 14.431876219268936 (/ 15.646356830292042 z))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 1e+300) {
		tmp = x + (y / (fma((z + 6.012459259764103), z, 3.350343815022304) / fma(fma(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968), z, 0.279195317918525)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y / (14.431876219268936 - (15.646356830292042 / z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 1e+300)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / Float64(fma(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103), z, 3.350343815022304) / fma(fma(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968), z, 0.279195317918525))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / Float64(14.431876219268936 - Float64(15.646356830292042 / z))));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 1e+300], N[(x + N[(y / N[(N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y / N[(14.431876219268936 - N[(15.646356830292042 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z 692910599291889/10000000000000000) 307332350656623/625000000000000) z) 11167812716741/40000000000000)) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z 6012459259764103/1000000000000000) z) 104698244219447/31250000000000)) < 1.0000000000000001e300

   1. Initial program 97.1%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}} \]

      2. fma-def 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}} \]

      3. fma-def 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

      4. fma-def 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

   if 1.0000000000000001e300 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z 692910599291889/10000000000000000) 307332350656623/625000000000000) z) 11167812716741/40000000000000)) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z 6012459259764103/1000000000000000) z) 104698244219447/31250000000000))

   1. Initial program 0.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 12.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}} \]

      2. fma-def 12.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}} \]

      3. fma-def 12.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

      4. fma-def 12.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 12.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{14.431876219268936 - 15.646356830292042 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936 - \color{blue}{\frac{15.646356830292042 \cdot 1}{z}}} \]

      2. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936 - \frac{\color{blue}{15.646356830292042}}{z}} \]

   6. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{14.431876219268936 - \frac{15.646356830292042}{z}}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 10^{+300}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936 - \frac{15.646356830292042}{z}}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 99.8% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5800000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 420000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936 - \frac{15.646356830292042}{z}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} + x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -5800000.0) (not (<= z 420000000.0)))
   (+ x (/ y (- 14.431876219268936 (/ 15.646356830292042 z))))
   (+
    (/
     (*
      y
      (+
       (* z (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968))
       0.279195317918525))
     (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304))
    x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5800000.0) || !(z <= 420000000.0)) {
		tmp = x + (y / (14.431876219268936 - (15.646356830292042 / z)));
	} else {
		tmp = ((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) + x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-5800000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 420000000.0d0))) then
        tmp = x + (y / (14.431876219268936d0 - (15.646356830292042d0 / z)))
    else
        tmp = ((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0)) + 0.279195317918525d0)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103d0)) + 3.350343815022304d0)) + x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5800000.0) || !(z <= 420000000.0)) {
		tmp = x + (y / (14.431876219268936 - (15.646356830292042 / z)));
	} else {
		tmp = ((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) + x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -5800000.0) or not (z <= 420000000.0):
		tmp = x + (y / (14.431876219268936 - (15.646356830292042 / z)))
	else:
		tmp = ((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) + x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -5800000.0) || !(z <= 420000000.0))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / Float64(14.431876219268936 - Float64(15.646356830292042 / z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) + x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -5800000.0) || ~((z <= 420000000.0)))
		tmp = x + (y / (14.431876219268936 - (15.646356830292042 / z)));
	else
		tmp = ((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) + x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -5800000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 420000000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y / N[(14.431876219268936 - N[(15.646356830292042 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -5.8e6 or 4.2e8 < z

   1. Initial program 39.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 49.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}} \]

      2. fma-def 49.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}} \]

      3. fma-def 49.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

      4. fma-def 49.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 49.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{14.431876219268936 - 15.646356830292042 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936 - \color{blue}{\frac{15.646356830292042 \cdot 1}{z}}} \]

      2. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936 - \frac{\color{blue}{15.646356830292042}}{z}} \]

   6. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{14.431876219268936 - \frac{15.646356830292042}{z}}} \]

   if -5.8e6 < z < 4.2e8

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5800000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 420000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936 - \frac{15.646356830292042}{z}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} + x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 99.0% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -190000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 6\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{12.000000000000014 + z \cdot 0.39999999996247915}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -190000.0) (not (<= z 6.0)))
   (+ x (/ y 14.431876219268936))
   (+ x (/ y (+ 12.000000000000014 (* z 0.39999999996247915))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -190000.0) || !(z <= 6.0)) {
		tmp = x + (y / 14.431876219268936);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y / (12.000000000000014 + (z * 0.39999999996247915)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-190000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 6.0d0))) then
        tmp = x + (y / 14.431876219268936d0)
    else
        tmp = x + (y / (12.000000000000014d0 + (z * 0.39999999996247915d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -190000.0) || !(z <= 6.0)) {
		tmp = x + (y / 14.431876219268936);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y / (12.000000000000014 + (z * 0.39999999996247915)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -190000.0) or not (z <= 6.0):
		tmp = x + (y / 14.431876219268936)
	else:
		tmp = x + (y / (12.000000000000014 + (z * 0.39999999996247915)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -190000.0) || !(z <= 6.0))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / 14.431876219268936));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / Float64(12.000000000000014 + Float64(z * 0.39999999996247915))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -190000.0) || ~((z <= 6.0)))
		tmp = x + (y / 14.431876219268936);
	else
		tmp = x + (y / (12.000000000000014 + (z * 0.39999999996247915)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -190000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 6.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y / 14.431876219268936), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y / N[(12.000000000000014 + N[(z * 0.39999999996247915), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.9e5 or 6 < z

   1. Initial program 41.0%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 50.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}} \]

      2. fma-def 50.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}} \]

      3. fma-def 50.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

      4. fma-def 50.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 50.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{14.431876219268936}} \]

   if -1.9e5 < z < 6

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}} \]

      2. fma-def 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}} \]

      3. fma-def 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

      4. fma-def 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{12.000000000000014 + 0.39999999996247915 \cdot z}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{12.000000000000014 + \color{blue}{z \cdot 0.39999999996247915}} \]

   6. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{12.000000000000014 + z \cdot 0.39999999996247915}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -190000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 6\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{12.000000000000014 + z \cdot 0.39999999996247915}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 99.2% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -190000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 6.4\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936 - \frac{15.646356830292042}{z}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{12.000000000000014 + z \cdot 0.39999999996247915}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -190000.0) (not (<= z 6.4)))
   (+ x (/ y (- 14.431876219268936 (/ 15.646356830292042 z))))
   (+ x (/ y (+ 12.000000000000014 (* z 0.39999999996247915))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -190000.0) || !(z <= 6.4)) {
		tmp = x + (y / (14.431876219268936 - (15.646356830292042 / z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y / (12.000000000000014 + (z * 0.39999999996247915)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-190000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 6.4d0))) then
        tmp = x + (y / (14.431876219268936d0 - (15.646356830292042d0 / z)))
    else
        tmp = x + (y / (12.000000000000014d0 + (z * 0.39999999996247915d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -190000.0) || !(z <= 6.4)) {
		tmp = x + (y / (14.431876219268936 - (15.646356830292042 / z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y / (12.000000000000014 + (z * 0.39999999996247915)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -190000.0) or not (z <= 6.4):
		tmp = x + (y / (14.431876219268936 - (15.646356830292042 / z)))
	else:
		tmp = x + (y / (12.000000000000014 + (z * 0.39999999996247915)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -190000.0) || !(z <= 6.4))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / Float64(14.431876219268936 - Float64(15.646356830292042 / z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / Float64(12.000000000000014 + Float64(z * 0.39999999996247915))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -190000.0) || ~((z <= 6.4)))
		tmp = x + (y / (14.431876219268936 - (15.646356830292042 / z)));
	else
		tmp = x + (y / (12.000000000000014 + (z * 0.39999999996247915)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -190000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 6.4]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y / N[(14.431876219268936 - N[(15.646356830292042 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y / N[(12.000000000000014 + N[(z * 0.39999999996247915), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.9e5 or 6.4000000000000004 < z

   1. Initial program 41.0%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 50.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}} \]

      2. fma-def 50.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}} \]

      3. fma-def 50.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

      4. fma-def 50.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 50.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{14.431876219268936 - 15.646356830292042 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936 - \color{blue}{\frac{15.646356830292042 \cdot 1}{z}}} \]

      2. metadata-eval 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936 - \frac{\color{blue}{15.646356830292042}}{z}} \]

   6. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{14.431876219268936 - \frac{15.646356830292042}{z}}} \]

   if -1.9e5 < z < 6.4000000000000004

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}} \]

      2. fma-def 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}} \]

      3. fma-def 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

      4. fma-def 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{12.000000000000014 + 0.39999999996247915 \cdot z}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{12.000000000000014 + \color{blue}{z \cdot 0.39999999996247915}} \]

   6. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{12.000000000000014 + z \cdot 0.39999999996247915}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -190000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 6.4\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936 - \frac{15.646356830292042}{z}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{12.000000000000014 + z \cdot 0.39999999996247915}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 98.8% accurate, 2.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -190000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.6\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{12.000000000000014}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -190000.0) (not (<= z 5.6)))
   (+ x (/ y 14.431876219268936))
   (+ x (/ y 12.000000000000014))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -190000.0) || !(z <= 5.6)) {
		tmp = x + (y / 14.431876219268936);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y / 12.000000000000014);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-190000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 5.6d0))) then
        tmp = x + (y / 14.431876219268936d0)
    else
        tmp = x + (y / 12.000000000000014d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -190000.0) || !(z <= 5.6)) {
		tmp = x + (y / 14.431876219268936);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y / 12.000000000000014);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -190000.0) or not (z <= 5.6):
		tmp = x + (y / 14.431876219268936)
	else:
		tmp = x + (y / 12.000000000000014)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -190000.0) || !(z <= 5.6))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / 14.431876219268936));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / 12.000000000000014));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -190000.0) || ~((z <= 5.6)))
		tmp = x + (y / 14.431876219268936);
	else
		tmp = x + (y / 12.000000000000014);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -190000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 5.6]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y / 14.431876219268936), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y / 12.000000000000014), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.9e5 or 5.5999999999999996 < z

   1. Initial program 41.0%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 50.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}} \]

      2. fma-def 50.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}} \]

      3. fma-def 50.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

      4. fma-def 50.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 50.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{14.431876219268936}} \]

   if -1.9e5 < z < 5.5999999999999996

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}} \]

      2. fma-def 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}} \]

      3. fma-def 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

      4. fma-def 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{12.000000000000014}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -190000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.6\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{12.000000000000014}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 79.8% accurate, 4.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y}{12.000000000000014} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (/ y 12.000000000000014)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y / 12.000000000000014);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y / 12.000000000000014d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y / 12.000000000000014);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y / 12.000000000000014)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y / 12.000000000000014))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y / 12.000000000000014);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y / 12.000000000000014), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 69.6%

   \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 74.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}} \]

   2. fma-def 74.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}} \]

   3. fma-def 74.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

   4. fma-def 74.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

3. Simplified 74.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 79.8%

   \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{12.000000000000014}} \]

5. Final simplification 79.8%

   \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{12.000000000000014} \]

Alternative 10: 51.5% accurate, 21.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 69.6%

   \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 69.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

   2. remove-double-neg 69.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-x\right)\right)} \]

   3. unsub-neg 69.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} - \left(-x\right)} \]

   4. *-commutative 69.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot y}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} - \left(-x\right) \]

   5. associate-*l/ 74.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \cdot y} - \left(-x\right) \]

   6. *-commutative 74.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} - \left(-x\right) \]

   7. fma-neg 74.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, -\left(-x\right)\right)} \]

   8. *-commutative 74.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, -\left(-x\right)\right) \]

   9. fma-def 74.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, -\left(-x\right)\right) \]

   10. fma-def 74.8%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, -\left(-x\right)\right) \]

   11. *-commutative 74.8%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, -\left(-x\right)\right) \]

   12. fma-def 74.8%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, -\left(-x\right)\right) \]

   13. remove-double-neg 74.8%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, \color{blue}{x}\right) \]

3. Simplified 74.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 51.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

5. Final simplification 51.1%

   \[\leadsto x \]

Developer target: 99.4% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\frac{0.07512208616047561}{z} + 0.0692910599291889\right) \cdot y - \left(\frac{0.40462203869992125 \cdot y}{z \cdot z} - x\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < -8120153.652456675:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z < 6.576118972787377 \cdot 10^{+20}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0
         (-
          (* (+ (/ 0.07512208616047561 z) 0.0692910599291889) y)
          (- (/ (* 0.40462203869992125 y) (* z z)) x))))
   (if (< z -8120153.652456675)
     t_0
     (if (< z 6.576118972787377e+20)
       (+
        x
        (*
         (*
          y
          (+
           (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z)
           0.279195317918525))
         (/ 1.0 (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))
       t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x);
	double tmp;
	if (z < -8120153.652456675) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z < 6.576118972787377e+20) {
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561d0 / z) + 0.0692910599291889d0) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125d0 * y) / (z * z)) - x)
    if (z < (-8120153.652456675d0)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (z < 6.576118972787377d+20) then
        tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0) * z) + 0.279195317918525d0)) * (1.0d0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103d0) * z) + 3.350343815022304d0)))
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x);
	double tmp;
	if (z < -8120153.652456675) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z < 6.576118972787377e+20) {
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x)
	tmp = 0
	if z < -8120153.652456675:
		tmp = t_0
	elif z < 6.576118972787377e+20:
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)))
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - Float64(Float64(Float64(0.40462203869992125 * y) / Float64(z * z)) - x))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < -8120153.652456675)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z < 6.576118972787377e+20)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304))));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < -8120153.652456675)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z < 6.576118972787377e+20)
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(N[(N[(0.07512208616047561 / z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(0.40462203869992125 * y), $MachinePrecision] / N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, -8120153.652456675], t$95$0, If[Less[z, 6.576118972787377e+20], N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 / N[(N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023321 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:logGamma from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (if (< z -8120153.652456675) (- (* (+ (/ 0.07512208616047561 z) 0.0692910599291889) y) (- (/ (* 0.40462203869992125 y) (* z z)) x)) (if (< z 6.576118972787377e+20) (+ x (* (* y (+ (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z) 0.279195317918525)) (/ 1.0 (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304)))) (- (* (+ (/ 0.07512208616047561 z) 0.0692910599291889) y) (- (/ (* 0.40462203869992125 y) (* z z)) x))))

  (+ x (/ (* y (+ (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z) 0.279195317918525)) (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))