Numeric.AD.Rank1.Halley:findZero from ad-4.2.4

Percentage Accurate: 82.1% → 98.2%

Time: 8.5s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 1.5×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* (* z 2.0) z) (* y t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (((y * 2.0d0) * z) / (((z * 2.0d0) * z) - (y * t)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * z) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 2.0) * z) - Float64(y * t))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 82.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* (* z 2.0) z) (* y t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (((y * 2.0d0) * z) / (((z * 2.0d0) * z) - (y * t)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * z) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 2.0) * z) - Float64(y * t))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{-1}{0.5 \cdot \frac{z \cdot 2 - y \cdot \frac{t}{z}}{y}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (/ -1.0 (* 0.5 (/ (- (* z 2.0) (* y (/ t z))) y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (-1.0 / (0.5 * (((z * 2.0) - (y * (t / z))) / y)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((-1.0d0) / (0.5d0 * (((z * 2.0d0) - (y * (t / z))) / y)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (-1.0 / (0.5 * (((z * 2.0) - (y * (t / z))) / y)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + (-1.0 / (0.5 * (((z * 2.0) - (y * (t / z))) / y)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(-1.0 / Float64(0.5 * Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 2.0) - Float64(y * Float64(t / z))) / y))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + (-1.0 / (0.5 * (((z * 2.0) - (y * (t / z))) / y)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(-1.0 / N[(0.5 * N[(N[(N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * N[(t / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 79.4%

   \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. remove-double-neg 79.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)\right)} \]

   2. neg-mul-1 79.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} \]

   3. *-commutative 79.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right) \cdot -1} \]

   4. *-commutative 79.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} \]

   5. neg-mul-1 79.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)\right)} \]

   6. remove-double-neg 79.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}} \]

   7. associate-/l* 87.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

   8. associate-*l* 87.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)} - y \cdot t}{z}} \]

3. Simplified 87.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 94.4%

   \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{t \cdot y}{z} + 2 \cdot z}} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 94.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\color{blue}{2 \cdot z + -1 \cdot \frac{t \cdot y}{z}}} \]

   2. mul-1-neg 94.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{2 \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{t \cdot y}{z}\right)}} \]

   3. associate-*r/ 97.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{2 \cdot z + \left(-\color{blue}{t \cdot \frac{y}{z}}\right)} \]

   4. *-commutative 97.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{2 \cdot z + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{y}{z} \cdot t}\right)} \]

   5. associate-/r/ 98.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{2 \cdot z + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{z}{t}}}\right)} \]

   6. unsub-neg 98.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\color{blue}{2 \cdot z - \frac{y}{\frac{z}{t}}}} \]

   7. *-commutative 98.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\color{blue}{z \cdot 2} - \frac{y}{\frac{z}{t}}} \]

   8. associate-/r/ 97.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{z \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z} \cdot t}} \]

   9. *-commutative 97.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{z \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{t \cdot \frac{y}{z}}} \]

6. Simplified 97.0%

   \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\color{blue}{z \cdot 2 - t \cdot \frac{y}{z}}} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. clear-num 96.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{z \cdot 2 - t \cdot \frac{y}{z}}{y \cdot 2}}} \]

   2. inv-pow 96.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{z \cdot 2 - t \cdot \frac{y}{z}}{y \cdot 2}\right)}^{-1}} \]

   3. *-un-lft-identity 96.7%

      \[\leadsto x - {\left(\frac{\color{blue}{1 \cdot \left(z \cdot 2 - t \cdot \frac{y}{z}\right)}}{y \cdot 2}\right)}^{-1} \]

   4. *-commutative 96.7%

      \[\leadsto x - {\left(\frac{1 \cdot \left(z \cdot 2 - t \cdot \frac{y}{z}\right)}{\color{blue}{2 \cdot y}}\right)}^{-1} \]

   5. times-frac 96.7%

      \[\leadsto x - {\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{z \cdot 2 - t \cdot \frac{y}{z}}{y}\right)}}^{-1} \]

   6. metadata-eval 96.7%

      \[\leadsto x - {\left(\color{blue}{0.5} \cdot \frac{z \cdot 2 - t \cdot \frac{y}{z}}{y}\right)}^{-1} \]

   7. *-commutative 96.7%

      \[\leadsto x - {\left(0.5 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot z} - t \cdot \frac{y}{z}}{y}\right)}^{-1} \]

8. Applied egg-rr 96.7%

   \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{{\left(0.5 \cdot \frac{2 \cdot z - t \cdot \frac{y}{z}}{y}\right)}^{-1}} \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. unpow-1 96.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{0.5 \cdot \frac{2 \cdot z - t \cdot \frac{y}{z}}{y}}} \]

   2. *-commutative 96.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{1}{0.5 \cdot \frac{2 \cdot z - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z} \cdot t}}{y}} \]

   3. associate-*l/ 94.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{1}{0.5 \cdot \frac{2 \cdot z - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot t}{z}}}{y}} \]

   4. associate-*r/ 98.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{1}{0.5 \cdot \frac{2 \cdot z - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{t}{z}}}{y}} \]

   5. *-commutative 98.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{1}{0.5 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot 2} - y \cdot \frac{t}{z}}{y}} \]

10. Simplified 98.3%

    \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{0.5 \cdot \frac{z \cdot 2 - y \cdot \frac{t}{z}}{y}}} \]

11. Final simplification 98.3%

    \[\leadsto x + \frac{-1}{0.5 \cdot \frac{z \cdot 2 - y \cdot \frac{t}{z}}{y}} \]

Alternative 2: 96.1% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{2 \cdot y}{z \cdot 2 - t \cdot \frac{y}{z}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (* 2.0 y) (- (* z 2.0) (* t (/ y z))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - ((2.0 * y) / ((z * 2.0) - (t * (y / z))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - ((2.0d0 * y) / ((z * 2.0d0) - (t * (y / z))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - ((2.0 * y) / ((z * 2.0) - (t * (y / z))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - ((2.0 * y) / ((z * 2.0) - (t * (y / z))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(Float64(2.0 * y) / Float64(Float64(z * 2.0) - Float64(t * Float64(y / z)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - ((2.0 * y) / ((z * 2.0) - (t * (y / z))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[(2.0 * y), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(t * N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 79.4%

   \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. remove-double-neg 79.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)\right)} \]

   2. neg-mul-1 79.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} \]

   3. *-commutative 79.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right) \cdot -1} \]

   4. *-commutative 79.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} \]

   5. neg-mul-1 79.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)\right)} \]

   6. remove-double-neg 79.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}} \]

   7. associate-/l* 87.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

   8. associate-*l* 87.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)} - y \cdot t}{z}} \]

3. Simplified 87.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 94.4%

   \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{t \cdot y}{z} + 2 \cdot z}} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 94.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\color{blue}{2 \cdot z + -1 \cdot \frac{t \cdot y}{z}}} \]

   2. mul-1-neg 94.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{2 \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{t \cdot y}{z}\right)}} \]

   3. associate-*r/ 97.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{2 \cdot z + \left(-\color{blue}{t \cdot \frac{y}{z}}\right)} \]

   4. *-commutative 97.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{2 \cdot z + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{y}{z} \cdot t}\right)} \]

   5. associate-/r/ 98.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{2 \cdot z + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{z}{t}}}\right)} \]

   6. unsub-neg 98.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\color{blue}{2 \cdot z - \frac{y}{\frac{z}{t}}}} \]

   7. *-commutative 98.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\color{blue}{z \cdot 2} - \frac{y}{\frac{z}{t}}} \]

   8. associate-/r/ 97.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{z \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z} \cdot t}} \]

   9. *-commutative 97.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{z \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{t \cdot \frac{y}{z}}} \]

6. Simplified 97.0%

   \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\color{blue}{z \cdot 2 - t \cdot \frac{y}{z}}} \]

7. Final simplification 97.0%

   \[\leadsto x - \frac{2 \cdot y}{z \cdot 2 - t \cdot \frac{y}{z}} \]

Alternative 3: 88.6% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{+35} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.55 \cdot 10^{-36}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \frac{2}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -2.2e+35) (not (<= z 2.55e-36)))
   (- x (/ y z))
   (+ x (* z (/ 2.0 t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.2e+35) || !(z <= 2.55e-36)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (2.0 / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-2.2d+35)) .or. (.not. (z <= 2.55d-36))) then
        tmp = x - (y / z)
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (2.0d0 / t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.2e+35) || !(z <= 2.55e-36)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (2.0 / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -2.2e+35) or not (z <= 2.55e-36):
		tmp = x - (y / z)
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (2.0 / t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -2.2e+35) || !(z <= 2.55e-36))
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(2.0 / t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -2.2e+35) || ~((z <= 2.55e-36)))
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (2.0 / t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -2.2e+35], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 2.55e-36]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.1999999999999999e35 or 2.54999999999999987e-36 < z

   1. Initial program 69.8%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 69.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 84.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}}\right) \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 84.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{-y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-out 84.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot 2}}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}} \]

      5. associate-/r/ 82.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot 2}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-out 82.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-y \cdot 2}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 82.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-2\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      8. metadata-eval 82.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{-2}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      9. *-commutative 82.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z\right)} \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      10. associate-*l* 82.6%

          \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      11. fma-neg 82.6%

          \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z \cdot z, -y \cdot t\right)}} \cdot z \]

   3. Simplified 82.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z \cdot z, -y \cdot t\right)} \cdot z} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 92.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \frac{y}{z}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 92.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{z}\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 92.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{z}} \]

   6. Simplified 92.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{z}} \]

   if -2.1999999999999999e35 < z < 2.54999999999999987e-36

   1. Initial program 88.4%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 88.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 90.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}}\right) \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 90.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{-y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-out 90.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot 2}}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}} \]

      5. associate-/r/ 91.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot 2}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-out 91.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-y \cdot 2}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 91.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-2\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      8. metadata-eval 91.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{-2}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      9. *-commutative 91.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z\right)} \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      10. associate-*l* 91.6%

          \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      11. fma-neg 91.6%

          \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z \cdot z, -y \cdot t\right)}} \cdot z \]

   3. Simplified 91.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z \cdot z, -y \cdot t\right)} \cdot z} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 90.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{2}{t}} \cdot z \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{+35} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.55 \cdot 10^{-36}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \frac{2}{t}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 88.6% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.3 \cdot 10^{+37} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.55 \cdot 10^{-36}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{z}{t} \cdot -2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -3.3e+37) (not (<= z 2.55e-36)))
   (- x (/ y z))
   (- x (* (/ z t) -2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -3.3e+37) || !(z <= 2.55e-36)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x - ((z / t) * -2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-3.3d+37)) .or. (.not. (z <= 2.55d-36))) then
        tmp = x - (y / z)
    else
        tmp = x - ((z / t) * (-2.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -3.3e+37) || !(z <= 2.55e-36)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x - ((z / t) * -2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -3.3e+37) or not (z <= 2.55e-36):
		tmp = x - (y / z)
	else:
		tmp = x - ((z / t) * -2.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -3.3e+37) || !(z <= 2.55e-36))
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(Float64(z / t) * -2.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -3.3e+37) || ~((z <= 2.55e-36)))
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	else
		tmp = x - ((z / t) * -2.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -3.3e+37], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 2.55e-36]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision] * -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -3.3000000000000001e37 or 2.54999999999999987e-36 < z

   1. Initial program 69.8%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 69.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 84.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}}\right) \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 84.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{-y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-out 84.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot 2}}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}} \]

      5. associate-/r/ 82.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot 2}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-out 82.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-y \cdot 2}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 82.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-2\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      8. metadata-eval 82.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{-2}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      9. *-commutative 82.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z\right)} \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      10. associate-*l* 82.6%

          \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      11. fma-neg 82.6%

          \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z \cdot z, -y \cdot t\right)}} \cdot z \]

   3. Simplified 82.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z \cdot z, -y \cdot t\right)} \cdot z} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 92.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \frac{y}{z}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 92.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{z}\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 92.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{z}} \]

   6. Simplified 92.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{z}} \]

   if -3.3000000000000001e37 < z < 2.54999999999999987e-36

   1. Initial program 88.4%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 88.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)\right)} \]

      2. neg-mul-1 88.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 88.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right) \cdot -1} \]

      4. *-commutative 88.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} \]

      5. neg-mul-1 88.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)\right)} \]

      6. remove-double-neg 88.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}} \]

      7. associate-/l* 90.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

      8. associate-*l* 90.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)} - y \cdot t}{z}} \]

   3. Simplified 90.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 90.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 90.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{z}{t} \cdot -2} \]

   6. Simplified 90.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{z}{t} \cdot -2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.3 \cdot 10^{+37} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.55 \cdot 10^{-36}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{z}{t} \cdot -2\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 81.4% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{-73} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.55 \cdot 10^{-36}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -2.4e-73) (not (<= z 2.55e-36))) (- x (/ y z)) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.4e-73) || !(z <= 2.55e-36)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-2.4d-73)) .or. (.not. (z <= 2.55d-36))) then
        tmp = x - (y / z)
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.4e-73) || !(z <= 2.55e-36)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -2.4e-73) or not (z <= 2.55e-36):
		tmp = x - (y / z)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -2.4e-73) || !(z <= 2.55e-36))
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / z));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -2.4e-73) || ~((z <= 2.55e-36)))
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -2.4e-73], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 2.55e-36]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.40000000000000006e-73 or 2.54999999999999987e-36 < z

   1. Initial program 73.4%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 73.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 86.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}}\right) \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 86.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{-y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-out 86.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot 2}}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}} \]

      5. associate-/r/ 84.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot 2}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-out 84.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-y \cdot 2}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 84.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-2\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      8. metadata-eval 84.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{-2}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      9. *-commutative 84.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z\right)} \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      10. associate-*l* 84.7%

          \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      11. fma-neg 84.7%

          \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z \cdot z, -y \cdot t\right)}} \cdot z \]

   3. Simplified 84.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z \cdot z, -y \cdot t\right)} \cdot z} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 89.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \frac{y}{z}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 89.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{z}\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 89.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{z}} \]

   6. Simplified 89.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{z}} \]

   if -2.40000000000000006e-73 < z < 2.54999999999999987e-36

   1. Initial program 86.7%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 86.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 89.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}}\right) \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 89.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{-y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-out 89.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot 2}}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}} \]

      5. associate-/r/ 90.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot 2}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-out 90.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-y \cdot 2}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 90.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-2\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      8. metadata-eval 90.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{-2}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      9. *-commutative 90.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z\right)} \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      10. associate-*l* 90.4%

          \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      11. fma-neg 90.4%

          \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z \cdot z, -y \cdot t\right)}} \cdot z \]

   3. Simplified 90.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z \cdot z, -y \cdot t\right)} \cdot z} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 77.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{-73} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.55 \cdot 10^{-36}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 75.5% accurate, 17.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 79.4%

   \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 79.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} \]

   2. associate-/l* 87.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}}\right) \]

   3. distribute-neg-frac 87.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{-y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

   4. distribute-lft-neg-out 87.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot 2}}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}} \]

   5. associate-/r/ 87.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot 2}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z} \]

   6. distribute-lft-neg-out 87.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-y \cdot 2}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

   7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 87.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-2\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

   8. metadata-eval 87.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{-2}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

   9. *-commutative 87.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z\right)} \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

   10. associate-*l* 87.3%

       \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

   11. fma-neg 87.3%

       \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z \cdot z, -y \cdot t\right)}} \cdot z \]

3. Simplified 87.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z \cdot z, -y \cdot t\right)} \cdot z} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 75.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

5. Final simplification 75.1%

   \[\leadsto x \]

Developer target: 99.9% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{1}{\frac{z}{y} - \frac{\frac{t}{2}}{z}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ 1.0 (- (/ z y) (/ (/ t 2.0) z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (1.0d0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0d0) / z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(z / y) - Float64(Float64(t / 2.0) / z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(1.0 / N[(N[(z / y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(t / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023320 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Numeric.AD.Rank1.Halley:findZero from ad-4.2.4"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (- x (/ 1.0 (- (/ z y) (/ (/ t 2.0) z))))

  (- x (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* (* z 2.0) z) (* y t)))))