SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2

Percentage Accurate: 93.8% → 98.8%

Time: 9.8s

Alternatives: 9

Speedup: 0.7×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 93.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.8% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ t_2 := x + \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_2 \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t_2 \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+294}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + t_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* z (- t x)))
        (t_2 (+ x (* (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))) (* z y)))))
   (if (<= t_2 (- INFINITY)) t_1 (if (<= t_2 4e+294) t_2 (+ x t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = z * (t - x);
	double t_2 = x + ((tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))) * (z * y));
	double tmp;
	if (t_2 <= -((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t_2 <= 4e+294) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else {
		tmp = x + t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = z * (t - x);
	double t_2 = x + ((Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))) * (z * y));
	double tmp;
	if (t_2 <= -Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t_2 <= 4e+294) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else {
		tmp = x + t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = z * (t - x)
	t_2 = x + ((math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))) * (z * y))
	tmp = 0
	if t_2 <= -math.inf:
		tmp = t_1
	elif t_2 <= 4e+294:
		tmp = t_2
	else:
		tmp = x + t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(z * Float64(t - x))
	t_2 = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y))) * Float64(z * y)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_2 <= Float64(-Inf))
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t_2 <= 4e+294)
		tmp = t_2;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + t_1);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = z * (t - x);
	t_2 = x + ((tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))) * (z * y));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_2 <= -Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t_2 <= 4e+294)
		tmp = t_2;
	else
		tmp = x + t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(x + N[(N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$2, (-Infinity)], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[t$95$2, 4e+294], t$95$2, N[(x + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (+.f64 x (*.f64 (*.f64 y z) (-.f64 (tanh.f64 (/.f64 t y)) (tanh.f64 (/.f64 x y))))) < -inf.0

   1. Initial program 53.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   if -inf.0 < (+.f64 x (*.f64 (*.f64 y z) (-.f64 (tanh.f64 (/.f64 t y)) (tanh.f64 (/.f64 x y))))) < 4.00000000000000027e294

   1. Initial program 99.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   if 4.00000000000000027e294 < (+.f64 x (*.f64 (*.f64 y z) (-.f64 (tanh.f64 (/.f64 t y)) (tanh.f64 (/.f64 x y)))))

   1. Initial program 61.8%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right) \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x + \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right) \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+294}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2: 98.2% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (fma z (* y (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(z, (y * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))), x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(z, Float64(y * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))), x)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(z * N[(y * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 93.9%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 93.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

   2. *-commutative 93.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x \]

   3. associate-*l* 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

   4. fma-def 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

3. Simplified 98.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 98.6%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right) \]

Alternative 3: 82.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{-85}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + t_1 \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(y, t_1, -x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (tanh (/ t y))))
   (if (<= y 2.3e-85) (+ x (* t_1 (* z y))) (+ x (* z (fma y t_1 (- x)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = tanh((t / y));
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.3e-85) {
		tmp = x + (t_1 * (z * y));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * fma(y, t_1, -x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = tanh(Float64(t / y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 2.3e-85)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(t_1 * Float64(z * y)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * fma(y, t_1, Float64(-x))));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, 2.3e-85], N[(x + N[(t$95$1 * N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(y * t$95$1 + (-x)), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 2.3e-85

   1. Initial program 94.8%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 21.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r* 21.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      2. rec-exp 21.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}\right) \]

      3. div-sub 21.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]

      4. rec-exp 21.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      5. tanh-def-a 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 82.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   if 2.3e-85 < y

   1. Initial program 91.8%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 47.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 47.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 91.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right), -x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{-85}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right), -x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 82.5% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{+128}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 1.15e+128) (+ x (* (tanh (/ t y)) (* z y))) (+ x (* z (- t x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.15e+128) {
		tmp = x + (tanh((t / y)) * (z * y));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 1.15d+128) then
        tmp = x + (tanh((t / y)) * (z * y))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.15e+128) {
		tmp = x + (Math.tanh((t / y)) * (z * y));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1.15e+128:
		tmp = x + (math.tanh((t / y)) * (z * y))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.15e+128)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) * Float64(z * y)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1.15e+128)
		tmp = x + (tanh((t / y)) * (z * y));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1.15e+128], N[(x + N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.14999999999999999e128

   1. Initial program 95.6%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 23.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r* 23.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      2. rec-exp 23.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}\right) \]

      3. div-sub 23.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]

      4. rec-exp 23.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      5. tanh-def-a 83.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 83.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   if 1.14999999999999999e128 < y

   1. Initial program 85.2%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 93.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{+128}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 68.6% accurate, 23.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 3.4 \cdot 10^{-88}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 3.4e-88) x (+ x (* z (- t x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 3.4e-88) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 3.4d-88) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 3.4e-88) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 3.4e-88:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 3.4e-88)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 3.4e-88)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 3.4e-88], x, N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 3.39999999999999975e-88

   1. Initial program 94.7%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 22.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r* 22.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      2. rec-exp 22.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}\right) \]

      3. div-sub 22.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]

      4. rec-exp 22.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      5. tanh-def-a 82.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 82.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 62.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 3.39999999999999975e-88 < y

   1. Initial program 91.9%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 72.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 65.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 3.4 \cdot 10^{-88}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 61.4% accurate, 29.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.7 \cdot 10^{-263}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.52 \cdot 10^{-254}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -3.7e-263) x (if (<= x 1.52e-254) (* z t) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -3.7e-263) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 1.52e-254) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-3.7d-263)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (x <= 1.52d-254) then
        tmp = z * t
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -3.7e-263) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 1.52e-254) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -3.7e-263:
		tmp = x
	elif x <= 1.52e-254:
		tmp = z * t
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -3.7e-263)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 1.52e-254)
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -3.7e-263)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 1.52e-254)
		tmp = z * t;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[x, -3.7e-263], x, If[LessEqual[x, 1.52e-254], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -3.6999999999999997e-263 or 1.52e-254 < x

   1. Initial program 94.6%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 28.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r* 28.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      2. rec-exp 28.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}\right) \]

      3. div-sub 28.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]

      4. rec-exp 28.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      5. tanh-def-a 81.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 81.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 61.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -3.6999999999999997e-263 < x < 1.52e-254

   1. Initial program 87.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 5.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r* 5.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      2. rec-exp 5.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}\right) \]

      3. div-sub 5.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]

      4. rec-exp 5.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      5. tanh-def-a 84.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 84.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 62.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + t \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 62.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 62.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t} + x \]

   7. Simplified 62.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t + x} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around inf 58.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 61.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.7 \cdot 10^{-263}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.52 \cdot 10^{-254}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 62.5% accurate, 30.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.66 \cdot 10^{-101}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (if (<= y 2.66e-101) x (* x (- 1.0 z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.66e-101) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 2.66d-101) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.66e-101) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 2.66e-101:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 2.66e-101)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 2.66e-101)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 2.66e-101], x, N[(x * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 2.65999999999999994e-101

   1. Initial program 94.6%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 21.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r* 21.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      2. rec-exp 21.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}\right) \]

      3. div-sub 21.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]

      4. rec-exp 21.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      5. tanh-def-a 82.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 82.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 61.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 2.65999999999999994e-101 < y

   1. Initial program 92.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 70.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 55.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 55.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 55.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 55.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 59.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.66 \cdot 10^{-101}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 66.1% accurate, 30.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.36 \cdot 10^{-50}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (if (<= y 1.36e-50) x (+ x (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.36e-50) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 1.36d-50) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x + (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.36e-50) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1.36e-50:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.36e-50)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1.36e-50)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1.36e-50], x, N[(x + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.36000000000000001e-50

   1. Initial program 94.9%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 21.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r* 21.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      2. rec-exp 21.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}\right) \]

      3. div-sub 21.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]

      4. rec-exp 21.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      5. tanh-def-a 81.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 81.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 61.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 1.36000000000000001e-50 < y

   1. Initial program 90.9%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 38.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r* 38.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      2. rec-exp 38.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}\right) \]

      3. div-sub 38.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]

      4. rec-exp 38.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      5. tanh-def-a 80.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 80.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 66.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + t \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 66.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 66.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t} + x \]

   7. Simplified 66.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 62.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.36 \cdot 10^{-50}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 60.4% accurate, 213.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 93.9%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 26.1%

   \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/r* 26.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

   2. rec-exp 26.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}\right) \]

   3. div-sub 26.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]

   4. rec-exp 26.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

   5. tanh-def-a 81.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

4. Simplified 81.4%

   \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 57.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

6. Final simplification 57.2%

   \[\leadsto x \]

Developer target: 97.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y)))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + (y * (z * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y)))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023320 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

  (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))